|
|
- Real-World Amount of Clotting Factor Products and Non-Factor Products
Dispensed and Annual Medical Expenditures for Japanese Patients with
Haemophilia A-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background Treatment for haemophilia A has expanded from plasma-derived factor VIII (pdFVIII) and standard half-life (SHL) recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) to extended half-life (EHL) rFVIII and non-factor products that mimic FVIII activity. Objective To determine amounts of clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) and emicizumab dispensed and associated healthcare expenditures in Japanese patients with haemophilia A. Methods This retrospective, non-interventional, observational study analysed data from 2016 to 2020 from a large-scale, hospital-based administrative database. Patients had haemophilia A without inhibitors and ≥ 2 prescriptions of the same CFC or emicizumab. Results In total, 974 patients with haemophilia A (median age, 30.0 years; median follow-up, 3.7 years) were included. Outpatient use of EHL rFVIII and emicizumab increased, although pdFVIII/SHL rFVIII were still used over the study. Median annual total healthcare expenditures/patient increased from ¥9,200,230 in 2016 to ¥19,748,221 in 2020. Overall, the median annual drug expenditure/patient increased from ¥8,723,120 in 2016 to ¥18,051,689 in 2020. Drug expenditure was highest with emicizumab, with an increase in median annual expenditure/patient from 2018 (n = 4, ¥26,030,206) to 2020 (n = 107, ¥45,430,408). Overall, 233 patients (23.9%) switched from an SHL to an EHL product. Although amounts of FVIII prescribed increased in the 3 months after switching, overall, there was no noticeable difference before and after switching. Median total healthcare and FVIII product expenditures increased following switching. Conclusions Prescribing of EHL products increased over the study and healthcare expenditures increased for patients who switched from SHL to EHL rFVIII products.
PubDate: 2024-08-10
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00420-7
- Prescribing Cascades of Loop Diuretics and Anti-vertigo Drugs Following
Treatment with Gabapentinoids and Benzodiazepines: Prescription Sequence
Symmetry Analysis of a Large-Scale Claims Database Including Japanese
Older Adults-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background Gabapentinoids (GBP) and benzodiazepines (BZ) are commonly prescribed in older adults and their package inserts list edema and vertigo as adverse drug reactions. These adverse drug reactions may be treated with symptomatic drug therapies without discontinuing the culprit drugs or decreasing their dose, thereby initiating a prescribing cascade and often resulting in polypharmacy. Whether prescribing cascades occur in the treatment of edema and dizziness among Japanese patients treated with GBP and BZ has not been investigated, including treatment with mirogabalin, a class drug of GBP marketed in Japan. Objective We aimed to investigate prescribing cascades with GBP-induced and BZ-induced edema and dizziness treated with loop diuretics (LD) and anti-vertigo drugs (AVD), respectively, among older adults. Methods A prescription sequence symmetry analysis design was used to detect signals of prescribing cascades associated with edema and dizziness induced by GBP and BZ (exposure drugs). Loop diuretics and AVD were the outcome drugs used to identify prescribing cascades following the initiation of exposure drugs. The study population consisted of enrollees of a large-scale health claims database provided by DeSC Healthcare, Inc., between April 2014 and March 2021. Subjects eligible for a prescription sequence symmetry analysis were patients aged ≥ 65 years prescribed an outcome drug within 90 days before and after exposure drug initiation. A signal of a prescribing cascade was detected if secular trend-adjusted sequence ratios were statistically significant on comparison of the frequencies of outcome drug initiation before and after exposure drug initiation. Results We identified 2671 patients with prescriptions of a GBP-LD combination, 4009 with a GBP-AVD combination, 8675 with a BZ-LD combination, and 9462 with a BZ-AVD combination. The adjusted sequence ratios for GBP-LD and BZ-LD cascades were significantly larger than one (adjusted sequence ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.69 [1.56–1.83]; 1.35 [1.29–1.41], respectively), indicating positive signals of prescribing cascades. No signal was detected for the GBP-AVD or BZ-AVD cascade (0.89 [0.83–0.94]; 0.90 [0.87–0.94], respectively). The adjusted sequence ratio for the mirogabalin cascade was higher than that for pregabalin (2.23 [1.84–2.71] vs 1.59 [1.46–1.73]). Conclusions Our study provides good evidence that LD-prescribing cascades associated with edema would be a class effect of GBP and BZ. Edema emerging around 1 month after GBP initiation should be carefully differentiated from pathological edema, and undue LD prescription as a prescribing cascade should be avoided.
