Journal Cover
Comparative Political Studies
Journal Prestige (SJR): 3.772
Citation Impact (citeScore): 3
Number of Followers: 217  
 
Hybrid Journal Hybrid journal   * Containing 2 Open Access Open Access article(s) in this issue *
ISSN (Print) 0010-4140 - ISSN (Online) 1552-3829
Published by Sage Publications Homepage  [1079 journals]
  • The Protestant Ethic Reexamined: Calvinism and Industrialization
    • Authors: Jeremy Spater, Isak Tranvik
      Pages: 1963 - 1994
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Volume 52, Issue 13-14, Page 1963-1994, November-December 2019.
      Can cultural differences affect economic change' Max Weber famously argued that ascetic Protestants’ religious commitments—specifically their work ethic—inspired them to develop capitalist economic systems conducive to rapid economic change. Yet today, scholars continue to debate the empirical validity of Weber’s claims, which address a vibrant literature in political economy on the relationship between culture and economic change. We revisit the link between religion and economic change in Reformed Europe. To do so, we leverage a quasi-experiment in Western Switzerland, where certain regions had Reformed Protestant beliefs imposed on them by local authorities during the Swiss Reformation, while other regions remained Catholic. Using 19th-century Swiss census data, we perform a fuzzy spatial regression discontinuity design to test Weber’s hypothesis and find that the Swiss Protestants in the Canton of Vaud industrialized faster than their Catholic neighbors in Fribourg.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-09-18T10:05:01Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019830721
       
  • The Evolution of the Immigration Debate: Evidence from a New Dataset of
           Party Positions Over the Last Half-Century
    • Authors: Rafaela Dancygier, Yotam Margalit
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      Immigration is one of the most contentious issues across contemporary democracies, but this has not always been the case. What accounts for this development' We study how immigration has evolved in the political debate in Western Europe over five decades by creating and analyzing a comprehensive new data set—Immigration in Party Manifestos (IPM)—of all immigration-related appeals made in preelection manifestos by major parties. Our account focuses on three central debates. First, contra to perceived wisdom, we find no evidence of polarization between left and right. Instead, we document a striking co-movement. Second, we find only modest support for the argument that the success of anti-immigrant parties significantly shapes how centrist parties position themselves on immigration. Finally, our evidence counters the claim that cultural issues have overtaken the debate over immigration. Although the prominence of immigration-related cultural appeals has increased in certain countries and elections, the economic dimension has remained prevalent.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-07-22T10:33:05Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019858936
       
  • How Do Inclusionary and Exclusionary Autocracies Affect Ordinary
           People'
    • Authors: Anja Neundorf, Johannes Gerschewski, Roman-Gabriel Olar
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      We propose a distinction between inclusionary and exclusionary autocratic ruling strategies and develop novel theoretical propositions on the legacy that these strategies leave on citizens’ political attitudes once the autocratic regime broke down. Using data of 1.3 million survey respondents from 71 countries and hierarchical age–period–cohort models, we estimate between and within cohort differences in citizens’ democratic support. We find that inclusionary regimes—with wider redistribution of socioeconomic and political benefits—leave a stronger antidemocratic legacy than exclusionary regimes on the political attitudes of their citizens. Similarly, citizens who were part of the winning group in an autocracy are more critical with democracy compared with citizens who were part of discriminated groups. This article contributes to our understanding about how autocracies affect the hearts and minds of ordinary citizens.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-07-17T05:26:46Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019858958
       
  • A Closer Look at the Limits of Consociationalism
    • Authors: Matthew Charles Wilson
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      Although scholars agree that ethnically divided societies are generally more prone to political violence, critics of consociationalism suggest that proportional representation and parliamentarism provide poor solutions for ethnically heterogeneous settings. I argue that extant findings about the impacts of powersharing institutions on conflict likelihood assume that institutions have a linear relationship with ethnic diversity, whereas in reality, the relationship is more complex. I demonstrate that proportional representation and parliamentarism are associated with an increased likelihood of civil conflict at mid-range levels of diversity but are associated with a decreased risk of conflict in more extremely divided settings, while federalism is independently associated with greater conflict risk at higher levels of ethnic heterogeneity. The results underscore that the peace-promoting effects of institutions may depend on how polarized societies are, encouraging scholars to think more seriously about the effectiveness of consociationalism for mitigating violence where there is greater ethnic diversity.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-07-16T08:29:14Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019858956
       
