Subjects -> LAW (Total: 1397 journals)
    - CIVIL LAW (30 journals)
    - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (52 journals)
    - CORPORATE LAW (65 journals)
    - CRIMINAL LAW (28 journals)
    - CRIMINOLOGY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT (161 journals)
    - FAMILY AND MATRIMONIAL LAW (23 journals)
    - INTERNATIONAL LAW (161 journals)
    - JUDICIAL SYSTEMS (23 journals)
    - LAW (843 journals)
    - LAW: GENERAL (11 journals)

LAW (843 journals)            First | 1 2 3 4 5     

Showing 601 - 354 of 354 Journals sorted alphabetically
Revista de Ciencias Forenses de Honduras     Open Access  
Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista de Ciências Jurídicas     Open Access  
Revista de Derecho     Open Access  
Revista de Derecho     Open Access  
Revista de Derecho     Open Access  
Revista de Derecho     Open Access  
Revista de Derecho (Concepción)     Open Access  
Revista de Derecho (Coquimbo)     Open Access  
Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo     Open Access  
Revista de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso     Open Access  
Revista de Derecho de la Seguridad Social, Laborum     Open Access  
Revista de Derecho de la Unión Europea     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Revista de Derecho de la Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista de Derecho Fiscal     Open Access  
Revista de Derecho Privado     Open Access  
Revista de Derecho Privado     Open Access  
Revista de Derecho Público     Open Access  
Revista de Direito     Open Access  
Revista de Direito Agrário e Agroambiental     Open Access  
Revista de Direito Ambiental e Socioambientalismo     Open Access  
Revista de Direito Brasileira     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista de Direito da Administração Pública     Open Access  
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi     Open Access  
Revista de Direito Sanitário     Open Access  
Revista de Direito Sociais e Políticas Públicas     Open Access  
Revista de Educación y Derecho     Open Access  
Revista de Estudios de la Justicia     Open Access  
Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista de Estudios Jurídicos y Criminológicos     Open Access  
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito     Open Access  
Revista de Estudos Institucionais     Open Access  
Revista de Historia del Derecho     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho     Open Access  
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba)     Open Access  
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho : Universidad de la República     Open Access  
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas     Open Access  
Revista de la Maestría en Derecho Procesal     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista de la Secretaría del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión     Open Access  
Revista de Llengua i Dret     Open Access  
Revista de Movimentos Sociais e Conflitos     Open Access  
Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça     Open Access  
Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica     Open Access  
Revista Derecho del Estado     Open Access  
Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo     Open Access  
Revista Direito e Práxis     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista Direito GV     Open Access  
Revista Direitos, Trabalho e Política Social     Open Access  
Revista do Curso de Direito     Open Access  
Revista do Curso de Direito do Centro Universitário Brazcubas     Open Access  
Revista dos Estudantes de Direito da UnB     Open Access  
Revista Electrónica Cordobesa de Derecho Internacional Público : RECorDIP     Open Access  
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual     Open Access  
Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito - PUC Minas Serro     Open Access  
Revista Española de Medicina Legal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Revista Estudios Jurídicos     Open Access  
Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista Eurolatinoamericana de Derecho Administrativo     Open Access  
Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia     Open Access  
Revista Historia y Justicia     Open Access  
Revista Icade. Revista de las Facultades de Derecho y Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales     Full-text available via subscription  
Revista Interdisciplinar de Direito     Open Access  
Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Revista Internacional de Derecho del Turismo     Open Access  
Revista Internacional de Doctrina y Jurisprudencia     Open Access  
Revista IUS     Open Access  
Revista Jurídica     Open Access  
Revista Jurídica : Investigación en Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista Jurídica Crítica y Derecho     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revista Jurídica da UFERSA     Open Access  
Revista Jurídica de Asturias     Open Access  
Revista Jurídica de la Universidad de León     Open Access  
Revista Jurídica IUS Doctrina     Open Access  
Revista Jurídica Portucalense/Portucalense Law Journal     Open Access  
Revista Jurídica Universidad Autónoma de Madrid     Open Access  
Revista Latinoamericana de Derecho Social     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Revista Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Revista Opinión Jurídica     Open Access  
Revista Pedagogía Universitaria y Didáctica del Derecho     Open Access  
Revista Persona y Derecho     Full-text available via subscription  
Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurí­dicos e Financeiros     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Revista Quaestio Iuris     Open Access  
Revue du Droit des Religions     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Revue générale de droit     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
Revue internationale de droit pénal     Full-text available via subscription  
Revue pro právo a technologie     Open Access  
Riau Law Journal     Open Access  
Roger Williams University Law Review i     Open Access  
RUDN Journal of Law     Open Access  
Rule of Law and Anti-Corruption Center Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Russian Politics & Law     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 7)
Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 6)
Santa Clara Law Review     Open Access  
Santé mentale et Droit     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
SASI     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Science & Justice     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 312)
ScienceRise : Juridical Science     Open Access  
