Subjects -> PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND COPYRIGHTS (Total: 27 journals)
Showing 1 - 9 of 9 Journals sorted alphabetically
Berkeley Technology Law Journal     Free   (Followers: 17)
Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 20)
GRUR International     Full-text available via subscription  
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 28)
International Data Privacy Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 29)
International Journal of Intellectual Property Management     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 29)
IP Theory     Open Access   (Followers: 12)
JIPITEC Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law     Open Access   (Followers: 26)
John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 7)
John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law     Free   (Followers: 10)
Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship     Open Access   (Followers: 35)
Journal of Data Protection & Privacy     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 7)
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 30)
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR)     Open Access   (Followers: 24)
Law, State and Telecommunications Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 14)
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property     Open Access   (Followers: 8)
Propiedad Intelectual     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial     Open Access  
The Journal of World Intellectual Property     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25)
Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi     Open Access  
Web Journal of Current Legal Issues     Open Access   (Followers: 6)
World Patent Information     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 17)
Similar Journals
Journal Cover
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Number of Followers: 30  
 
  Hybrid Journal Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
ISSN (Print) 1747-1532 - ISSN (Online) 1747-1540
Published by Oxford University Press Homepage  [414 journals]
  • The destruction of copyright—are jurisprudence and legislators throwing
           fundamental principles of copyright under the bus'
    • Authors: Bäcker K; Feindor-Schmidt U.
      Pages: 41 - 55
      Abstract: The authorsDr Kerstin Bäcker and Dr Ursula Feindor-Schmidt, LLM, are lawyers based in Cologne and Munich.This articleRecent developments in both EU jurisprudence and legislation regarding the liability regime for platforms which provide access to content uploaded by the services’ users give rise to concern about a destruction and dilution of the fundamental principles of copyright.The outcome of the current struggle between right-holders and platforms both in the courts and the legislature will have an immense impact on the rights of artistic, business and scholarly creators—as well as the entertainment, media and publishing industries that serve them.This article looks at the reasons why it makes sense to protect the exclusive rights granted by copyright and their fundamental principles, and how current developments in EU jurisprudence and legislation are endangering basic principles of protection.
      PubDate: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa209
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2021)
       
  • The lost tribe: SEP licensing practices in German post-Huawei
           jurisprudence
    • Authors: Heitto J.
      Pages: 56 - 65
      PubDate: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa208
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2021)
       
  • Claiming rights to Augmented Space: current and future scenarios
    • Authors: Faccio S.
      Pages: 79 - 88
      PubDate: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa206
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2021)
       
  • Let’s do away with the notion of the “personal brand”
    • Authors: Wilkof N.
      Pages: 1 - 2
      Abstract: Should we be comfortable with the concept of the “personal brand”' Or does it threaten to pollute the integrity of the notion of a “brand”, as the IP world has come to know it' A brand is a brand is a brand. But maybe not.
      PubDate: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa202
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2020)
       
  • A patentable computer program could only be one button press away
    • Authors: Lam O; Smith J.
      Pages: 3 - 4
      Abstract: Lenovo (Singapore) PTE Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents [2020] EWHC 1706 (Pat), 9 July 2020
      PubDate: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa185
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2020)
       
  • Wheely good result for BMW in the Patents Court 
    • Authors: Strath J.
      Pages: 5 - 7
      Abstract: Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v Premier Alloy Wheels (UK) Ltd [2020] EWHC 2094 (Pat), 30 July 2020
      PubDate: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa184
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2020)
       
  • US Supreme Court precludes judicial review of time-bar challenges of US
           Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board institution
           decisions 
    • Authors: Macedo C; Lisiewski C, Sturm C.
      Pages: 7 - 8
      Abstract: Thryv, Inc v Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, No 18-916, 140 S Ct 1367, 20 April 2020
      PubDate: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa170
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2020)
       
