Subjects -> BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS (Total: 3853 journals)
    - ACCOUNTING (134 journals)
    - BANKING AND FINANCE (314 journals)
    - BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS (1435 journals)
    - CONSUMER EDUCATION AND PROTECTION (20 journals)
    - COOPERATIVES (4 journals)
    - ECONOMIC SCIENCES: GENERAL (235 journals)
    - ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, THEORIES AND HISTORY (259 journals)
    - FASHION AND CONSUMER TRENDS (20 journals)
    - HUMAN RESOURCES (103 journals)
    - INSURANCE (26 journals)
    - INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE (146 journals)
    - INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND AID (103 journals)
    - INVESTMENTS (22 journals)
    - LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS (71 journals)
    - MACROECONOMICS (17 journals)
    - MANAGEMENT (635 journals)
    - MARKETING AND PURCHASING (117 journals)
    - MICROECONOMICS (23 journals)
    - PRODUCTION OF GOODS AND SERVICES (125 journals)
    - PUBLIC FINANCE, TAXATION (42 journals)
    - TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL DIRECTORIES (2 journals)

HUMAN RESOURCES (103 journals)                     

Showing 1 - 101 of 101 Journals sorted alphabetically
Accounting and Business Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 37)
Accounting and the Public Interest     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 4)
Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 35)
Accounting Education: An International Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24)
Accounting Forum     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 31)
Accounting, Organizations and Society     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 47)
Advances in Accounting     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14)
Advances in Developing Human Resources     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 33)
Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
American Journal of Finance and Accounting     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25)
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 49)
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 331)
Asian Review of Accounting     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Attachment & Human Development     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Australian Accounting Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
British Accounting Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11)
Burnout Research     Open Access   (Followers: 10)
Coaching : Theorie & Praxis     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Contemporary Accounting Research     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 33)
Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Critical Perspectives on Accounting     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 19)
EURO Journal on Decision Processes     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
European Accounting Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22)
European Journal of Training and Development     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 13)
Evidence-based HRM     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
FOR Rivista per la formazione     Full-text available via subscription  
German Journal of Human Resource Management     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
HR Future     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 4)
Human Relations     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 66)
Human Resource and Organization Development Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 6)
Human Resource Development International     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27)
Human Resource Development Quarterly     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 31)
Human Resource Development Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 33)
Human Resource Management     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 91)
Human Resource Management Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 86)
Human Resource Management Research     Open Access   (Followers: 27)
Human Resource Management Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 65)
Human Resource Research     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Intangible Capital     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
International Journal of Accounting     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
International Journal of Accounting and Finance     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 20)
International Journal of Accounting Information Systems     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 15)
International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 16)
International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
International Journal of Critical Accounting     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
International Journal of Economics and Accounting     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
International Journal of Ethics and Systems     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 4)
International Journal of Human Resource Management     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 57)
International Journal of Human Resource Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 17)
International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 31)
International Journal of Management Development     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 13)
International Journal of Management Education     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Journal of Accounting and Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 51)
Journal of Accounting and Public Policy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
Journal of Accounting Education     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
Journal of Accounting Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 37)
Journal of Advances in Management Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4)
Journal of Corporate Citizenship     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Journal of Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Journal of Global Responsibility     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Journal of HR intelligence     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Journal of Human Capital     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 14)
Journal of Human Development and Capabilities : A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24)
Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Journal of Human Values     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Journal of Marketing and HR     Open Access   (Followers: 7)
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness : People and Performance     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
Journal of Professions and Organization     Free   (Followers: 6)
Journal of Service Management     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
Kelaniya Journal of Human Resource Management     Open Access  
New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 13)
NHRD Network Journal     Full-text available via subscription  
Open Journal of Leadership     Open Access   (Followers: 19)
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 77)
Pacific Accounting Review     Hybrid Journal  
Personality and Individual Differences     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 28)
Personnel Assessment and Decisions     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Personnel Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 16)
Professions and Professionalism     Open Access   (Followers: 9)
Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations     Hybrid Journal  
Public Personnel Management     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14)
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
Quarterly National Accounts - Comptes nationaux trimestriels     Full-text available via subscription  
Research in Accounting Regulation     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Research in Human Development     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Review of Accounting Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 28)
Review of Public Personnel Administration     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
Revista Gestión de las Personas y Tecnología     Open Access  
Revista Portuguesa e Brasileira de Gestão     Open Access  
South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 4)
Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research     Full-text available via subscription  
Sri Lankan Journal of Human Resource Management     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Strategic HR Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)