PubDate: 2024-08-08
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00446-x
- Enhancing Outcomes in Chronic Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease Through
Aggressive Management of Nintedanib-Induced Adverse Drug Reactions: A
Retrospective Analysis-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background and Objectives Nintedanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is integral in slowing pulmonary fibrosis progression in chronic fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) often limits its use, leading to treatment discontinuation, typically within 3–12 months. Discontinuation adversely affects patient outcomes. The study investigated whether aggressive ADR management can prolong nintedanib therapy and improve patient outcomes. Methods This retrospective, single-center study enrolled Taiwanese patients with chronic fibrotic ILD who were treated with nintedanib from January 2016 to December 2022 in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Patients were categorized into those who discontinued treatment within 180 days and those continuing beyond. Management of ADRs was identified through concurrent prescriptions for symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or hepatic dysfunction. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, pulmonary function tests, and instances of acute exacerbation were analyzed. Results The study enrolled 94 patients, with 71 (75.5%) experiencing ADRs. Among these, 41 (43.6%) discontinued nintedanib within 180 days. The administration of medications for managing nausea/vomiting [17 (41.5%) versus 36 (67.9%), p = 0.0103] and diarrhea [12 (29.3%) versus 33 (62.3%), p = 0.0015] was less frequent in the discontinued group compared with the continued group. Additionally, a higher incidence of acute exacerbation was observed in the discontinued group (34.1% versus 20.8%, p = 0.016). Conclusion Aggressive management of ADRs may enhance patient tolerance to nintedanib, potentially prolonging treatment duration and improving outcomes in chronic fibrotic ILD.
PubDate: 2024-08-05
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00443-0
- Exploring the Association Between Heart Rate Control and
Rehospitalization: A Real-World Analysis of Patients Hospitalized with
Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), lower discharge heart rate (HR) is known to be associated with better outcomes. However, the effect of HR control on patient outcomes, and the demographic and clinical determinants of this association, are not well documented. Objectives The purpose of this work was to evaluate the association between the HR control and the risk of post-discharge rehospitalization in patients hospitalized with HFrEF. Methods Data were collected using a retrospective medical record review in the USA. Reduction in HR between admission and discharge (“HR control”) defined the primary exposure, categorized as no reduction, > 0 to < 20% reduction, and ≥ 20% reduction. Time to first rehospitalization in the post-discharge follow-up defined the study outcome and was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression modeling. Results A total of 1002 patients were analyzed (median age, 63 years; median follow-up duration, 24.2 months). At admission, 59.1% received beta-blockers, 57.4% received diuretics, and 47.5% received angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Most patients (90.5%) achieved some HR control (38.4% achieved > 0 to < 20% reduction, and 52% achieved ≥ 20% reduction). Approximately 39% were rehospitalized during the follow-up (14% within 30 days). In multivariable analysis, patients with > 0 to < 20% reduction in HR had a 39% lower risk of rehospitalization [hazard ratio 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43–0.85]; patients with ≥ 20% reduction in HR had a 38% lower rehospitalization risk (hazard ratio 0.62; 95% CI 0.45–0.87) than those with no HR reduction. Conclusions Reduction in HR between admission and discharge was associated with reduced risk for rehospitalization. Findings indicate HR control as an important goal in the management of patients hospitalized for HFrEF.
PubDate: 2024-08-01
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00436-z
- Comparison of Real-World On-Label Treatment Persistence in Patients with
Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Guselkumab Versus Subcutaneous Tumor
Necrosis Factor Inhibitors-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background Treatment persistence among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is essential for achieving optimal treatment outcomes. Guselkumab, a fully human interleukin-23p19-subunit inhibitor, was approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of active PsA in July 2020, with a dosing regimen of 100 mg at week 0, week 4, then every 8 weeks. In the Phase 3 DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 studies of patients with active PsA, 94% of guselkumab-randomized patients completed treatment through 1 year and 90% did so through 2 years (DISCOVER-2). Real-world evidence is needed to compare treatment persistence while following US prescribing guidelines (i.e., on-label persistence) for guselkumab versus subcutaneous (SC) tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis). Methods Adults with PsA receiving guselkumab or their first SC TNFi (i.e., adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, or golimumab) between 14 July 2020 and 31 March 2022 were identified in the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database (first claim defined the treatment start date [index date]). Baseline characteristics and biologic use (biologic-naïve/biologic-experienced) were assessed during the 12-month period preceding the index date. Baseline characteristics were balanced between cohorts using propensity-score weighting based on the standardized mortality ratio