Publisher: Universitas Udayana (Total: 62 journals)   [Sort by number of followers]

Showing 1 - 61 of 61 Journals sorted alphabetically
Advances in Tropical Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Agrotrop : J. on Agriculture Science     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Buletin Studi Ekonomi     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Buletin Veteriner Udayana     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Bumi Lestari J. of Environment     Open Access  
Cakra Kimia (Indonesian E-J. of Applied Chemistry)     Open Access  
COPING (Community of Publishing in Nursing)     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
E-J. of Cultural Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
e-J. of Linguistics     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
E-J. of Tourism     Open Access   (Followers: 8)
E-Jurnal Agroekoteknologi Tropika (J. of Tropical Agroecotechnology)     Open Access  
E-Jurnal Akuntansi     Open Access  
E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana     Open Access  
E-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Universitas Udayana     Open Access  
E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana     Open Access  
E-Jurnal Medika Udayana     Open Access  
Ecotrophic : J. of Environmental Science     Open Access  
Indonesia Medicus Veterinus     Open Access  
Indonesian J. of Legal and Forensic Sciences     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Intisari Sains Medis     Open Access  
Intl. J. of Engineering and Emerging Technology     Open Access  
itepa : Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan     Open Access  
J. of Food Security and Agriculture     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
J. of Health Sciences and Medicine     Open Access  
J. of Marine and Aquatic Sciences     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
J. of Veterinary and Animal Sciences     Open Access  
JBN (Jurnal Bedah Nasional)     Open Access  
Jurnal Analisis Pariwisata     Open Access  
Jurnal Arsitektur Lansekap     Open Access  
Jurnal BETA (Biosistem dan Teknik Pertanian)     Open Access  
Jurnal Biologi Udayana     Open Access  
Jurnal Destinasi Pariwisata     Open Access  
Jurnal Ekonomi Kuantitatif Terapan     Open Access  
Jurnal Energi Dan Manufaktur     Open Access  
Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis     Open Access  
Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa SPEKTRUM     Open Access  
Jurnal Ilmiah Merpati (Menara Penelitian Akademika Teknologi Informasi)     Open Access  
Jurnal Ilmu dan Kesehatan Hewan (Veterinary Science and Medicine J.)     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Jurnal Ilmu Komputer     Open Access  
Jurnal IPTA     Open Access  
Jurnal Kepariwisataan dan Hospitalitas     Open Access  
Jurnal Kimia (J. of Chemistry)     Open Access  
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law J.)     Open Access  
Jurnal Master Pariwisata (J. Master in Tourism Studies)     Open Access  
Jurnal Matematika     Open Access  
Jurnal Rekayasa dan Manajemen Agroindustri     Open Access  
Jurnal Spektran     Open Access  
Jurnal Udayana Mengabdi     Open Access  
Jurnal Veteriner     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Kertha Patrika     Open Access  
Lingual : J. of Language and Culture     Open Access  
Linguistika : Buletin Ilmiah Program Magister Linguistik Universitas Udayana     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Lontar Komputer : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi     Open Access  
Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Majalah Ilmiah Teknologi Elektro : J. of Electrical Technology     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Matrik : Jurnal Manajemen, Strategi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan     Open Access  
Piramida     Open Access  
Ruang-Space: Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan (J. of The Built Environment)     Open Access  
Simbiosis : J. of Biological Sciences     Open Access  
Sport and Fitness J.     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Udayana J. of Law and Culture     Open Access  
Similar Journals
Journal Cover
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal)
Number of Followers: 0  

  This is an Open Access Journal Open Access journal
ISSN (Print) 2302-528X - ISSN (Online) 2502-3101
Published by Universitas Udayana Homepage  [62 journals]
  • The Regulatory Framework Regarding The Offences Against Coral Reefs In
           Achieving Sustainable Development Goal 14

