A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  

              [Sort by number of followers]   [Restore default list]

  Subjects -> STATISTICS (Total: 130 journals)
Showing 1 - 151 of 151 Journals sorted alphabetically
Advances in Complex Systems     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Advances in Data Analysis and Classification     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 52)
Applied Categorical Structures     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4)
Argumentation et analyse du discours     Open Access   (Followers: 7)
Asian Journal of Mathematics & Statistics     Open Access   (Followers: 8)
AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Biometrical Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
Biometrics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 50)
British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 18)
Building Simulation     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
CHANCE     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11)
Computational Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 15)
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 35)
Current Research in Biostatistics     Open Access   (Followers: 8)
Decisions in Economics and Finance     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Demographic Research     Open Access   (Followers: 14)
Engineering With Computers     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Environmental and Ecological Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
ESAIM: Probability and Statistics     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Extremes     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11)
Handbook of Numerical Analysis     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 5)
Handbook of Statistics     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 7)
IEA World Energy Statistics and Balances -     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
International Journal of Quality, Statistics, and Reliability     Open Access   (Followers: 17)
International Journal of Stochastic Analysis     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
International Statistical Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Journal of Applied Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 20)
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23)
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 39, SJR: 3.664, CiteScore: 2)
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
Journal of Computational & Graphical Statistics     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 21)
Journal of Econometrics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 83)
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
Journal of Forecasting     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 19)
Journal of Global Optimization     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Journal of Mathematics and Statistics     Open Access   (Followers: 6)
Journal of Nonparametric Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Journal of Probability and Statistics     Open Access   (Followers: 10)
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 33)
Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Journal of Statistical Physics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 13)
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
Journal of Statistical Software     Open Access   (Followers: 16, SJR: 13.802, CiteScore: 16)
Journal of the American Statistical Association     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 73, SJR: 3.746, CiteScore: 2)
Journal of the Korean Statistical Society     Hybrid Journal  
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics)     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 37)
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (Statistics in Society)     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 28)
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Statistical Methodology)     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 41)
Journal of Theoretical Probability     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Journal of Time Series Analysis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 16)
Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23)
Law, Probability and Risk     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Lifetime Data Analysis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
Mathematical Methods of Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4)
Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Metrika     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4)
Monthly Statistics of International Trade - Statistiques mensuelles du commerce international     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
Multivariate Behavioral Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
Optimization Letters     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Optimization Methods and Software     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 33)
Pharmaceutical Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 15)
Queueing Systems     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
Research Synthesis Methods     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
Review of Economics and Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 145)
Review of Socionetwork Strategies     Hybrid Journal  
Risk Management     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 16)
Sankhya A     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Scandinavian Journal of Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
Sequential Analysis: Design Methods and Applications     Hybrid Journal  
Significance     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
Sociological Methods & Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 42)
SourceOECD Measuring Globalisation Statistics - SourceOCDE Mesurer la mondialisation - Base de donnees statistiques     Full-text available via subscription  
Stata Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 8)
Statistica Neerlandica     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Statistical Methods and Applications     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Statistical Methods in Medical Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 28)
Statistical Modelling     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 18)
Statistical Papers     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4)
Statistics & Probability Letters     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 13)
Statistics and Computing     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14)
Statistics and Economics     Open Access  
Statistics in Medicine     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 128)
Statistics: A Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Stochastic Models     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Stochastics An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes: formerly Stochastics and Stochastics Reports     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Teaching Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
Technology Innovations in Statistics Education (TISE)     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
TEST     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
The American Statistician     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 26)
The Canadian Journal of Statistics / La Revue Canadienne de Statistique     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews - Computational Statistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)

              [Sort by number of followers]   [Restore default list]

Similar Journals
Journal Cover
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Journal Prestige (SJR): 1.402
Citation Impact (citeScore): 2
Number of Followers: 28  
 
  Hybrid Journal Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
ISSN (Print) 0962-2802 - ISSN (Online) 1477-0334
Published by Sage Publications Homepage  [1174 journals]
  • Single reader between-cases AUC estimator with nested data

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Hongfei Du, Si Wen, Yufei Guo, Fang Jin, Brandon D Gallas
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is widely used in evaluating diagnostic performance for many clinical tasks. It is still challenging to evaluate the reading performance of distinguishing between positive and negative regions of interest (ROIs) in the nested-data problem, where multiple ROIs are nested within the cases. To address this issue, we identify two kinds of AUC estimators, within-cases AUC and between-cases AUC. We focus on the between-cases AUC estimator, since our main research interest is in patient-level diagnostic performance rather than location-level performance (the ability to separate ROIs with and without disease within each patient). Another reason is that as the case number increases, the number of between-cases paired ROIs is much larger than the number of within-cases ROIs. We provide estimators for the variance of the between-cases AUC and for the covariance when there are two readers. We derive and prove the above estimators’ theoretical values based on a simulation model and characterize their behavior using Monte Carlo simulation results. We also provide a real-data example. Moreover, we connect the distribution-based simulation model with the simulation model based on the linear mixed-effect model, which helps better understand the sources of variation in the simulated dataset.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-07-06T01:48:19Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221111539
       
  • Statistical methods used to combine the effective reproduction number,
           [math], and other related measures of COVID-19 in the UK

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Thomas Maishman, Stephanie Schaap, Daniel S Silk, Sarah J Nevitt, David C Woods, Veronica E Bowman
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      In the recent COVID-19 pandemic, a wide range of epidemiological modelling approaches were used to predict the effective reproduction number, R(t), and other COVID-19-related measures such as the daily rate of exponential growth, r(t). These candidate models use different modelling approaches or differing assumptions about spatial or age-mixing, and some capture genuine uncertainty in scientific understanding of disease dynamics. Combining estimates using appropriate statistical methodology from multiple candidate models is important to better understand the variation of these outcome measures to help inform decision-making. In this paper, we combine estimates for specific UK nations/regions using random-effects meta-analyses techniques, utilising the restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) method to estimate the heterogeneity variance parameter, and two approaches to calculate the confidence interval for the combined estimate: the standard Wald-type and the Knapp and Hartung (KNHA) method. As estimates in this setting are derived using model predictions, each with varying degrees of uncertainty, equal-weighting is favoured over the standard inverse-variance weighting to avoid potential up-weighting of models providing estimates with lower levels of uncertainty that are not fully accounting for inherent uncertainties. Both equally-weighted models using REML alone and REML+KNHA approaches were found to provide similar variation for R(t) and r(t), with both approaches providing wider, and therefore more conservative, confidence intervals around the combined estimate compared to the standard inverse-variance weighting approach. Utilising these meta-analysis techniques has allowed for statistically robust combined estimates to be calculated for key COVID-19 outcome measures. This in turn allows timely and informed decision-making based on all available information.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-07-04T06:09:57Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221109506
       
  • Authors’ response

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Wei Liu, Frank Bretz, Mario Cortina-Borja
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-07-02T02:51:22Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221111376
       
  • Analysis of survival data with cure fraction and variable selection: A
           pseudo-observations approach

