Subjects -> LAW (Total: 1537 journals)
    - CIVIL LAW (37 journals)
    - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (52 journals)
    - CORPORATE LAW (88 journals)
    - CRIMINAL LAW (28 journals)
    - FAMILY AND MATRIMONIAL LAW (23 journals)
    - INTERNATIONAL LAW (171 journals)
    - JUDICIAL SYSTEMS (23 journals)
    - LAW (937 journals)
    - LAW: GENERAL (11 journals)

LAW (937 journals)            First | 1 2 3 4 5     

Showing 801 - 354 of 354 Journals sorted alphabetically
Tulsa Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
UCLA Entertainment Law Review     Open Access  
UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
UCLA Law Review     Free   (Followers: 8)
UCLA Women's Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Udayana Journal of Law and Culture     Open Access  
UIR Law Review     Open Access  
UniSA Student Law Review     Open Access  
University of Baltimore Journal of Land and Development     Open Access  
University of Baltimore Law Forum     Open Access  
University of Baltimore Law Review     Open Access  
University of Bologna Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
University of Chicago Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 21)
University of Chicago Law School Record     Open Access  
University of Cincinnati Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
University of Kansas Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
University of Massachusetts Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
University of Miami Business Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
University of Miami Law Review     Free   (Followers: 3)
University of Miami National Security & Armed Conflict Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
University of New Brunswick Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
University of New South Wales Law Journal, The     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 18)
University of Pittsburgh Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
University of Queensland Law Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 11)
University of St. Thomas Law Journal     Open Access  
University of Toronto Law Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 14)
University of Vienna Law Review     Open Access  
UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Unnes Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
USFQ Law Review     Open Access  
Utrecht Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Valparaiso University Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Vanderbilt Law Review     Free   (Followers: 5)
Varia Justicia     Open Access  
Veredas do Direito : Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável     Open Access  
Veritas et Justitia     Open Access  
Verstek     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Vertentes do Direito     Open Access  
Via Inveniendi Et Iudicandi     Open Access  
Vianna Sapiens     Open Access  
Victoria University Law and Justice Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Victoria University of Wellington Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 10)
Villanova Environmental Law Journal     Open Access  
Villanova Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Violence Against Women     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 64)
VirtuaJus - Revista de Direito     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Vniversitas     Open Access  
Vox Juris     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Waikato Law Review: Taumauri     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 7)
Washington and Lee Journal of Energy, Climate, and the Environment     Open Access  
Washington and Lee Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Washington Law Review     Free   (Followers: 3)
Washington University Global Studies Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 11)
Washington University Journal of Law & Policy     Open Access  
Washington University Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Wayne Law Review     Free  
Web Journal of Current Legal Issues     Open Access   (Followers: 6)
Western Journal of Legal Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Western New England Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
William and Mary Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice / Recueil annuel de Windsor d'accès à la justice     Open Access  
Wirtschaftsrechtliche Blätter     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics     Open Access  
Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities     Open Access   (Followers: 12)
Yale Journal of Law and Technology     Open Access   (Followers: 12)
Yale Journal on Regulation     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 23)
Yale Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 65)
Yearbook of European Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 18)
Yuridika     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Yurisdiksi : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains     Open Access  
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Zuzenbidea ikasten : Irakaskuntzarako aldizkaria     Open Access  
ZZR : Zbornik Znanstvenih Razprav     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
交大法學評論     Open Access  

  First | 1 2 3 4 5     

Similar Journals
Journal Cover
University of Bologna Law Review
Number of Followers: 1  

  This is an Open Access Journal Open Access journal
ISSN (Online) 2531-6133
Published by Università di Bologna Homepage  [34 journals]
  • What COVID‐19 does to our Universities

    • Authors: Matthias Klatt
      Pages: 1 - 5
      PubDate: 2021-03-27
      DOI: 10.6092/issn.2531-6133/12618
      Issue No: Vol. 6, No. 1 (2021)
  • What Is Next for Digital Trade in a Post‐Brexit Britain' –
           Examining the Regulation of Data Flows Under G.A.T.S. & Possible
           Implications of G.D.P.R. on Britain as a Third Country

    • Authors: Abhishek Rana, Rishabha Meena
      Pages: 6 - 28
      Abstract: Data, much like other currencies, flows cross-border -from one jurisdiction to the other. However, it is hard to regulate the privacy aspects surrounding such free-flowing data by rules strictly based on jurisdiction. This article thereby begins by discussing the importance of data protection regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (G.D.P.R.), followed by a brief analysis of the General Agreement on Trade in Services’ pivotal role in regulating data flows and digital trade, and how it can be further used in checking the World Trade Organisation consistency of various data protection requirements resorted by the European Union (E.U.) so far under the G.D.P.R.. Lastly, the note examines how, post the Brexit transition period, the situation will change for the United Kingdom (U.K.) as it has become a third country for the E.U. data protection regime, with the authors critiquing the various models, including the recent Draft U.K.-E.U. Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement, that may help the U.K. in attaining an “adequacy” status, which is requisite for the continuation of an unconstrained digital trade with the E.U. .
      PubDate: 2021-05-05
      DOI: 10.6092/issn.2531-6133/12880
      Issue No: Vol. 6, No. 1 (2021)
  • Challenging the Undesired Outcome of FIOST Clauses on Cargo Interests