  • Speechmaking and the Selectorate: Persuasion in Nonpreferential Electoral
           Systems
    • Authors: Jorge M. Fernandes, Miguel Won, Bruno Martins
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      This article examines the extent to which legislators use legislative debates to engage in localism activities to cater to the interests of their selectorate in nonpreferential electoral systems. We define localism activities as the delivery of tangible and intangible benefits to a geographically confined constituency that is instrumental to legislators’ re-selection. Our primary argument is that legislators whose selectorate operates at the local level make more speeches with parochial references. Results show strong support for this assertion. Furthermore, we find that high district magnitude leads to higher levels of localism. We use a mixed-methods research design, combining an original data set of 60,000 debates in Portugal with qualitative evidence from elite interviews. We make a methodological innovation in the field of representation and legislative studies by using a Named Entity Recognition tool to analyze the debates.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-07-12T09:50:48Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019858964
       
  • The Origins of Persistent Current Account Imbalances in the Post-Bretton
           Woods Era
    • Authors: Mark S. Manger, Thomas Sattler
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      Why do some countries run persistent current account surpluses' Why do others run deficits, often over decades, leading to enduring global imbalances' Such persistent imbalances are the root cause of many financial crises and a major source of international economic conflict. We propose that differences in wage-bargaining institutions explain a large share of imbalances through their effect on the trade balance. In countries with coordinated wage bargaining, wage growth in export industries can be restrained to ensure competitiveness, leading to persistent trade surpluses. We estimate the contribution of these institutions to trade balances in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries since 1977 and find ample support for our hypothesis. Contrary to much of the literature, the choice of fixed or floating exchange rate regimes has only a small effect on trade or current account balances. In other words, internal adjustment in surplus countries via wage-bargaining institutions trumps external adjustment by deficit countries.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-07-11T04:59:10Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019859031
       
  • (How) Do Voters Discriminate Against Women Candidates' Experimental
           and Qualitative Evidence From Malawi
    • Authors: Amanda Clayton, Amanda Lea Robinson, Martha C. Johnson, Ragnhild Muriaas
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      How do voters evaluate women candidates in places where traditional gender norms are strong' We conduct a survey experiment in Malawi to assess both whether citizens discriminate against women candidates and how other salient candidate characteristics—political experience, family status, policy focus, and gendered kinship practices—interact with candidate gender to affect citizen support. Contrary to our expectations, we find citizens prefer women candidates ceteris paribus, and women and men with the same traits are evaluated similarly. Yet, we find two unexpected ways women candidates are disadvantaged in the electoral process. First, we find that citizens prefer candidates who are married with young children, a profile much more common among men than women candidates in practice. Second, we find pervasive qualitative reports of negative campaigning that likely affected citizens’ evaluations of actual women candidates, while not affecting evaluations of hypothetical candidates. We discuss how our results speak to the ways gender biases operate in practice across political contexts.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-07-10T06:32:19Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019858960
       
  • Vote Secrecy With Diverse Voters
    • Authors: Daniel W. Gingerich, Danilo Medeiros
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      Why would incumbent politicians adopt the secret ballot when doing so weakens the advantages of incumbency' Why is the secret ballot considered a democratizing reform in some settings, whereas in others it is associated with democratic backsliding' We provide theory and empirics to address these questions. Our starting point is the observation that the secret ballot had two consequences. It reduced the capacity to monitor the vote, thereby dampening the efficacy of clientelism. Yet, depending on literacy and electoral rules, it could also narrow political participation. Recognizing this, we endogenize politicians’ preferences over the secret ballot, concentrating on the role of their personal and constituency characteristics. Legislative roll call voting data from Brazil’s Second Republic (1945-1964) is used to test our framework. Consistent with expectations, the level of literacy of legislators’ supporters and the strength of their local ties strongly influenced the choice to adopt the secret ballot.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-07-08T05:00:01Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019859040
       