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Chien-Lin Su, Sy Han Chiou, Feng-Chang Lin, Robert W Platt
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      In biomedical studies, survival data with a cure fraction (the proportion of subjects cured of disease) are commonly encountered. The mixture cure and bounded cumulative hazard models are two main types of cure fraction models when analyzing survival data with long-term survivors. In this article, in the framework of the Cox proportional hazards mixture cure model and bounded cumulative hazard model, we propose several estimators utilizing pseudo-observations to assess the effects of covariates on the cure rate and the risk of having the event of interest for survival data with a cure fraction. A variable selection procedure is also presented based on the pseudo-observations using penalized generalized estimating equations for proportional hazards mixture cure and bounded cumulative hazard models. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to examine the proposed methods. The proposed technique is demonstrated through applications to a melanoma study and a dental data set with high-dimensional covariates.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-06-27T07:11:43Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221108579
       
  • Methods of analysis for survival outcomes with time-updated mediators,
           with application to longitudinal disease registry data

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Kamaryn T Tanner, Linda D Sharples, Rhian M Daniel, Ruth H Keogh
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Mediation analysis is a useful tool to illuminate the mechanisms through which an exposure affects an outcome but statistical challenges exist with time-to-event outcomes and longitudinal observational data. Natural direct and indirect effects cannot be identified when there are exposure-induced confounders of the mediator-outcome relationship. Previous measurements of a repeatedly-measured mediator may themselves confound the relationship between the mediator and the outcome. To overcome these obstacles, two recent methods have been proposed, one based on path-specific effects and one based on an additive hazards model and the concept of exposure splitting. We investigate these techniques, focusing on their application to observational datasets. We apply both methods to an analysis of the UK Cystic Fibrosis Registry dataset to identify how much of the relationship between onset of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes and subsequent survival acts through pulmonary function. Statistical properties of the methods are investigated using simulation. Both methods produce unbiased estimates of indirect and direct effects in scenarios consistent with their stated assumptions but, if the data are measured infrequently, estimates may be biased. Findings are used to highlight considerations in the interpretation of the observational data analysis.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-06-17T06:20:28Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221107104
       
  • The analysis of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality: A competing risk approach
           or a cure model'

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Xiaonan Xue, Omar Saeed, Francesco Castagna, Ulrich P Jorde, Ilir Agalliu
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Competing risk analyses have been widely used for the analysis of in-hospital mortality in which hospital discharge is considered as a competing event. The competing risk model assumes that more than one cause of failure is possible, but there is only one outcome of interest and all others serve as competing events. However, hospital discharge and in-hospital death are two outcomes resulting from the same disease process and patients whose disease conditions were stabilized so that inpatient care was no longer needed were discharged. We therefore propose to use cure models, in which hospital discharge is treated as an observed “cure” of the disease. We consider both the mixture cure model and the promotion time cure model and extend the models to allow cure status to be known for those who were discharged from the hospital. An EM algorithm is developed for the mixture cure model. We also show that the competing risk model, which treats hospital discharge as a competing event, is equivalent to a promotion time cure model. Both cure models were examined in simulation studies and were applied to a recent cohort of COVID-19 in-hospital patients with diabetes. The promotion time model shows that statin use improved the overall survival; the mixture cure model shows that while statin use reduced the in-hospital mortality rate among the susceptible, it improved the cure probability only for older but not younger patients. Both cure models show that treatment was more beneficial among older patients.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-06-17T06:20:21Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221106300
       
  • Group sequential methods for the Mann-Whitney parameter

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Claus P Nowak, Tobias Mütze, Frank Konietschke
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Late phase clinical trials are occasionally planned with one or more interim analyses to allow for early termination or adaptation of the study. While extensive theory has been developed for the analysis of ordered categorical data in terms of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, there has been comparatively little discussion in the group sequential literature on how to provide repeated confidence intervals and simple power formulas to ease sample size determination. Dealing more broadly with the nonparametric Behrens-Fisher problem, we focus on the comparison of two parallel treatment arms and show that the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, the Brunner-Munzel test, as well as a test procedure based on the log win odds, a modification of the win ratio, asymptotically follow the canonical joint distribution. In addition to developing power formulas based on these results, simulations confirm the adequacy of the proposed methods for a range of scenarios. Lastly, we apply our methodology to the FREEDOMS clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00289978) in patients with relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-06-14T06:12:31Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221107103
       
  • Analyzing the overall effects of the microbiome abundance data with a
           Bayesian predictive value approach

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Xinyan Zhang, Nengjun Yi
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      The microbiome abundance data is known to be over-dispersed and sparse count data. Among various zero-inflated models, zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) model and zero-inflated beta binomial (ZIBB) model are the methods to analyze the microbiome abundance data. ZINB and ZIBB have two sets of parameters, which are for modeling the zero-inflation part and the count part separately. Most previous methods have focused on making inferences in terms of separate case-control effect for the zero-inflation part and the count part. However, in a case-control study, the primary interest is normally focused on the inference and a single interpretation of the overall unconditional mean (also known as the overall effect) of the microbiome abundance in microbiome studies. Here, we propose a Bayesian predictive value (BPV) approach to estimate the overall effect of the microbiome abundance. This approach is implemented based on R package brms. Hence, the parameters in the models will be estimated with two Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms used in Stan. We performed simulations and real data applications to compare the proposed approach and R package glmmTMB with simulation method in the estimation and inference in terms of the ratio function between the overall effects from two groups in a case-control study. The results show that the performance of the BPV approach is better than R package glmmTMB with the simulation method in terms of lower absolute biases and relative absolute biases, and coverage probability being closer to the nominal level especially when the sample size is small and zero-inflation rate is high.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-06-13T06:44:15Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221107106
       
  • Adjusting for time of infection or positive test when estimating the risk
           of a post-infection outcome in an epidemic

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Shaun R Seaman, Tommy Nyberg, Christopher E Overton, David J Pascall, Anne M Presanis, Daniela De Angelis
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      When comparing the risk of a post-infection binary outcome, for example, hospitalisation, for two variants of an infectious pathogen, it is important to adjust for calendar time of infection. Typically, the infection time is unknown and positive test time used as a proxy for it. Positive test time may also be used when assessing how risk of the outcome changes over calendar time. We show that if time from infection to positive test is correlated with the outcome, the risk conditional on positive test time is a function of the trajectory of infection incidence. Hence, a risk ratio adjusted for positive test time can be quite different from the risk ratio adjusted for infection time. We propose a simple sensitivity analysis that indicates how risk ratios adjusted for positive test time and infection time may differ. This involves adjusting for a shifted positive test time, shifted to make the difference between it and infection time uncorrelated with the outcome. We illustrate this method by reanalysing published results on the relative risk of hospitalisation following infection with the Alpha versus pre-existing variants of SARS-CoV-2. Results indicate the relative risk adjusted for infection time may be lower than that adjusted for positive test time.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-06-13T06:44:04Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221107105
       