  • Lionel Messi v EUIPO: 2-0. Court of Justice blows final whistle on
           opposition proceedings involving Leo Messi
    • Authors: Martin S.
      Pages: 9 - 11
      Abstract: Court of Justice of the European Union, Cases C449/18P and C474/18P, MESSI (fig.)/MASSI et al., EU:C:2020:722, 17 September 2020
      PubDate: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa177
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2020)
       
  • Genuine use of a mark without a single sale. Possible' ‘Yes!’,
           says the General Court
    • Authors: Martin S.
      Pages: 11 - 13
      Abstract: General Court of the EU, Case T-677/19, SYRENA, EU:T:2020:424, 23 September 2020
      PubDate: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa201
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2020)
       
  • Land Rover fails to defend 3D shape mark oppositions
    • Authors: Woolgar A.
      Pages: 13 - 15
      Abstract: Jaguar Land Rover Limited v Ineos Industries Holdings Limited, High Court of Justice of England and Wales [2020] EWHC 2130 (Ch), 3 August 2020
      PubDate: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa193
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2020)
       
  • SkyKick—a continuing saga: infringement, injunction, costs and
           appeals 
    • Authors: Meale D.
      Pages: 16 - 17
      Abstract: Sky v SkyKick [2020] EWHC 990 (29 April 2020) and [2020] EWHC 1735, 2 July 2020
      PubDate: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa205
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2020)
       
  • AG Hogan advises CJEU to rule that disclosure of evidence in court
           proceedings is not a communication to the public
    • Authors: Malovic N.
      Pages: 17 - 18
      Abstract: Opinion of Advocate General Hogan in Case C-637/19 BY v CX, EU:C:2020:650, 3 September 2020In his Opinion on 3 September 2020, Advocate General (AG) Hogan advised the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to rule that the electronic transmission by a party to proceedings of protected materials as evidence to a court does neither constitute a communication nor a distribution to the public under, respectively, Articles 3(1) and 4(1) of Directive 2001/29 (the InfoSoc Directive).
      PubDate: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa176
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2020)
       
  • Brazil is one step closer to implementation of the Nagoya Protocol
    • Authors: Carls S.
      Pages: 19 - 20
      Abstract: Nagoya Protocol Approval, Legislative Decree No 136 of 11 August 2020
      PubDate: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa181
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2020)
       
  • ‘Thou shalt not pass’—trade mark and design offices and courts as
           guardians of public policy and morality
    • Authors: Gommers C; De Pauw E, Letten I.
      Pages: 21 - 40
      PubDate: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa191
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2020)
       
  • Meet my artificially-intelligent virtual self: creative avatars, machine
           learning, smart contracts and the copyright conundrum
    • Authors: Lim E.
      Pages: 66 - 78
      Abstract: The authorDr Eugene C Lim is a faculty member at the City University of Hong Kong School of Law.This articleArtificial intelligence (AI) technologies have, in recent years, triggered a dramatic paradigm shift in how we conceive of authorship and creation. Intelligent machines, such as those powered by the new GPT-3 neural network technology, are capable of generating expressions, composing text, performing translations and producing other ‘creative’ outputs once thought to be beyond the ability of computers.This article will focus on intelligent AI applications (or ‘creative avatars’) that are programmed to replicate the ‘style’ of a human author (such as Shakespeare, Rembrandt or JK Rowling), and the regulatory challenges flowing from the generation of such works. While much of the literature in the field has proposed fairly significant modifications to traditional copyright rules in dealing with AI-generated content, this article adopts a different approach by suggesting that interim solutions can be found outside of the ‘copyright box’.In particular, it will propose a consent-based contract framework, featuring digital watermarks and blockchain technologies, as an interim solution to regulate rights in relation to works generated by creative avatars, at least in the early years of emerging neural network technologies, in an effort to facilitate the dissemination of AI-generated derivative works and to promote the eventual enrichment of the public domain.
      PubDate: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa192
      Issue No: Vol. 16, No. 1 (2020)
       
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
 


Your IP address: 100.26.179.251
 
Home (Search)
API
About JournalTOCs
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-