A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  

  First | 1 2 3 4 5        [Sort by number of followers]   [Restore default list]

  Subjects -> PSYCHOLOGY (Total: 983 journals)
Showing 601 - 174 of 174 Journals sorted alphabetically
Revista Colombiana de Psicología     Open Access  
Revista Costarricense de Psicología     Open Access  
Revista de Cultura Teológica     Open Access  
Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación     Open Access  
Revista de Investigacion Psicologica     Open Access  
Revista de Psicodidáctica     Open Access  
Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Revista de Psicologia     Open Access  
Revista de Psicología     Open Access  
Revista de Psicología : Segunda Epoca     Open Access  
Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones     Open Access  
Revista de Psicología Social, International Journal of Social Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada     Open Access  
Revista Laborativa     Open Access  
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología     Open Access  
Revista Psicológica Herediana     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista Wímb Lu     Open Access  
Revue de psychoéducation     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée / European Review of Applied Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Revue québécoise de psychologie     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia     Open Access  
Roeper Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Rorschachiana     Hybrid Journal  
RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics     Open Access  
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Satir International Journal     Open Access  
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14)
Scandinavian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review     Hybrid Journal  
School Psychology Quarterly     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 8)
School Psychology Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Scientonomy : Journal for the Science of Science     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Seeing and Perceiving     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Self and Identity     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23)
Sexual Abuse A Journal of Research and Treatment     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 43)
Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 9)
Sexual Offending : Theory, Research, and Prevention     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Simmel Studies     Full-text available via subscription  
Sleep Medicine     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22)
Sleep Medicine : X     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Social Action : The Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology     Free   (Followers: 3)
Social and Personality Psychology Compass     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 19)
Social Behavior and Personality : An International Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 14)
Social Cognition     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 20)
Social Inclusion     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Social Issues and Policy Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Social Psychological and Personality Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 40)
Social Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 33)
Social Psychology Quarterly     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 24)
Social Science Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 31)
Society and Security Insights     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Socio-analysis     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
Socioaffective Neuroscience and Psychology     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Somnologie - Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
South African Journal of Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Spanish Journal of Psychology     Hybrid Journal  
SSM - Mental Health     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Studia z Kognitywistyki i Filozofii Umysłu     Open Access  
Studies in Asian Social Science     Open Access  
SUCHT - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis / Journal of Addiction Research and Practice     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4)
Suma Psicologica     Open Access  
Tajdida : Jurnal Pemikiran dan Gerakan Muhammadiyah     Open Access  
Teaching of Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11)
Terapia Psicológica     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Tesis Psicologica     Open Access  
TESTFÓRUM     Open Access  
The Arts in Psychotherapy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
The Brown University Psychopharmacology Update     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
The Clinical Neuropsychologist     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 13)
The International Journal of Psychoanalysis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
The Journals of Gerontology : Series B : Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 21)
The Psychoanalytic Quarterly     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
The Sport Psychologist     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Themenzentrierte Interaktion     Hybrid Journal  
Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Therapeutic Communities : The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 17)
Thérapie familiale     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 6)
Thinking & Reasoning     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Tobacco Use Insights     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Torture Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Transactional Analysis Journal     Hybrid Journal  
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24)
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25)
Undecidable Unconscious : A Journal of Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Universal Journal of Psychology     Open Access  
Unoesc & Ciência - ACHS     Open Access  
Vinculo - Revista do NESME     Open Access  
VIVESIANA     Open Access  
Voices : The Art and Science of Psychotherapy     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Wege zum Menschen : Zeitschrift für Seelsorge und Beratung, heilendes und soziales Handeln     Hybrid Journal  
Wellbeing, Space & Society     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Western Undergraduate Psychology Journal     Open Access  
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
Yaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi / Life Skills Journal of Psychology     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Zeitschrift für Arbeits - und Organisationspsychologie A&O     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie     Full-text available via subscription  
Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie und -psychiatrie     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Zeitschrift für Individualpsychologie     Hybrid Journal  
Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Zeitschrift für Psychodrama und Soziometrie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Zeitschrift für Psychologie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie     Hybrid Journal  
Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)

  First | 1 2 3 4 5        [Sort by number of followers]   [Restore default list]

Similar Journals
Journal Cover
Organizational Psychology Review
Journal Prestige (SJR): 1.635
Citation Impact (citeScore): 3
Number of Followers: 16  
 