  • MEGH: A parametric class of general hazard models for clustered survival
           data

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Francisco Javier Rubio, Reza Drikvandi
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      In many applications of survival data analysis, the individuals are treated in different medical centres or belong to different clusters defined by geographical or administrative regions. The analysis of such data requires accounting for between-cluster variability. Ignoring such variability would impose unrealistic assumptions in the analysis and could affect the inference on the statistical models. We develop a novel parametric mixed-effects general hazard (MEGH) model that is particularly suitable for the analysis of clustered survival data. The proposed structure generalises the mixed-effects proportional hazards and mixed-effects accelerated failure time structures, among other structures, which are obtained as special cases of the MEGH structure. We develop a likelihood-based algorithm for parameter estimation in general subclasses of the MEGH model, which is implemented in our R package MEGH. We propose diagnostic tools for assessing the random effects and their distributional assumption in the proposed MEGH model. We investigate the performance of the MEGH model using theoretical and simulation studies, as well as a real data application on leukaemia.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-06-07T05:47:42Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221102620
       
  • MISL: Multiple imputation by super learning

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Thomas Carpenito, Justin Manjourides
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Multiple imputation techniques are commonly used when data are missing, however, there are many options one can consider. Multivariate imputation by chained equations is a popular method for generating imputations but relies on specifying models when imputing missing values. In this work, we introduce multiple imputation by super learning, an update to the multivariate imputation by chained equations method to generate imputations with ensemble learning. Ensemble methodologies have recently gained attention for use in inference and prediction as they optimally combine a variety of user-specified parametric and non-parametric models and perform well when estimating complex functions, including those with interaction terms. Through two simulations we compare inferences made using the multiple imputation by super learning approach to those made with other commonly used multiple imputation methods and demonstrate multiple imputation by super learning as a superior option when considering characteristics such as bias, confidence interval coverage rate, and confidence interval width.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-06-06T05:14:45Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221104238
       
  • A poisson-multinomial spatial model for simultaneous outbreaks with
           application to arboviral diseases

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Alexandra M. Schmidt, Laís P. Freitas, Oswaldo G. Cruz, Marilia S. Carvalho
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Dengue, Zika, and chikungunya are arboviral diseases (AVD) transmitted mainly by Aedes aegypti. Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil, has been endemic for dengue for over 30 years, and experienced the first joint epidemic of the three diseases between 2015-2016. They present similar symptoms and only a small proportion of cases are laboratory-confirmed. These facts lead to potential misdiagnosis and, consequently, uncertainty in the registration of the cases. We have available the number of cases of each disease for the [math] neighborhoods of Rio de Janeiro. We propose a Poisson model for the total number of cases of Aedes-borne diseases and, conditioned on the total, we assume a multinomial model for the allocation of the number of cases of each of the diseases across the neighborhoods. This provides simultaneously the estimation of the associations of the relative risk of the total cases of AVD with environmental and socioeconomic variables; and the estimation of the probability of presence of each disease as a function of available covariates. Our findings suggest that a one standard deviation increase in the social development index decreases the relative risk of the total cases of AVD by 28%. Neighborhoods with smaller proportion of green area had greater odds of having chikungunya in comparison to dengue and Zika. A one standard deviation increase in population density decreases the odds of a neighborhood having Zika instead of dengue by 18% but increases the odds of chikungunya in comparison to dengue by 18% and by 43% in comparison to Zika.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-06-06T05:14:24Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221102628
       
  • Multiple imputation for cause-specific Cox models: Assessing methods for
           estimation and prediction

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Edouard F Bonneville, Matthieu Resche-Rigon, Johannes Schetelig, Hein Putter, Liesbeth C de Wreede
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      In studies analyzing competing time-to-event outcomes, interest often lies in both estimating the effects of baseline covariates on the cause-specific hazards and predicting cumulative incidence functions. When missing values occur in these baseline covariates, they may be discarded as part of a complete-case analysis or multiply imputed. In the latter case, the imputations may be performed either compatibly with a substantive model pre-specified as a cause-specific Cox model [substantive model compatible fully conditional specification (SMC-FCS)], or approximately so [multivariate imputation by chained equations (MICE)]. In a large simulation study, we assessed the performance of these three different methods in terms of estimating cause-specific regression coefficients and predicting cumulative incidence functions. Concerning regression coefficients, results provide further support for use of SMC-FCS over MICE, particularly when covariate effects are large and the baseline hazards of the competing events are substantially different. Complete-case analysis also shows adequate performance in settings where missingness is not outcome dependent. With regard to cumulative incidence prediction, SMC-FCS and MICE are performed more similarly, as also evidenced in the illustrative analysis of competing outcomes following a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The findings are discussed alongside recommendations for practising statisticians.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-06-06T05:14:09Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221102623
       
  • Conversion of non-inferiority margin from hazard ratio to restricted mean
           survival time difference using data from multiple historical trials

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Ruizhe Chen, Sanjib Basu, Jeffrey P Meyers, Qian Shi
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      The restricted mean survival time measure has gained a lot of interests for designing and analyzing oncology trials with time-to-event endpoints due to its intuitive clinical interpretation and potentially high statistical power. In the non-inferiority trial literature, restricted mean survival time has been used as an alternative measure for reanalyzing a completed trial, which was originally designed and analyzed based on traditional proportional hazard model. However, the reanalysis procedure requires a conversion from the non-inferiority margin measured in hazard ratio to a non-inferiority margin measured by restricted mean survival time difference. An existing conversion method assumes a Weibull distribution for the population survival time of the historical active control group under the proportional hazard assumption using data from a single trial. In this article, we develop a methodology for non-inferiority margin conversion when data from multiple historical active control studies are available, and introduce a Kaplan-Meier estimator-based method for the non-inferiority margin conversion to relax the parametric assumption. We report extensive simulation studies to examine the performances of proposed methods under the Weibull data generative models and a piecewise-exponential data generative model that mimic the tumor recurrence and survival characteristics of advanced colon cancer. This work is motivated to achieve non-inferiority margin conversion, using historical patient-level data from a large colon cancer clinical database, to reanalyze an internationally collaborated non-inferiority study that evaluates 6-month versus 3-month duration of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer patients.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-06-01T06:00:01Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221102621
       
  • Fitting joint models of longitudinal observations and time to event by
           sequential Bayesian updating

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Paul McKeigue
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Joint modelling of longitudinal measurements and time to event, with longitudinal and event submodels coupled by latent state variables, has wide application in biostatistics. Standard methods for fitting these models require numerical integration to marginalize over the trajectories of the latent states, which is computationally prohibitive for high-dimensional data and for the large data sets that are generated from electronic health records. This paper describes an alternative model-fitting approach based on sequential Bayesian updating, which allows the likelihood to be factorized as the product of the likelihoods of a state-space model and a Poisson regression model. Updates for linear Gaussian state-space models can be efficiently generated with a Kalman filter and the approach can be implemented with existing software. An application to a publicly available data set is demonstrated.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-06-01T05:50:24Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221104241
       
