Subjects -> PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND COPYRIGHTS (Total: 28 journals)
Showing 1 - 9 of 9 Journals sorted alphabetically
Berkeley Technology Law Journal     Free   (Followers: 15)
Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 17)
GRUR International     Full-text available via subscription  
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24)
International Data Privacy Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27)
International Journal of Innovation Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
International Journal of Intellectual Property Management     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 26)
Invention Disclosure     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
IP Theory     Open Access   (Followers: 10)
JIPITEC Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law     Open Access   (Followers: 21)
John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law     Free   (Followers: 8)
Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship     Open Access   (Followers: 29)
Journal of Data Protection & Privacy     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 5)
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25)
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR)     Open Access   (Followers: 22)
Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4)
Law, State and Telecommunications Review     Open Access  
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 13)
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property     Open Access   (Followers: 7)
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial     Open Access  
The Journal of World Intellectual Property     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22)
World Patent Information     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 15)
Similar Journals
Journal Cover
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Number of Followers: 25  
 
  Hybrid Journal Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
ISSN (Print) 1747-1532 - ISSN (Online) 1747-1540
Published by Oxford University Press Homepage  [419 journals]
  • The DSM Directive 3 years on: have we found our digital single market
           yet'

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Rosati E.
      Pages: 397 - 398
      PubDate: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpac035
      Issue No: Vol. 17, No. 5 (2022)
       
  • Scientific TDM exception and communication to the public: did Italians do
           it better … or at least not worse'

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Calabrese B.
      Pages: 399 - 406
      Abstract: The authorBernardo Calabrese is Postdoctoral Researcher in Commercial Law at Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy.AbstractThe Italian transposition of the (EU) exception for text and data mining in favour of research organizations and cultural heritage institutions (Article 3 of Directive 2019/790) is of particular interest. At a first glance, it may appear straightforward in following the approach of the Directive, but it actually contains a rather surprising addition: unlike its EU counterpart, the Italian exception also encompasses the communication to the public of research results.This addition is all but negligible, requiring further interpretation. By virtue of the normative clause in Article 25 of the Directive, together with the application of general principles on the scope of copyright protection, the Italian provision is compatible with EU law and innovative at the same time.Nonetheless, its meaning appears ambivalent: on the one hand, it completes the freedom of action for scientific research in the EU, according to the same rationale of legal certainty and public support that inspired the reform; on the other hand, it exacerbates the same problems that characterize the Directive in creating by difference a more limited legal framework for commercial initiatives in this field. All things considered, the Italiansolution represents a model—if not of ‘better’— at least of ‘not worse’ harmonization against the impossibility to fix directly the lack of reference to communication to the public that afflicts the EU regime upstream.
      PubDate: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpac026
      Issue No: Vol. 17, No. 5 (2022)
       
  • Bulgaria falls into all the traps set by Article 5 of the CDSM Directive

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Lazarova A.
      Pages: 407 - 413
      PubDate: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpac029
      Issue No: Vol. 17, No. 5 (2022)
       
  • Press publishers’ right in France: a tale of Odyssean gods

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Loutfi Z.
      Pages: 414 - 420
      PubDate: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpac027
      Issue No: Vol. 17, No. 5 (2022)
       
  • The new Italian press publishers’ right: creative,
           fairness-oriented… and invalid'

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Sganga C; Contardi M.
      Pages: 421 - 428
      Abstract: The authorsCaterina Sganga is Associate Professor of Comparative Private Law at Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa. Magali Contardi is Research Fellow in Comparative Private Law at Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa and PhD Candidate at the University of Alicante.AbstractArticle 15 CDSMD introduces a new related right in favour of press publishers, covering the online reproduction and making available of press publications by information society service providers. The final wording of the provision pervasively harmonizes some aspects of the new right, but leaves sensitive matters in the discretion of national legislatures, such as the notion of short extracts, the devise of specific licensing and/or distributing schemes and the related possibility to interfere with parties’ freedom to contract.Halfway down the road of the transposition process, divergences on key points are already emerging: some Member States have adopted solutions that present controversial features, which characterize them as cases in point of the side effects that an act of imperfect harmonization such as Article 15 CDSMD may engender.As a paradigmatic example of this trend, this article focuses on the Italian transposition of the press publisher’s right, offering a critical assessment of its most salient features and testing its validity under EU law on the basis of the indications provided so far by the European Commission and the CJEU. The result of this exercise will also be useful to draw the margin of discretion left to other Member States in the implementation of Article 15 CDSMD.
      PubDate: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpac028
      Issue No: Vol. 17, No. 5 (2022)
       
