Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating. A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Abstract: Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Volume 23, Issue 1, Page iii-iv, May 2022.
Citation: Psychological Science in the Public Interest PubDate: 2022-05-19T05:53:48Z DOI: 10.1177/15291006221085255 Issue No:Vol. 23, No. 1 (2022)
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating. A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Authors:Michael A. Olson, Laura J. Gill Pages: 1 - 6 Abstract: Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Volume 23, Issue 1, Page 1-6, May 2022.
Citation: Psychological Science in the Public Interest PubDate: 2022-05-19T05:53:47Z DOI: 10.1177/15291006221094508 Issue No:Vol. 23, No. 1 (2022)
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating. A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Authors:Anthony G. Greenwald, Nilanjana Dasgupta, John F. Dovidio, Jerry Kang, Corinne A. Moss-Racusin, Bethany A. Teachman Pages: 7 - 40 Abstract: Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Volume 23, Issue 1, Page 7-40, May 2022. Accumulated findings from studies in which implicit-bias measures correlate with discriminatory judgment and behavior have led many social scientists to conclude that implicit biases play a causal role in racial and other discrimination. In turn, that belief has promoted and sustained two lines of work to develop remedies: (a) individual treatment interventions expected to weaken or eradicate implicit biases and (b) group-administered training programs to overcome biases generally, including implicit biases. Our review of research on these two types of sought remedies finds that they lack established methods that durably diminish implicit biases and have not reproducibly reduced discriminatory consequences of implicit (or other) biases. That disappointing conclusion prompted our turn to strategies based on methods that have been successful in the domain of public health. Preventive measures are designed to disable the path from implicit biases to discriminatory outcomes. Disparity-finding methods aim to discover disparities that sometimes have obvious fixes, or that at least suggest where responsibility should reside for developing a fix. Disparity-finding methods have the advantage of being useful in remediation not only for implicit biases but also systemic biases. For both of these categories of bias, causes of discriminatory outcomes are understood as residing in large part outside the conscious awareness of individual actors. We conclude with recommendations to guide organizations that wish to deal with biases for which they have not yet found solutions. Citation: Psychological Science in the Public Interest PubDate: 2022-05-19T05:53:46Z DOI: 10.1177/15291006211070781 Issue No:Vol. 23, No. 1 (2022)
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating. A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Pages: 41 - 42 Abstract: Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Volume 23, Issue 1, Page 41-42, May 2022.
Citation: Psychological Science in the Public Interest PubDate: 2022-05-19T05:53:45Z DOI: 10.1177/15291006221099494 Issue No:Vol. 23, No. 1 (2022)
Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