Scientiam Juris     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Scientometrics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 42)
SCRIPTed - A Journal of Law, Technology & Society     Open Access   (Followers: 16)
Seattle Journal for Social Justice     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Seattle University Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Seqüência : Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos     Open Access  
Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Seton Hall Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Sexual Offending : Theory, Research, and Prevention     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Singapore Academy of Law Journal     Full-text available via subscription  
Singapore Journal of Legal Studies     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Social & Legal Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Società e diritti     Open Access  
Sociologia del diritto     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
South African Crime Quarterly     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
South African Journal of Bioethics and Law     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
South East European University Review (SEEU Review)     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Southern Illinois University Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Sri Lanka Journal of Forensic Medicine, Science & Law     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
St. John's Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Stanford Law & Policy Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 5)
Stanford Law Review     Free   (Followers: 40)
Stanford Technology Law Review     Free   (Followers: 3)
Statute Law Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22)
Statutes and Decisions : Laws USSR     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Strategic Direction     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Studenckie Zeszyty Naukowe     Open Access  
Studia Canonica     Full-text available via subscription  
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia     Open Access  
Studia Iuridica Toruniensia     Open Access  
Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Studies in Social Justice     Open Access   (Followers: 8)
Suffolk University Law Review     Free  
Suhuf     Open Access  
Supremasi Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum     Open Access  
Supreme Court Review, The     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 6)
Sustainable Development Law & Policy     Open Access   (Followers: 12)
Swiss Political Science Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Sydney Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 13)
Syiar Hukum     Open Access  
Tanjungpura Law Journal     Open Access  
Te Mata Koi : Auckland University Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 8)
Teisė : Law     Open Access  
Temas Socio-Jurídicos     Open Access  
Texas Journal of Women and the Law     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Texas Law Review     Free   (Followers: 10)
The American Lawyer     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
The Journal of Legislative Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 13)
The Jurist : Studies in Church Law and Ministry     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
The Modern American     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
THEMIS - Revista de Derecho     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Theoretical Criminology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 44)
Theory and Practice of Legislation     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Tidsskrift for erstatningsrett, forsikringsrett og trygderett     Full-text available via subscription  
Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap     Full-text available via subscription  
Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14)
Tilburg Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Toruńskie Studia Polsko-Włoskie     Open Access  
Touro Law Review     Open Access  
Transnational Environmental Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
Transnational Legal Theory     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Transport Policy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Transportation Planning and Technology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
Trusts & Trustees     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Tulane Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Tulsa Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
UCLA Entertainment Law Review     Open Access  
UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
UCLA Law Review     Free   (Followers: 8)
UCLA Women's Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Udayana Journal of Law and Culture     Open Access  
UIR Law Review     Open Access  
Universitas : Revista de Filosofía, Derecho y Política     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
University of Baltimore Journal of Land and Development     Open Access  
University of Baltimore Law Forum     Open Access  
University of Baltimore Law Review     Open Access  
University of Chicago Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 19)
University of Chicago Law School Record     Open Access  
University of Cincinnati Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
University of Kansas Law Review     Open Access  
University of Massachusetts Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
University of Miami Business Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review     Open Access  
University of Miami Law Review     Free   (Followers: 3)
University of Miami National Security & Armed Conflict Law Review     Open Access  
University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
University of New Brunswick Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
University of New South Wales Law Journal, The     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 15)
University of Pittsburgh Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
University of Queensland Law Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 11)
University of St. Thomas Law Journal     Open Access  
University of Toronto Law Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 14)
University of Vienna Law Review     Open Access  
UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Unnes Law Journal     Open Access  
USFQ Law Review     Open Access  
Utrecht Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi     Open Access  
Valparaiso University Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Vanderbilt Law Review     Free   (Followers: 5)
Varia Justicia     Open Access  