  Hybrid Journal Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
ISSN (Print) 2041-3866 - ISSN (Online) 2041-3874
Published by Sage Publications Homepage  [1176 journals]
  • Developing, Testing, or Extending Theory with Meta-analyses

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Jan L. Pletzer, Dana L. Joseph, Claudia Buengeler, Roni Reiter-Palmon
      Pages: 169 - 177
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Volume 14, Issue 2, Page 169-177, May 2024.
      In recent decades, meta-analyses have become an increasingly popular method to summarize empirical evidence. In this editorial, we outline what we expect from meta-analyses and which meta-analyses are (not) likely to published in Organizational Psychology Review. Most importantly, we describe how meta-analyses can be used to develop, test, or extend theories, which is crucial given the centrality of theories to move the entire field forward. In addition, meta-analyses provide a unique opportunity to develop a detailed agenda for future research by pinpointing gaps in or additions to theory, and by identifying methodological deficiencies that prevent the development, testing, or extension of theories. At last, we provide suggestions for appropriate meta-analytic methods that can help to make a substantial theoretical contribution and briefly outline methodological expectations for meta-analyses submitted to Organizational Psychology Review.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-06-07T05:25:04Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866241245813
      Issue No: Vol. 14, No. 2 (2024)
       
  • Application of Justice Theory to Address Social Issues: Introduction to
           the Special Issue

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: D. Ramona Bobocel, Joel Brockner
      Pages: 282 - 287
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Volume 14, Issue 2, Page 282-287, May 2024.

      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-06-07T05:25:10Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866241228425
      Issue No: Vol. 14, No. 2 (2024)
       
  • How Justice Theory and Research Can Help Address Organizational and
           Societal Problems

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Joel Brockner, D. Ramona Bobocel
      Pages: 288 - 306
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Volume 14, Issue 2, Page 288-306, May 2024.
      Organizational justice scholars have examined the consequences and causes of employees’ fairness perceptions. Given the reliability of what is known about how, when, and why fairness perceptions matter, we can and should contribute to addressing the pressing problems of our times, regardless of whether they primarily reside within organizations (e.g., diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)) or outside of organizations (e.g., climate change, political extremism). Our focus aligns with more general calls for responsible management research (Tsui, 2022). Accordingly, we illustrate the implications of organizational justice scholarship for addressing three issues: DEI, climate change, and political extremism. We also consider some of the barriers associated with translating organizational justice theory and research to practice, offer some recommendations on how to overcome those barriers, and delineate some of the unintended consequences of our best efforts. Finally, we describe ways in which organizational justice scholars can make our knowledge more accessible in public domains.Plain Language Summary Title: Application of Justice Theory and Research to Help Address Organizational and Societal ProblemsPlain Language Summary: Given the reliability of what is known about how, when, and why fairness perceptions matter, we suggest that it is time for organizational justice scholars to use our knowledge to help address the pressing problems of our times, regardless of whether they primarily reside within organizations. Our focus aligns with more general calls for responsible management research (Tsui, 2022). Accordingly, we illustrate the implications of organizational justice scholarship for addressing three issues: diversity equity and inclusivity, climate change, and political extremism. We also consider some of the barriers associated with translating organizational justice theory and research to practice, offer some recommendations on how to overcome those barriers, and delineate some of the unintended consequences of our best efforts. Finally, we describe ways in which organizational justice scholars can make our knowledge more accessible in public domains.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-06-07T05:24:57Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866241232139
      Issue No: Vol. 14, No. 2 (2024)
       
  • The Contributions of Social/Organizational Psychology to Policing

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Tom R. Tyler
      Pages: 307 - 322
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Volume 14, Issue 2, Page 307-322, May 2024.
      This article reviews the contributions of social/organizational psychology to social reform in the area of law and legal institutions. Social/organizational psychology provides theoretical models for legal authority based on popular legitimacy, something that is created and maintained when laws are created and when legal authority is implemented through just procedures. This alternative model provides a contrast to the generally dominant deterrence model and, when adopted, leads to a more desirable relationship between community members and legal authorities because it motivates not only compliance but also cooperation with legal authorities and community engagement.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-06-07T05:25:02Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866231225142
      Issue No: Vol. 14, No. 2 (2024)
       
