A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  

              [Sort by number of followers]   [Restore default list]

  Subjects -> MILITARY (Total: 109 journals)
Showing 1 - 24 of 24 Journals sorted alphabetically
Africa Conflict Monitor     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 8)
Armed Conflict Survey     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 15)
Armed Forces & Society     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24)
Arms & Armour     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
British Journal for Military History     Open Access   (Followers: 40)
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Ciencia y Poder Aéreo     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Civil Wars     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 21)
Coleção Meira Mattos : Revista das Ciências Militares     Open Access  
Conflict, Security & Development     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 426)
Critical Military Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4)
CRMA Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Cuadernos de Marte     Open Access  
Defence and Peace Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22)
Defence Science Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 40)
Defence Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 31)
Defence Technology     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Defense & Security Analysis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 31)
Digital War     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Disaster and Military Medicine     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Doutrina Militar Terrestre em Revista     Open Access  
Eesti Sõjaajaloo Aastaraamat / Estonian Yearbook of Military History     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
EsSEX : Revista Científica     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
First World War Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27)
Fra Krig og Fred     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Gettysburg Magazine     Full-text available via subscription  
Great Circle: Journal of the Australian Association for Maritime History, The     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 7)
Headmark     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Human Factors and Mechanical Engineering for Defense and Safety     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
International Bibliography of Military History     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
International Journal of Intelligent Defence Support Systems     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
International Peacekeeping     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 472)
Journal for Maritime Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Journal of Bioterrorism & Biodefense     Open Access   (Followers: 6)
Journal of African Military History     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Journal of Archives in Military Medicine     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Journal of Chinese Military History     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Journal of Conflict and Security Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 20)
Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics     Open Access  
Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation : Applications, Methodology, Technology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Journal of Defense Studies & Resource Management     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Journal of Military and Information Science     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Journal of Military and Strategic Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Journal of Military and Veterans Health     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 10)
Journal of Military Ethics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11)
Journal of Military Experience     Open Access   (Followers: 7)
Journal of Military History     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 34)
Journal of Military Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Journal of National Security Law & Policy     Free   (Followers: 8)
Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Journal of power institutions in post-soviet societies     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Journal of Slavic Military Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 18)
Journal of Terrorism Research     Open Access   (Followers: 26)
Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
Journal on Baltic Security     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Martial Arts Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Media, War & Conflict     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 15)
Medical Journal Armed Forces India     Full-text available via subscription  
Medicine, Conflict and Survival     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Militärgeschichtliche Zeitschrift     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Military Behavioral Health     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Military Medical Research     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Military Medicine     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
Military Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Modern Information Technologies in the Sphere of Security and Defence     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Naval Research Logistics: an International Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Nonproliferation Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
O Adjunto : Revista Pedagógica da Escola de Aperfeiçoamento de Sargentos das Armas     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Perspectives on Terrorism     Open Access   (Followers: 472)
Post-Soviet Armies Newsletter     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Problemy Mechatroniki. Uzbrojenie, lotnictwo, inżynieria bezpieczeństwa / Problems of Mechatronics. Armament, Aviation, Safety Engineering     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Revista Agulhas Negras     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista Babilônia     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista Científica Fundação Osório     Open Access  
Revista Científica General José María Córdova     Open Access  
Revista Cubana de Medicina Militar     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista do Exército     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista Militar de Ciência e Tecnologia     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista Política y Estrategia     Open Access  
Sabretache     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Sanidad Militar     Open Access  
Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Scientia Militaria : South African Journal of Military Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Scientific Journal of Polish Naval Academy     Open Access  
Securitologia     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Security and Defence Quarterly     Open Access   (Followers: 7)
Security Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 48)
Signals     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Small Wars & Insurgencies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 373)
Small Wars Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 17)
Social Development & Security : Journal of Scientific Papers     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Special Operations Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Strategic Comments     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
The Military Balance     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
The RUSI Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 17)
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22)
United Service     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
University of Miami National Security & Armed Conflict Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte. Das zentrale Forum der Zeitgeschichtsforschung     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11)
Vojnotehnički Glasnik     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Vulcan     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
War & Society     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 26)
War in History     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23)
Whitehall Papers     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Wiedza Obronna     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Zeitschrift für Slawistik     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
선진국방연구     Open Access  

              [Sort by number of followers]   [Restore default list]

Similar Journals
Journal Cover
Journal of Conflict and Security Law
Journal Prestige (SJR): 0.402
Number of Followers: 20  
 