    • Authors: Ayu Izza Elvany
      Pages: 1 - 12
      Abstract: The purpose of this research is to analyze the regulatory framework regarding the offences against coral reefs to ensure stringent law enforcement. The research methods that are used in this study are the statute approach and conceptual approach. The analysis of the research showed that the regulatory framework regarding the offences against coral reefs is Law No.1 of 2014 amending Law No. 27 of 2007 concerning the Management of Coastal Area and Isles, especially Article 73 paragraph (1) letter a. The article recognized both an individual and a corporation as a legal person yet there is no article regarding corporate criminal liability. Furthermore, the article has the element of intentionally meaning the article adopted the principle of geen straf zonder schuld. Additionally, the analysis showed that the offences against coral reefs regardless of the used method is hindering the sustainable development goals (SDGs) achievement. Regarding the criminal punishments, to achieve the balance of coral reefs sustainability and public welfare, this research recommends the article to regulate the payment of compensation as a penal measure.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p01
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • Law Enforcement in The Process of Investigation on The Crime of Skimming
           by Foreign Nationals

    • Authors: I Made Wahyu Chandra Satriana, Ni Made Liana Dewi
      Pages: 13 - 27
      Abstract: This study aims to analyze the law enforcement process at the level of investigation of skimming crimes by foreign nationals in the jurisdiction of the Bali Police; and Factors that support and hinder the law enforcement process at the investigation level of skimming crimes by foreign nationals in the jurisdiction of the Bali Regional Police. The research method used is a empirical legal research. The results showed that law enforcement process at the level of investigation of skimming crimes by foreign nationals in the Bali Regional Police jurisdiction was carried out based on Perkap No. 6 of 2019 which includes receiving police reports, making investigative administrations, examining victims and witnesses, collecting evidence and conducting case titles that end in the examination process in court; and factors that support and hinder the law enforcement process at the level of investigation of skimming crimes by foreign nationals in the Bali Regional Police jurisdiction, including (a) supporting factors which include their own legal (act factors) and public factors; (b) inhibiting factors include legal themselves (statutory factors), law enforcement, and facilities that support law enforcement, community and legal culture factors.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p02
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • Legal Status of Venture Capital Fund Joint Investment Contract

    • Authors: Michael Widyaputra
      Pages: 28 - 43
      Abstract: Indonesian Venture capital companies can manage a Venture Fund (Dana Ventura) in the form of a Joint Investment Contract (Kontrak Investasi Bersama). Venture Fund is a financial instrument to collect and manage investor funds to be used for venture capital business activities. This Venture Fund is managed together with the Custodian Bank (Bank Kustodian) whose task is to store and administer the collected funds. The concept of a Venture Fund Joint Investment Contract is similar to that of a Limited Participation Mutual Funds Collective Investment Contract (Reksa Dana Berbentuk Kontrak Investasi Kolektif Penyertaan Terbatas) which also collects and manage funds together with Custodian Bank, then to invest one of which equity securities. However, Venture Fund has not been optimally exploited in Indonesia due to unclear legal status of the fund unlike the Limited Participation Mutual Funds. The issue lies on whether the fund can act in any transactions on its own. This different with Limited Participation Mutual Funds where the regulation is clear that Mutual Funds cannot act on its own. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal status of Venture Fund by comparing it with Limited Participation Mutual Funds. The research method used is a normative legal research method. The results of this study indicate that the Venture Fund is not a legal entity. Furthermore, in conducting venture capital business activities, Venture Fund should be represented by Custodian Bank, as is the case with Limited Participation Mutual Funds.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p03
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • Sub Contractors in Government Procurement Contract of Goods and Services

    • Authors: Merry Tjoanda
      Pages: 44 - 58
      Abstract: This research aimed to review and analyze the position of sub contractors in government procurement contract of goods/services and how the legal relationship between sub contractors and contractors in government procurement contract of goods/services. The research method used normative juridical. The approach used are the statute approach and the conceptual approach. From the results of this research it was concluded that; (1) Subcontractors as subjects of contract law are regulated in various laws and regulations, especially those government procurement contract of goods/services. This subcontractors have legal standing in contractual relationships, especially in government procurement contracts of goods/services. (2) The subcontractor has a legal relationship with the Contractor as a service provider based on the subcontract but has no legal relationship with Commitment-Making Officer (CMO)/PPK as a service user.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p04
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • Legal Inconsistency over the Blood Donor Unit and Blood Transfusion Unit
           Existence in Realizing Indonesia Blood Transfusion Services Authority