approach. The follow-up period spanned from the index date until the earlier of the end of continuous insurance eligibility or end of data availability. On-label persistence, defined as the absence of treatment discontinuation (based on a gap of 112 days for guselkumab or 56 days for SC TNFi) or any dose escalation/reduction during follow-up, was assessed in the weighted treatment cohorts using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. A Cox proportional hazards model, further adjusted for baseline biologic use, was used to compare on-label persistence between the weighted cohorts. Results The guselkumab cohort included 526 patients (mean age 49.8 years; 61.2% female) and the SC TNFi cohort included 1953 patients (mean age: 48.5 years; 60.2% female). After weighting, baseline characteristics were well balanced with a mean follow-up of 12.3–12.4 months across cohorts; 51.5% of patients in the guselkumab cohort and 16.7% in the SC TNFi cohort received biologics in the 12-month baseline period. Respective rates of treatment persistence at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 91.2%, 84.1%, 75.9%, and 71.5% for the guselkumab cohort versus 77.3%, 61.6%, 50.0%, and 43.7% for the SC TNFi cohort (all log-rank p < 0.001). At 12 months, patients in the guselkumab cohort were 3.0 times more likely than patients in the SC TNFi cohort to remain persistent on treatment (p < 0.001). Median time to discontinuation was not reached for the guselkumab cohort and was 8.9 months for the SC TNFi cohort. Conclusion This real-world study employing US commercial health-plan claims data to assess on-label treatment persistence in PsA demonstrated that, at 12 months, guselkumab was associated with a 3 times greater likelihood of persistence compared with SC TNFi. Graphical abstract 
PubDate: 2024-07-31
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00428-z
- Impact of Third-Generation Antiseizure Medications on People with Epilepsy
in a Low-Income Population: The Brivaracetam Experience in a Real-World
Study-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background Third-generation antiseizure medications, such as brivaracetam, are recognized for their superior safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profiles. However, their potential benefits are often limited in low-income populations because of challenges related to availability and affordability. Objective We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of brivaracetam for treating epilepsy in a low-income population, within a real-world setting. Methods This retrospective cohort study included individuals with epilepsy from a low-income population in Bogotá, Colombia, who were treated with brivaracetam between January 2020 and July 2023. Effectiveness (mean seizure reduction and ≥ 50% seizure reduction) and safety (retention rate and adverse events) were evaluated. Results A total of 106 individuals were included, with a median age of 33 years (interquartile range: 24–44). Most had focal epilepsy with a median disease duration of 25.4 years (standard deviation: 13.6). The baseline seizure frequency was 4 seizures per month (interquartile range: 2–15) and individuals had previously received a mean of 4.4 (standard deviation: 1.8) antiseizure medications. The mean percentage seizure reduction at 3, 6, and 12 months was 55.3%, 66.9%, and 63.8%, respectively. Additionally, 60%, 63.8%, and 65.9% of individuals achieved a ≥ 50% seizure reduction at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Retention rate at 3 months was 89% (n = 95) and 18.7% (n = 20) reported adverse effects. Conclusions In a real-world setting, brivaracetam has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of epilepsy in individuals from a low-income population. This study suggests that people with epilepsy living in this context can significantly benefit from the use of third-generation antiseizure medications.
PubDate: 2024-07-23
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00445-y
- The Association Between Deep Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, and
Janus Kinase Inhibitors: Reporting Status and Signal Detection in the
Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background Although Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have expanding indications, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are serious adverse events associated with their use. Moreover, their analysis using the Japanese database of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports has not yet been conducted. Objective The objective of this study was to analyze the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER) to evaluate the association between JAK inhibitors and DVT and PE. Methods JADER reports from April 2004 to October 2023 were analyzed. A classification of reports for the period covered was performed by drug, and an imbalance analysis was performed with oral JAK inhibitors as the target drug and DVT, PE, and “embolic and thrombotic events, venous” (Standardised MedDRA Query; SMQ) as the target adverse events. Reported odds ratios (ROR) and information components (IC) were calculated for signal detection. Results Overall, 6631 JAK inhibitor-related adverse events were reported, including 60 and 41 cases of DVT and PE, respectively. The ROR and IC of the JAK inhibitors for DVT were 2.52 (1.95–3.25) and 1.27 (0.41–2.13), while those of baricitinib for DVT were 4.37 (2.83–6.73) and 1.90 (0.47–3.33), respectively. ROR signals were detected for JAK inhibitors for PE and “embolic and thrombotic events, venous (SMQ),” overall and for several JAK inhibitors but none for IC. Conclusions Several JAK inhibitors are under postmarketing phase vigilance, and the number of reported adverse events is low. However, when administering these drugs, care should be taken to avoid the development of thromboembolism, considering the patient’s background.