           

Similar Journals
Journal Cover
EURO Journal on Decision Processes
Number of Followers: 3  
 
  Hybrid Journal Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
ISSN (Print) 2193-9438 - ISSN (Online) 2193-9446
Published by Springer-Verlag Homepage  [2656 journals]
  • Bargaining over shares of uncertain future profits
    • Abstract: We address the following basic question: How should parties, with possibly different risk-attitudes and beliefs, who are contemplating creating a partnership, divide uncertain future profits' We assume that the formula for division of profits is a result of negotiations, and model it via the Nash-bargaining-like solution (NBLS). After characterizing the optimal contract, using calculus of variations, we assume a linear contract and find its optimal parameters for various cases of interest. We also consider the implications of an asymmetric NBLS.
      PubDate: 2019-01-28
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-019-00095-4
       
  • Assessing the effectiveness of economic sanctions
    • Abstract: The strength of sanctions can significantly impact the outcome of a dispute. The effectiveness of economic sanctions will be explored within the context of the conflict between Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and US shale oil producers in 2014. The outcome was not what OPEC anticipated, perhaps because OPEC misperceived the opponent’s preferences. Sensitivity to sanctions is a major component of a decision maker’s preferences when a dispute, or a negotiation, is modeled within the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR). This study uses Inverse GMCR to determine what preference rankings would be required for the conflict to end as OPEC wished. The difference between the original preference ranking and the required rankings reflects the miscalculation of the strength of the economic “squeeze” that OPEC imposed when it flooded the market with oil to reduce the price. OPEC expected this sanction to be strong enough to damage, and perhaps destroy, the shale industry, but shale producers were able to withstand it. The graph model analysis suggests why this conflict ended as it did, and provides guidelines for understanding whether sanctions can be effective in forcing a particular outcome on a dispute.
      PubDate: 2019-01-21
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-019-00096-3
       
  • A game-theoretical analysis of joint-rebate strategies in platform-based
           retailing systems
    • Abstract: Rebates are commonly used as one of the most important short-term promotion tactics in retailing industries. In this paper, we study a platform-based retail system consisting of a retail platform who provides a retail facility and a product seller who sells products through the retail platform. The seller pays rent and also a percentage of his revenue to the platform as commissions for using the facility and services of the platform. In a promotion program, both the retail platform and the seller have strategic options of either offering rebates individually or launching a joint rebate. The parties are free to choose their rebate amounts, if any, and their decisions are, therefore, handled as endogenous decisions in our model. We investigate the optimal rebate strategies and performance of each party in the retail system analytically. Research results show that, given an exogenous retail price and a commission rate, the platform and the seller may choose a unilateral rebate or a joint-rebate program. For any log-concave demand function, we prove that an equilibrium on rebates of the platform and the seller exists and is unique. Furthermore, several managerial insights are presented with regard to the selection of rebate programs. Finally, we address the endogenous pricing problem as an extension of the original problem.
      PubDate: 2019-01-02
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0091-6
       
  • Application of a hybrid Delphi and aggregation–disaggregation procedure
           for group decision-making
    • Abstract: A hybrid procedure for group multiple criteria decision analysis is introduced that consolidates a moderated Delphi process with an autonomous aggregation–disaggregation mechanism. The research is based on the assumption that both consolidated approaches can lead to synergistic effects when properly combined. The paper justifies the hybrid procedure by comparing the three approaches, and by assessing it with a preliminary case study that is based on several factors of a universal framework for the evaluation of group decision-making methods and systems. These factors address convergence of the decision-making process, conflict resolution and cognitive complexity. The paper aims to define the decision-making process completely and thoroughly, fully operationalize all steps of the hybrid procedure algorithmically and methodologically and provide an application of the procedure. The application shows that the process converges and imposes acceptable cognitive load on the decision-makers, which implies that the hybrid procedure is able to perform efficiently.
      PubDate: 2019-01-02
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0094-3
       
