Authors:Buse GENİŞ; Kaan Cem GENİŞ Abstract: World War I was won at the end of 1918 by the Entente States formed by the bloc of Britain, France and the USA. After the war, the victorious States signed separate armistice agreements with the defeated States. The armistice of Mondros was signed with the Ottoman government on October 30, 1918. Therepercussions of World War I were widely covered in the press of both the victorious and the defeated States. In this study the numbers published in 1919 by “Current History” magazine, which was the spokesman of the Paris Peace Conference, which was convened to create the new world order after World War I will be discussed. This journal gave extensive information about both the Entente and the Alliance states. The main element of the study was formed from the news about the Turks in this journal. The views of the victorious States about the Turks and the Turkish state and the actions they have designed will be discussed. An attempt will be made to enricht hearticle with the addition of the “Current History” Journal as well as various academic sources. This article aims to provide important data in the journal “Current History” in terms of showing the perspectives of the Entente States to the Turks. PubDate: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +030
Authors:Zeynep Burcu ŞAHİN Abstract: After the period of national struggle, Turkey entered a new era; Differences of opinion, which were not taken into account during the war, started to show themselves. Military and political leaders who worked together during the period of national struggle had a disagreement on these issues in the period when the economic, political, and social change had begin; These differences of opinion, fed by personal resentments and mutual distrust between the leaders, paved the way for the birth of the Terakkiperver Cumhuriyet Party, the second political party of the Republic of Turkey. The Terakkiperver Cumhuriyet Party and the dissident Istanbul press that supported it stated the transition to a new era in Turkey which bears the pain of democratization and modernization efforts. Examining this short-term wave of freedom and opposition seen in the press and suspended with the Law of Reconciliation is important for the correct reading of our democratic history. The restrictions on the freedom of the press implemented in the following period differ from the tyranny of the press in authoritarian and totalitarian regimes. These restrictions are against any idea that advocates retrogression and any threat to progress. The subject of this study is the reflections of dissenting views on the press during the transition to the multi-party system and the situation of the press of the period. The study aims to shed light on the problems experienced today by looking at the problems experienced in the democratization process in Turkey from the perspective of freedom of the press. PubDate: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +030
Authors:Esin YÜZBAŞI Abstract: After the Turkish women were granted the right to vote and be elected on 5 December 1934, 17 women deputies entered the parliament in the 1935 general election for the 5th term of the parliament. In the by-elections held in this period, the number of female deputies rose to 18, with 1 more deputies entering the parliament. These 18 deputies took their place in history as the first female deputies of Turkey. Although Turkish women were given the right to vote and be elected in 1934, the first female deputy representing Zonguldak entered the parliament in the 10th term parliamentary elections held on May 2, 1954. Edibe Sayar, a lawyer and writer, became the first female deputy of Zonguldak. Edibe Sayar served as Petition Commission Member, Education Commission Member, Ministry of Justice Commission Member, Parliamentary Presidency Council Clerk Member and Classification Member of Budget Committee. In this study, it is aimed to reveal the law proposals, motions, commission studies, speeches and clerk duties of 10th term Deputy Edibe Sayar in the parliament. PubDate: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +030
Authors:Recep Murat GEÇİKLİ Abstract: The prerequisit for the development of societies in every field are based on the educational system they have. On the other hand, higher education is the last important stage of education. For this reason, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk gave importance to education and training both during the National Struggle and the following period. This process continued even after his death. In addition to the universities in Istanbul and Ankara, the opening of universities in various regions of Anatolia was a continuation of this process. The Democrat Party government especially dealt with this issue and established new universities in Trabzon, Izmir, Ankara and Erzurum. Accordingly, a commission was established upon the invitation of the Minister of National Education. After its meetings, this commission presented an advisory report to the government on the location, conditions, and type of universities planned to open. In this study, at first the history of higher education in Turkey is discussed. This report, which contributed to higher education and was not used in any studies, was examined in detail. PubDate: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +030
Open Access journal
[12 journals]