PubDate: 2024-07-20
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00447-w
- Disease Stage and Motor Fluctuation Duration Predict Drug Tolerability: A
Real-Life, Prospective Italian Multicenter Study on the Use of Opicapone
in Parkinson’s Disease-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background Opicapone is a third-generation catechol-O-methyl-transferase inhibitor currently used for the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease. Its benefit and safety have been established by clinical trials; however, data about its use in a real-life context, and particularly in an Italian population of patients with Parkinson’s disease, are missing. Objectives We aimed to gather data about the real-life tolerability/safety of opicapone when used for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease-related motor fluctuations. Methods We enrolled 152 consecutive patients with Parkinson’s disease and followed them for 2 years after opicapone introduction. We obtained baseline clinical and demographical information, including disease duration, stage, phenotype, as well as axial and non-motor symptoms. We collected the reasons for any treatment interruption and adverse events emerging after opicapone introduction. Results Eighty-nine (58%) patients reported adverse events and 46 (30%) patients discontinued the treatment. Adverse events occurred less frequently in “earlier” patients accordingly to the disease course and l-Dopa treatment pathway; a motor fluctuation duration ≥12 months and Hoehn and Yahr scale score ≥2.5 were the main predictors of therapy withdrawal. Conclusions This study confirms the good tolerability/safety profile of opicapone in a real-life setting and provides country-specific data for Italian patients with Parkinson’s disease.
PubDate: 2024-07-02
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00442-1
- PCSK9 Inhibitors and Infection-Related Adverse Events: A Pharmacovigilance
Study Using the World Health Organization VigiBase-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Aims Protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are novel lipid-lowering agents used in patients with cardiovascular disease. Despite reassuring safety data from pivotal trials, increasing evidence from real-world studies suggests that PCSK9i increase the risk of bacterial and viral infections. Therefore, this study aimed to identify signals of infection-related adverse events (AEs) associated with PCSK9i. Methods We performed an observational pharmacovigilance study using the World Health Organization’s VigiBase, recorded up to December 2022. We included individual case safety reports (ICSRs) of PCSK9 inhibitors, alirocumab and evolocumab, and compared them with those of other drugs. Infection-related ICSRs were retrieved from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities System Organ Class ‘infections and infestations.’ Results Among 114,293 reports (258,099 drug–AE pairs) related to PCSK9 inhibitors, 54% included female patients, 41% included patients aged ≥65 years, and 82% included patients who received evolocumab. Additionally, beyond AEs recognized by regulatory authorities, organ infections such as influenza (reporting odds ratio [ROR] 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.74–3.05), gastric infections (ROR 2.47, 95% CI 1.63–3.75), and kidney infections (ROR 1.36, 95% CI 1.06–1.73) were observed. Sensitivity analysis indicated a heightened risk of infection-related AEs associated with PCSK9i regardless of the specific drug type. Conclusions In addition to the labelled respiratory infections, six infection-related symptoms in the gastrointestinal, urinary, and renal organs were identified. Our findings support the need for systematic surveillance of infections among PCSK9i users.
PubDate: 2024-07-02
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00430-5
- Falls and Fractures among Nursing Home Residents Treated with Pimavanserin
versus Other Atypical Antipsychotics: Analysis of Medicare Beneficiaries
with Parkinson’s Disease Psychosis-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background Reducing falls and fractures remains an important clinical goal in managing older residents with Parkinson’s disease psychosis (PDP) in long-term care/nursing home (LTC/NH) settings. Objectives This analysis examined risk of all-cause falls or fractures among PDP residents on continuous monotherapy with pimavanserin (PIM) versus (i) other atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) [quetiapine (QUE), risperidone (RIS), olanzapine (OLA), aripiprazole (ARI)] and (ii) QUE. Methods A retrospective analysis of parts A, B, and D claims from a 100% Medicare sample (2013–2019) in LTC/NH settings was conducted. LTC/NH residents in the USA initiating continuous monotherapy (PIM versus other AAPs; PIM versus QUE) for ≥ 6 months between 01 January 2014 and 31 December 2018 were 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) on 31 variables (age, sex, race, region, and 27 Elixhauser comorbidities). Outcomes included three measures: risks of falls only, fractures only, and falls/fractures during 6-months follow-up. Demographic characteristics were described using chi-square and t-tests. Generalized linear models were used to assess difference in risks of falls/fractures. Results Of 7187 residents, 47.59% (n = 3420) were female and mean age was 78.8 (± 7.75) years. In total, 14% (n = 1005) were on PIM and 86% (n = 6182) were on other AAPs. After PSM, falls only among PIM residents (n = 1005) was 4.58% (n = 46) versus 7.66% (n = 77) for other AAPs (n = 1005) [relative risk (RR) = 0.63 (0.46, 0.86), p < 0.05] and 8.26% (n = 83) for QUE (n = 1005) residents (p < 0.05). Fractures only among PIM residents was 1.39% (n = 14) compared with 2.09% (n = 21) for other AAPs (p = 0.31) and 1.89% (n = 19) for QUE (p = 0.49), respectively. Taken together, falls/fractures among PIM residents were 5.67% (n = 57) versus 9.05% (n = 91) for other AAPs [RR = 0.63 (0.46, 0.86), p < 0.05] and 9.55% (n = 96) for QUE (p < 0.05), respectively. Conclusions In this analysis of LTC/NH residents with PDP, PIM had a 37% and 41% lower risk of all-cause falls/fractures versus other AAPs and versus QUE, respectively.