  • Special issue on negotiations: introduction
    • PubDate: 2018-12-19
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0090-7
       
  • Offer and veto: an experimental comparison of two negotiation procedures
    • Abstract: Negotiation by veto is introduced as a novel negotiation approach and as an alternative to the exchange of offers. Rather than proposing offers, negotiators following the negotiation by veto approach eliminate unfavorable settlement options from the set of possible agreements until they eventually achieve a mutual acceptable solution. It is argued that this approach could lead to superior negotiation outcomes and improve negotiators’ satisfaction. In an experiment with student participants the performance of offer and veto negotiation procedures is compared. In simple negotiation problems both negotiation procedures reach similar outcomes. In complex negotiation problems negotiation by veto achieves fewer but better agreements. However, participants were more satisfied with the negotiation process, outcome and their opponent’s behavior when exchanging offers rather than vetoing alternatives.
      PubDate: 2018-12-15
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0093-4
       
  • Choice-making and choose-ables: making decision agents more human and
           choosy
    • Abstract: This paper discusses concepts that might shape, extend, limit or re-focus an agent’s set of options that can then be thought of as that particular agent’s potential in terms of their ways forward and degrees of freedom. Because there is no unambiguous word that conveys the meaning of this higher order concept of choice-making, the term “choose-able” has been adopted in order to distinguish it from the usual decision concepts known as choice or option. An agent’s choose-ables are defined as the imagined deemed possible ways forward, that the agent has to construct, compose or create before they can choose. The central concept of a choose-able is a very powerful one if only it could be surfaced and made explicit. It is often only possible to make inferences about the nature of choose-ables after observing the actions taken once a choice has been made. Drama theory formally develops this kind of inferencing and provided a foundation for this paper as it explores the relational realms of options. The paper presents a funnelling construct and then draws together Catastrophe theory and Culture theory to offer new ways of analysing the shaping effects of relational contexts on an agent’s choose-ables that then act as a medium through which agents are drawn to make choices and carry out observable actions. The strength of the combination of the theories lies in their descriptive power of subjective, relational concepts that hitherto have tended to remain hidden and tacit.
      PubDate: 2018-12-14
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0092-5
       
  • Foreword to the Special Issue on supporting and explaining decision
           processes by means of argumentation
    • PubDate: 2018-11-01
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0088-1
       
  • The need of diagrams based on Toulmin schema application: an aeronautical
           case study
    • Abstract: In this article, justification diagrams are introduced for structuring evidence to support conclusions that are reached from results of simulation studies. An industrial application is used to illustrate the use of the justification diagrams. Adapted from the Toulmin schema, the aim of justification diagram is to define a comprehensive, auditable and shareable notation to explain the results, the input data, the assumptions made and the techniques applied, to construct a cogent conclusion. Further, the dustification diagrams provide a visual representation of the argument that aims to corroborate the specified claims, or conclusions. A large part of this work is based on the application of the justification diagrams in the context of the European project, TOICA. The justification diagrams were used to structure all justifications that would be needed to convince an authority that a simulation process, and the associated results, upheld a particular conclusion. These diagrams are built concurrently in a product development process that accompanies the various stages of Verification and Validation (V&V) and where, for each design stage of V&V, argumentation is constructed by aggregating evidence and documents produced at this design stage.
      PubDate: 2018-11-01
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0086-3
       
  • A practical application approach to argumentation for multicriteria
           analysis and decision support
    • Abstract: This paper explores, through an application example, connections between argumentation and another type of methods often involved in decision problems, namely, multicriteria analysis. A novel argumentative analysis framework is proposed and applied to assess a short supply chain device for food aid, regarding different categories of criteria. The analysis leads to some feedback concerning argumentation systems.
      PubDate: 2018-11-01
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0087-2
       
