JournalTOCs

Evaluation Journal of Australasia
Number of Followers: 0

Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
ISSN (Print) 1035-719X - ISSN (Online) 2515-9372
Published by Sage Publications

[1174 journals]

Critical appraisal of the establishment of a theory-informed evaluation
capacity building function in a large government department
- Free pre-print version: Loading...
  Rate this result: What is this?
  
  Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
  A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
  
  Authors: Delyth Lloyd, Eleanor Williams, Desiree Terrill
  Abstract: Evaluation Journal of Australasia, Ahead of Print.
  Evaluation Capacity Building (ECB) is a critical function that can increase uptake, quality and impact of evaluation activity in large organisations. This article describes how ECB theory has been applied in the design and implementation of foundational evaluation training in a large state government department. Appraisal of the first three years (2018–21) establishing the training component of the capacity building function is explored, in light of contemporary capacity building literature. Post-training feedback indicated high degree of participant satisfaction and met need among department staff. One-year follow-up of training workshops indicated that over two-thirds of respondents (68 percent) found evaluation training had a lasting impact on their work, and that participants continued to use evaluation support materials and apply what they had learned. The article provides practical information on this theory-informed approach, to support others who are commencing or delivering evaluation capacity initiatives within public sector agencies or other large organisations, including for those who are adapting training for online delivery during COVID-19. The article identifies lessons learned, including through the experience of moving training online during the COVID-19 pandemic, and presents opportunities to increase the impact of evaluation capacity building.
  Citation: Evaluation Journal of Australasia
  PubDate: 2022-06-21T10:54:37Z
  DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221109311
Suicide story: An evaluation of ‘tackling suicide Our Way’
- Free pre-print version: Loading...
  Rate this result: What is this?
  
  Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
  A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
  
  Authors: John Guenther, Mona Roberts, Keith Buzzacott, Danielle Dyall
  Abstract: Evaluation Journal of Australasia, Ahead of Print.
  Despite concerted efforts to improve strategic responses to suicide, it remains a major concern in Australia. Among Indigenous communities the rates of suicide are up to three times higher than among non-Indigenous communities. Indigenous males are three times as likely to suicide than Indigenous females. The death rates for the Northern Territory are second highest in Australia, at 27.4 deaths per 100,000 population. In the Northern Territory, a program called Suicide Story is working to empower Indigenous people, creating a language to talk about suicide, and giving them tools to respond to the warning signs of suicide. The program was developed by Indigenous people and is run by Indigenous people in response to community needs. This paper draws from an evaluation of the program conducted in the Northern Territory at its 10-year mark, in 2018. Although it is impossible to assess how many lives have been saved, this paper takes a position that resilience is an indicator of prevention. One way to achieving this is through culturally safe processes. Based on the evaluation findings, we consider what that means for Suicide Story and other culturally safe suicide prevention programs designed with and for Indigenous people in Australia.
  Citation: Evaluation Journal of Australasia
  PubDate: 2022-05-24T02:47:22Z
  DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221104841
Assessing achievements in place-based initiatives – developing a
tailor-made tool
- Free pre-print version: Loading...
  Rate this result: What is this?
  
  Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
  A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
  
  Authors: Patricia M O’Connor, Eleanor Clune, Tracey Marriner, Shantanu Sheshgir, Jill Waddell
  Abstract: Evaluation Journal of Australasia, Ahead of Print.
  Assessing achievements of place-based initiatives (PBIs) has become increasingly important in contemporary evaluation practice. While key characteristics of successful PBIs have been described in the literature, the practicalities of assessing implementation progress across multiple PBIs under the umbrella of a single program invoke complex challenges. This article presents the process used to develop a tool for assessing implementation progress across a 14-site PBI aimed at improving health and education outcomes for First Nations children in Australia. Sites included a mix of metropolitan, regional, remote and very remote locations around Australia and varying levels of PBI maturity. A literature scan identified the attributes of successful PBIs and indicators/measures that could be used to evaluate them. These attributes were condensed into eight domains, and a further two were added due to their importance for this evaluation. The identified indicators and measures were mapped against these domains to generate a question bank. A process of consistently rating sites against the measures relevant to each of them enabled the identification of achievements within each site, comparisons between sites and evaluation of the progress of the program overall. The development of this tool provides a case study for developing a practical, fit-for-purpose tool to evaluate PBIs.
  Citation: Evaluation Journal of Australasia
  PubDate: 2022-05-22T11:57:19Z
  DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221102278
Book Review: Evaluation in Today’s world: Respecting diversity,
improving quality and promoting usability
- Free pre-print version: Loading...
  Rate this result: What is this?
  
  Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
  A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
  
  Authors: Charlie Tulloch
  Abstract: Evaluation Journal of Australasia, Ahead of Print.
  
  Citation: Evaluation Journal of Australasia
  PubDate: 2022-04-18T02:11:07Z
  DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221088344
Evaluator Perspective
- Free pre-print version: Loading...
  Rate this result: What is this?
  
  Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
  A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
  
  Authors: Amy Gullickson
  Abstract: Evaluation Journal of Australasia, Ahead of Print.
  
  Citation: Evaluation Journal of Australasia
  PubDate: 2022-01-11T12:04:07Z
  DOI: 10.1177/1035719X211069710
Editorial
- Free pre-print version: Loading...
  Rate this result: What is this?
  
  Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
  A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
  
  Authors: John Guenther
  First page: 61
  Abstract: Evaluation Journal of Australasia, Ahead of Print.
  
  Citation: Evaluation Journal of Australasia
  PubDate: 2022-05-26T12:54:28Z
  DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221090438
Evaluation in the field of early childhood development: A scoping review
- Free pre-print version: Loading...
  Rate this result: What is this?
  
  Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
  A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
  
  Authors: Giulia Puinean, Rebecca Gokiert, Mischa Taylor, Shelly Jun, Pieter de Vos
  First page: 63
  Abstract: Evaluation Journal of Australasia, Ahead of Print.
  Children’s early experiences and environments profoundly impact their development; therefore, ensuring the well-being of children through effective supports and services is critical. Evaluation is a tool that can be used to understand the effectiveness of early childhood development (ECD) practices, programs, and policies. A deeper understanding of the evaluation landscape in the ECD field is needed at this time. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the state of evaluation in the ECD field across four constructs: community-driven evaluation, culturally responsive evaluation, evaluation capacity building, and evaluation use and influence. A comprehensive search of 7 electronic databases, including Canadian and international literature published in English from 2000 to 2020, was conducted. A total of 30 articles met the inclusion criteria. Findings demonstrate that some studies include aspects of a community-engaged approach to evaluation; however, comprehensive approaches to community-driven evaluation, culturally responsive evaluation, evaluation capacity building, and evaluation use in the field of ECD are not commonly achieved. This review will inform strategies for bridging evaluation gaps in the ECD sector, ultimately equipping organisations with the evaluative tools to improve practices, programs, and policies that impact the children, families, and communities they serve.
  Citation: Evaluation Journal of Australasia
  PubDate: 2022-03-25T02:59:02Z
  DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221080575
Evaluating a peer-led wellbeing programme for doctors-in-training during
the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia, using the Most Significant
Change technique
- Free pre-print version: Loading...
  Rate this result: What is this?
  
  Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
  A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
  
  Authors: Karen Crinall, Madeleine Ward, Rebecca MacDonald, William Crinall, James Aridas, Daniel L Rolnik
  First page: 90
  Abstract: Evaluation Journal of Australasia, Ahead of Print.
  This article discusses the use of the Most Significant Change (MSC) technique in a mixed-methods evaluation of a pilot wellbeing programme for obstetrics and gynaecology doctors-in-training introduced at a large public hospital during Melbourne, Australia’s second coronavirus (COVID-19) lockdown, which occurred from 7 July to 26 October 2020. The evaluation was conducted remotely using videoconferencing technology, to conform with pandemic restrictions. MSC complemented the program’s participatory principles and was chosen because it seeks to learn about participants’ perceptions of programme impacts by evaluating their stories of significant change. Stakeholders select one story exemplifying the most significant change resulting from the evaluated program. Inductive thematic analysis of all stories is combined with reasons for making the selection, to inform learnings (Dart & Davies, 2003; Tonkin et al., 2021). Nine stories of change were included in the selection. The most significant change was a more supportive workplace culture brought about by enabling basic needs to be met and breaking down hierarchical barriers. This was linked to five interconnected themes – connection, caring, communication, confidence and cooperation. The evaluation learnings are explored and reflections on remotely conducting MSC evaluation are shared.
  Citation: Evaluation Journal of Australasia
  PubDate: 2022-03-28T04:15:53Z
  DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221080576
Lessons learned in evaluating system interdependencies using qualitative
methods
- Free pre-print version: Loading...
  Rate this result: What is this?
  
  Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
  A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
  
  Authors: Eric Souvannasacd, Heather Engblom, Richard N. Van Eck, Ralph Renger, Marc Basson
  First page: 108
  Abstract: Evaluation Journal of Australasia, Ahead of Print.
  This article shares lessons learned while evaluating the system interdependencies for a clinical and translational research centre (CTR). It explores the methodological challenge of discussing system concepts (e.g., cascading failures, feedback loops, and reflex arcs) with layperson participants during evaluation interviews. The article discusses the iterative process of moving from structured interview approaches in favor of an open narrative approach for data collection and lessons learned.
  Citation: Evaluation Journal of Australasia
  PubDate: 2022-02-15T07:31:41Z
  DOI: 10.1177/1035719X211066961
Evaluator perspective: Doyen Radcliffe and Sharon Babyack
- Free pre-print version: Loading...
  Rate this result: What is this?
  
  Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
  A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
  
  Authors: Anthea Rutter
  First page: 126
  Abstract: Evaluation Journal of Australasia, Ahead of Print.
  
  Citation: Evaluation Journal of Australasia
  PubDate: 2022-01-31T04:47:31Z
  DOI: 10.1177/1035719X211070080
Thematic analysis: A practical guide
- Free pre-print version: Loading...
  Rate this result: What is this?
  
  Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating.
  A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
  
  Authors: Melissa Forbes
  First page: 132
  Abstract: Evaluation Journal of Australasia, Ahead of Print.
  
  Citation: Evaluation Journal of Australasia
  PubDate: 2021-12-10T01:57:55Z
  DOI: 10.1177/1035719X211058251