  • The Polish transposition of the press publishers’ right: waiting for
           the miracle'

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Kowala M.
      Pages: 429 - 436
      PubDate: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpac037
      Issue No: Vol. 17, No. 5 (2022)
       
  • The Finnish transposition of Article 17 of Directive 2019/790: progress or
           regress'

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Melart S.
      Pages: 437 - 442
      Abstract: The authorSamuli Melart (LLM) is a Doctoral Candidate Researcher in IP Law at University of Turku (Finland) and Project Researcher at IPR University Center. He is also an expert member in the Finnish Copyright Council.AbstractThe ongoing process to transpose Article 17 of Directive 2019/790 (‘CDSMD’) into national law has proven challenging in Finland. Policy fluctuations in the Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture have resulted in highly bipolar legislative drafting, which has produced two highly divergent approaches how to transpose Article 17. The difference shows especially in the provisions transposing the so-called filtering obligations of online content sharing service providers (‘OCSSPs’) under Article 17(4) and limits imposed on it by Article 17(7) and (8).The first Finnish draft bill of 2021 sought to transpose Article 17 by entirely rewriting its provisions. This was meant to rectify conceptual ambiguities and to mitigate fundamental right risks to the users of these OCSSPs. Following closely the Opinion of Advocate General in Polish challenge to Article 17, the first draft limited the use of automated blocking to ‘completely equivalent’ works.The second draft bill of 2022 retracted from rewriting Article 17 and instead switched to transposing it closer to its original wording following Danish and Swedish models. The freedom of expression emphasis and user right considerations of the first draft were largely removed and replaced with hollow reiterations of the Directive recitals.
      PubDate: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpac030
      Issue No: Vol. 17, No. 5 (2022)
       
  • The Italian implementation of Article 17 of Directive 2019/790:
           complaints, appeals and the new powers of AGCOM

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Lavagnini S.
      Pages: 443 - 449
      PubDate: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpac032
      Issue No: Vol. 17, No. 5 (2022)
       
  • Spanish transposition of Arts. 15 and 17 of the DSM Directive: overview of
           selected issues

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Peguera M.
      Pages: 450 - 456
      Abstract: The authorMiquel Peguera is Associate Professor of Commercial Law. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Spain.AbstractThe Spanish DSM Directive has been transposed into Spanish law by means of a Royal Decree Law of November 2021.This article considers the way in which the press publishers’ right and the special regime for online content-sharing service providers have been implemented into Spanish law, focusing on some problematic issues that warrant careful consideration and that might be improved in a future law, currently discussed in the Spanish Parliament, that may end up superseding the initial Decree.
      PubDate: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpac034
      Issue No: Vol. 17, No. 5 (2022)
       
  • The transposition of the transparency obligation pursuant to Article 19
           Directive (EU) 790/2019: an Italian perspective

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Bossi L; Ciani Sciolla J.
      Pages: 457 - 464
      PubDate: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpac033
      Issue No: Vol. 17, No. 5 (2022)
       
  • Something old, something new: Czech transposition of disputes under the
           DSM Directive

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Juřičková J.
      Pages: 465 - 472
      PubDate: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpac031
      Issue No: Vol. 17, No. 5 (2022)
       
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
 


Your IP address: 3.235.176.80
 
Home (Search)
API
About JournalTOCs
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-