PubDate: 2024-06-24
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00433-2
- Six-Month Real-World Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Ixekizumab After
Switching from IL-23 Inhibitors and Other Biologic Therapies: The
CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background Prior work showed that patients from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry who had previously failed a prior biologic and then initiated ixekizumab demonstrated improvements in disease severity and patient-reported outcomes after 6 months. However, newer therapies such as interleukin-23 inhibitors (IL-23i) were not considered. Here, with more recent data including IL-23i, 6-month effectiveness of ixekizumab following a switch from any biologic was assessed as well as whether 6-month effectiveness of ixekizumab was impacted by prior biologic class. Methods We included CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry patients who initiated ixekizumab after discontinuing another biologic therapy and had a corresponding 6-month follow-up visit following ixekizumab initiation (N = 743, 2016–2023). Immediate prior biologic class was categorized as tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or interleukin-12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i, n = 405), non-ixekizumab interleukin-17i (IL-17i, n = 237), or IL-23i (n = 101). Adjusted mean changes in body surface area (BSA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), itch, and skin pain were calculated for prior biologic class groups using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Proportions achieving ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100, respectively), Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1, and DLQI 0/1 were calculated for all patients and compared among prior biologic classes via relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariable modified Poisson regression. Results Mean improvements in BSA, DLQI, itch, and skin pain, were 7.6, 3.6, 23.3, and 16.7, respectively, for ixekizumab patients who switched from TNFi or IL-12/23i (all p < 0.05); 6.8, 3.3, 19.6, and 14.1, respectively, for those who switched from non-ixekizumab IL-17i (all p < 0.05); and 7.8, 3.4, 22.2, and 12.8, respectively, for those who switched from IL-23i (all p < 0.05). Overall, 54%, 41%, and 31% of ixekizumab initiators achieved PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100, respectively, 50% maintained or achieved IGA 0/1, and 48% maintained or achieved DLQI 0/1. The prior TNFi or IL-12/23i group was 31% more likely to achieve PASI100 (RR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.01, 1.69) and 32% more likely to maintain or achieve IGA 0/1 (RR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.11, 1.57), but not significantly more likely to achieve PASI90. The prior IL-23i group was 45% more likely to achieve PASI90 (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.10, 1.91), 55% more likely to achieve PASI100 (RR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.12, 2.13), and 39% more likely to maintain or achieve IGA 0/1 (RR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.12, 1.73) compared to the prior non-ixekizumab IL-17i group. Achievement of PASI75 and DLQI 0/1 was consistent across the prior TNFi or IL-12/23i, IL-23i, and non-ixekizumab IL-17i groups. Conclusions These updated findings with IL-23i data reaffirm that patients with psoriasis who switch to ixekizumab after discontinuing another biologic demonstrate improvement in disease severity and patient-reported outcomes at 6 months in real-world settings. Compared to patients who switched from another IL-17i, patients who switched class from a TNFi or IL-12/23i were more likely to achieve PASI100 and IGA 0/1, and patients who switched class from an IL-23i were more likely to achieve PASI90 in addition to PASI100 and IGA 0/1.
PubDate: 2024-06-24
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00439-w
- Omeprazole and Risk of Hypertension: Analysis of Existing Literature and
the WHO Global Pharmacovigilance Database-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Introduction The association between omeprazole and hypertension is poorly documented. The summary of product characteristics of omeprazole approved by major regulators did not mention hypertension as an adverse drug event. Triggered by a locally reported case, this study was conducted to assess the possible causal relationship between omeprazole and hypertension. Methods Globally reported cases of hypertension following use of omeprazole submitted to the World Health Organization global database, VigiBase, were retrieved on 5 March 2024 and analyzed descriptively. Besides this, a literature search was made to identify preclinical, clinical, and epidemiological information on the association between omeprazole and hypertension or increased blood pressure using different data sources. Relevant information, gathered from different data sources, was finally systematically organized into an Austin Bradford-Hill causality assessment framework to assess the causal relationship between omeprazole and hypertension. Results VigiBase indicated a total of 1043 cases of hypertension related to omeprazole from 36 different countries. In the global database, a statistical signal was triggered (IC025: 0.12) on association of omeprazole and hypertension. From the 1043 cases, 65.0% and 10.6% were reported as ‘serious’ and ‘fatal’, respectively. Hypertension resolved following withdrawal of omeprazole in 85 cases and recurred after re-introduction of the suspect drug in 14 cases. In 225 cases, omeprazole was the only suspected drug, while in 122 cases, omeprazole was the sole drug administered. When only these 122 cases were considered, 29 cases had positive dechallenge, four cases were with positive rechallenge and the median time-to-onset was 2 days. Literature search identified a possible biological mechanism and some experimental evidence that indicates omeprazole could possibly cause hypertension. Conclusion Currently available totality of evidence suggests there is a possible causal relationship between omeprazole and hypertension. Hence, it is recommended to monitor and report any incidence of hypertension related to omeprazole, and further epidemiological studies are recommended to corroborate the suggested causal association.