  • Doing justice: Moving from the pain and trauma of injustice to healing

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Robert J. Bies, Laurie J. Barclay
      Pages: 323 - 345
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Volume 14, Issue 2, Page 323-345, May 2024.
      Injustice lies at the heart of many societal challenges. By adopting the lens of injustice, we argue that critical insights and interventions can be illuminated. We highlight the importance of healing for addressing the pain and trauma of injustice as well as the role of justice in the healing process, where it can serve as a motivating force (e.g., when people desire justice), healing salve (e.g., when people “do justice”), and desired end state (e.g., working towards a just society). In doing so, we outline how to facilitate healing from injustice and enable the transition from injustice to justice. We provide an agenda for future research that showcases the importance of further understanding the pain and trauma of injustice. We conclude with a call for scholars and practitioners to engage in courageous action to recognize the toll of injustice, promote healing, and work towards a more just society.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-06-07T05:24:58Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866231225083
      Issue No: Vol. 14, No. 2 (2024)
       
  • Imagine moving behavioral science findings languishing in scholarly
           journals to public consumption

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Gary P. Latham, Alex Alonso
      Pages: 360 - 369
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Volume 14, Issue 2, Page 360-369, May 2024.
      Where has our reach and impact gone' As behavioral scientists, it is incumbent upon us to extend the reach of our work. Doing so is never easy unless you follow a few approaches. This manuscript underscores the imperative for behavioral scientists to communicate their research findings beyond traditional academic confines, targeting non-scientific audiences. We outline strategic steps that scholars can adopt to enhance the visibility, accessibility, and impact of their research. These include (1) translating scientific jargon into comprehensible language; (2) leveraging digital platforms like blogs, podcasts, and social media; (3) collaborating with media professionals for broader outreach; (4) engaging in public talks and community forums; and (5) developing buy-in from the audiences needed for organizational success. Implementing these strategies not only reinforces the societal relevance of social behavioral science, but also fosters a more informed and engaged public, bridging the gap between academia and the broader community.Plain language summary (latham & alonso)Too often behavioral scientists find themselves languishing in navel-gazing postures because of our incentivization systems. We, behavioral scientists, are rewarded for publishing in peer-reviewed journals where we communicate with one another in the most abstruse jargon imaginable. It comes as no surprise then that we seldom find ourselves translating theory into applied work and, even more seldom, making an impact on real-world problems.While we find ourselves in low-impact, high navel-gazing situations often, there are several things we can do to take application to theory and, vice versa, enhance theory into applied settings. Throughout this manuscript, Latham and Alonso provide a thorough examination of how behavioral scientists can develop partnerships with stakeholder groups. Further, they examine how learning programs can adapt to build partnership skillsets among behavioral scientists. Finally, they apply their findings to an example involving the application of theory around interactive justice.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-06-07T05:25:00Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866231225086
      Issue No: Vol. 14, No. 2 (2024)
       
  • Trust in Human-Agent Teams: A Multilevel Perspective and Future Research
           Agenda

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Jessica L. Wildman, Daniel Nguyen, Amanda L. Thayer, Valerie T. Robbins-Roth, Meredith Carroll, Kendall Carmody, Cherrise Ficke, Mohammed Akib, Arianna Addis
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Ahead of Print.
      As technology continues to advance, interest in how humans perceive and interact with autonomous agents has increased, spurring ample research within human-agent teams (HATs). However, the word team is a bit of a misnomer, in that much of this research has examined one human in relation to one agent. We extend the HAT literature by applying a multilevel lens to develop future research questions regarding trust in heterogeneous HATs. First, we assert that trust is an attitude that is multireferent, suggesting research should explore not just humans’ trust in agents, but many other perspectives such as agents’ trust in humans. Second, we assert that trust is multilevel, suggesting research should explore higher-level emergent forms of trust. Third and fourth, we assert trust is dynamic and event-based, suggesting research should explore discontinuous changes in trust in response to events such as agent- and human-enacted trust violation and repair.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-05-22T01:01:28Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866241253278
       
  • An inconvenient truth about “bundling” commitment, engagement, and
           embeddedness: Unbundling to extend theory on turnover motivations and
           beyond

