Hybrid journal * Containing 1 Open Access article(s) in this issue * ISSN (Print) 2040-106X - ISSN (Online) 2040-1078 Published by Inderscience Publishers[451 journals]
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating. A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Authors:Sara Casacci, Adriano Pareto Pages: 295 - 312 Abstract: Composite indices for measuring multi-dimensional phenomena such as sustainable development, quality of life, and competitiveness, are based on individual indicators that have no common unit of measurement. As a rule, individual indicators are normalised by univariate methods, independently of each other. However, normalisation has a strong impact on results since it creates a 'correspondence system' among different variables. Thus the normalisation method should take into account the relationships existing in the data. In this paper, a nonlinear multivariate method is proposed for normalising a set of individual indicators in order to aggregate them into a composite index and construct profiles of country performance. An application to the measurement and analysis of socio-economic development is also shown. Keywords: composite index; indicators; normalisation; nonlinear relationship Citation: International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 4 (2021) pp. 295 - 312 PubDate: 2022-02-07T23:20:50-05:00 DOI: 10.1504/IJMCDM.2021.120746 Issue No:Vol. 8, No. 4 (2022)
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating. A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Authors:Majid Jangi, Seyyed Hadi Ghasemi, Mahin Ghorban Sabbagh, Hamed Tabesh, Sayyed Mostafa Mostafavi, Mahmoud Tara Pages: 313 - 330 Abstract: Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is intricate in the medical domain. The purpose of this study was to develop a new software tool called 'Expository Posthaste Effective Resemblant Tool (ExPERT) ' for MCDM in 2018-2019 in multi-stages. First, scenario and MCDM steps were determined. Then MCDM steps were implemented in HTML/CSS/JavaSript and the query was sent to the server using a PHP script. After that, the tool was evaluated in real clinical settings. The developed tool included dynamic interconnected weight assignment of factors, visualisation of implicit knowledge, incorporating written descriptions, and instant feedback to change implicit knowledge into explicit knowledge. As such, the tool enables the user to produce visual presentations, simultaneously display multi-criteria decisions, and provide written feedback on user-assigned weightings. Using a visual presentation, this tool can potentially reduce the time required to assign weightings to different criteria, easy to use, and eliminating the need for specific training of participants. Keywords: multi-criteria decision making; MCDM; implicit knowledge; feedback; factor weighting; visualisation Citation: International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 4 (2021) pp. 313 - 330 PubDate: 2022-02-07T23:20:50-05:00 DOI: 10.1504/IJMCDM.2021.120747 Issue No:Vol. 8, No. 4 (2022)
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating. A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Authors:Mouna Regaieg, Hela Moalla Frikha Pages: 331 - 348 Abstract: Combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method is a new method for multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) and evaluation. The decision-maker (DM) assigns criteria relative importance coefficients (weight criteria) subjectively. According to the process of MCDM, the problem consists in finding the parameter values that minimise the inconsistency between the model obtained with those parameters and the final decision. To overcome this issue, this study aims to develop a mathematical programming model eliciting objective weight parameters of the CODAS method without the DM's preferences and then allows ranking the different alternatives. An illustrative example is performed to check the performance of this tool. Finally, sensitivity analyses are carried to check the sensitivity of the results and an empirical comparison with other weighting methods are presented. Keywords: multi-criteria decision making; CODAS method; weight elicitation; Lagrange function; criteria weight values Citation: International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 4 (2021) pp. 331 - 348 PubDate: 2022-02-07T23:20:50-05:00 DOI: 10.1504/IJMCDM.2021.120759 Issue No:Vol. 8, No. 4 (2022)
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating. A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Please help us test our new pre-print finding feature by giving the pre-print link a rating. A 5 star rating indicates the linked pre-print has the exact same content as the published article.
Authors:Ana Garcia-Bernabeu, Adolfo Hilario-Caballero, David Pla-Santamaria, Francisco Salas-Molina Pages: 368 - 385 Abstract: In the last two decades, the construction of composite indicators to measure and compare multidimensional phenomena in a broad spectrum of domains has increased considerably. Different methodological approaches are used to summarise huge datasets of information in a single figure. This paper proposes a new approach that consists in computing a multicriteria composite performance interval based on different aggregation rules. The suggested approach provides an additional layer of information as the performance interval displays a lower bound from a non-compensability perspective, and an upper bound allowing for full-compensability. The outstanding features of this proposal are: 1) a distance-based multicriteria technique is taken as the baseline to construct the multicriteria performance interval; 2) the aggregation of distances/separation measures is made using particular cases of Minkowski <i>L<SUB align="right">p</i> metric; 3) the span of the multicriteria performance interval can be considered as a sign of the dimensions or indicators balance. Keywords: composite indicators; multicriteria decision making; compensability; performance interval Citation: International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 4 (2021) pp. 368 - 385 PubDate: 2022-02-07T23:20:50-05:00 DOI: 10.1504/IJMCDM.2021.120760 Issue No:Vol. 8, No. 4 (2022)