  • The Ideological Shadow of Authoritarianism
    • Authors: Elias Dinas, Ksenia Northmore-Ball
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      How do the labels left and right take on meaning in new democracies' Existing explanations point to the universality of the left–right scheme or, reversely, emphasize regionally dominant social cleavages. We propose an alternative legacy-focused theory based on two observations: Dictatorships are not ideologically neutral and are negatively evaluated by most citizens and elites after democratization. These premises lead us to expect that when the authoritarian regime is associated with the left (right), the citizens of a new democracy will display an antileft (antiright) bias in their left–right self-identification. We test this hypothesis across Latin American and European new democracies. We find significant bias, which in the case of new democracies following left-wing regimes is concealed due to intercohort heterogeneity. Although older cohorts denote a positive bias, cohorts born after Stalin’s era denote negative bias against the left. Consistent with our expectations, repression exacerbates this bias whereas indoctrination mitigates it. Finally, we look at how these biases apply to party preferences. The findings have important implications for understanding authoritarian legacies and party system development in new democracies.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-07-08T04:58:02Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019852699
       
  • To Reform or to Retain' Politicians’ Incentives to Clean Up Corrupt
           Courts in Hybrid Regimes
    • Authors: Ketevan Bolkvadze
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      This article offers a novel take on the problem of judicial independence in nondemocracies. Some scholars hold that political fragmentation leads to more judicial independence; others argue that it leads to less independence in nondemocracies. These studies have focused on judicial politicization and neglected judicial corruption. Using a process-tracing controlled comparison of reforms in Georgia and Moldova, I investigate the impact of political fragmentation on judicial corruption. I argue that politicians in less fragmented regimes, as in Georgia, have stronger incentives to reform corrupt courts, and utilize anticorruption measures for establishing long-term political control. In more fragmented regimes, as in Moldova, politicians have stronger incentives to resist anticorruption measures and instead utilize corrupt courts for short-term private gains. These findings suggest that political fragmentation in hybrid regimes can propel politicians to delegate neither more, nor less power to courts, but instead to use distinct avenues, or “entry-points,” to influence judicial outcomes.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-07-04T09:16:21Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019859029
       
  • Testing the “China Model” of Meritocratic Promotions: Do Democracies
           Reward Less Competent Ministers Than Autocracies'
    • Authors: Don S. Lee, Paul Schuler
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      Proponents of the “China Model” suggest that autocracies, particularly in East Asia, reward competence more than democracies. However, a competing literature argues that autocracies are less likely to reward competence because autocrats fear that competent officials could challenge for power. We argue that autocracies do not fear technical competence; they fear political competence. As such, autocracies may promote ministers with technical competence but punish the politically competent. Democracies, by contrast, place a premium on political competence when deciding whom to promote. We provide the first test of this theory on how ministerial behavior is rewarded using a unique data set of political performance and promotions in nine East Asian countries. Our findings show that autocracies promote officials with technical competence as long as the ministers limit their political behavior. In democracies, parliamentary and presidential democracies promote those displaying political competence.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-07-04T09:15:19Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019858962
       
  • Backing the Incumbent in Difficult Times: The Electoral Impact of
           Wildfires
    • Authors: Roberto Ramos, Carlos Sanz
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      How do voters react to shocks that are outside the control of politicians' We address this question by studying the electoral impact of wildfires in Spain in the period 1983-2014. This context allows us to study (a) the effects of fires at different locations and times, as opposed to a specific disaster; (b) the heterogeneous effects by time relative to election day; and (c) the effects on elections for all levels of government. Using a difference-in-difference strategy, we find that an accidental fire up to 9 months ahead of a municipal election increases the incumbent party’s vote share by up to 8 percentage points, whereas a fire earlier in the term does not affect the election results. In addition, fires have no effect on regional or national elections. We discuss the possible mechanisms behind the results in light of the main theories on electoral accountability.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-07-03T09:33:09Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019858959
       
  • Is Bigger Always Better' How Targeting Aid Windfalls Affects Capture
           and Social Cohesion
    • Authors: Laura Paler, Camille Strauss-Kahn, Korhan Kocak
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      A central challenge in development involves ensuring that aid reaches those in greatest need. Aid agencies typically try to achieve this by targeting aid to vulnerable individuals or groups. Despite the prevalence of targeting, we know little about its effects on distributional outcomes and social cohesion in communities where some are intended to benefit and others are excluded. We investigate this by formalizing targeting as a bargaining game with coalition formation involving three players—the target group, the elite, and an excluded group. Our approach yields the counter-intuitive insight that the target group will actually benefit more in communities where elites and the excluded group compete to capture aid. We provide support for predictions using a regression discontinuity design and original survey data from an aid program implemented in Aceh, Indonesia. This article demonstrates the importance of understanding the role of community dynamics in shaping the economic and social outcomes of targeted aid programs.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-06-18T08:48:17Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019852694
       