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Carl P. Maertz, Clark D. Johnson, Brittney C. Bauer
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Ahead of Print.
      This paper critiques a research practice that we call “bundling,” which has produced highly popular constructs in the organizational behavior literature, including organizational commitment, employee engagement, and organizational embeddedness. We show how these bundled constructs, using broad labels from common parlance, have produced overlapping meanings, confounded theoretical mechanisms, and imposed limiting “ideal employee” conceptions in the literature, organizations, and ultimately, societal discourse about employees. We argue that “unbundling” these constructs can provide multiple benefits to theory, empirical inquiry, and practical assessment of complex employee motives. As a demonstration, we unbundle the three focal constructs to integrate and clarify their component relations within the nomological net of turnover motivation. Thereby, we enrich conceptions of proximal withdrawal states, while synthesizing the most comprehensive model of turnover motivations. Finally, we discuss further research implications suggested by unbundling our focal constructs, and unbundling more generally.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-05-09T06:36:06Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866241245310
       
  • Physical Challenge Interventions and the Development of Transferable
           Skills for the Workplace: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: William P. Tyne, David Fletcher, Nicola J. Paine, Clare Stevinson
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Ahead of Print.
      This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesising the existing research on the effectiveness of interventions featuring physical challenges for developing transferable skills and psychological health outcomes. Results from 47 independent samples across 44 studies revealed that the overall proximal effects of the interventions were medium (g = 0.51) and that effects gradually diminished over time (g = 0.39). Analyses across individual outcomes revealed interventions positively influenced interpersonal (g = 0.55), intrapersonal (g = 0.53), and cognitive skills (g = 0.53), as well as psychological health outcomes (g = 0.56). Moderator analyses indicate interventions can be potentially beneficial irrespective of design and participants involved. However, the current state of the literature does not truly allow for thorough conclusions to be made regarding the appropriateness and effectiveness of physical challenge interventions for organizational settings.Plain Language SummaryTransferable skills, described as interpersonal (e.g., communication), intrapersonal (e.g., resilience), and cognitive skills (e.g., problem-solving), have been identified as indispensable human resources in modern-day workplaces. Researchers have found these skills to be associated with numerous desirable performance (e.g., productivity) and health outcomes (e.g., reduced burnout). Therefore, the demand for occupational initiatives which can develop transferable skills is growing and workplaces are increasingly looking outside of work settings for training and development opportunities. Physical challenge interventions which feature novel outdoor environments and recreational physical challenges (e.g., rock climbing and high ropes courses), in particular, are gaining popularity as a method for enhancing employees' transferable skills and psychological wellbeing. However, no review has attempted to synthesize this body of research relative to the occupational domain. This paper evaluated published literature to identify the types of transferable skills and psychological health-related outcomes that can be developed in working-age adults through participating in physical challenge interventions. Our findings suggest physical challenge interventions can have positive short-and long-term effects on transferable skills, particularly interpersonal and intrapersonal skills, and support psychological health. However, due to the current state of the literature, we are not able to determine whether positive changes transfer to workplaces nor make thorough conclusions on the appropriateness and effectiveness of physical challenge interventions for organizational settings. In our discussions, we highlight methodological limitations of the current evidence base, issues concerning intervention implementation in organizational settings, and provide recommendations for future research.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-04-26T07:32:37Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866241245301
       
  • A systematic review of technology in the after-action review (or debrief)

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Nathanael L. Keiser
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Ahead of Print.
      The after-action review (AAR), also termed debrief, is a training approach that commonly encompasses some form of technology, but technology is largely a tangential consideration, which serves as the impetus for this review. Based on a systematic review of 91 empirical studies (113 AARs), a variety of nuances are identified about (1) where in the AAR technology is used, and the (2) users, (3) type, and (4) use of that technology. Technology is indeed common to AARs, but typically relegated to either aid in the task performance episode (92%) or in the provision of task feedback (52%). More broadly, the findings from the present review reflect the inherent complexity of determining how best to use technology in AARs with little extant guidance. These findings are followed by a set of six recommendations that will ideally spur greater use of technology in AARs to address longstanding issues that attenuate its effectiveness.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-04-17T10:34:52Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866241245314
       
  • It's about the process, not the product: A meta-analytic investigation of
           team demographic diversity and processes