  • Interactive resolution of multiobjective combinatorial optimization
           problems by incremental elicitation of criteria weights
    • Abstract: We propose an introduction to the use of incremental preference elicitation methods in the field of multiobjective combinatorial optimization. We consider three different optimization problems in vector-valued graphs, namely the shortest path problem, the minimum spanning tree problem and the assignment problem. In each case, the preferences of the decision-maker over cost vectors are assumed to be representable by a weighted sum but the weights of criteria are initially unknown. We then explain how to interweave preference elicitation and search to quickly determine a near-optimal solution with a limited number of preference queries. This leads us to successively introduce an interactive version of dynamic programming, greedy search, and branch and bound to solve the problems under consideration. We then present numerical tests showing the practical efficiency of these algorithms that achieve a good compromise between the number of queries asked and the solution times.
      PubDate: 2018-11-01
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0085-4
       
  • Multiple local optima in Zeuthen–Hicks bargaining: an analysis of
           different preference models
    • Abstract: Zeuthen–Hicks bargaining provides a dynamic model that explains how two parties in a negotiation make concessions to reach the Nash bargaining solution. However, it is not clear whether this process will always reach the global optimum corresponding to the Nash bargaining solution, or could end at a local optimum, or even in disagreement. In this paper, we analyze different types of utility functions, both analytically and in a computational study, to determine under which circumstances convergence to the Nash bargaining solution will be achieved. We show that non-standard preferences, involving, e.g., reference point effects, might indeed lead to multiple local optima of the Nash bargaining objective function and thus failure of the bargaining process. This occurs more often if expectations of parties are mutually incompatible.
      PubDate: 2018-10-28
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0089-0
       
  • Predicting in shock: on the impact of negative, extreme, rare, and short
           lived events on judgmental forecasts
    • Abstract: The occurrence of unexpected events that are extreme in magnitude, rare in frequency, and short-lived in duration poses distinctive challenges to decision makers and planners. In this paper we examine the impact of negative versions of these events, which we term “shocks”, on the judgmental forecasts of subjects experiencing them. A behavioral experiment asking participants to forecast monthly time series in the presence of temporary but extreme decreases in those series is used. Average changes to annual prediction intervals and 1-month ahead forecasts were much smaller than the magnitude of the shock and occurred in proportion to the size of the shock. Changes to prediction intervals were more persistent for moderate than large shocks, and larger for shocks occurring a second time. Our results provide supporting evidence for the view that decision makers underweight rare and extreme events rather than overweight them, consistent with a discounting or forgetting effect. The behavioral findings are relevant to operations researchers involved in expert judgment elicitation and in supporting decision making.
      PubDate: 2018-06-01
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-017-0063-2
       
  • On proper scoring rules and cumulative prospect theory
    • Authors: Arthur Carvalho; Stanko Dimitrov; Kate Larson
      Abstract: Scoring rules are traditional techniques to measure the association between a reported belief and an observed outcome. The condition that a scoring rule is proper means that an agent maximizes his expected score when he reports a belief that equals his true belief. The implicit assumption that the agent is risk neutral is, however, often unrealistic, at least when the underlying agent is a human. Modern decision theories based on rank-dependent utilities, such as cumulative prospect theory, have been shown to be more effective at describing how human beings make decisions under risk and uncertainty. Traditional proper scoring rules are, however, incompatible with cumulative prospect theory because they fail to satisfy a property called comonotonicity. In this paper, we provide novel insights on why comonotonicity is crucial to make proper scoring rules indeed proper when eliciting beliefs from cumulative prospect theory agents. After suggesting strategies to create comonotonic proper scoring rules, we propose calibration procedures to obtain an agent’s true belief by removing the influence of the agent’s value function and weighting functions from his reported belief, when beliefs are elicited by means of comonotonic proper scoring rules.
      PubDate: 2018-04-25
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0081-8
       