  First | 1 2 3 4 5     

Similar Journals
Journal Cover
Texas Law Review
Journal Prestige (SJR): 1.865
Citation Impact (citeScore): 1
Number of Followers: 10  

  Free journal Free journal
ISSN (Print) 0040-4411
Published by U of Texas Homepage  [4 journals]
  • Originalism, Sex Discrimination, and Age Discrimination
    • Authors: texaslrev_admin
      Abstract: Read Full Article (PDF) Eric S. Fish Posted on November 14, 2012 Eric S. Fish, Originalism, Sex Discrimination, and Age Discrimination, 91 Texas L. Rev. See Also 1 (2012) Recent Yale graduate Eric S. Fish responds to Calabresi and Rickert. Read more
      PubDate: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:17:34 +000
       
  • The Relevance, Role, and Reliability of Audits in the Global Economy
    • Authors: texaslrev_admin
      Abstract: Read Full Article (PDF) Note appears in Issue 7 Mr. James R. Doty Posted on June 24, 2012 90 texas L. Rev. 1891 In The Relevance, Role, and Reliability of Audits in the Global Economy, James R. Doty, Chairman of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), discusses the PCAOB and its oversight work.
      PubDate: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:39:48 +000
       
  • What More Can Be Done to Deter Violations of the Federal SEC Laws'
    • Authors: texaslrev_admin
      Abstract: Read Full Article (PDF) Note appears in Issue 7 Mr. David M. Becker Posted on June 24, 2012 90 Texas L. Rev. 1811 In What More Can Be Done to Deter Violations of the Federal Securities Laws', David Becker of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP and former General Counsel and Senior Policy Director of the U.S SEC discusses recent criticism of the SEC that focuses “on the severity of sanctions the SEC obtains in its settlements with wrongdoers.”  Becker argues that “severity does not guarantee efficacy.”  Becker “suggests that there is probably little to be gained from increasing sanctions and that the SEC probably would be better served by focusing its efforts on increasing the likelihood that certain violations are punished and by redoubling its efforts to move more quickly.”
      PubDate: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:37:36 +000
       
  • The Emperor Has No Clothes: Confronting the D.C. Circuit's Usurpation of
           SEC Rulemaking Authority
    • Authors: texaslrev_admin
      Abstract: Read Full Article (PDF) Note appears in Issue 7 Prof. James D. Cox and Mr. Benjamin J.C. Baucom Posted on June 24, 2012 90 Texas L. Rev. 1811 In The Emperor Has No Clothes: Confronting the D.C. Circuit’s Usurpation of SEC Rulemaking Authority, Professor James D. Cox of Duke University School of Law & Benjamin J.C. Baucom, recent law clerk to Justice Don R. Willett of the Supreme Court of Texas, argue “that the level of review invoked by the D.C. Circuit in Business Roundtable and its earlier decisions is dramatically inconsistent with the standard enacted by Congress.”  They conclude “that the D.C. Circuit has assumed for itself a role opposed to the one Congress prescribed for courts reviewing SEC rules.”
      PubDate: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:35:06 +000
       
  • Do Labyrinthine Legal Limits on Leverage Lessen the Likelihood of
           Losses' An Analytical Framework
    • Authors: texaslrev_admin
      Abstract: Read Full Article (PDF) Book Review appears in Issue 7 Profs. Andrew W. Lo and Thomas J. Brennan Posted on June 24, 2012 90 Texas L. Rev. 1775 A common theme in the regulation of financial institutions and transactions is leverage constraints. Although such constraints are implemented in various ways—from minimum net capital rules to margin requirements to credit limits—the basic motivation is the same: to limit the potential losses of certain counterparties. However, the emergence of dynamic trading strategies, derivative securities, and other financial innovations poses new challenges to these constraints. We propose a simple analytical framework for specifying leverage constraints that addresses this challenge by explicitly linking the likelihood of financial loss to the behavior of the financial entity under supervision and prevailing market conditions. An immediate implication of this framework is that not all leverage is created equal, and any fixed numerical limit can lead to dramatically different loss probabilities over time and across assets and investment styles. This framework can also be used to investigate the macroprudential policy implications of microprudential regulations through the general-equilibrium impact of leverage constraints on market parameters such as volatility and tail probabilities.
        Read more
      PubDate: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:32:04 +000
       