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Allison M. Traylor, Julie V. Dinh, Linnea C. Ng, Denise L. Reyes, Shannon K. Cheng, Natalie C. Croitoru, Eduardo Salas
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Ahead of Print.
      To better understand the effects of demographic diversity on teams, we conducted a meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between team demographic diversity and team processes. Drawing from the categorization-elaboration model, we hypothesized that team demographic diversity elicits opposing effects on team performance via information elaboration and social categorization processes. We also explored several team-level and contextual moderators on these relationships. In our meta-analysis of 406 effects from 38,304 teams, we found that team demographic diversity is related to increased social categorization processes, but we did not find support for a relationship between team demographic diversity and information elaboration. In addition, we identified team education level and occupational and industry context as moderators of these relationships, finding stronger support for moderators of the relationship between diversity and social categorization than the relationship between diversity and information elaboration. We discuss implications of our findings for research and practice.Plain Language SummaryWe summarize previous work on how demographic diversity (i.e., age, gender, race/ethnicity, and nationality diversity) affect how teams work together. We analyzed data from multiple studies and explored the relationship between team demographic diversity and team processes. We also examined various factors that may influence these relationships, including team characteristics and features of a team's context. We found evidence supporting a positive relationship between team demographic diversity and social categorization processes. However, we did not find any support for a relationship between team demographic diversity and information elaboration. We also discovered that team education level, as well as occupational and industry context, impacted the strength of these relationships. Notably, the relationship between diversity and social categorization was more strongly influenced than the relationship between diversity and information elaboration. Our findings have important implications for future research and practical applications in team settings.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-04-16T04:28:31Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866241245312
       
  • Safety Listening in Organizations: An Integrated Conceptual Review

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Alyssa M. Pandolfo, Tom W. Reader, Alex Gillespie
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Ahead of Print.
      Failures of listening to individuals raising concerns are often implicated in safety incidents. To better understand this and theorize the communicative processes by which safety voice averts harm, we undertook a conceptual review of “safety listening” in organizations: responses to any voice that calls for action to prevent harm. Synthesizing research from disparate fields, we found 36 terms/definitions describing safety listening which typically framed it in terms of listeners’ motivations. These motivational accounts, we propose, are a by-product of the self-report methods used to study listening (e.g., surveys, interviews), which focus on listening perceptions rather than actual responses following speaking-up. In contrast, we define safety listening as a behavioral response to safety voice in organizational contexts to prevent harms. Influenced by cognitive, interactional, and environmental factors, safety listening may prevent incidents through enabling cooperative sensemaking processes for building shared awareness and understanding of risks and hazards.Plain Language SummaryNumerous global accidents (e.g., Tenerife air disaster), disasters (e.g., Challenger space-shuttle crash), and scandals (e.g., Enron’s accounting scandal) stem from a shared cause: listeners failing to act upon legitimate voiced concerns. While research mainly centers on understanding and encouraging individuals to raise concerns, fewer studies explore listeners’ responses. In this review, we advocate developing the concept of ‘safety listening’ (listeners’ responses to voice aiming to prevent major harms). Our conceptual review positions safety listening as the necessary counterpart to safety voice; differentiates safety listening from other listening types (e.g., active listening); examines its terms/definitions, explanations, and measurements; and explores its influencers (e.g., listener motives) and impacts (e.g., injuries). Scholars have used 36 unique terms/definitions to describe safety listening (e.g., whistleblower retaliation) and often link it to listeners’ motivations (i.e., they listened because they wanted to). This motivational focus, we argue, is a by-product of using self-report methods (e.g., surveys, interviews) that elicit perceptions rather than observing the actual behavioral responses to voice. To advance the literature, we propose using a standard definition, observing safety listening in real-life data (e.g., 9-1-1 calls, airline transcripts), and exploring mechanisms for how voice and listening cause outcomes (e.g., accidents). In sum, this review creates the foundation for future research to develop a comprehensive and cumulative understanding of safety listening and will ultimately contribute to preventing future accidents and scandals.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-04-13T09:40:54Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866241245276
       
  • Digitally Connected, Evolutionarily Wired: An Evolutionary Mismatch
           Perspective on Digital Work

