Subjects -> OCCUPATIONS AND CAREERS (Total: 33 journals)
|
|
|
- IOP volume 13 issue 3 Cover and Front matter
- PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.74 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- IOP volume 13 issue 3 Cover and Back matter
- PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.75 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- Prestige and relevance of the scholarly journals: Impressions of SIOP
members- Authors: Scott Highhouse; Michael J. Zickar, Sarah R. Melick
Pages: 273 - 290 Abstract: Prestigious journals are widely admired for publishing quality scholarship, yet the primary indicators of journal prestige (i.e., impact factors) do not directly assess audience admiration. Moreover, the publication landscape has changed substantially in the last 20 years, with electronic publishing changing the way we consume scientific research. Given that it has been 18 years since the publication of the last journal prestige survey of SIOP members, the authors conducted a new survey and used these results to reflect on changing practices within industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology. SIOP members (n = 557) rated the prestige and relevance of I-O and management journals. Responses were analyzed according to job setting, and were compared to a survey conducted by Zickar and Highhouse (2001) in 2000. There was considerable consistency in prestige ratings across settings (i.e., management department vs. psychology department; academic vs. applied), especially among the top journals. There was considerable variance, however, in the perceived usefulness of different journals. Results also suggested considerable consistency across the two time periods, but with some increases in prestige among OB-oriented journals. Changes in the journal landscape are discussed, including the rise of OHP as a topic of concentration in I-O. We suggest that I-O programs will continue to attract the top researchers in talent management and OHP, which should result in the use of a broader set of journals for judging I-O program impact. PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.2 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- Is where you are more important than who you are'
- Authors: Alan M. Saks; Jamie A. Gruman
Pages: 291 - 294 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.51 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- Pardon my French: On superfluous journal rankings, incentives, and impacts
on industrial-organizational psychology publication practices in French business schools- Authors: Mehmet A. Orhan
Pages: 295 - 306 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.59 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- I-O Psychology and management journal prestige in business schools: Do
institutional versus individual views differ'- Authors: In-Sue Oh; Chad H. Van Iddekinge
Pages: 307 - 311 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.58 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- Publish or perish, but what about practice'
- Authors: Alicia S. Davis; Sofia S. Van Sickle, Saskia Shirley, Jennifer Feitosa
Pages: 312 - 315 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.57 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- I-O psychology’s top journals at the bottom of the TOP ranking: Should
we consider openness and transparency when ranking journals'- Authors: Deborah M. Powell; Jeffrey R. Spence, David J. Stanley
Pages: 316 - 320 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.52 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- Prestige does not equal quality: Lack of research quality in high-prestige
journals- Authors: Tine Köhler; Justin A. DeSimone, Jeremy L. Schoen
Pages: 321 - 327 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.53 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- The TOP factor: An indicator of quality to complement journal impact
factor- Authors: Sven Kepes; George C. Banks, Sheila K. Keener
Pages: 328 - 333 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.56 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- Enabling practical research for the benefit of organizations and society
- Authors: Jennifer L. Geimer; Richard N. Landers, Emily G. Solberg
Pages: 334 - 338 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.55 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- The global impact of North American journal prestige: Understanding its
effects on faculty life throughout the world- Authors: Austin Lee Nichols; Sharon Glazer, Andrei Ion, Rana Moukarzel
Pages: 339 - 344 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.54 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- Successful aging at work: A process model to guide future research and
practice- Authors: Dorien T. A. M. Kooij; Hannes Zacher, Mo Wang, Jutta Heckhausen