  • Rethinking Democratic Diffusion: Bringing Regime Type Back In
    • Authors: Edward Goldring, Sheena Chestnut Greitens
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      Studies of democratic diffusion often emphasize geographic proximity: democratization in a country or region makes democratization nearby more likely. We argue that regime type has been underappreciated; authoritarian breakdown and democratization often diffuse along networks of similar regimes. A regime’s type affects its vulnerability to popular challenge, and regime similarity increases the likelihood that protest strategies developed against one regime are effective against similar regimes. We employ a qualitative case study from China to generate our theory, then test it quantitatively and with out-of-sample cases. We find that regime similarity strongly predicts autocratic breakdown and democratic diffusion, making both outcomes more likely. Including regime similarity significantly reduces the effect of geographic proximity, although geographic proximity may increase the effect of regime similarity. Reinterpreting democratic diffusion as a regime-type phenomenon calls for revision to conventional wisdom on the role of international factors in authoritarian breakdown and democratization.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-06-17T06:53:31Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019852701
       
  • Democracy and Retribution: Transitional Justice and Regime Support in
           Postwar West Germany
    • Authors: Giovanni Capoccia, Grigore Pop-Eleches
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      How harshly should perpetrators of past abuses be punished, to reinforce the legitimacy of a new democracy' Drawing on sociopsychological theories, we hypothesize that prodemocratic mass attitudes are favored by the perception that defendants in transitional justice trials have been punished in a way that is morally proportional to their offenses. This perception is shaped by the social categorization of defendants and the opinions about the certainty of their guilt that predominate in the mass public. When defendants are largely seen as co-ethnics and their guilt is contested, like in the West German case, prodemocratic attitudes are likely to be strengthened by lighter punishments and undermined by harsher sanctions. The analysis of subnational variation in patterns of punishment in postwar West Germany confirms this hypothesis and shows that these attitudinal effects persist in the medium term. Our findings have implications for research on transitional justice and democratization.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-06-13T07:16:22Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019852704
       
  • Are We All Amazon Primed' Consumers and the Politics of Platform Power
    • Authors: Pepper D. Culpepper, Kathleen Thelen
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      This article articulates a distinctive source of political influence of some technology firms, which we call platform power. Platform power inheres in companies of economic scale that provide the terms of access through which large numbers of consumers access goods, services, and information. Firms with platform power benefit from a deference from policymakers, but this deference is not primarily a function of direct influence through lobbying or campaign contributions, nor does it come from the threat of disinvestment. Companies with platform power instead benefit from the tacit allegiance of consumers, who can prove a formidable source of opposition to regulations that threaten these platforms. Focusing on the critical role played by consumers in explaining the powers platform firms wield in the rich democracies lends insight as well into their distinctive vulnerabilities, which flow from events that split the consumer–platform alliance or that cue citizen, as opposed to consumer, political identities.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-06-11T12:23:50Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019852687
       
  • Leader Succession and Civil War
    • Authors: Andrej Kokkonen, Anders Sundell
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.
      Leadership succession is a perennial source of instability in autocratic regimes. Despite this, it has remained a curiously understudied phenomenon in political science. In this article, we compile a novel and comprehensive dataset on civil war in Europe and combine it with data on the fate of monarchs in 28 states over 800 years to investigate how autocratic succession affected the risk of civil war. Exploiting the natural deaths of monarchs to identify exogenous variation in successions, we find that successions substantially increased the risk of civil war. The risk of succession wars could, however, be mitigated by hereditary succession arrangements (i.e., primogeniture—the principle of letting the oldest son inherit the throne). When hereditary monarchies replaced elective monarchies in Europe, succession wars declined drastically. Our results point to the importance of the succession, and the institutions governing it, for political stability in autocratic regimes.
      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-06-11T12:23:42Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019852712
       