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Mark van Vugt, Stephen M. Colarelli, Norman P. Li
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Ahead of Print.
      This paper makes the case for an evolutionary mismatch between digital work and the way human ancestors engaged in work. Psychological adaptations for producing things that early humans needed to survive and thrive, such as cognitive mechanisms for obtaining and processing food, toolmaking, and learning valuable working skills, evolved in the context of small networks of hunter–gatherers. These adaptations are central to understanding the significance of work in human evolution. Evolutionary mismatches operate when novel environments cue ancestral adaptations in ways that no longer provide adaptive benefits. We argue that digital work, although efficient and productive, is misaligned with some fundamental human needs, preferences, and routines, thereby illuminating a potential dark side. Yet digitalization also offers opportunities for matching the modern work environment to our evolved work psychology. We conclude with an agenda for advancing research in industrial and organizational psychology on digital work from an evolutionary mismatch perspective.Digital Work and Human EvolutionThis paper talks about how the way we work now with computers and digital technology is verydifferent from how our human ancestors used to work. Our ancestors had to do specific tasks to survive, like finding food and making tools. These tasks were done in small nomadic groups. Our brains evolved to be good at these tasks. But now, our work is mostly done on computers with digital tools. This can sometimes make us feel stressed or unhappy because it doesn't match up with what our brains are good at. However, there are also positive things about working with digital technology, for example, that we can work from anywhere. We should do more research on this topic to understand it better.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-03-20T07:53:49Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866241232138
       
  • Where's the theory contribution' An answer in four parts

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Martin Martin Kilduff, Daniel Daniel O’Sullivan
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Ahead of Print.
      The requirement for a theory contribution in empirical papers causes consternation among some and confusion among many. We address this issue by articulating alternative approaches to theory that include formal modeling, paradigm elaboration, problem solving, and theory emergence from observations. Knowledge about these different approaches will, we believe, help ameliorate disagreement and incomprehension across the research tribes that dominate social science and business school research. Each approach requires different assumptions about truth and the representation of reality. We outline each approach, provide examples, and a short critique. We suggest that what may seem mundane to the critical realist may be eye-opening to the pragmatist who directs attention to practitioners. For the scholar immersed within the walls of a paradigm, a set of stylized facts may challenge and inspire. The secret to innovative theory contributions is to synthesize ideas from the different tribes to use within your own focused research program.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-03-07T07:03:00Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866241233739
       
  • A meta-analytic integration of the faultlines literature

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Sherry M.B. Thatcher, Bertolt Meyer, Youngsang Kim, Pankaj C. Patel
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Ahead of Print.
      Reviewing over 20 years of faultlines research, we conducted a meta-analysis based on 168 studies from 162 papers with a sample size of 24,953 teams. Dormant faultlines are positively and significantly related to conflict and activated faultlines, but contrary to widespread beliefs, not directly related to team performance or team satisfaction. Further, the negative effects of dormant faultlines hinge on their activation; activated faultlines mediate the relationship between dormant faultlines on the one hand, and conflict, information elaboration, team performance, and team satisfaction on the other. However, when controlling for the effect of activated faultlines, there are positive effects of dormant faultlines on information elaboration. The relationship between dormant faultlines and activated faultlines was more pronounced when dormant faultlines were based on demographic attributes. Additionally, dormant faultlines were negatively related to team performance when teams were not top management or board teams and when studies were conducted in labs. We synthesize these results to provide a robust agenda for future research on team faultlines.Plain Language SummaryIt has been a little over 25 years since the demographic faultlines construct was introduced to our field by Lau and Murnighan to help explain the mixed effects of diversity research. Hundreds of publications indicate the value of the faultlines construct; however, the results of our meta-analysis suggest that, contrary to widespread belief, there are no direct effects of dormant faultlines (hypothetical faultlines) on team performance or team satisfaction, although dormant faultlines do have a strong positive relationship to conflict. Once activated, faultlines are positively related to conflict, negatively related to information elaboration, and negatively related to team performance and team satisfaction. One bright spot in our findings is that if faultlines are activated and we control for the relationship between dormant faultlines and conflict, teams have more information elaboration suggesting that effective faultline management can have positive effects.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-03-06T08:21:34Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866231225064
       
  • Switching gears: How teams co-construct adaptive leadership style
           transitions in dynamic contexts