  • Path-specific effects in the presence of a survival outcome and causally
           ordered multiple mediators with application to genomic data

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: An-Shun Tai, Pei-Hsuan Lin, Yen-Tsung Huang, Sheng-Hsuan Lin
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Causal multimediation analysis (i.e. the causal mediation analysis with multiple mediators) is critical for understanding the effectiveness of interventions, especially in medical research. Deriving the path-specific effects of exposure on the outcome through a set of mediators can provide detail about the causal mechanism of interest However, existing models are usually restricted to partial decomposition, which can only be used to evaluate the cumulative effect of several paths. In genetics studies, partial decomposition fails to reflect the real causal effects mediated by genes, especially in complex gene regulatory networks. Moreover, because of the lack of a generalized identification procedure, the current multimediation analysis cannot be applied to the estimation of path-specific effects for any number of mediators. In this study, we derive the interventional analogs of path-specific effect for complete decomposition to address the difficulty of nonidentifiability. On the basis of two survival models of the outcome, we derive the generalized analytic forms for interventional analogs of path-specific effects by assuming the normal distributions of mediators. We apply the new methodology to investigate the causal mechanism of signature genes in lung cancer based on the cell cycle pathway, and the results clarify the gene pathway in cancer.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-05-30T06:45:10Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221104239
       
  • Model-free screening for variables with treatment interaction

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Shiferaw B Bizuayehu, Jin Xu
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Precision medicine is a medical paradigm that focuses on making effective treatment decision based on individual patient characteristics. When there are a large amount of patient information, such as patient’s genetic information, medical records and clinical measurements, available, it is of interest to select the covariates which have interactions with the treatment, for example, in determining the individualized treatment regime where only a subset of covariates with treatment interactions involves in decision making. We propose a marginal feature ranking and screening procedure for measuring interactions between the treatment and covariates. The method does not require imposing a specific model structure on the regression model and is applicable in a high dimensional setting. Theoretical properties in terms of consistency in ranking and selection are established. We demonstrate the finite sample performance of the proposed method by simulation and illustrate the applications with two real data examples from clinical trials.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-05-30T06:45:03Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221102624
       
  • Combined statistical decision limits based on two GH-2000 scores for the
           detection of growth hormone misuse

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Wei Liu, Frank Bretz, Dankmar Böhning, Richard I.G. Holt, Yang Han, Walailuck Böhning, Nishan Guha, David A. Cowan
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      The growth hormone-2000 biomarker method, based on the measurements of insulin-like growth factor-I and the amino-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen, has been developed as a powerful technique for the detection of growth hormone misuse by athletes. Insulin-like growth factor-I and amino-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen are combined in gender-specific formulas to create the growth hormone-2000 score, which is used to determine whether growth hormone has been administered. To comply with World Anti-Doping Agency regulations, each analyte must be measured by two methods. Insulin-like growth factor-I and amino-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen can be measured by a number of approved methods, each leading to its own growth hormone-2000 score. Single decision limits for each growth hormone-2000 score have been introduced and developed by Bassett, Erotokritou-Mulligan, Holt, Böhning and their co-authors in a series of papers. These have been incorporated into the guidelines of the World Anti-Doping Agency. A joint decision limit was constructed based on the sample correlation between the two growth hormone-2000 scores generated from an available sample to increase the sensitivity of the biomarker method. This paper takes this idea further into a fully developed statistical approach. It constructs combined decision limits when two growth hormone-2000 scores from different assay combinations are used to decide whether an athlete has been misusing growth hormone. The combined decision limits are directly related to tolerance regions and constructed using a Bayesian approach. It is also shown to have highly satisfactory frequentist properties. The new approach meets the required false-positive rate with a pre-specified level of certainty.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-05-25T11:42:36Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221093730
       
  • Doubly-robust estimator of the difference in restricted mean times lost
           with competing risks data

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Jingyi Lin, Ludovic Trinquart
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      In the context of competing risks data, the subdistribution hazard ratio has limited clinical interpretability to measure treatment effects. An alternative is the difference in restricted mean times lost (RMTL), which gives the mean time lost to a specific cause of failure between treatment groups. In non-randomized studies, the average causal effect is conventionally used for decision-making about treatment and public health policies. We show how the difference in RMTL can be estimated by contrasting the integrated cumulative incidence functions from a Fine-Gray model. We also show how the difference in RMTL can be estimated by using inverse probability of treatment weighting and contrasts between weighted non-parametric estimators of the area below the cumulative incidence. We use pseudo-observation approaches to estimate both component models and we integrate them into a doubly-robust estimator. We demonstrate that this estimator is consistent when either component is correctly specified. We conduct simulation studies to assess its finite-sample performance and demonstrate its inherited consistency property from its component models. We also examine the performance of this estimator under varying degrees of covariate overlap and under a model misspecification of nonlinearity. We apply the proposed method to assess biomarker-treatment interaction in subpopulations of the POPLAR and OAK randomized controlled trials of second-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-05-24T05:45:01Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221102625
       
  • Simulation extrapolation method for measurement error: A review

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Varadan Sevilimedu, Lili Yu
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Measurement error is pervasive in statistics due to the non-availability of authentic data. The reasons for measurement error mainly relate to cost, convenience, and human error. Measurement error can result in non-negligible bias due to attenuated estimates, reduced power of statistical tests, and lower coverage probabilities of the coefficient estimators in a regression model. Several methods have been proposed to correct for measurement error, all of which can be grouped into two broad categories based on the underlying model—functional and structural. Functional models provide flexibility and robustness to estimators by placing minimal or no assumptions on the distribution of the mismeasured covariate or by treating them as a fixed entity, as opposed to a structural model which treats the underlying mismeasured covariates as random with a specified structure. The simulation extrapolation method is one method that is used for the partial correction of measurement error in both structural and functional models. Reviews of measurement error correction techniques are available in the literature. However, none of the previously conducted reviews has exclusively focused on simulation extrapolation and its application in continuous measurement error models, despite its widespread use and ease of application. We attempt to close this gap in the literature by highlighting its development over the past two and a half decades.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-05-24T05:44:44Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221102619
       
  • Variance partitioning in spatio-temporal disease mapping models

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Maria Franco-Villoria, Massimo Ventrucci, Håvard Rue
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Bayesian disease mapping, yet if undeniably useful to describe variation in risk over time and space, comes with the hurdle of prior elicitation on hard-to-interpret random effect precision parameters. We introduce a reparametrized version of the popular spatio-temporal interaction models, based on Kronecker product intrinsic Gaussian Markov random fields, that we name the variance partitioning model. The variance partitioning model includes a mixing parameter that balances the contribution of the main and interaction effects to the total (generalized) variance and enhances interpretability. The use of a penalized complexity prior on the mixing parameter aids in coding prior information in an intuitive way. We illustrate the advantages of the variance partitioning model using two case studies.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-05-19T04:45:46Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221099642
       