  • Governments as Shadow Banks: The Looming Threat to Financial Stability
    • Authors: texaslrev_admin
      Abstract: Read Full Article (PDF) Book Review appears in Issue 7 Prof. Viral V. Acharya Posted on June 24, 2012 90 Texas L. Rev. 1745 Governments often have short-term horizons and are focused excessively on the level of current economic activity, disregarding whether financial-sector regulation designed to achieve it leads to long-term instability. Their short-term objective can be well served through policies governing competition and risk taking in the financial sector. By allowing excessive competition, providing downside guarantees, and encouraging risky lending for populist schemes, governments can create periods of intense economic activity fueled by credit booms. This way, governments effectively operate as “shadow banks” in the financial sector, a moral hazard that can have even more adverse consequences than risk-taking incentives of the financial sector. This government role appears to have been at the center of recent boom and bust cycles, especially in the housing sector in the United States through the presence of government-sponsored enterprises (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac), and continues to pose a threat to financial stability.
        Read more
      PubDate: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:28:27 +000
       
  • Preventing the Fire Next Time: Too Big to Fail
    • Authors: texaslrev_admin
      Abstract: Read Full Article (PDF) Article appears in Issue 7 Mr. H. Rodgin Cohen Posted on June 24, 2012 90 Texas L. Rev. 1717 In Preventing the Fire Next Time: Too Big To Fail, H. Rodgin Cohen, Senior Chairman of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, New York, argues that “the financial crisis of 2007-2009 threatened the very fabric of the financial system.” Cohen argues that while the great financial crisis requires a regulatory response, such a response “requires thoughful and comprehensive analysis as opposed to simplistic answers.” Moreover, Cohen points out that any response will impact not only the banking system, but also the overall economy.
        
        
        
        Read more
      PubDate: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:25:28 +000
       
  • Too Complex to Depict' Innovation, "Pure Information," and the SEC
           Disclosure Paradigm
    • Authors: texaslrev_admin
      Abstract: Read Full Article (PDF) Article appears in Issue 7 Prof. Henry T. C. Hu Posted on June 24, 2012 90 Texas L. Rev. 1601     Since the Depression, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s totemic philosophy has been to promote a robust informational foundation for private decision makers, thereby furthering efficiency and corporate governance.  As a necessary corollary, the SEC’s approach has been incremental.  The SEC has generally not ventured beyond the realm of information to that of substantive decision making, as to stock prices or otherwise.
          This disclosure philosophy has always been substantially implemented through what can be conceptualized as an “intermediary depiction” model.  An intermediary—e.g., a corporation issuing shares—stands between the investor and an objective reality.  The intermediary observes that reality, crafts a depiction of the reality’s pertinent aspects, and transmits the depiction to investors.  Securities law directs that depictions are to be accurate and complete.  “Information” is conceived of in terms of, if not equated to, such depictions.
          This Article’s core thesis is that the longstanding intermediary depiction model is increasingly undermined by innovations in financial theory and practice, and that the disclosure paradigm must metamorphosize to comprehend a spectrum of what can be referred to as “pure information” models.  Modern financial innovation has resulted in objective realities that are far more complex than in the past, often beyond the capacity of the English language, accounting terminology, visual display, risk measurement, and other tools on which all depictions must primarily rely.  This Article illustrates this in part by focusing on the crafting of depictions of the risk–return characteristics of asset-backed securities (ABS), an important financial innovation whose informational problems helped cause the global financial crisis.  The Article shows that such characteristics can be so complex that even “objective reality” is subject to multiple meanings.  Given such rudimentary tools and such complex realities, the depictions may offer little more than shadowy, gross outlines of the objective reality, however that reality might be conceived.
          Financial innovation can sometimes pose a second, more fundamental roadblock to good depictions: even a well-intentioned intermediary either may not truly understand or may not function as if he understands the reality he is charged with depicting.  This second roadblock can flow both from complexities of financial innovation (what can be called “true misunderstanding”) and organizational complexities associated with the intermediary itself (what can be called “functional misunderstanding”).
          The Article shows that depictions of major banks involved in financial innovation activities can suffer from both roadblocks, thus helping explain the severity of the bank disclosure problems that also helped cause the financial crisis.  Such a bank’s activities may be too complex relative to existing depiction tools, and the activities and the organization of the bank itself may be so complex that the bank may suffer from both true misunderstandings and functional misunderstandings of the objective reality it is in.  An afterword (at Section IV(C)(3)) uses the just-unfolding derivatives problems involving JPMorgan Chase and its Chief Investment Office to illustrate both roadblocks.
          If complexities related to financial innovation are creating problems for the disclosure paradigm, technological innovation may contribute to a solution.  With advances in computer and Internet technologies, it is no longer essential to rely exclusively on intermediary depictions of reality.  The intermediary need not always stand between the investor and an objective reality, recounting to the investor what the intermediary sees.  Figuratively, if the intermediary step...
      PubDate: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:22:57 +000
       