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Marie S. Thommes, Sjir Uitdewilligen, Ramón Rico, Mary J. Waller
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Ahead of Print.
      Despite agreement among leadership scholars that the effectiveness of a leadership style is situationally dependent, little is known about the process of effectively switching among different leadership styles as situations unexpectedly change. Organizations rely heavily on teams to quickly and accurately adapt in dynamic contexts, and we focus here on clarifying the process of adaptive leadership style transitions in teams as they cope with situations unexpectedly shifting from requiring process efficiency to requiring collective sensemaking. We review and build on pertinent literature to develop a process model depicting switching among leadership styles not as an isolated act of a team leader, but as interdependent behaviors of a leader and team members in co-constructing the adaptive switching process. We offer testable propositions derived from the model that delineate variables influencing the adaptive leadership process and team adaptive performance. Finally, we discuss future research and practical implications based on the model's exploration.Plain Language SummaryOrganizations depend on teams to pivot quickly when situations unexpectedly change. In some situations, teams must be as efficient as possible; in others, teams must work together to make sense of chaos. Little is known regarding why some teams can quickly switch back and forth among these situations, while other teams stumble. In this paper, we explain how the team leader and team members of adaptive teams work together to co-construct an adaptive switching process that allows the team to accurately sense when a switch is needed and switch leadership behaviors for both leader and team members when the situation so warrants.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-01-31T05:49:10Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866231214238
       
  • Toward a Strategic Perspective of Meeting Participation

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Stephenson J. Beck, Emily A. Paskewitz, Joseph A. Allen
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Ahead of Print.
      Participation in meetings is a multifaceted process. Meeting members must consider individual and meeting goals when creating their messages, as well as a host of other context and resource factors. The purpose of this essay is to create a framework through which to consider meeting member contributions. Pulling from literature in impression management, resource conservation, and meeting science, the essay introduces a strategic perspective of meeting participation and categorizes five meeting participation types. Implications of this perspective on future meeting research are considered.Plain Language SummaryOver the years, meeting attendance has become a larger and larger portion of employee workload. Meetings are salient locations of work, where group members interact in a way that advances the organizational goal. Since meeting interactions showcase group members’ preparation and competence, meeting participation is important not only to the purposes of the group but also to the reputation and credibility of the group members. The theoretical framework in this essay showcases the factors that influence how group members choose to participate in meetings. Group members must balance the need to maintain a good impression during meeting interaction while also weighing how much energy to use given the myriad responsibilities that members must juggled. Different meeting characteristics (e.g., virtual meetings and group size) may influence how members try to maintain good impressions and conserve energy. The intersection of these member goals creates five ways that individuals participate in meetings: full participation, nonparticipation, pretend participation, token legitimacy, and off/on participation. Meeting members may use one or several of these approaches during the course of a meeting, depending on how they balance their impression management and resource conservation goals.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-01-23T07:32:51Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866231226405
       
  • Justice theory as a framework for policy-making consultation

    • Free pre-print version: Loading...

      Authors: Deborah E. Rupp, Niti Pandey, Dale S. Rothman
      Abstract: Organizational Psychology Review, Ahead of Print.
      In this paper, we respond to the call by Brockner and Bobocel for leveraging justice research to address critical social issues. Pulling from research within the areas of policy studies and liberal philosophy, we make three major arguments: a) Critical social issues are “wicked problems,” which combine high decision stakes, high diversity of actors, and high uncertainty, and therefore require the simultaneous and coordinated expertise of multiple disciplines for effective intervention; b) to tackle more far-reaching issues such as these requires a broadening of what is considered “just;” and c) those working within the policy realm are aware of and actively applying many of the justice principles outlined by Brockner and Bobocel. We conclude by converting Brockner and Bobocel's evidence-based insights (along with our extensions) into a consultative framework with which policy makers can audit their progress, decisions, and actions. We argue that it is through this sort of application of justice principles that uncertainty can be managed, durable agreements can be reached, and positive social change can be achieved.
      Citation: Organizational Psychology Review
      PubDate: 2024-01-10T07:50:49Z
      DOI: 10.1177/20413866231225165
       
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
 


Your IP address: 3.92.91.54
 
Home (Search)
API
About JournalTOCs
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-
JournalTOCs
 
 

 A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  

  First | 1 2 3 4 5        [Sort by number of followers]   [Restore default list]