  • Robust statistical inference for matched win statistics

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Roland A. Matsouaka
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      As alternatives to the time-to-first-event analysis of composite endpoints, the win statistics, that is, the net benefit, the win ratio, and the win odds have been proposed to assess treatment effects, using a hierarchy of prioritized component outcomes based on clinical relevance or severity. Whether we are using paired organs of a human body or pair-matching patients by risk profiles or propensity scores, we can leverage the level of granularity of matched win statistics to assess the treatment effect. However, inference for the matched win statistics (net benefit, win ratio, and win odds)—quantities related to proportions—is either not available or unsatisfactory, especially in samples of small to moderate size or when the proportion of wins (or losses) is near 0 or 1. In this paper, we present methods to address these limitations. First, we introduce a different statistic to test for the null hypothesis of no treatment effect and provided a sample size formula. Then, we use the method of variance estimates recovery to derive reliable, boundary-respecting confidence intervals for the matched net benefit, win ratio, and win odds. Finally, a simulation study demonstrates the performance of the proposed methods. We illustrate the proposed methods with two data examples.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-05-17T05:25:42Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221090761
       
  • On estimating the area under the ROC curve in ranked set sampling

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: M. Mahdizadeh, Ehsan Zamanzade
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      In medical research, the receiver operating characteristic curve is widely used to evaluate accuracy of a continuous biomarker. The area under this curve is known as an index for overall performance of the biomarker. This article develops three new estimators of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in ranked set sampling. The first estimator is obtained under normality assumption. The two other estimators are constructed by applying a Box–Cox transformation on data, and then using either a parametric estimator or a kernel-density-based estimator. A simulation study is carried out to compare the proposed estimators with those available in the literature. It emerges that the new estimators offer some advantages in specific situations. Application of the methods is demonstrated using real data in the context of medicine.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-05-12T01:25:51Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221097211
       
  • An objective bayesian approach to estimation in multistage experiments

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Pierre Bunouf
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      This article presents a Bayesian approach to estimation in multistage experiments based on the reference prior theory. The idea of deriving design-dependent priors was first introduced using Jeffreys’ criterion. A theoretical framework was then established by showing that explicit reference to the design is fully Bayesian justified and Bayesian objectivity cannot ignore such information. Extending the work to multi-parameter problems, a general form of priors was derived from the reference prior theory. In this article, I evidence the good frequentist properties of the reference posterior estimators with normally distributed data. As a notable advance, I address the issue of the point and the interval estimations upon experiment termination. The approach is applied to a data set collected in a clinical trial in schizophrenia with the possibility to stop the trial early if interim results provide sufficient evidence of efficacy or futility. Finally, I discuss the idea of using the reference posterior estimators as a default choice for objective estimation in multistage experiment.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-05-11T07:51:48Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221099640
       
  • Estimating and testing the influence of early diagnosis on cancer survival
           via point effects of diagnoses and treatments

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Xiaoqin Wang, Johannes Blom, Weimin Ye, Li Yin
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      A cancer diagnosis is part of a complex stochastic process, which involves patient's characteristics, diagnosing methods, an initial assessment of cancer progression, treatments and a certain outcome of interest. To evaluate the performance of diagnoses, one needs not only a consistent estimation of the causal effect under a specified regime of diagnoses and treatments but also reliable confidence interval, P-value and hypothesis testing of the causal effect. In this article, we identify causal effects under various regimes of diagnoses and treatments by the point effects of diagnoses and treatments and thus are able to estimate and test these causal effects by estimating and testing point effects in the familiar framework of single-point causal inference. Specifically, using data from a Swedish prognosis study of stomach cancer, we estimate and test the causal effects on cancer survival under various regimes of diagnosing and treating hospitals including the optimal regime. We also estimate and test the modification of the causal effect by age. With its simple setting, one can readily extend the example to a large variety of settings in the area of cancer diagnosis: different personal characteristics such as family history, different diagnosing procedures such as multistage screening, and different cancer outcomes such as cancer progression.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-05-05T05:27:42Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221098429
       
  • Response-adaptive treatment randomization for multiple comparisons of
           treatments with recurrentevent responses

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Jingya Gao, Feifang Hu, Siu Hung Cheung, Pei-Fang Su
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Recurrent event responses are frequently encountered during clinical trials of treatments for certain diseases, such as asthma. The recurrence rates of different treatments are often compared by applying the negative binomial model. In addition, a balanced treatment-allocation procedure that assigns the same number of patients to each treatment is often applied. Recently, a response-adaptive treatment-allocation procedure has been developed for trials with recurrent event data, and has been shown to be superior to balanced treatment allocation. However, this response-adaptive treatment allocation procedure is only applicable for the comparison of two treatments. In this paper, we derive response-adaptive treatment-allocation procedures for trials which comprise several treatments. As pairwise comparisons and multiple comparisons with a control are two common multiple-testing scenarios in trials with more than two treatments, corresponding treatment-allocation procedures for these scenarios are also investigated. The redesign of two clinical studies illustrates the clinical benefits that would be obtained from our proposed response-adaptive treatment-allocation procedures.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-04-29T05:20:52Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221095244
       
  • A Bayesian approach to simultaneous adjustment of misclassification and
           missingness in categorical covariates

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Michelle Xia, Rexford M. Akakpo
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      This study considers concurrent adjustment of misclassification and missingness in categorical covariates in regression models. Under various misclassification and missingness mechanisms, we derive a general mixture regression structure for regression models that can incorporate multiple surrogates of categorical covariates that are subject to misclassification and missingness. In simulation studies, we demonstrate that including observations with missingness and/or multiple surrogates of the covariate helps alleviate the efficiency loss caused by misclassification. In addition, we study the efficacy of misclassification adjustment when the number of categories increases for the covariate of interest. Using data from the Longitudinal Studies of HIV-Associated Lung Infections and Complications, we perform simultaneous adjustment of misclassification and missingness in the self-reported cocaine and heroin use variable when assessing its association with lung density measures.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-04-27T08:32:50Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221094941
       
  • Design and analysis of partially randomized preference trials with
           propensity score stratification

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Yumin Wang, Fan Li, Ondrej Blaha, Can Meng, Denise Esserman
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      While the two-stage randomized design allows us to unbiasedly evaluate the impact of patients’ treatment preference on the outcome of interest, it may not always be practical to implement in clinical practice; patients with a strong preference may not be willing to be randomized. The more pragmatic, partially randomized preference design (PRPD) allows patients who are unwilling to be randomized, but willing to state their preference, to receive their preferred treatment in lieu of the first-stage randomization in the two-stage design, at the cost of potentially introducing bias in estimating the effects of interest. In this article, we consider the application of propensity score stratification (PSS) in a PRPD to recreate a conditional first-stage randomization based on observed covariates, enabling the estimation and inference of the overall treatment, selection and preference effects with minimum bias. We additionally derive a set of closed-form sample size formulas for detecting all three effects of interest in a PSS-PRPD. Simulation studies demonstrate the bias reduction properties of the PSS-PRPD, and validate the accuracy of the proposed sample size formulas. Our results show that 5 to 10 propensity score strata may be needed to correct for biases in effect estimates, and the exact number of strata needed to achieve the best match between the empirical power and formula prediction may depend on the degree of effect heterogeneity. Finally, we demonstrate our proposed formulas by estimating the required sample sizes to detect treatment, selection and preference effects in the context of the Harapan Study.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-04-26T07:29:05Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221095673
       