  Hybrid Journal Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
ISSN (Print) 1467-7954 - ISSN (Online) 1467-7962
Published by Oxford University Press Homepage  [414 journals]
  • Protection of Detainees from Sexual Violence under International
           Humanitarian Law
    • Authors: Bradley S.
      Pages: 381 - 422
      Abstract: This article addresses the question of whether current frameworks under international humanitarian law offer adequate protection to persons detained for reasons relating to armed conflict from crimes of sexual violence. Sexual violence against detainees is a persistent issue in both international and non-international armed conflicts. Sexual violence against male detainees is also a widespread issue, with men and boys constituting the bulk of persons detained in conflict, and also facing unique barriers in reporting abuses. An evaluation of current legal frameworks under the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the Additional Protocols of 1977 identifies key fault-lines in the law, including a widespread statutory characterisation of sexual violence as a crime principally committed against women. Case law demonstrates a resultant tendency to conceptualise sexual abuse of male detainees as torture, rather than sexual violence. Additionally, state interpretations of the law reflect this absence of gender neutrality. Compliance mechanisms are furthermore held back by the lack of clarity and specificity of prohibitions on sexual violence against detainees in international and non-international armed conflicts. Ultimately, options for strengthening the law in this area are subject to the political will of states and carry the risk of winding back existing standards of protection. The development of a non-binding but standard-setting instrument devised with the support of states and specifically prohibiting the issue of sexual violence against detainees in gender- neutral and comprehensive terms may ultimately be the most effective means of strengthening existing legal frameworks.
      PubDate: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/kraa010
      Issue No: Vol. 25, No. 3 (2020)
       
  • Reviving the Principle of Non-Intervention in Cyberspace: The Path Forward
    • Authors: Moulin T.
      Pages: 423 - 447
      Abstract: The applicability of existing rules of international law (namely sovereignty or the prohibition to use force) is currently challenged in cyberspace. In contrast, the relevance of the non-intervention principle is accepted by states and raises less questions about the ‘territoriality’ or the ‘militarization’ of cyberspace. At first sight, it thus appears as a convenient source for the regulation of cyberthreats. However, the Nicaragua case also established a stringent test for a foreign interference to qualify as an unlawful intervention. First, it must bear ‘on matters in which each State is permitted, by the principle of State sovereignty to decide freely’ (ie the ‘domaine réservé’). Then, it must involve ‘methods of coercion in regard to such choices’. I contend that both criteria are maladjusted to address cyberthreats and must be reconceptualised. In fact, the domaine réservé describes domains where states are free from international rules. However, few domains, including electoral processes or main economic orientations, are totally isolated from international law. I thus argue that it must be reconceptualised into the so-called ‘domaine privilégié’. It consists of a domain with clear-cut contours, unaffected by the developments of international law, which encompasses the fundamental interests of a state and its population. Then, coercion describes situations where a state is compelled to act, or to refrain from acting, in a certain fashion. This traditional approach is also problematic, and I argue that coercion must be understood in terms of deprivation of control.
      PubDate: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/kraa011
      Issue No: Vol. 25, No. 3 (2020)
       
  • Trends in Global Disarmament Treaties
    • Authors: Casey-Maslen S; Vestner T.
      Pages: 449 - 471
      Abstract: Since the adoption of the UN Charter, states have concluded numerous international disarmament treaties. What are their core features, and are there any trends in their design' This article discusses the five global disarmament treaties, namely the 1971 Biological Weapons Convention, the 1992 Chemical Weapons Convention, the 1997 Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions and the 2017 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. It first considers how a broad set of prohibitions of activities with respect to specific weapons has evolved over time. Then, it analyses the treaties’ implementation and compliance support mechanisms as well as their procedural aspects regarding entry into force and withdrawal. This article finds that a pattern has developed over the last two decades to outlaw all and any use of weapons by disarmament treaty, without first instituting a prohibition on their use under international humanitarian law (IHL). It also finds that reporting obligations, meetings of States Parties and treaty-related institutions are generally created, either directly by treaty or by subsequent state party decisions. Finally, there is a tendency to make the treaty’s entry into force easier, and the withdrawal more difficult. It is argued that these trends arise from states’ attempt to establish more easily disarmament treaties, design more robust disarmament treaties and more effectively protect civilians. The article concludes by reflecting whether these trends form the basis of a new branch of international law—international disarmament law—and discusses them in the context of emerging weapons and technologies.
      PubDate: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/kraa014
      Issue No: Vol. 25, No. 3 (2020)
       
  • Protracted Armed Violence as a Criterion for the Existence of
           Non-international Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law,
           International Criminal Law and Beyond
    • Authors: Hrnjaz M; Simentić Popović J.
      Pages: 473 - 500
      Abstract: The present article provides legal analysis of the concept of ‘protracted armed violence’ which is part of the commonly accepted definition of non-international armed conflict (NIAC). The International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia interpreted this notion as the intensity requirement. However, the practice of other international legal institutions that use this concept (such as International Criminal Court and some other judicial institutions) is not always coherent with this finding. This fact raised several theoretical and practical issues in the process of interpretation and implementation of international legal norms. Therefore, the aim of the article is to critically reassess the ‘protracted armed violence’ concept in various branches of international law and to contribute to the better understanding of the NIAC phenomenon.
      PubDate: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/kraa009
      Issue No: Vol. 25, No. 3 (2020)
       