    • Authors: I Made Wirya Darma, I Gede Agus Kurniawan, Gede Eka Rusdi Antara
      Pages: 59 - 75
      Abstract: This study specifically focusing on uncertainty and inconsistencies that faced on blood transfusion services caused by the existence of Blood Donor Unit and Blood Transfusion Unit led by existing norms on the statutory laws. The Act on Health, the Blood Service Government Regulation, and the Minister of Health Regulation No. 83/2014 assign blood services to the Blood Transfusion Unit. However, the existence of the Red Cross Law along with the Red Cross Government Regulation normalizes the task of providing blood services to the Blood Donor Unit, without confirming legal certainty for the Blood Transfusion Unit. This has triggered the issue of legal inconsistency towards those who carry out blood services, so a solution is needed through this study.  This study is based on normative juridical legal research supported by a statutory approach as well as a legal conceptual approach. The results of this study are there are two options that can be formulated in the future, namely by basing the principle of legal preference lex posteriori derogate legi priori or based on the technique of formulating statutory norms according to the principle of clarity of formulation, certainty of the formulation of explanations, transitional provisions, closing provisions and phrases that selected in determining the executor of blood service duties.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p05
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • The Stateless Person In Indonesia: Consequences and Legal Protection

    • Authors: Made Nurmawati
      Pages: 76 - 88
      Abstract: This study aimed to examine what the legal consequences are for those who are stateless persons and how the government's legal protection for people with status as stateless persons in Indonesia. The method used to achieve this goal is through normative legal research. Legal materials will be collected by means of an inventory, classification, identification, interpretation and descriptive analysis. The results indicated that there are various causes of statelessness, such as: disintegration of the nation, political factors, the application of different citizenship principles between countries, bureaucratic obstacles, racial, religious discrimination and etcetera. The state of statelessness will result in the lack of rights and obligations and protection of them from any country. Indonesia has attempted to provide legal protection for those with statelessness through concrete efforts by collaborating with UNHCR, entering into agreements between countries, discretion and regulations in existing legislation. However, the existing regulations still need to be revised the obscurity of several norms relating to protection of stateless persons.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p06
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • Pengujian Tindakan Faktual dan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Pemerintah
           dalam Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara

    • Authors: Ridwan Ridwan
      Pages: 89 - 108
      Abstract: This research aims to analyse the basis of examination to the government’s factual and unlawful actions and the compensation determination due to both actions in the Indonesian administrative court system. It is normative legal research that studies the principles and norms with the sources of law as the main objects. Various approaches used in this research are the statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The result shows that the regulations and good governance principles or governance legal norms are still used as the basis in assessing and examining the government’s factual and unlawful actions (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad) in the administrative court system. It also shows that the compensation determination remains laid on the Government Regulation Number 43 the Year 1991 concerning the Compensation and its Procedure in Administrative Court and the Treasury Minister Regulation Number 1129/KMK.01/1991 concerning the Procedural of Imposing Administrative Court Decision on Compensation Payment.  Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis dasar pengujian terhadap tindakan faktual dan perbuatan melanggar hukum oleh pemerintah dalam sistem PTUN dan menganalisis penentuan ganti kerugian dalam perkara tindakan faktual dan perbuatan melanggar hukum oleh pemerintah dalam sistem PTUN. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif yaitu penelitian terhadap kaidah atau hukumnya itu sendiri dan asas hukum positif, dengan menjadikan bahan-bahan hukum (sources of the law) sebagai objek kajian. Metode pendekatan yang akan digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), dan secara tidak langsung digunakan pula pendekatan kasus (case approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dasar penilaian dan pengujian terhadap tindakan faktual dan/atau perbuatan melanggar hukum oleh pemerintah (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad) dalam sistem PTUN sampai saat ini masih berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan AUPB atau norma hukum pemerintahan. kerugian dalam konteks tindakan faktual dan perbuatan melanggar hukum oleh pemerintah dalam sistem PTUN sampai saat ini masih menggunakan ketentuan PP No. 43 Tahun 1991 tentang Ganti Rugi dan Tata Cara Pelaksanaannya pada PTUN dan Keputusan Menteri Keuangan No. 1129/KMK.01/1991 tentang Tata Cara Pembayaran Ganti Rugi Pelaksanaan Keputusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p07
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • Penerapan Force Majeure dalam Pemenuhan isi Kontrak Akibat Pandemi
           Covid-19 di Indonesia