  • Estimation of multiple ordered ROC curves using placement values

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Soutik Ghosal, Katherine L Grantz, Zhen Chen
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      In many diagnostic accuracy studies, a priori orders may be available on multiple receiver operating characteristic curves. For example, being closer to delivery, fetal ultrasound measures in the third trimester should be no less accurate than those in the second trimester in predicting small-for-gestational-age births. Such an a priori order should be incorporated in estimating receiver operating characteristic curves and associated summary accuracy statistics, as it can potentially improve statistical efficiency of these estimates. Early work in the literature has mainly taken an indirect approach to this task and has induced the desired a priori order through modeling test score distributions. We instead propose a new strategy that incorporates the order directly through the modeling of receiver operating characteristic curves. We achieve this by exploiting the link between placement value (the relative position of a diseased test score in the healthy score distribution), the cumulative distribution function of placement value, and receiver operating characteristic curve, and by building stochastically ordered random variables through mixture distributions. We take a Bayesian semiparametric approach in using Dirichlet process mixture models so that the placement values can be flexibly modeled. We conduct extensive simulation studies to examine the performance of the proposed methodology and apply the new framework to data from obstetrics and women’s health studies.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-04-22T06:54:08Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221094940
       
  • Unbiased and robust analysis of co-localization in super-resolution images

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Xueyan Liu, Clifford S. Guy, Emilio Boada-Romero, Douglas R. Green, Margaret E. Flanagan, Cheng Cheng, Hui Zhang
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Spatial data from high-resolution images abound in many scientific disciplines. For example, single-molecule localization microscopy, such as stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy, provides super-resolution images to help scientists investigate co-localization of proteins and hence their interactions inside cells, which are key events in living cells. However, there are few accurate methods for analyzing co-localization in super-resolution images. The current methods and software are prone to produce false-positive errors and are restricted to only 2-dimensional images. In this paper, we develop a novel statistical method to effectively address the problems of unbiased and robust quantification and comparison of protein co-localization for multiple 2- and 3-dimensional image datasets. This method significantly improves the analysis of protein co-localization using super-resolution image data, as shown by its excellent performance in simulation studies and an analysis of co-localization of protein light chain 3 and lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1 in cell autophagy. Moreover, this method is directly applicable to co-localization analyses in other disciplines, such as diagnostic imaging, epidemiology, environmental science, and ecology.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-04-22T06:53:51Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221094133
       
  • A dose–effect network meta-analysis model with application in
           antidepressants using restricted cubic splines

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Tasnim Hamza, Toshi A Furukawa, Nicola Orsini, Andrea Cipriani, Cynthia P Iglesias, Georgia Salanti
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Network meta-analysis has been used to answer a range of clinical questions about the preferred intervention for a given condition. Although the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological agents depend on the dose administered, network meta-analysis applications typically ignore the role that drugs dosage plays in the results. This leads to more heterogeneity in the network. In this paper, we present a suite of network meta-analysis models that incorporate the dose–effect relationship using restricted cubic splines. We extend existing models into a dose–effect network meta-regression to account for study-level covariates and for groups of agents in a class-effect dose–effect network meta-analysis model. We apply our models to a network of aggregate data about the efficacy of 21 antidepressants and placebo for depression. We find that all antidepressants are more efficacious than placebo after a certain dose. Also, we identify the dose level at which each antidepressant's effect exceeds that of placebo and estimate the dose beyond which the effect of antidepressants no longer increases. When covariates were introduced to the model, we find that studies with small sample size tend to exaggerate antidepressants efficacy for several of the drugs. Our dose–effect network meta-analysis model with restricted cubic splines provides a flexible approach to modelling the dose–effect relationship in multiple interventions. Decision-makers can use our model to inform treatment choice.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-02-24T04:44:34Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802211070256
       
  • Fitting to the UK COVID-19 outbreak, short-term forecasts and estimating
           the reproductive number

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Matt J. Keeling, Louise Dyson, Glen Guyver-Fletcher, Alex Holmes, Malcolm G Semple, Michael J. Tildesley, Edward M. Hill
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to the fore the need for policy makers to receive timely and ongoing scientific guidance in response to this recently emerged human infectious disease. Fitting mathematical models of infectious disease transmission to the available epidemiological data provide a key statistical tool for understanding the many quantities of interest that are not explicit in the underlying epidemiological data streams. Of these, the effective reproduction number, [math], has taken on special significance in terms of the general understanding of whether the epidemic is under control ([math]). Unfortunately, none of the epidemiological data streams are designed for modelling, hence assimilating information from multiple (often changing) sources of data is a major challenge that is particularly stark in novel disease outbreaks. Here, focusing on the dynamics of the first wave (March–June 2020), we present in some detail the inference scheme employed for calibrating the Warwick COVID-19 model to the available public health data streams, which span hospitalisations, critical care occupancy, mortality and serological testing. We then perform computational simulations, making use of the acquired parameter posterior distributions, to assess how the accuracy of short-term predictions varied over the time course of the outbreak. To conclude, we compare how refinements to data streams and model structure impact estimates of epidemiological measures, including the estimated growth rate and daily incidence.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-01-17T04:12:50Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802211070257
       
  • Efficiency of a randomized confirmatory basket trial design constrained to
           control the family wise error rate by indication

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Linchen He, Yuru Ren, Han Chen, Daphne Guinn, Deepak Parashar, Cong Chen, Shuai Sammy Yuan, Valeriy Korostyshevskiy, Robert A. Beckman
      First page: 1207
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Basket trials pool histologic indications sharing molecular pathophysiology, improving development efficiency. Currently, basket trials have been confirmatory only for exceptional therapies. Our previous randomized basket design may be generally suitable in the resource-intensive confirmatory phase, maintains high power even with modest effect sizes, and provides nearly k-fold increased efficiency for k indications, but controls false positives for the pooled result only. Since family wise error rate by indications may sometimes be required, we now simulate a variant of this basket design controlling family wise error rate at 0.025k, the total family wise error rate of k separate randomized trials. We simulated this modified design under numerous scenarios varying design parameters. Only designs controlling family wise error rate and minimizing estimation bias were allowable. Optimal performance results when [math]. We report efficiency (expected # true positives/expected sample size) relative to k parallel studies, at 90% power (“uncorrected”) or at the power achieved in the basket trial (“corrected,” because conventional designs could also increase efficiency by sacrificing power). Efficiency and power (percentage active indications identified) improve with a higher percentage of initial indications active. Up to 92% uncorrected and 38% corrected efficiency improvement is possible. Even under family wise error rate control, randomized confirmatory basket trials substantially improve development efficiency. Initial indication selection is critical.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-04-11T03:36:00Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221091901
       