PubDate: 2024-06-22
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00441-2
- Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients with Metastatic
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Without Actionable Genomic Alterations
Previously Treated with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background For patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, timely molecular testing is essential to determine the appropriate course of therapy. Initial treatment with platinum chemotherapy and/or an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is the standard of care for patients without actionable genomic alterations. Objective We aimed to assess treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, no actionable genomic alterations, and with prior ICI and platinum-based chemotherapy in a community oncology setting. Methods This retrospective observational study examined electronic health records from adult patients with an initial metastatic non-small cell lung cancer diagnosis without actionable genomic alterations from 2017 to 2019. Patients had received a subsequent line of therapy (LOT) [index] after discontinuing platinum-based chemotherapy plus an ICI in the previous one or two LOTs. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were analyzed descriptively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analyses. Results Among the study population (n = 961), the most common index LOT regimens were non-platinum-based chemotherapies (57.3%), platinum-based chemotherapies (12.9%), ICI-based chemotherapies (12.7%), platinum + ICI-based chemotherapies (9.4%), and other (7.7%). The most common post-index LOT regimens were non-platinum based (61.2%), ICI based (15.3%), platinum based (10.7%), platinum + ICI based (3.2%), and other (2.5%). Median time to treatment discontinuation, time to next treatment, and overall survival were numerically longest with index LOT ICI-based regimens (6.5, 9.9, and 18.9 months, respectively) and shortest with platinum-based regimens (2.8, 5.3, and 8.0 months, respectively) and non-platinum-based regimens (2.6, 5.0, and 7.8 months, respectively). Conclusions Among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer without actionable genomic alterations previously treated with platinum + ICIs, non-platinum chemotherapy agents were most commonly prescribed in the index LOT. Clinical outcomes including time to treatment discontinuation, time to next treatment, and overall survival were short, highlighting the unmet need for more effective later-line treatments.
PubDate: 2024-06-19
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00440-3
- Real-world Outcomes of Dual HER2 Blockade Therapy in Metastatic
HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: from Induction to Maintenance-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background and Objective Dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab combined with taxane-based chemotherapy (Cht) has been the standard first-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) for years, due to the impressive results of the CLEOPATRA study. Real-world (RW) studies have become critical for assessing treatment effectiveness and safety in real-life circumstances. The aim of this study was to analyze the treatment outcomes of first-line therapy for HER2-positive mBC in RW clinical practice, specifically focusing on the use of maintenance endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor positive (HR-positive) patients. Methods This retrospective analysis included 106 HER2-positive mBC patients treated with trastuzumab and pertuzumab combined with taxane-based Cht from October 2015 to December 2020 at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb. Results At a median follow-up of 30 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 25 months for the total population (95% confidence interval [CI] 16 - not analyzed). Patients with de novo mBC had longer median PFS than patients with recurrent disease (not reached vs. 18 months; hazard ratio 1.99; 95% CI 0.69–3.64, p<0.022). Age, hormone receptor positivity, visceral involvement, number of Cht cycles and previous adjuvant trastuzumab did not impact PFS. Most HR-positive patients (N=55, 88.7%) received maintenance ET after induction Cht. Conclusion This retrospective study provides additional data on patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes of RW HER2-positive mBC patients treated with pertuzumab and trastuzumab as first-line therapy. In our institution, maintenance ET after induction Cht has become standard clinical practice.