    • Authors: Desak Nyoman Dwi Indah Parwati, I Made Sarjana
      Pages: 109 - 124
      Abstract: This study aimed to analyze the application of force majeure related to the fulfillment of contract contents in contracts due to the covid-19 that occurred in Indonesia. Normative legal research was the method chosen in this study. The result of study indicated that has been performed display that with the issuance of Presidential Decree No. 12 of 2020 concerning Determination of Non-Natural Disasters for the Spread of Corona Virus Disease 2019 by some people as a legal basis for determining covid-19 as force majeure. Debtors are allowed to submit to creditors that the Pandemic Covid-19 has made debtor difficult for to fulfill the contents of the contract. However, not all debtors can use Covid-19 as an excuse for force majeure, only debtors who do not have a steady income and are proven directly to creditors who can use the Covid-19 excuse as force majeure and good faith is needed from the debtor. In addition, related to the impact of force majeure on the fulfillment of the contents of the contract in a contract being disrupted, the process of fulfilling the contents of the contract is delayed due to the covid-19 pandemi but does not make a contract void or can be canceled. Penelitaian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa mengenai penerapan force majeure terkait pemenuhan isi kontrak dalam kontrak akibat pandemi covid-19 yang terjadi di Indonesia. Penelitian hukum normative merupakan metode yang dipilih dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dikeluarkannya kebijakan tentang Penetapan Bencana Non-Alam Penyebaran Corona Virus Disease 2019 melalui Keppres No. 12 Tahun 2020 oleh sebagian masyarakat dijadikan acuan dasar hukum penetapan covid-19 sebagai alasan force majeure. Debitur diperbolehkan mengajukan kepada kreditur bahwa adanya pandemi covid-19 menyebabkan debitur sulit untuk memenuhi isi kontrak. Namun tidak semua debitur bisa menggunakan covid-19 sebagai alasan force majeure, hanya debitur yang tidak memiliki penghasilan tetap saja dan dibuktikan langsung kepada kreditur yang bisa menggunakan alasan covid-19 sebagai force majeure serta diperlukan adanya itikad baik dari debitur. Selain itu terkait dengan dampak force majeure terhadap pemenuhan isi kontrak dalam suatu kontrak menjadi terganggu, proses pemenuhan isi kontrak menjadi tertunda akibat pandemi covid-19 namun tidak menjadikan suatu kontrak menjadi batal atau dapat dibatalkan.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p08
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • Aspek De Jure Perlindungan Lagu dan Royalti Pasca Pemberlakuan Peraturan
           Pemerintah No. 56 Tahun 2021

    • Authors: Anak Agung Sagung Ngurah Indradewi, Anak Agung Istri Ari Atu Dewi
      Pages: 125 - 136
      Abstract: This writing aimed to analyze, identify and elaborate the legal protection of song and music based on the prevailing law concerning Copyrights and the mechanism of collecting and distributing of royalty after the enactment of Government Regulation Number 56 of 2021. This article was normative legal research using statutory approach, conceptual approach and analytical approach. The study indicated that song is one of the objects of copyright which is protected under the provision of Article 40-point d of the Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. The enactment of Government Regulation Number 56 of 2021 emphasized that the mechanism for managing royalties for songs and/or music is carried out through the National Collective Management Institutions. To realize a royalty management for songs and/or music, it is necessary to have awareness on the part of the Author, Copyright Holder, and Related Rights owners to carry out the Recording of songs and/or music and there needs to be awareness from parties who use songs and/or music in a form of public service that is commercial in nature to fulfill obligations in the form of royalty payments to
      Authors , Copyright Holders and/or Related Rights owners through National Collective Management Institutions. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk menganalisis, mengidenfitikasi, dan mengelaborasi perlindungan hukum atas lagu berdasarkan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait hak cipta, dan mekanisme pemungutan dan pengelolaan royalti setelah diberlakukannya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56/2021. Artikel ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep serta pendekatan analisis. Studi menunjukkan bahwa lagu merupakan objek perlindungan hak cipta sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 40 huruf d Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Dengan diberlakukannya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56 Tahun 2021 mempertegas bahwa mekanisme pengelolaan royalti atas lagu dan/atau musik dilakukan melalui Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif Nasional. Untuk mewujudkan suatu pengelolaan royalti atas lagu dan/atau musik, diperlukan adanya kesadaran dari pihak Pencipta, Pemegang Hak Cipta, dan pemilik Hak Terkait untuk melakukan Pencatatan atas lagu dan/atau musik dan perlu adanya kesadaran dari pihak yang memanfaatkan lagu dan/atau musik dalam bentuk layanan public yang bersifat komersial untuk melakukan pemenuhan kewajiban berupa pembayaran royalti kepada Pencipta, Pemegang Hak Cipta dan/atau pemilik Hak Terkait melalui LMKN.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p09
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • Meninjau Keabsahan Kepemilikan Akta Perseroan Terbatas Persekutuan Modal
           dengan Saham Harta Bersama Suami Istri