  • A comparison of analytical strategies for cluster randomized trials with
           survival outcomes in the presence of competing risks

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Fan Li, Wenhan Lu, Yuxuan Wang, Zehua Pan, Erich J Greene, Guanqun Meng, Can Meng, Ondrej Blaha, Yize Zhao, Peter Peduzzi, Denise Esserman
      First page: 1224
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      While statistical methods for analyzing cluster randomized trials with continuous and binary outcomes have been extensively studied and compared, little comparative evidence has been provided for analyzing cluster randomized trials with survival outcomes in the presence of competing risks. Motivated by the Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders trial, we carried out a simulation study to compare the operating characteristics of several existing population-averaged survival models, including the marginal Cox, marginal Fine and Gray, and marginal multi-state models. For each model, we found that adjusting for the intraclass correlations through the sandwich variance estimator effectively maintained the type I error rate when the number of clusters is large. With no more than 30 clusters, however, the sandwich variance estimator can exhibit notable negative bias, and a permutation test provides better control of type I error inflation. Under the alternative, the power for each model is differentially affected by two types of intraclass correlations—the within-individual and between-individual correlations. Furthermore, the marginal Fine and Gray model occasionally leads to higher power than the marginal Cox model or the marginal multi-state model, especially when the competing event rate is high. Finally, we provide an illustrative analysis of Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders trial using each analytical strategy considered.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-03-15T05:09:54Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221085080
       
  • Integrative nearest neighbor classifier for block-missing multi-modality
           data

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Guan Yu, Surui Hou
      First page: 1242
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      In modern biomedical classification applications, data are often collected from multiple modalities, ranging from various omics technologies to brain scans. As different modalities provide complementary information, classifiers using multi-modality data usually have good classification performance. However, in many studies, due to the high cost of measures, in a lot of samples, some modalities are missing and therefore all data from those modalities are missing completely. In this case, the training data set is a block-missing multi-modality data set. In this paper, considering such classification problems, we develop a new weighted nearest neighbors classifier, called the integrative nearest neighbor (INN) classifier. INN harnesses all available information in the training data set and the feature vector of the test data point effectively to predict the class label of the test data point without deleting or imputing any missing data. Given a test data point, INN determines the weights on the training samples adaptively by minimizing the worst-case upper bound on the estimation error of the regression function over a convex class of functions. Our simulation study shows that INN outperforms common weighted nearest neighbors classifiers that only use complete training samples or modalities that are available in each sample. It performs better than methods that impute the missing data as well, even for the case where some modalities are missing not at random. The effectiveness of INN has been also demonstrated by our theoretical studies and a real application from the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-03-18T12:07:50Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221084596
       
  • Causal mediation analysis with multiple causally non-ordered and ordered
           mediators based on summarized genetic data

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Lei Hou, Yuanyuan Yu, Xiaoru Sun, Xinhui Liu, Yifan Yu, Hongkai Li, Fuzhong Xue
      First page: 1263
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Causal mediation analysis investigates the mechanism linking exposure and outcome. Dealing with the impact of unobserved confounders among exposure, mediator and outcome is an issue of great concern. Moreover, when multiple mediators exist, this causal pathway intertwines with other causal pathways, rendering it difficult to estimate the path-specific effects. In this study, we propose a method (PSE-MR) to identify and estimate path-specific effects of an exposure (e.g. education) on an outcome (e.g. osteoarthritis risk) through multiple causally ordered and non-ordered mediators (e.g. body mass index and pack-years of smoking) using summarized genetic data, when the sequential ignorability assumption is violated. Specifically, PSE-MR requires a specific rank condition in which the number of instrumental variables is larger than the number of mediators. Furthermore, we illustrate the utility of PSE-MR by providing guidance for practitioners and exploring the mediation effects of body mass index and pack-years of smoking in the causal pathways from education to osteoarthritis risk. Additionally, the results of simulation reveal that the causal estimates of path-specific effects are almost unbiased with good coverage and Type I error properties. Also, we summarize the least number of instrumental variables for the specific number of mediators to achieve 80% power.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-03-29T08:14:05Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221084599
       
  • Generalized quasi-linear mixed-effects model

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Yusuke Saigusa, Shinto Eguchi, Osamu Komori
      First page: 1280
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) is one of the most common method in the analysis of longitudinal and clustered data in biological sciences. However, issues of model complexity and misspecification can occur when applying the GLMM. To address these issues, we extend the standard GLMM to a nonlinear mixed-effects model based on quasi-linear modeling. An estimation algorithm for the proposed model is provided by extending the penalized quasi-likelihood and the restricted maximum likelihood which are known in the GLMM inference. Also, the conditional AIC is formulated for the proposed model. The proposed model should provide a more flexible fit than the GLMM when there is a nonlinear relation between fixed and random effects. Otherwise, the proposed model is reduced to the GLMM. The performance of the proposed model under model misspecification is evaluated in several simulation studies. In the analysis of respiratory illness data from a randomized controlled trial, we observe the proposed model can capture heterogeneity; that is, it can detect a patient subgroup with specific clinical character in which the treatment is effective.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-03-14T05:02:22Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221085864
       
  • Joint analysis of multivariate failure time data with latent variables

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Deng Pan, Xinyuan Song, Junhao Pan
      First page: 1292
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      We propose a joint modeling approach to investigate the observed and latent risk factors of the multivariate failure times of interest. The proposed model comprises two parts. The first part is a distribution-free confirmatory factor analysis model that characterizes the latent factors by correlated multiple observed variables. The second part is a multivariate additive hazards model that assesses the observed and latent risk factors of the failure times. A hybrid procedure that combines the borrow-strength estimation approach and the asymptotically distribution-free generalized least square method is developed to estimate the model parameters. The asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators are derived. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed method performs well for practical settings. An application to a study concerning the risk factors of multiple diabetic complications is provided.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-04-04T09:02:08Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221089028
       
  • Modeling rounded counts using a zero-inflated mixture of power series
           family of distributions

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Sayed Jamal Mirkamali
      First page: 1313
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      This paper proposes an extension of zero-inflated models for analyzing rounded counting outcomes. A zero-inflated mixture of power series is proposed, and the EM algorithm is developed to estimate parameters. The accuracy of estimators is evaluated using a simulation study. The results of simulations show that the estimation procedure is successful and estimates are accurate. An application of our models for analyzing the number of cigarettes smoked per day of respondents for the American’s Changing Lives study is enclosed. The proposed model best fits the data and the relationships between rounded counts and other covariates revealed by proposed regression models.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-04-08T06:00:34Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221089031
       
  • Receiver operating characteristic estimation and threshold selection
           criteria in three-class classification problems for clustered data