  Subjects -> PSYCHOLOGY (Total: 983 journals)
Showing 601 - 174 of 174 Journals sorted alphabetically
Revista Colombiana de Psicología     Open Access  
Revista Costarricense de Psicología     Open Access  
Revista de Cultura Teológica     Open Access  
Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación     Open Access  
Revista de Investigacion Psicologica     Open Access  
Revista de Psicodidáctica     Open Access  
Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Revista de Psicologia     Open Access  
Revista de Psicología     Open Access  
Revista de Psicología : Segunda Epoca     Open Access  
Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones     Open Access  
Revista de Psicología Social, International Journal of Social Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada     Open Access  
Revista Laborativa     Open Access  
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología     Open Access  
Revista Psicológica Herediana     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista Wímb Lu     Open Access  
Revue de psychoéducation     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée / European Review of Applied Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Revue québécoise de psychologie     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia     Open Access  
Roeper Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Rorschachiana     Hybrid Journal  
RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics     Open Access  
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Satir International Journal     Open Access  
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14)
Scandinavian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review     Hybrid Journal  
School Psychology Quarterly     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 8)
School Psychology Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Scientonomy : Journal for the Science of Science     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Seeing and Perceiving     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Self and Identity     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23)
Sexual Abuse A Journal of Research and Treatment     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 43)
Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 9)
Sexual Offending : Theory, Research, and Prevention     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Simmel Studies     Full-text available via subscription  
Sleep Medicine     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22)
Sleep Medicine : X     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Social Action : The Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology     Free   (Followers: 3)
Social and Personality Psychology Compass     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 19)
Social Behavior and Personality : An International Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 14)
Social Cognition     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 20)
Social Inclusion     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Social Issues and Policy Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Social Psychological and Personality Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 40)
Social Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 33)
Social Psychology Quarterly     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 24)
Social Science Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 31)
Society and Security Insights     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Socio-analysis     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
Socioaffective Neuroscience and Psychology     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Somnologie - Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
South African Journal of Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Spanish Journal of Psychology     Hybrid Journal  
SSM - Mental Health     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Studia z Kognitywistyki i Filozofii Umysłu     Open Access  
Studies in Asian Social Science     Open Access  
SUCHT - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis / Journal of Addiction Research and Practice     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4)
Suma Psicologica     Open Access  
Tajdida : Jurnal Pemikiran dan Gerakan Muhammadiyah     Open Access  
Teaching of Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11)
Terapia Psicológica     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Tesis Psicologica     Open Access  
TESTFÓRUM     Open Access  
The Arts in Psychotherapy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
The Brown University Psychopharmacology Update     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
The Clinical Neuropsychologist     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 13)
The International Journal of Psychoanalysis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
The Journals of Gerontology : Series B : Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 21)
The Psychoanalytic Quarterly     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
The Sport Psychologist     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Themenzentrierte Interaktion     Hybrid Journal  
Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Therapeutic Communities : The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 17)
Thérapie familiale     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 6)
Thinking & Reasoning     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Tobacco Use Insights     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Torture Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Transactional Analysis Journal     Hybrid Journal  
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24)
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25)
Undecidable Unconscious : A Journal of Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Universal Journal of Psychology     Open Access  
Unoesc & Ciência - ACHS     Open Access  
Vinculo - Revista do NESME     Open Access  
VIVESIANA     Open Access  
Voices : The Art and Science of Psychotherapy     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Wege zum Menschen : Zeitschrift für Seelsorge und Beratung, heilendes und soziales Handeln     Hybrid Journal  
Wellbeing, Space & Society     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Western Undergraduate Psychology Journal     Open Access  
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
Yaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi / Life Skills Journal of Psychology     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Zeitschrift für Arbeits - und Organisationspsychologie A&O     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie     Full-text available via subscription  
Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie und -psychiatrie     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Zeitschrift für Individualpsychologie     Hybrid Journal  
Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Zeitschrift für Psychodrama und Soziometrie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Zeitschrift für Psychologie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie     Hybrid Journal  
Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)

  First | 1 2 3 4 5        [Sort by number of followers]   [Restore default list]

Similar Journals
Similar Journals
HOME > Browse the 73 Subjects covered by JournalTOCs  
SubjectTotal Journals
 
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
 


Your IP address: 3.92.91.54
 
Home (Search)
API
About JournalTOCs
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-