    • Authors: Ni Made Lalita Sri Devi, I Ketut Westra
      Pages: 137 - 145
      Abstract: This study was intended to provide the understanding of the legal validity of the private company of capital partnership established by married couple and the effect resulted by this company. This study used the normative legal research regarding the issues of norms that occured with a norm vacuum. This study contained several legal sources such as primary legal sources that study the limited liability company and secondary legal sources that examined the literature as well as the scientific works. The result of this study indicated that the legals of Limited Liability Corporation does not specifically regulate the holdings prohibition of the married couple without having marriage agreement, however, if the seperation of the asset is unavailable within the ownership of the married couple Limited Liability Corporation shares, it will infringe the Legals of Limited Liability Corporation, this is because of the capital partnership is not included in the Limited Liability Corporation. The consequence of Limited Liability Corporation with only one sharesholder will influence the status of the company because the company as a legal corporation becomes a Limited Liability Corporation that is not taking any responsible as a legal corporation anymore, it will be dismissed by the court because it leads to Chapter 7 number 6 of The Legals of Limited Liability Company. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman terkait keabsahan hukum akta Perseroan Terbatas yang didirikan suami istri dan akibat hukum dari suatu Perseroan Terbatas persekutuan modal yang didirikan suami istri. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif terkait persoalan norma yang terjadi dengan suatu kekosongan norma. Penelitian ini termuat dengan beberapa sumber hukum yaitu sumber hukum primer yang mengakaji UU PT dan sumber hukum sekunder yang mengkaji literatur maupun karya ilmiah. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa Undang-undang Perseroan Terbatas tidak mengatur mengkhusus larangan dengan saham suami istri tanpa memiliki perjanjian kawin, akan tetapi jika akta kepemilikian Perseroan Terbatas sahamnya suami istri tidak memiliki pemisahan harta akan menyalahi aturan Undang-undang Perseroan Terbatas hal ini timbul dikarenakan tidak adanya persekutuan modal pada Perseroan Terbatas. Akibat dari suatu Perseroan Terbatas yang pemegang sahamnya hanya satu pendiri akan mempengaruhi pada status dari Perseroan Terbatas tersebut karena Perseroan Terbatas sebagai badan hukum menjadi Perseroan Terbatas tidak memiliki tanggung jawab sebagai badan hukum lagi, hal seperti ini dapat dibubarkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri karena telah merujuk pada Pasal 7 angka 6 Undang-ndang Perseroan Terbatas.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p10
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • Pelayanan Prima Narapidana Korupsi di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan

    • Authors: Yohanes Sri Pudyatmoko, G. Aryadi
      Pages: 146 - 165
      Abstract: The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze public services for convicts of corruption cases in Penitentiary Institutions. This study is intended to find the basis for applying the principle of correctional justice with a justice approach to the possibility of preferential treatment. This research is a normative legal research based on secondary data from Correctional Institutions in Special Region of Yogyakarta, especially Wirogunan Prison and Sleman Prison with the support of primary data. The results of the study indicate that public services have been implemented with reference to service standards in the two research objects. Special treatment is given based on considerations of justice by referring to affirmative action to certain prisoners but does not only lead to corruption convicts. In the preferential treatment of prisoners there is indeed discrimination, but it is positive discrimination according to justice which is justified. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pelayanan publik bagi narapidana kasus korupsi di   Lembaga Pemasyaraktan. Penelitian ini dimaksudkan menemukan landasan penerapan prinsip pemasyarakatan dengan pendekatan keadilan terhadap kemungkinan adanya perlakuan istimewa. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif berdasarkan data sekunder Lembaga Pemasyarakatan di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, khususnya Lapas Wirogunan dan Lapas Sleman dengan dukungan data primer. Hasil studi menunjukkan   bahwa pelayanan publik telah dilaksanakan dengan mengacu standar pelayanan di kedua objek penelitian.  Perlakuan istinewa diberikan berdasarkan pertimbangan keadilan dengan mengacu pada affirmative action kepada narapidana tertentu akan tetapi tidak mengarah kepada narapidana kasus korupsi saja.  Dalam perlakuan istimewa terhadap narapidana tersebut memang terdapat diskriminasi, akan tetapi merupakan diskriminasi positif sesuai keadilan yang memang dibenarkan.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p11
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terdaftar Akibat Tindakan Trademarks
           Squatting di Indonesia

    • Authors: Tania Novelin, Pande Yogantara S
      Pages: 166 - 176
      Abstract: The purpose of this paper is the purpose of this paper is to examine, analyze and elaborate the concept of trademarks squatting and legal protection of registered trademarks due to trademarks squatting in Indonesia. This paper is a paper using a normative research method using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and an analytical approach. The results show that the concept of the Trademarks Squatting Act is not regulated in the provisions of the Trademarks and Geographical Indications Act, but in international settings, WIPO explains that trademark squatting is the act of registering or using a mark which is generally a well-known foreign mark, where the mark has not been registered in a country or the mark has been registered but has never been used by the owner of the mark concerned. As well as legal protection for registered marks as a result of trademark squatting in Indonesia, namely being able to file a lawsuit against other parties who unlawfully use a Mark that has similarities in principle or in its entirety for similar goods and/or services in the form of a claim for compensation; and/or Termination of all actions related to the use of the Mark in accordance with the provisions of Article 83 paragraph 1 of the Law on Marks and Geographical Indications. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengkaji, menganalisa dan mengelaborasi konsep tindakan trademarks squatting serta perlindungan hukum terhadap merek terdaftar akibat tindakan trademarks squatting di Indonesia. Tulisan ini merupakan tulisan dengan menggunakan metode peneltiian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan analisis (analytical approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Konsep Tindakan Trademarks Squatting tidak diatur dalam ketentuan Undang-Undang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, namun dalam pengaturan internasional, WIPO menjelaskan bahwa trademark squatting adalah tindakan mendaftarkan atau menggunakan merek yang umumnya merupakan merek asing terkenal, di mana merek tersebut belum terdaftar di suatu negara atau merek tersebut sudah terdaftar namun tidak pernah digunakan oleh pemilik merek yang bersangkutan. Serta perlindungan hukum terhadap merek terdaftar akibat tindakan trademarks squatting di Indonesia yaitu dapat mengajukan gugatan terhadap pihak lain yang secara tanpa hak menggunakan Merek yang mempunyai persamaan pada pokoknya atau keseluruhannya untuk barang dan/atau jasa yang sejenis berupa Gugatan ganti rugi; dan/atau Penghentian semua perbuatan yang berkaitan dengan penggunaan Merek tersebut sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 83 ayat 1 UU Merek dan Indikasi Geografis.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p12
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • The Enforcement of Environmental Criminal Law in Customary Law Community

