Authors:Stefano Stabile, Rosita Cenna, Valentina Sinna, Franchina Veronica, Francesca Mannozzi, Irene Federici, Sara Testoni, Celeste Cagnazzo Pages: 1 - 3 Abstract: We are currently witnessing an increase in procedural and managerial complexities within the field of clinical research, which require greater human and infrastructural resources as well as imply the need for a greater skill set and expertise on the part of professionals. Within this frame of reference clinical trial units and clinical research coordinators play a vital role in the design and conduct of clinical trials in Italy. There is a current recruitment and retention crisis for this specialist role due to a complex set of factors, most likely to have come to a head due to the lack of recognition at the Italian institutional level, that lead to precarious work contracts, lack of identity, and excessive turnover at experimental sites. This article, led by the Italian Group of Clinical Research Coordinator (GIDMcrc), presents some of the issues and ways in which national stakeholders may be able to address this. PubDate: 2023-01-16 DOI: 10.33393/ao.2023.2508 Issue No:Vol. 10 (2023)
Authors:Francesca Fiorentino, Beatrice Canali, Paolo Morelli, Federica Demma Pages: 6 - 12 Abstract: Introduction: This study estimates the change in the costs of second-line or later (2L+) treatments compared to the current scenario, associated with the introduction of brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris®) (BV) in combination with doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (A+AVD) for the treatment of previously untreated (1L) patients with stage IV classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma (cHL). Methods: An economic model has been developed that estimates the variation in treatment costs of 2L+ associated with the introduction of BV in 1L from the point of view of the Italian National Health System over a time horizon of 3 years. The population eligible to receive a treatment of 2L+ has been estimated from the literature, considering an increasing consumption in the three years of A+AVD in 1L. Two main scenarios and several alternative scenarios were considered to address the uncertainty that characterizes the distribution of market shares of 2L+ treatments. Results: In the baseline scenario, over three years, the introduction of BV in 1L is associated with a cumulative reduction in treatment costs of 2L+ of € 1.74 M. In all scenarios, a reduction in treatment costs of 2L+ is confirmed, with a total saving that varies between € 5.6 M and € 1.3 M compared to the main scenarios. Conclusions: The present analysis shows that the introduction of A+AVD in 1L for the treatment of stage IV CD30+ cHL patients is associated with a reduction in treatment costs of 2L+, even if there are some limitations related to the uncertainty of real cost and population estimates. PubDate: 2023-01-16 DOI: 10.33393/ao.2023.2486 Issue No:Vol. 10 (2023)
Authors:Roberto Ravasio, Raffaella Viti, Antonio Saverio Roscini Pages: 13 - 21 Abstract: Background: The aim of this economic evaluation was to compare the cost per responder between vedolizumab and ustekinumab in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) after failure of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors in Italy. Methods: Clinical efficacy was assessed using the results of an Italian large multicentre observational retrospective cohort study. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab as second line therapy in Crohn’s disease patients in which tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors failed. Clinical efficacy of vedolizumab and ustekinumab was measured by clinical response and clinical remission. Treatment costs were based on the number of administrations at 26 or 52 weeks. Cost per responder, based on clinical efficacy and clinical response, was used as a cost-effectiveness indicator. Results: Regardless of the clinical efficacy measure used and the treatment duration considered, the cost per responder was consistently lower for vedolizumab compared with ustekinumab on all clinical measures. Considering the clinical response, the cost per responder at 26 weeks was € 15,640 for vedolizumab and € 23,667 for ustekinumab and at 52 weeks was € 23,927 for vedolizumab and € 30,820 for ustekinumab. Considering the clinical remission, the cost per responder at 26 weeks was € 22,832 for vedolizumab and € 33,786 for ustekinumab and at 52 weeks was € 29,488 for vedolizumab and € 46,847 for ustekinumab. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the validity of results. Conclusion: These results suggest that vedolizumab is a cost-effective option compared with ustekinumab from the perspective of the Italian health service in patients with CD after failure of TNF-α inhibitors. PubDate: 2023-01-16 DOI: 10.33393/ao.2023.2515 Issue No:Vol. 10 (2023)
Open Access journal