PubDate: 2024-06-16
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00438-x
- The Clinical Course of Bowel Urgency Severity Among Patients with
Inflammatory Bowel Disease—A Real-World Study-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background Bowel urgency is a highly burdensome symptom among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Objectives To assess changes in severity of bowel urgency and identify predictors of worsening or improvement among patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) at 6 months from their enrollment visit. Methods Data from patients in the Study of a Prospective Adult Research Cohort with IBD were analyzed. Enrolled patients with CD or UC with 6-month visits were included. Changes and predictors of bowel urgency severity over 6 months in patients with CD or UC were examined using two separate analyses: (a) “worsening” versus “no change” excluding those with moderate-to-severe bowel urgency at enrollment, and (b) “improvement” versus “no change” excluding those with no bowel urgency at enrollment. The enrollment characteristics were compared within these groups. Results At baseline, in both CD and UC, use of biologics and/or immunomodulators at enrollment was similar across cohorts. Among patients with CD, 206 of 582 (35.4%) reported worsening, and 195 of 457 (42.7%) reported improvement in bowel urgency. Younger age (P = 0.013) and moderate-to-severe bowel urgency (P < 0.001) were associated with improvement. Moderate bowel urgency (P = 0.026) and bowel incontinence while awake (P = 0.022) were associated with worsening. Among patients with UC, 84 of 294 (28.6%) reported worsening, and 111 of 219 (50.7%) reported improvement in bowel urgency. Higher symptomatic disease severity (P = 0.011) and more severe bowel urgency (P < 0.001) were associated with improvement. Conclusions Bowel urgency is an unpredictable and unstable symptom among patients with IBD. Over 50% of patients with CD or UC experienced either worsening or improvement at 6 months postenrollment.
PubDate: 2024-06-15
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00434-1
- Incidence of Liver and Non-liver Cancers After Hepatitis C Virus
Eradication: A Population-Based Cohort Study-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background and Objectives Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) offer a high rate of hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication. However, concerns on the risk of cancer after HCV eradication remain. Our study aimed at quantifying the incidence of cancer in patients treated with anti-HCV therapies in Catalonia (Spain) and their matched controls. Methods This was a population-based study using real-world data from the public healthcare system of Catalonia between 2012 and 2016. Propensity score matching was performed in patients with HCV infection treated with interferon-based therapy (IFN), sequential IFN and DAA (IFN+DAA), and DAA only (DAA) with concurrent controls. We estimated the annual incidence of overall cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and non-liver cancer of HCV-treated patients and their corresponding rate ratios. Results The study included 11,656 HCV-treated patients and 49,545 controls. We found statistically significant increases in the rate of overall cancer for IFN+DAA-treated (rate ratio [RR] 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27–2.46) and DAA-treated patients (RR 1.90, 95% CI 1.66–2.19) and in the rate of HCC for IFN-treated (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02–2.22), IFN+DAA-treated (RR 3.89, 95% CI 2.26–6.69), and DAA-treated patients (RR 6.45, 95% CI 4.90–8.49) compared with their corresponding controls. Moreover, DAA-treated patients with cirrhosis showed an increased rate of overall cancer versus those without cirrhosis (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.51–2.44). Conclusions Results showed that overall cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in Catalonia was significantly higher among HCV-treated patients compared with matched non-HCV-infected controls, and risks were higher in patients with cirrhosis. An increased awareness of the potential occurrence of uncommon malignant events and monitoring after HCV eradication therapy may benefit patients.
PubDate: 2024-06-14
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00437-y
- Association of Drug–Disease Interactions with Mortality or Readmission
in Hospitalised Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review and
Meta-Analysis-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background and Objective Multimorbidity is common in hospitalised adults who are at increased risk of inappropriate prescribing including drug–disease interactions. These interactions occur when a medicine being used to treat one condition exacerbates a concurrent medical condition and may lead to adverse health outcomes. The aim of this review was to examine the association between drug–disease interactions and the risk of mortality and readmission in hospitalised middle-aged and older adults. Methods A systematic review was conducted on drug–disease interactions in hospitalised middle-aged (45–64 years) and older adults (≥65 years). The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42022341998). Drug–disease interactions were defined as a medicine being used to treat one condition with the potential to exacerbate a concurrent medical condition or that were inappropriate based on a comorbid medical condition. Both observational and interventional studies were included. The outcomes of interest were mortality and readmissions. The databases searched included MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Library from inception to 12 July, 2022. A meta-analysis was performed to pool risk estimates using the random-effects model. Results A total of 563 studies were identified and four met the inclusion criteria. All were observational studies in older adults, with no studies identified in middle-aged adults. Most of the studies were at risk of bias because of an inadequate adjustment for covariates and a lack of clarity around individuals lost to follow-up. There were various definitions of drug–disease interactions within these four studies. Two studies assessed drugs that were contraindicated based on renal function, one assessed an individual drug–disease combination, and one was based on the clinical judgement of a pharmacist. There were two studies that showed an association between drug–disease interactions and the outcomes of interest. One reported that the use of diltiazem in patients with heart failure was associated with an increased risk of readmissions. The second reported that the use of medicines contraindicated according to renal function were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality and a composite of mortality and readmission. Three of the studies (total study population = 5705) were amenable to a meta-analysis, which showed no significant association between drug–disease interactions and readmissions (odds ratio = 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.80–1.38). Conclusions Few studies were identified examining the risk of drug–disease interactions and mortality and readmission in hospitalised adults. Most of the identified studies were at risk of bias. There is no universal accepted definition of drug–disease interactions in the literature. Further studies are needed to develop a standardised and accepted definition of these interactions to guide further research in this area.