    • Authors: Sagung Putri M.E. Purwani
      Pages: 177 - 189
      Abstract: The purpose of this paper was to examine and analyze the regulation of criminal sanctions in environmental crimes by customary law community, and analyze customary law community policies in the settlement of environmental crimes. This paper was normative research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicated that Based on all the abovementioned, it can be concluded that the regulation of Environmental Criminal Enforcement by Customary Law Community has been regulated in the provisions of environmental laws and regulations, namely Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management, Law No. 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry, and Regulation of the Minister of Environment and Forestry Number 32 of 2015 concerning Forests. Further, there are also environmental criminal laws which are regulated in other sectoral laws relating to the environment and natural resources. Regarding the Settlement of Environmental Crimes by Customary law community, it is done through efforts to arrange Deliberations and Restorations in the balance of nature and the environment that were previously damaged and polluted by customary law community. Thus, there is a need for recognition and management of customary forests that must be carried out professionally and sustainably based on local wisdom. Hence, it is expected to be able to improve equitable welfare.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p13
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • Pemidanaan Wajib Pajak Atas Pelanggaran Kewajiban Perpajakan (Perspektif
           Undang-Undang Ketentuan Umum Tata Cara Perpajakan)

    • Authors: I Made Walesa Putra, Marcus Priyo Gunarto, Dahliana Hasan
      Pages: 190 - 214
      Abstract: Article aimed to examine the restriction between tax administration violations with tax crimes in order to prevent or minimize disparities in tax law enforcement, for more objective and have legal certainty in distinguishing or determining to what extent a violation of tax administration provisions classified as a tax crime. The type of research is normative research with a statutory and consept approach. The results of study indicated that the restriction of a tax administration violation committed by a taxpayer therefore, it can become a tax crime is based on whether it has fulfilled the formulation of offense element in Article 38, Article 39, and Article 39A of the Tax Law (UU KUP). Beside the fulfillment of the article formulation, there is a policy of  the tax authorities or law enforcement officers in accordance with the Tax Law, which is very decisive to become a criminal act by prioritizing the principles of taxation, administrative penal law by the ultimum remedium character. The policy concerns the authority to stop cases in the process of examining preliminary evidence and stopping investigations, to be resolved administratively by paying the repayment added with fine. Even if criminal law is enforced, fines are prioritized over imprisonment or confinement, as the benefit principle is prioritized in tax law enforcement. Penulisan artikel bertujuan mengkaji batasan pelanggaran administrasi perpajakan dengan tindak pidana pajak, sehingga dapat mencegah ataupun meminimalisir disparitas penegakan hukum perpajakan agar lebih objektif dan berkepastian hukum dalam membedakan ataupun menentukan sejauh mana suatu pelanggaran ketentuan administrasi perpajakan dapat menjadi tindak pidana perpajakan.  Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa batasan suatu pelanggaran administrasi perpajakan yang dilakukan oleh wajib pajak sehingga dapat menjadi suatu tindak pidana perpajakan adalah berdasarkan apakah telah memenuhi rumusan unsur tindak pidana dalam Pasal 38, Pasal 39, dan Pasal 39A UU KUP. Disamping pemenuhan rumusan pasal tersebut, ada kebijakan fiskus ataupun aparat penegak hukum sesuai UU KUP yang sangat menentukan untuk menjadi tindak pidana dengan mengedepankan prinsip perpajakan, administrative penal law yang karakternya ultimum remedium. Kebijakan tersebut, menyangkut kewenangan untuk menghentikan perkara pada proses pemeriksaan bukti permulaan dan penghentian penyidikan, untuk dapat diselesaikan secara administratif dengan membayar pelunasan ditambah denda. Bahkan jika dilakukan penegakan hukum pidana maka sanksi pidana denda diprioritaskan daripada penjara maupun kurungan, sebagaimana asas kemanfaatan yang lebih diutamakan dalam penegakan hukum perpajakan.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p14
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • Model Perjanjian Escrow : Kajian Tentang Kewenangan dan Tugas Notaris
           Sebagai Penyedia Jasa Escrow