  • Peacekeepers: Internationalist Protectors or National Perpetrators,
           Protected Either Way'
    • Authors: Cryer R; Perova N.
      Pages: 501 - 536
      Abstract: Peacekeepers occupy a liminal legal position, having never been provided for in the UN Charter. That said, a detailed legal regime has grown up around peacekeepers, both in terms of how they are protected by the criminal law and the jurisdictional regime that surrounds them. The piece argues that this relates to two sides of protection, which reflects dual image that has arisen around them. The first is that of international ‘saviours’ acting on behalf of a purported international community who have little more power than their moral authority, and therefore are worthy of additional protection from criminal law. This is shown through an analysis of the 1994 Convention on the Safety of United Nations and Associated Personnel and the relevant provisions of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. However, peacekeepers have also been accused, of, and committed various crimes against the populations they are sent to protect. When this occurs, international law enters at a different level, casting peacekeepers as nationals of their sending State and placed in a jurisdictional regime that functionally, if not by design, protects ‘our boys’ from facing criminal liability for their conduct. This is investigated through analysis of peacekeepers’ Status of Forces Agreements and the Rome Statute regime applicable to them. These deeply inconsistent narratives, of peacekeepers as representatives of international good intentions, and national actors, operate in tandem to shield them from the consequences of their conduct. We recommend a holistic approach that is understanding, but less forgiving.
      PubDate: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/kraa020
      Issue No: Vol. 25, No. 3 (2020)
       
  • Human Shielding, Subjective Intent, and Harm to the Enemy
    • Authors: Kis Kelemen B.
      Pages: 537 - 564
      Abstract: The weaker party in asymmetrical conflicts often attempts to protect itself from attack in a fashion prohibited by international law, particularly by using human shields. This article examines whether the traditional characterization of shielding based on subjective intent (the voluntary or involuntary nature of shielding) has any legal consequence and if so, how subjective intent can result in a change of status under international humanitarian law. This article argues that protective status cannot be altered solely through the intent of protected persons. In light of a careful analysis of treaty law, the author proposes a new understanding of the threshold of harm requirement of direct participation in hostilities and suggests that all human shields should be considered persons directly participating in hostilities, even when they do not possess a legally relevant will. Consequently, this article calls for an equal treatment of human shields due to their status as direct participants in hostilities. The article also calls for clarification of law by states on this issue, for there are inherent tensions within the law of armed conflict between the applicable law and state policies, in light of the relevant legal norms regulating the consequences of human shielding.
      PubDate: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/kraa015
      Issue No: Vol. 25, No. 3 (2020)
       
  • Accounting for Those in the Hands of the Belligerent: Security Detainees,
           the Missing and the Dead in the Israeli–Hamas Conflict
    • Authors: Margalit A.
      Pages: 565 - 598
      Abstract: Five Israeli nationals, two soldiers and three civilians, have gone missing since the 2014 Israeli–Hamas violent escalation, and they are currently held incommunicado by Palestinian armed groups in the Gaza Strip. In response, the Israeli Government revoked some entitlements from Hamas security detainees held in Israel. It also withholds bodies of Palestinian militants, killed while carrying out attacks against Israelis, refusing to hand them over to the families. The bodies are to be buried in Israel until Israeli nationals, or their remains, are repatriated by Hamas. In several instances where the authorities returned the remains to the next of kin, they imposed various restrictions on the funeral arrangements. The Israeli Supreme Court recently examined the Government’s practices, with some judges finding them unlawful. These developments call for the analysis of the matter under the law of armed conflict (LOAC), taking into account that other States involved in armed conflict encounter similar challenges. This article accordingly discusses some of the legal obligations arising when persons, or their remains, are believed to be in the hands of the belligerent party. It also considers the legality of certain measures taken to promote their repatriation.
      PubDate: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/kraa019
      Issue No: Vol. 25, No. 3 (2020)
       
  • John Reynolds, Empire, Emergency, and International Law
    • Authors: Said W.
      Pages: 599 - 602
      Abstract: ReynoldsJohn, Empire, Emergency, and International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2017, 342pp. ISBN-13: 978-1107172517
      PubDate: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/kraa012
      Issue No: Vol. 25, No. 3 (2020)
       
  • Marina Lostal, International Cultural Heritage Law in Armed Conflicts:
           Case-Studies of Syria, Libya, Mali, the Invasion of Iraq, and the Buddhas
           of Bamiyan
    • Authors: Bagheri S.
      Pages: 603 - 605
      Abstract: LostalMarina, International Cultural Heritage Law in Armed Conflicts: Case-Studies of Syria, Libya, Mali, the Invasion of Iraq, and the Buddhas of Bamiyan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 198 pp. ISBN: 9781316620496, £21.99 (paperback).
      PubDate: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/krz025
      Issue No: Vol. 25, No. 3 (2019)
       
  • Daragh Murray, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Armed Groups
    • Authors: Rodenhäuser T.
      Pages: 605 - 609
      Abstract: MurrayDaragh, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Armed Groups.West Sussex: Hart Publishing, 2016, 323 pp. ISBN: 9781509901630, £65.00
      PubDate: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/krz029
      Issue No: Vol. 25, No. 3 (2019)
       
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
 


Your IP address: 3.227.208.0
 
Home (Search)
API
About JournalTOCs
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-