  • Editorial to a feature issue on advances in behavioural research on
           supported decision processes
    • Authors: Gilberto Montibeller; Jyrki Wallenius
      PubDate: 2018-04-24
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0083-6
       
  • Factors influencing the ratio bias
    • Authors: David Bourdin; Rudolf Vetschera
      Abstract: The ratio bias refers to the tendency of individuals to judge probabilities expressed as ratios of large numbers as more likely than equivalent or even higher probabilities expressed as a ratio of small numbers. For example, the ratio bias effect occurs when a lottery offering a 9/100 chance of winning is preferred over a lottery that offers a 1/10 chance of winning. Although previous empirical research has found evidence for the ratio bias, the exact conditions under which this effect occurs are still unclear and there is a lack of rigor in distinguishing the ratio bias from other similar effects. In this article, besides providing a comprehensive and integrative literature review, we present the results of an experiment in which we extend previous research on the ratio bias by comparing deviations both in favor of low- and high-number alternatives, as well as allowing for indifference. Results indicate that a systematic deviation in favor of high-number alternatives does exist, but that the ratio bias must be clearly distinguished from a general tendency to indicate indifference. Concerning characteristics of the problem and the decision maker, we find significant influences of probability levels involved (the ratio bias occurs more frequently for low probabilities), and of gender (the bias occurs more often among female subjects).
      PubDate: 2018-04-23
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0082-7
       
  • “Financial decision support”: feature issue editorial
    • Authors: Constantin Zopounidis; Dimitrios Niklis; Michalis Doumpos
      PubDate: 2018-03-09
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0080-9
       
  • The role of supervised learning in the decision process to fair trade US
           municipal debt
    • Authors: Gordon H. Dash; Nina Kajiji; Domenic Vonella
      Abstract: Determining a fair price and an appropriate timescale to trade municipal debt is a complex decision. This research uses data informatics to explore transaction characteristics and trading activity of investment grade US municipal bonds. Using the relatively recent data stream distributed by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, we provide an institutional summary of market participants and their trading behavior. Subsequently, we focus on a sample of AAA bonds to derive a new methodology to estimate a trade-weighted benchmark municipal yield curve. The methodology integrates the study of ridge regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector regression. We find an enhanced radial basis function artificial neural network outperforms alternate methods used to estimate municipal term structure. This result forms the foundation for establishing a decision theory on optimal municipal bond trading. Using multivariate modeling of a liquidity domain measured across three dependent variables, we investigate the proposed decision theory by estimating weekly production-theoretic bond liquidity returns to scale. Across the three liquidity measures and for almost all weeks investigated, bond trading liquidity is elastic with respect to the modeled factors. This finding leads us to conclude that an optimal trading policy for municipal debt can be implemented on a weekly timescale using the elasticity estimates of bond price, trade size, risk, days-to-maturity, and the macroeconomic influences of labor in the workforce and building activity.
      PubDate: 2018-03-03
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0079-2
       
  • Valuation of an R&D project with three types of uncertainty
    • Authors: Michi Nishihara
      Abstract: This paper develops an R&D decision-making model in the real options framework. The model is generic enough to capture three types of uncertainty in an R&D project, namely, uncertainty of research duration and costs, market value of technology, and a competitor’s technology development. I derive analytical solutions, which help practitioners and researchers to evaluate various cases of R&D investment. Further, by analyzing the model with a wide range of parameter values, I reveal the following effects of the three types of uncertainty on R&D investment: higher uncertainty of research duration and costs, unlike market value uncertainty, speeds up investment, especially combined with a higher risk of competition. The investment timing can be U-shaped in the strength of competition because of the trade-off between the preemptive investment effect and the decreased project value effect. These results can account for empirical findings about the uncertainty–investment relation in industries with high R&D intensity and severe competition.
      PubDate: 2018-01-22
      DOI: 10.1007/s40070-018-0076-5
       
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
 


Your IP address: 3.237.48.165
 
Home (Search)
API
About JournalTOCs
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-