    • Authors: Anak Agung Bagus Juniarta, Desak Putu Dewi Kasih
      Pages: 215 - 227
      Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to analyze, identify, and elaborate on the concept of escrow or escrow accounts including escrow agreements in relation to buying and selling transactions in Indonesia and to examine the role of Notaries as providers of escrow services in buying and selling transactions in Indonesia based on the prevailing laws and regulations. apply. This paper is a paper that used a normative legal research method using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and an analytical approach. The results of the study show that the concept of escrow service is a service provided by a neutral or impartial third party with the aim of storing documents, securities, goods or money, based on a written agreement between the seller, buyer and escrow holder, where the agreement contains instructions on the procedures and conditions for the delivery of documents, securities, goods or money to certain parties, as well as the authority of a notary as a provider of escrow services in buying and selling transactions is not regulated in UUJN-P especially in Article 15 UUJN-P does not explain that a notary is authorized as escrow service provider in buying and selling transactions, so in other words a Notary does not have the authority to become an escrow service provider in buying and selling transactions. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk menganalisa, mengidentifikasi, dan mengelaborasi konsep escrow atau escrow account termasuk juga perjanjian escrow dalam kaitannya dengan kegiatan transaksi jual beli di Indonesia serta mengkaji mengenai peran Notaris sebagai penyedia jasa escrow dalam transaksi jual beli di Indonesia berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Tulisan ini adalah tulisan yang menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan analisis (analytical approach). Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa konsep jasa escrow adalah suatu jasa yang diberikan oleh pihak ketiga yang bersifat netral atau tidak memihak dengan tujuan untuk menyimpan dokumen, surat berharga, barang atau uang, berdasarkan atas perjanjian tertulis antara penjual, pembeli dan pemegang escrow, dimana perjanjian tersebut berisi instruksi tentang tata cara dan kondisi untuk penyerahan atas dokumen, surat berharga, barang atau uang ke pihak tertentu, serta Kewenangan notaris sebagai penyedia jasa escrow dalam transaksi jual beli tidak diatur dalam UUJN-P khususnya dalam Pasal 15 UUJN-P tidak menjelaskan Notaris berwenang sebagai penyedia jasa escrow dalam transaksi jual beli, sehingga dengan kata lain Notaris tidak memiliki kewenangan untuk menjadi penyedia jasa escrow dalam transaksi jual beli.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p15
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
  • Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak dalam Kegiatan Equity-Based
           Crowdfunding di Indonesia

    • Authors: Ni Gusti Agung Ayu Putu Rismajayanti, Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi Santosa
      Pages: 228 - 240
      Abstract: Equity crowdfunding investors need legal certainty and legal protection for their investments. On the other hand, equity issuers and platform operators also need to get legal certainty from the Financial Services Authority. The Financial Services Authority has issued Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) Number 37/POJK.04/2018 regarding Funding Services through Information Technology Based Shares (Equity Crowdfunding). The problem examined in this paper is how the construction of legal relations and legal protection for the parties in equity crowdfunding in Indonesia. This study uses a normative method by reviewing the laws and regulations related to the legal issues studied. The results of the study concluded that the parties in holding equity crowdfunding, namely share issuers, organizers, and investors, all three has a triangular relationship that is born based on agreements or laws and regulations. Even though the OJK has issued regulations relating to equity crowdfunding, the current regulations do not guarantee full legal protection especially for investors. Penerbit equity serta penyelenggara platform juga perlu mendapatkan kepastian hukum dari Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan telah menerbitkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (POJK) Nomor 37/POJK.04/2018 tentang Layanan Urun Dana Melalui Penawaran Saham Berbasis Teknologi Informasi (Equity Crowdfunding). Permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penulisan ini adalah bagaimana konstruksi hubungan hukum serta perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak dalam equity crowdfunding di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif dengan mengkaji peraturan perundang-undangan terkait permasalahan hukum yang diteliti. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa para pihak dalam penyelenggaraan equity crowdfunding, yaitu penerbit saham, penyelenggara, dan pemodal, ketiganya memiliki hubungan hukum yang lahir berdasarkan perjanjian maupun peraturan perundang-undangan. Meskipun OJK telah menerbitkan peraturan terkait equity crowdfunding, pengaturan yang ada saat ini belum memberikan jaminan perlindungan hukum sepenuhnya khususnya bagi pemodal.
      PubDate: 2022-05-12
      DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p16
      Issue No: Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022)
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762

Your IP address:
Home (Search)
About JournalTOCs
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-