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Duc-Khanh To, Gianfranco Adimari, Monica Chiogna, Davide Risso
      First page: 1325
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Statistical evaluation of diagnostic tests, and, more generally, of biomarkers, is a constantly developing field, in which complexity of the assessment increases with the complexity of the design under which data are collected. One particularly prevalent type of data is clustered data, where individual units are naturally nested into clusters. In these cases, Bias can arise from omission, in the evaluation process, of cluster-level effects and/or individual covariates. Focusing on the three-class case and for continuous-valued diagnostic tests, we investigate how to exploit the clustered structure of data within a linear-mixed model approach, both when the assumption of normality holds and when it does not. We provide a method for the estimation of covariate-specific receiver operating characteristic surfaces and discuss methods for the choice of optimal thresholds, proposing three possible estimators. A proof of consistency and asymptotic normality of the proposed threshold estimators is given. All considered methods are evaluated by extensive simulation experiments. As an application, we study the use of the Lysosomal Associated Membrane Protein Family Member 5 gene expression as a biomarker to distinguish among three types of glutamatergic neurons.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-04-01T06:35:39Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221089029
       
  • Re-randomisation trials in multi-episode settings: Estimands and
           independence estimators

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Brennan C Kahan, Ian R White, Richard Hooper, Sandra Eldridge
      First page: 1342
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Often patients may require treatment on multiple occasions. The re-randomisation design can be used in such multi-episode settings, as it allows patients to be re-enrolled and re-randomised for each new treatment episode they experience. We propose a set of estimands that can be used in multi-episode settings, focusing on issues unique to multi-episode settings, namely how each episode should be weighted, how the patient's treatment history in previous episodes should be handled, and whether episode-specific effects or average effects across all episodes should be used. We then propose independence estimators for each estimand, and show the manner in which many re-randomisation trials have been analysed in the past (a simple comparison between all intervention episodes vs. all control episodes) corresponds to a per-episode added-benefit estimand, that is, the average effect of the intervention across all episodes, over and above any benefit conferred from the intervention in previous episodes. We show this estimator is generally unbiased, and describe when other estimators will be unbiased. We conclude that (i) consideration of these estimands can help guide the choice of which analysis method is most appropriate; and (ii) the re-randomisation design with an independence estimator can be a useful approach in multi-episode settings.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-04-15T06:07:11Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221094140
       
  • Combining individual patient data from randomized and non-randomized
           studies to predict real-world effectiveness of interventions

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Michael Seo, Thomas PA Debray, Yann Ruffieux, Sandro Gsteiger, Sylwia Bujkiewicz, Axel Finckh, Matthias Egger, Orestis Efthimiou
      First page: 1355
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials is generally considered the most reliable source of estimates of relative treatment effects. However, in the last few years, there has been interest in using non-randomized studies to complement evidence from randomized controlled trials. Several meta-analytical models have been proposed to this end. Such models mainly focussed on estimating the average relative effects of interventions. In real-life clinical practice, when deciding on how to treat a patient, it might be of great interest to have personalized predictions of absolute outcomes under several available treatment options. This paper describes a general framework for developing models that combine individual patient data from randomized controlled trials and non-randomized study when aiming to predict outcomes for a set of competing medical interventions applied in real-world clinical settings. We also discuss methods for measuring the models’ performance to identify the optimal model to use in each setting. We focus on the case of continuous outcomes and illustrate our methods using a data set from rheumatoid arthritis, comprising patient-level data from three randomized controlled trials and two registries from Switzerland and Britain.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-04-26T07:28:51Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221090759
       
  • Sensitivity analysis for calibrated inverse probability-of-censoring
           weighted estimators under non-ignorable dropout

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Li Su, Shaun R Seaman, Sean Yiu
      First page: 1374
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Inverse probability of censoring weighting is a popular approach to handling dropout in longitudinal studies. However, inverse probability-of-censoring weighted estimators (IPCWEs) can be inefficient and unstable if the weights are estimated by maximum likelihood. To alleviate these problems, calibrated IPCWEs have been proposed, which use calibrated weights that directly optimize covariate balance in finite samples rather than the weights from maximum likelihood. However, the existing calibrated IPCWEs are all based on the unverifiable assumption of sequential ignorability and sensitivity analysis strategies under non-ignorable dropout are lacking. In this paper, we fill this gap by developing an approach to sensitivity analysis for calibrated IPCWEs under non-ignorable dropout. A simple technique is proposed to speed up the computation of bootstrap and jackknife confidence intervals and thus facilitate sensitivity analyses. We evaluate the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods using simulations and apply our methods to data from an international inception cohort study of systemic lupus erythematosus. An R Markdown tutorial to demonstrate the implementation of the proposed methods is provided.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-04-12T08:02:53Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221090763
       
  • Using horseshoe prior for incorporating multiple historical control data
           in randomized controlled trials

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Tomohiro Ohigashi, Kazushi Maruo, Takashi Sozu, Masahiko Gosho
      First page: 1392
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      Meta-analytic approaches and power priors are often used to incorporate historical controls into the analysis of a current randomized controlled trial. In this study, we propose a method for incorporating multiple historical controls based on a horseshoe prior, which is a type of global–local shrinkage prior. The method assumes that historical controls follow the same distribution as the current control. In the case in which only a few historical controls are heterogeneous, we consider them to follow a potentially biased distribution from the distribution of the current control. We analyze two clinical trial examples with binary and time-to-event endpoints and conduct simulation studies to compare the performance of the proposed and existing methods. In the analysis of the clinical trial example, the posterior standard deviation of the treatment effect is decreased by the proposed method by considering the bias between the current control and heterogeneous historical control. In the scenarios in which the current and historical controls follow the same distribution, the statistical power using the proposed method is higher than that using existing methods. The proposed method is advantageous when few or no heterogeneous historical controls are expected.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-04-05T07:02:14Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221090752
       
  • Equivalence tests for ratio of means in bioequivalence studies under
           crossover design

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Yingdong He, Yuhao Deng, Chong You, Xiao-Hua Zhou
      First page: 1405
      Abstract: Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Ahead of Print.
      There are several problems concerning the statistical definition of average bioequivalence provided by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. We proposed a ratio of means based on the original bioavailability measure as the definition for average bioequivalence. Under the log-normal distribution assumption, we proposed a hypothesis testing-based method and a confidence interval-based method to answer the question of whether the ratio of means falls into a predetermined interval. For the hypothesis testing-based method, we decomposed the null two-sided hypothesis of the ratio of means into two one-sided hypotheses. With the intersection–union theorem for asymptotic tests, we constructed two asymptotic size-[math] tests for the original null hypothesis. The method of variance estimation recovery was adopted to develop the confidence interval-based method. Simulation studies showed that the proposed methods can maintain the empirical type I error rate closely at the nominal level and is as powerful as the two one-sided [math]-test for testing the ratio of means under different settings. The application of the proposed methods was illustrated through six datasets in real-world examples.
      Citation: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      PubDate: 2022-04-15T06:06:51Z
      DOI: 10.1177/09622802221093721
       
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
 


Your IP address: 18.207.133.27
 
Home (Search)
API
About JournalTOCs
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-