  • The Lesser Evil' Corruption Voting and the Importance of Clean
           Alternatives
    • Authors: Mattias Agerberg
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-06-10T07:16:20Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019852697
       
  • The Lay of the Land: Information Capacity and the Modern State
    • Authors: Thomas Brambor, Agustín Goenaga, Johannes Lindvall, Jan Teorell
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-05-27T10:09:42Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019843432
       
  • The Authoritarian Wager: Political Action and the Sudden Collapse of
           Repression
    • Authors: Branislav L. Slantchev, Kelly S. Matush
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-05-14T09:45:38Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019843564
       
  • Tradeoffs of Inclusion: Development in Ancient Athens
    • Authors: Federica Carugati
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-05-06T08:33:39Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019843557
       
  • Protests and Voter Defections in Electoral Autocracies: Evidence From
           Russia
    • Authors: Katerina Tertytchnaya
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-05-06T08:32:04Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019843556
       
  • Linkage Switches in Local Elections: Evidence From the Workers’
           Party in Brazil
    • Authors: Peter G. Johannessen
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-05-01T06:40:18Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019843567
       
  • Pulling the Strings' The Strategic Use of Pro-Government Mobilization
           in Authoritarian Regimes

         This is an Open Access Article Open Access Article

    • Authors: Sebastian Hellmeier, Nils B. Weidmann
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-04-25T06:23:26Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019843559
       
  • Democracy and the Entanglement of Political Parties and the State:
           Party–State Relations in 20th-Century France, Italy, and Germany

         This is an Open Access Article Open Access Article

    • Authors: P. (Pepijn) Corduwener
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-04-22T07:00:45Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019843548
       
  • Institutions and the “Resource Curse”: Evidence From Cases of
           Oil-Related Bribery
    • Authors: Paasha Mahdavi
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-03-19T09:14:33Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019830727
       
  • Coalition Agreements, Issue Attention, and Cabinet Governance
    • Authors: Heike Klüver, Hanna Bäck
      First page: 1995
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-03-12T04:37:47Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019830726
       
  • Policy Regimes and Economic Accountability in Latin America
    • Authors: Ryan E. Carlin, Timothy Hellwig
      First page: 2032
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-03-12T07:22:37Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019830731
       
  • The Political Conditions for Local Peacemaking: A Comparative Study of
           Communal Conflict Resolution in Kenya
    • Authors: Emma Elfversson
      First page: 2061
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-03-12T04:42:59Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019830734
       
  • Evading the Patronage Trap: Organizational Capacity and Demand Making in
           Mexico
    • Authors: Brian Palmer-Rubin
      First page: 2097
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-03-12T04:46:25Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019830745
       
  • Being There Is Half the Battle: Group Inclusion, Constitution-Writing, and
           Democracy
    • Authors: Todd A. Eisenstadt, Tofigh Maboudi
      First page: 2135
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-03-12T04:45:05Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019830739
       
  • Path Dependence in European Development: Medieval Politics, Conflict, and
           State Building
    • Authors: Avidit Acharya, Alexander Lee
      First page: 2171
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-03-12T04:35:47Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019830716
       
  • Asymmetric Accountability: An Experimental Investigation of Biases in
           Evaluations of Governments’ Election Pledges
    • Authors: Elin Naurin, Stuart Soroka, Niels Markwat
      First page: 2207
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-03-15T05:28:13Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019830740
       
  • Economic Geography, Political Inequality, and Public Goods in the Original
           13 U.S. States
    • Authors: Pablo Beramendi, Jeffrey Jensen
      First page: 2235
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-03-18T05:33:38Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019830741
       
  • Street Demonstrations and the Media Agenda: An Analysis of the Dynamics of
           Protest Agenda Setting
    • Authors: Will Jennings, Clare Saunders
      First page: 2283
      Abstract: Comparative Political Studies, Ahead of Print.

      Citation: Comparative Political Studies
      PubDate: 2019-03-19T09:15:33Z
      DOI: 10.1177/0010414019830736
       
 
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
Fax: +00 44 (0)131 4513327
 
Home (Search)
Subjects A-Z
Publishers A-Z
Customise
APIs
Your IP address: 3.227.233.55
 
About JournalTOCs
API
Help
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-