    • Authors: Ahmet Gelgec
      Pages: 29 - 47
      Abstract: Loss of, or damage to goods is a frequent occurrence in the shipping industry, which may often occur as a result of improper cargo-handling operations during loading, discharging or even stowing. This highly concerns cargo interests, as they will seek to reimburse their loss from their carriers under bills of lading. Often, the bill of lading may well contain terms of a charterparty by way of incorporation that allow the carrier to contract out their cargo-related operations. Once this is the case, the cargo interest is unjustly left without a remedy for loss of, or damage to his goods vis-à-vis the carrier under English law. This paper, instead of challenging the correctness of the law firmly established concerning the transfer of these obligations via Free In and Out Stowed and Trimmed (FIOST) clauses, rather, aims to propose ideas to tackle the impact arising out of the status quo under English law. Finally, it offers some plausible suggestions for cargo interests to surmount this undesired outcome.
      PubDate: 2021-05-11
      DOI: 10.6092/issn.2531-6133/12881
      Issue No: Vol. 6, No. 1 (2021)
  • Constituting Over Constitutions

    • Authors: Carter Dillard
      Pages: 48 - 75
      Abstract: In philosophy, legal theory and law, the Grundnorm, or basic norm, is often assumed to be the constitution, or that which overrides other norms. That is incorrect. This paper argues that the grundnorm should be the norm which regulates human procreation. This norm must proceed from the theoretical absence of human power, or a zero baseline. This essay attempts to correct the grundnorm fallacy with what will be called the Zero-Baseline Model. The correction reorients our human rights regimes and family planning systems, in ways that lead to an inevitable list of specific policy reforms that largely invert current family planning models and policies in use at the United Nations, European Union, the United States, and elsewhere. Those reforms can all be described in a simple narrative of reorienting family planning laws and policies from what would-be parents desire, subjectively, towards what all future children need, objectively. And as the evidence shows, those reforms prove highly effective and much more efficient in promoting child welfare, reducing economic and other inequalities, mitigating the climate and other ecological crises, protecting non-humans, and building democracy, than their alternatives.
      PubDate: 2021-07-19
      DOI: 10.6092/issn.2531-6133/13299
      Issue No: Vol. 6, No. 1 (2021)
  • Is a Requirement to Wear a Mask Economically Valid During COVID-19'

    • Authors: Steve G. Parsons
      Pages: 76 - 94
      Abstract: Two of the most important categories of government intervention in response to COVID-19 are business closures and mask mandates. The scientific literature supports the efficacy of mask-wearing to reduce the transmission of respiratory viruses (including COVID-19). However, the efficacy is greater in stopping outbound transmission (meaning that my mask protects you) than inbound transmission (meaning that my mask protects me). Evidence suggests that the full benefits to society of wearing masks are far greater than the full costs to society of wearing masks. The author argues that mask-wearing is far more cost effective than business closures in controlling the spread of COVID-19. Moreover, the author argues that highly infectious diseases have an externality dimension. The person infected with COVID-19 makes a decision regarding whether to wear a mask based on their own perceived costs and benefits of mask-wearing, but that decision has consequences for those they come in contact with: the infected person’s decision not to wear a mask imposes costs on others that are external to the infected person’s decision process not to do so. The author further argues that some possible methods by which to deal with such an external cost (individual negotiations, a tax on spreading COVID-19, or as subsidy for wearing masks) are impractical. This makes a mask-wearing government mandate economically valid.
      PubDate: 2021-08-04
      DOI: 10.6092/issn.2531-6133/13410
      Issue No: Vol. 6, No. 1 (2021)
  • The Price of Transitional Justice: A Cost‐Benefit Analysis of its
           Mechanisms in Post‐Revolution Phase

    • Authors: Eman M. Rashwan
      Pages: 95 - 142
      Abstract: Transitional Justice [hereinafter T.J.] in the post-revolution phase refers to the policies that aim to deal with the autocratic past-regime violations against its people to achieve accountability and democracy and promote human rights and the rule of law. To achieve these goals, the United Nations, within its Rule of Law Initiative, issued in 2010, a set of five mechanisms that work as guidelines for nations recovering from conflicts. I argue that whatever the mechanism or combination selected by a society transforming from an autocracy into democracy is, the nature of these mechanisms requires a trade-off between multiple considerations. To explain this inevitable trade-off, I go through each mechanism in detail, analyze it from both legal and economic perspectives, and then provide a basic cost-benefit analysis. I suggest that transitional justice as a constitutional arrangement requires a holistic approach in its adoption and application because this initial cost-benefit analysis cannot be standardized for all cases. I also suggest that transitional justice policies that take into account proportionality, a combination of different mechanisms, customization of the mechanisms upon the relevant case, and adopting these policies in the formality of basic or organic laws may be expected to have the most effective outcomes achieving the goals of T.J. with the least legal complications.
      PubDate: 2021-10-06
      DOI: 10.6092/issn.2531-6133/13622
      Issue No: Vol. 6, No. 1 (2021)
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762

Your IP address:
Home (Search)
About JournalTOCs
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-