  • Switching to Prophylactic Injunctions
    • Authors: texaslrev_admin
      Abstract: Read Full Article (PDF) Professor Tracy A. Thomas Posted on June 1, 2012 90 Texas L. Rev. See Also 295 Professor Thomas responds to John Golden's argument regarding patent-infringement injunctions. Read more
      PubDate: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:26:06 +000
       
  • Party Rulemaking: Making Procedural Rules Through Party Choice
    • Authors: texaslrev_admin
      Abstract: Read Full Article (PDF) Article appears in Issue 6 Prof. Robert G. Bone Posted on June 1, 2012 90 Texas L. Rev. 1329             Procedural rules have different sources and are made in different ways.  Some boast a constitutional pedigree, while others are legislatively created.  Some, such as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, are the product of a formal committee-based rulemaking process, while others are rooted in the common law or the rulemaking of local courts.  In this article, Professor Robert Bone explores yet another source of procedural rules: party rulemaking.  Party rulemaking involves parties choosing general procedural rules for their lawsuits by agreement.  Today, the latitude given to party rulemaking is quite limited in adjudication, even though it is very broad in arbitration.  For example, parties can contract for discovery rules in civil cases, but it is not clear that they can alter otherwise applicable pleading rules, joinder rules, summary judgment rules, and so on.  The scope of party rulemaking has been the subject of intense debate in recent years.  Some scholars favor an expansive approach, one that would turn many of the officially promulgated rules into defaults.  Others urge much stricter limits.  Yet arguments on both sides of the debate are incomplete and rather weak in important respects.  For example, they fail to appreciate the difficulty of evaluating costs and benefits in the highly strategic environment of litigation, and when they discuss the impact of party rulemaking on adjudicative legitimacy, they tend to rely on perceived legitimacy and ignore the importance of normative legitimacy.            In this article, Bone takes a close look at this debate.  He critically examines the conventional arguments for and against party rulemaking and evaluates the balance of costs and benefits from utilitarian and rights-based perspectives.  He concludes that the cost-benefit case against party rulemaking is unpersuasive except in certain cases, and he identifies three limited scenarios that justify judicial restraint in enforcing agreements.  He then turns to arguments from adjudicative legitimacy, those that claim that broad party rulemaking licenses illegitimate departures from the way civil adjudication should be conducted.   Arguments of this type require a theory of adjudication that is capable of identifying core elements essential to the institution’s legitimacy.  In the case of American civil adjudication, he argues, the core elements have to do with an institutional commitment to a distinctive mode of principled reasoning.   It follows that the most troubling examples of party rulemaking are those that tinker with procedures that frame, guide, or incentivize this reasoning process.  In the end, Bone concludes that while some important aspects of procedure should be off limits to party rulemaking, parties in general should have broader freedom to fashion their own procedural rules than they do today. Read more
      PubDate: Wed, 23 May 2012 15:42:24 +000
       
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
 


Your IP address: 3.236.50.79
 
Home (Search)
API
About JournalTOCs
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-