Pages: 345 - 365 Abstract: Although aging workforces result in numerous practical challenges for organizations and societies, little research has focused on successful aging at work. The limited existent research has generated rather diverse conceptualizations of successful aging at work, which are often broad and difficult to operationalize in practice. Therefore, to advance research and practice, we offer a specific and practical conceptualization of successful aging at work by developing a process model, which identifies relevant antecedents and mechanisms. In particular, we define successful aging at work as the proactive maintenance of, or adaptive recovery (after decline) to, high levels of ability and motivation to continue working among older workers. We also argue that proactive efforts to maintain, or adaptive efforts to recover and restore, high ability and motivation to continue working result from a self-regulation process that involves goal engagement and disengagement strategies to maintain, adjust, and restore person–environment fit. Further, we propose that at various levels (i.e., person, job, work group, organization, and society) more distal factors function as antecedents of this self-regulation process, with age-related bias and discrimination potentially operating at each level. Finally, we offer a roadmap for future research and practical applications. PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.1 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- Who has the option to age successfully at work' Considering nonwork
factors- Authors: Meghan K. Davenport; Margaret E. Beier
Pages: 366 - 368 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.72 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- Advancing our understanding of successful aging at work: A socioemotional
selectivity theory perspective- Authors: Marc Cubrich; Alexandra Petruzzelli
Pages: 369 - 373 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.71 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- The role of leader-member exchange in successful aging at work
- Authors: Erica Fernandes; John N. Shea, Nicole Rogers, Crystal Smith, Evelyn Rogers
Pages: 374 - 376 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.70 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- Putting successful aging into context
- Authors: Gretchen A. Petery; Lucinda J. Iles, Sharon K. Parker
Pages: 377 - 382 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.69 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- On the limits of agency for successful aging at work
- Authors: Rachel S. Rauvola; Cort W. Rudolph
Pages: 383 - 387 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.61 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- “Midlife crisis” on the road to successful workforce aging
- Authors: Vanessa Burke; Alicia A. Grandey
Pages: 388 - 394 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.62 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- This time with feeling: Aging, emotion, motivation, and decision making at
work- Authors: Joseph A. Mikels; Alice F. Stuhlmacher
Pages: 395 - 398 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.65 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- Successful aging at work: reflections on alpha, beta, and gamma change for
older workers and the 2020 SIOP workforce trends- Authors: Deborah A. Olson; Kenneth S. Shultz
Pages: 399 - 402 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.66 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- What’s age got to do with it' You may be surprised!
- Authors: Kristin Allen; Gerianne van Someren, Sara Gutierrez
Pages: 403 - 407 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.68 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- Clarifying multilevel and temporal influences on successful aging at work:
An ecological systems perspective- Authors: Justin Marcus
Pages: 408 - 412 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.67 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- How bias thwarts successful aging at work
- Authors: Abby Corrington; Linnea C. Ng, Cassandra N. Phetmisy, Ivy Watson, Felix Y. Wu, Mikki Hebl
Pages: 413 - 416 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.63 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- A step forward: from conceptualizing to measuring successful aging at work
- Authors: Stanimira K. Taneva; Georgi P. Yankov
Pages: 417 - 421 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.64 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- Successfully aging at work or successfully working while aging' The
importance of older workers’ psychological well-being- Authors: William P. Jimenez
Pages: 422 - 425 PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.60 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
- YouScience: mitigating the skills gap by addressing the gender imbalance
in high-demand careers- Authors: Rodney A. McCloy; Patrick J. Rottinghaus, Chan Jeong Park, Rich Feller, Todd Bloom
Pages: 426 - 441 Abstract: The U.S. labor market continues to grapple with a “skills gap” (Marshall & Craig, 2019): a disconnect between the skills employers need and the number of job-seekers with those skills. Compounded by historically low unemployment rates, this gap is leaving employers with unfilled jobs and narrow talent pipelines. Concurrently, there are lingering concerns regarding underrepresentation of women and minorities in certain sectors of the labor market—particularly occupations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). This article examines how the traditional interest-only career guidance tools used in education significantly influence the gender-based skills gaps that persist in high-demand careers and introduces YouScience, a company that is helping ameliorate the skills gap by combining measures of aptitudes and interests in a new career discovery platform. We close by presenting action steps for students, parents, educators, and counselors, as well as positing possible effects of COVID-19 on career exploration and counseling. PubDate: 2020-09-01T00:00:00.000Z DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.73 Issue No: Vol. 13, No. 3 (2020)
|