PubDate: 2024-06-09
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00432-3
- Characterizing Utilization and Outcomes of Digoxin Immune Fab for Digoxin
Toxicity-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background Digoxin is a widely prescribed drug for congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Digoxin has a narrow therapeutic index and toxicity can develop quite easily. Digoxin immune fab (DIF) is an effective treatment for toxicity, however there are limited studies characterizing its impact on clinical outcomes in real-world clinical practice. Objectives The aim of this study was to identify factors and healthcare outcomes associated with digoxin immune fab (DIF) treatment in patients with confirmed/suspected digoxin toxicity. Methods An IRB-approved retrospective chart review of digoxin toxic patients (2011–2020) presenting at an academic healthcare system was conducted. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Patients were stratified by DIF treatment versus non-DIF treatment. DIF utilization patterns (appropriate, use when not indicated, or underutilized) were determined using pre-defined criteria. Severe digoxin toxicity was defined as having one or more of the following: mental status disturbances, antiarrhythmic therapy, acute renal impairment or dehydration, serum digoxin concentration (SDC) > 4 ng/mL, or serum K+ > 5 mEq/mL. Logistic multivariable regression analysis evaluated factors associated with DIF use. All statistical analyses were performed in R version 4.1. Results Data from 96 patients (non-DIF treated group = 49; DIF treated group = 47) were analyzed. DIF was used appropriately in 70 patients (73%), underutilized in 19 (20%), and administered to 7 (7%) patients when it was not indicated. Several clinical parameters differentiated the DIF from the non-DIF group (p < 0.05) including higher mean SDC (3.41 ± 1.63 vs 2.87 ± 1.17), higher mean potassium (5.33 ± 1.48 vs 4.55 ± 0.87), more toxicity severity (85% vs 49%), and more likely to require cardiac pacing (26% vs 4%). Digoxin toxicity resolved sooner in the DIF group (coefficient − 0.702, 95% CI − 1.137 to − 0.267) (p < 0.01) and they had shorter intensive care unit lengths of stay (12.4 ± 20.3 vs 24.4 ± 28.7 days; p = 0.018). The all-cause mortality rate in patients appropriately managed with DIF therapy versus those patients where DIF was underutilized was 11% and 21%, respectively. Conclusions Based on our study population, DIF therapy appears to be beneficial in limiting duration of toxicity and intensive care unit lengths of stay in digoxin toxic patients. Although DIF was appropriately utilized in most cases, there was a relatively high proportion of cases in which DIF treatment was either underutilized or not indicated.
PubDate: 2024-06-05
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00435-0
- The Association Between Antidepressant Use and Drug-Induced Liver Injury:
A Nationwide, Population-Based Case–Control Study in Taiwan-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Background and Objective The complex risk factors of liver injury have prevented the establishment of causal relationships. This study aimed to explore the effects of antidepressant class, cumulative days of medication exposure, presence of comorbidities, and the use of confounding drugs on the risk of antidepressant-induced liver injury. Methods The population-based case–control study sample included individuals registered on the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database between 2000 and 2018. Hospitalized patients with suspected drug-induced liver injury were considered as cases, while control subjects were matched 1:1 by age, gender, and index date (the first observed diagnosis of liver injury). Multivariable regression models were performed to evaluate the association between antidepressants and liver injury. Results The findings showed that antidepressant users exhibited a higher risk of liver injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12–1.20), particularly those prescribed non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (NSRIs; aOR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01–1.10), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; aOR 1.22; 95% CI 1.16–1.29), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs; aOR 1.18; 95% CI 1.13–1.24), and others (aOR 1.27; 95% CI 1.14–1.42). Moreover, cases exhibited a more significant proportion of antidepressant usage and longer durations of treatment compared with controls. The risk of liver injury was higher in the first 30 days of use across all classes of antidepressants (aOR 1.24; 95% CI 1.18–1.29). Conclusion SSRIs or SNRIs are commonly used to treat depression and other psychological disorders, and consideration of their potential effects on the liver is essential.
PubDate: 2024-06-05
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00419-0
- Correction to: Efficacy of Three Teriparatide Preparations and
Romosozumab, Osteogenesis Promoters, in the Treatment of Fresh Vertebral
Fractures: A Retrospective Observational Study-
Free pre-print version: Loading...
Rate this result:
What is this?
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
PubDate: 2024-04-06
DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00421-6
|
Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
