Hybrid journal * Containing 1 Open Access article(s) in this issue * ISSN (Print) 1478-9647 - ISSN (Online) 1478-9655 Published by Inderscience Publishers[439 journals]
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating. A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Authors:Mengyang Gu, Xingmei Hu, Xiaolin Ma Pages: 205 - 232 Abstract: The study presents a dynamic interaction between the pace of intellectual economic growth and youth unemployment in four countries: Brazil, South Africa, Germany, and the USA. The analysis spans 23 years, from 2000 to 2023. A deeper study of secondary data gathered from reliable worldwide sources is investigated in this research project using the quantitative research approach. According to the data, youth unemployment was predicted and influenced by economic growth at different times. The influence of major variables, such as the inflation rate, wage levels, and foreign direct investment (FDI), varied among the countries. Unexpectedly, South Africa's GDP growth rate correlates adversely with youth unemployment, while foreign direct investment correlates positively. The Brazil analysis identified no significant predictors, suggesting other variables may affect the model. The study employs regression models and Granger causality tests to find trends, correlations, and probable causal links between economic indicators and teenage labour market outcomes. Pre-processing and data extraction with STATA organise and purify data for research analysis. Keywords: youth unemployment; economic intellectual growth; cross-country analysis; inflation; foreign direct investment; FDI; gross domestic product; granger causality Citation: International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, Vol. 15, No. 3 (2025) pp. 205 - 232 PubDate: 2025-05-12T23:20:50-05:00 DOI: 10.1504/IJIPM.2025.146202 Issue No:Vol. 15, No. 3 (2025)
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating. A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Authors:Amos Arumba Nyameino, Amos Saurombe Pages: 233 - 249 Abstract: Universities are becoming actively involved in protecting their agricultural innovations due to the growing need for sustainable food systems (SFS) and the demand for solutions to global challenges. They have established technology transfer offices (TTOs) to facilitate the protection and commercialisation of research outputs generated at their universities. However, the agricultural sector encounters various challenges that significantly impact uptake of agricultural research outputs. The present study was undertaken in Kenya, where severe droughts have occurred. Findings indicate that while there is an increase in IP protection for innovations generated at the universities, there remains a need for increased commercialisation of this IPs. This study used a quantitative methodology to assess the collected data, and the result indicate that academic institutions prioritise teaching and do not promote the commercialisation of academic research outputs. The study thus recommends that universities establish industrial hubs and streamline administrative procedures to reduce bureaucratic barriers. Keywords: agriculture; climate change; patents; innovations; universities; intellectual property management; commercialisation of patents; research outputs; sustainable food systems; SFS Citation: International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, Vol. 15, No. 3 (2025) pp. 233 - 249 PubDate: 2025-05-12T23:20:50-05:00 DOI: 10.1504/IJIPM.2025.146206 Issue No:Vol. 15, No. 3 (2025)
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating. A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Authors:Miranda Risang Ayu Palar, Helitha Novianty Muchtar, Rahmanisa Purnamasari Faujura, Mieke Namira Fuadi, Siti Syafa Naila Arsyad Pages: 250 - 274 Abstract: This article argues that the establishment of a special product classification for geographical indication (GI) in the intellectual property (IP) legal system is important to make the registration process easier and more comprehensive. This article explains arguments in favour to the establishment of GI product classification and aims to propose a model of GI product classification that may be applicable for different countries. Data in this article were obtained by qualitative research. Descriptive analysis and legal comparison were used to explore the arguments about the importance of GI product classification. An exploratory approach was used to compose a single model of GI product classification system. The research results show that establishing GI product classification is important because of administrative, substantive and specific reasons. Unlike classifications for trademarks, patents or industrial designs registration systems, classification for GI is likely to have more substantial significance rather than merely administrative. Keywords: geographical indication; product classification; intellectual property Citation: International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, Vol. 15, No. 3 (2025) pp. 250 - 274 PubDate: 2025-05-12T23:20:50-05:00 DOI: 10.1504/IJIPM.2025.146208 Issue No:Vol. 15, No. 3 (2025)
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating. A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Authors:Miranda Risang Ayu Palar, Helitha Novianty Muchtar, Rahmanisa Purnamasari Faujura, Mieke Namira Fuadi, Siti Syafa Naila Arsyad Pages: 275 - 291 Abstract: This article presents a new systematic analysis of the effectiveness of an unfair competition claim in the UAE for protecting the unregistered scent mark. The main aim of this article is to discuss the specificity of an unfair competition claim for civil protection of unregistered scent marks. This objective will be achieved by: 1) an analysis of the requirements for filing an unfair competition lawsuit; 2) discussing the difficulties in the registration of scent mark; 3) presenting the provisions of the UAE jurisdictions concerning the unfair competition lawsuit; 4) concluding the most important acts of unfair competition related to the scent mark. In this context, it is particularly important to analyse the specific aspects that should be taken into consideration when applying an unfair competition lawsuit to protect the legitimate interest of the owner of the unregistered scent mark. The article concludes that the judiciary in UAE should play a prominent role in protecting the unregistered scent mark used by national and foreign investors until the intellectual property laws settle on the mechanism for registering this type of unconventional mark. Keywords: scent mark; unfair competition; compensation; liability; UAE Citation: International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, Vol. 15, No. 3 (2025) pp. 275 - 291 PubDate: 2025-05-12T23:20:50-05:00 DOI: 10.1504/IJIPM.2025.146207 Issue No:Vol. 15, No. 3 (2025)
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating. A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Authors:Aneela Fatima, Nikolaos Voutyrakos Pages: 292 - 309 Abstract: The TRIPS Agreement provides a minimum standard of protection for geographical indications (GIs) concerning rural nations. This paper explores the intricate dynamics of the international protection of GIs through trademark protection, sui generis protection, and international treaties, which are an integral part of the IPR legal arsenal, fostering equitable competition and instilling confidence in consumers. This debate is culminated in the Darjeeling tea saga, which aptly illustrates the challenges that rural nations such as India may have while pursuing GI protection. This paper aims to comprehensively evaluate the effects of trademark protection and sui generis protection on the relevant stakeholders including producers, consumers, local economies, and international commerce at large. The ultimate goal is to provide policymakers, legal practitioners, and stakeholders with insights into the complex factors that must be taken into account when safeguarding GIs in the contemporary global market. Keywords: geographical indications; Darjeeling tea; sui generis; trademark; India; certification mark; TRIPS Agreement Citation: International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, Vol. 15, No. 3 (2025) pp. 292 - 309 PubDate: 2025-05-12T23:20:50-05:00 DOI: 10.1504/IJIPM.2025.146209 Issue No:Vol. 15, No. 3 (2025)