Authors:Burkhard Liebsch Pages: 5 - 16 Abstract: German Editorial to the Special Issue on Philosophical Theories of War: Contemporary Challenges and Discussions presenting an overview of the latest state of the debate. PubDate: 2021-12-29 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v23i2.262 Issue No:Vol. 23, No. 2 (2021)
Authors:Burkhard Liebsch, Michael Staudigl Pages: 17 - 25 Abstract: English Editorial of the special Issue on Philosophical Theories of War: Contemporary Challenges and Discussions giving an overview of the latest state of the debate. PubDate: 2021-12-29 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v23i2.263 Issue No:Vol. 23, No. 2 (2021)
Authors:Christopher Pollmann Pages: 26 - 61 Abstract: In debate with Bernhard H. F. Taureck, Burkhard Liebsch and other authors, we try to develop a materialistic theory of war. Central to this are the rivalries between sovereign states, which have extended and become more complex in the course of globalization. Both political-economic and symbolic-emotional interests are bundled in them. The competition between states, only partially curbed by supranational authorities, also reflects in so-called international law. In contrast to the domestic legal system, this has indeed only limited legal character, as Thucydides’ famous Melian dialogue shows. PubDate: 2021-12-29 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v23i2.264 Issue No:Vol. 23, No. 2 (2021)
Authors:Bernhard Taureck Pages: 62 - 78 Abstract: There is a consensus on war: violent conflicts are out. But they continue to happen. One likes to exclude violent conflicts and to avoid them. But they could happen. Avoidance of wars appears not be sufficient. International relations presuppose an international anarchy. Anarchy does not exclude wars, but reduces them to exceptions. The present essay attempts to argue in favour of a categorical exclusion of violent conflicts which easily could destroy vital conditions of human survival. PubDate: 2021-12-29 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v23i2.265 Issue No:Vol. 23, No. 2 (2021)
Authors:Reinhard Mehring Pages: 79 - 98 Abstract: In the "Labyrinth of Legitimacy" and Ethos Analysis. Carl Schmitt and Herfried Münkler on the New Wars and New Warriors The article analyzes Münkler's continuation of Carl Schmitt's late work on international law in the book Kriegssplitter and emphasizes its divergent ethical approach. PubDate: 2021-12-29 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v23i2.266 Issue No:Vol. 23, No. 2 (2021)
Authors:James Dodd Pages: 99 - 116 Abstract: Is something like a true "philosophy of war"—understood as a coherent system of ideas, or a clearly articulated theoretical posture adequate to fully addressing the enduring chal-lenges of war on a properly philosophical register—at all possible' What follows is an attempt to outline, in four problems, the parameters of any future critique of a philosophy of war: the problem of categories, the problem of representation, the problem of violence, and finally the problem of peace. It is argued that within each horizon delimited by these four problems philosophy encounters a potential limit, one that raises fundamental doubts regarding the cogency of any philosophy of war considered as a systematic enterprise. PubDate: 2021-12-29 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v23i2.267 Issue No:Vol. 23, No. 2 (2021)
Authors:Debra Bergoffen Pages: 117 - 129 Abstract: Examining the continuities and differences between war and war-like violence, focusing on the war like violence of racism and rape through the lens of Sartre’s ontology of “The Look”, Merleau-Ponty’s concept of a body schema, and Beauvoir’s analysis of women as “the sex”, I argue that war-like violence deploys the affect perceptions of shame, degrada-tion, humiliation and disgust to violate the ontological contract of intersubjectivity and mutual vulnerability. PubDate: 2021-12-29 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v23i2.268 Issue No:Vol. 23, No. 2 (2021)
Authors:Petar Bojanić Pages: 130 - 144 Abstract: The text reconstructs the protocol of 'victory' as part of the interruption of enmity and establishment of temporary peace. Different understandings of the enemy and enmity imply that victory in war and cessation of conflict can essentially determine the way war is conducted, and that they follow rules of war. Victory is supposed to be a crucial moment that characterizes the ethics of war. Particular testimonies and thematizations of victory in the Orthodox Christian tradition can provide an intro-duction into a potential ethics of war that could ensure a new relationship towards the enemy and killing the enemy. PubDate: 2021-12-29 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v23i2.269 Issue No:Vol. 23, No. 2 (2021)
Authors:Burkhard Liebsch Pages: 145 - 175 Abstract: Wars and Fatal Illusions of Defeatability as a Threat. Metatheoretical Observations and Desiderata of a Contemporary Philosophy of Martial Violence This essay deals with the question how war threatens us even when peace seems to reign. Refering to Heraklit, Kant, and recent theories of war, the author takes answers to this question into account especially with respect to the problem if it is possible to keep in check illusions which make us believe that one can get rid of enmity by way of 'final solutions'. PubDate: 2021-12-29 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v23i2.270 Issue No:Vol. 23, No. 2 (2021)
Open Access journal
