Subjects -> SOCIAL SCIENCES (Total: 1714 journals)
    - BIRTH CONTROL (22 journals)
    - CHILDREN AND YOUTH (252 journals)
    - FOLKLORE (30 journals)
    - MATRIMONY (16 journals)
    - MEN'S INTERESTS (16 journals)
    - MEN'S STUDIES (90 journals)
    - SEXUALITY (53 journals)
    - SOCIAL SCIENCES (1018 journals)
    - WOMEN'S INTERESTS (44 journals)
    - WOMEN'S STUDIES (173 journals)

WOMEN'S INTERESTS (44 journals)

Showing 1 - 44 of 44 Journals sorted alphabetically
ABO : Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts, 1640-1830     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Ada : A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology     Open Access   (Followers: 22)
AFRREV LALIGENS : An International Journal of Language, Literature and Gender Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Antyajaa : Indian Journal of Women and Social Change     Hybrid Journal  
Asian Journal of Women's Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice     Open Access   (Followers: 15)
Black Women, Gender & Families     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 18)
Body Image     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 15)
Breastfeeding Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 18)
Canadian Journal of Women and the Law     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
Canadian Social Science     Open Access   (Followers: 14)
Canadian Woman Studies     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
DePaul Journal of Women, Gender and the Law     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy     Open Access   (Followers: 21)
Feminist Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 21)
Feminist Legal Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 19)
Feminist Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 19)
feminists@law     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Frontline     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 18)
Gender and Language     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 15)
Gender Impact Assessment     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
Girlhood Studies     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
Investigaciones Feministas     Open Access  
Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Journal of Fashion Technology & Textile Engineering     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Journal of Women's History     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 20)
Michigan Feminist Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
ninepatch : A Creative Journal for Women and Gender Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Partner Abuse     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
philoSOPHIA     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 4)
Politics & Gender     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 25)
Premie Press : a quarterly publication for those interested in the development of premature babies and children     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
QED : A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
QJB : Querelles. Jahrbuch für Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
querelles-net : Rezensionszeitschrift für Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung     Open Access  
Social Work With Groups     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
Temas de Mujeres     Open Access  
William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Woman : Psychosomatic Gynaecology and Obstetrics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Women & Performance: a journal of feminist theory     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Women and Music: A Journal of Gender and Culture     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 12)
Women in German Yearbook : Feminist Studies in German Literature & Culture     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 7)
Women, Gender, and Families of Color     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 5)
Similar Journals
Journal Cover
Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy
Number of Followers: 21  

  This is an Open Access Journal Open Access journal
ISSN (Print) 1090-1043
Published by Duke University Press Homepage  [23 journals]
  • Journal Staff

    • PubDate: Mon, 13 May 2019 07:38:46 PDT
  • The Paradox of Policing as Protection: A Harm Reduction Approach to
           Prostitution Using Safe Injection Sites as a Guide

    • Authors: Emani Walks
      PubDate: Mon, 13 May 2019 07:38:39 PDT
  • Biopower, Disability and Capitalism: Neoliberal Eugenics and the Future of
           ART Regulation

    • Authors: Gabrielle Goodrow
      Abstract: Discourse around reproductive and contraceptive technology in the United States is typically organized around ideas of autonomy, privacy, and free choice. The dichotomy of “pro-choice” and “pro-life” structures all debates on the topic, and the political framework of neoliberalism channels discussion into prepackaged frameworks of cost-benefit analysis and the primacy of free market choice. However, an examination of history and present policy developments paints a different picture. This Note argues that access to and regulation around contraception, abortion, and overall reproductive health and technology has been informed by and continues to interact with ideas of biopower and both positive and negative eugenics, and that neoliberal conceptions of free reproductive choice ignore the implications of this connection.Part II traces the history of the eugenics movement in America, exemplified by forced and coerced sterilization of people considered mentally or physically “degenerate,” particularly those confined to institutions, and explores the rhetoric in early contraceptive-focused treatises and court decisions that reflect eugenicist views. Part III analyzes the modern trends on legal access to and regulation of reproductive and contraceptive technology and its interaction with race, socioeconomic status, and, in particular, disability (one of the more anxiety-producing categories of humanity in the neoliberal era). In Part IV, the Note goes on to argue that construction of a rational and compassionate legal framework where a woman’s right to choose is preserved (or revived) and the humanity of disabled persons is also respected is not only possible, but essential.A truly feminist reproductive framework must be built on justice, not market choice, and must respect both the agency and autonomy of pregnant women and the humanity and individual subjectivity of disabled persons. Policy strategies towards this end will not be easy, but attention to all the intersectional and overlapping factors that affect women’s reproductive decision-making, especially with regard to disability and reproductive technology, can change the way we view and value disabled personhood in our society.
      PubDate: Mon, 13 May 2019 07:38:32 PDT
  • “Tragic and Glorious Pages”: The Evolution of Intersex Rights in
           Russia and Reframing Law and Tradition to Advance Reform

    • Authors: Maggie J. Meyers
      PubDate: Mon, 13 May 2019 07:38:24 PDT
  • Immigration, Adoption and Our National Identity

    • Authors: Shani M. King
      PubDate: Mon, 13 May 2019 07:38:17 PDT
  • The Other 20 Cents Isn’t Worth It: The Inadequacy of Title VII’s
           Anti-Retaliation Framework

    • Authors: Hannah Taylor
      Abstract: This Article examines the framework for resolving Title VII retaliation disputes through the lens of gender pay disparity and proposes that the current framework is inadequate. The Article begins by illustrating the issue and the impact of retaliatory conduct in the workplace through the stories of two female workers. It also explains the Title VII retaliation standard and explores the process for filing and pursuing an anti-retaliation claim under this framework.Ultimately, the current framework is inadequate for two reasons. First, it does little to discourage retaliatory conduct by employers or co-workers because what amounts to “retaliation” under the law is under-inclusive and difficult to prove. Second, the employment relationship is among the most important in American society, but instead of seeking to salvage it, the current litigation-driven anti-retaliation framework destroys it. Consequently, the Article proposes an alternative dispute resolution method for solving retaliation disputes and provides examples from the transformative mediation and ombudsman models.
      PubDate: Mon, 13 May 2019 07:38:10 PDT
  • Journal Staff

    • PubDate: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 06:29:45 PST
  • Using Federal Nondiscrimination Laws to Avoid ERISA: Securing Protection
           From Transgender Discrimination in Employee Health Benefit Plans

    • Authors: Bridget Schaaff
      Abstract: Recent attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act and the potential rollback of the interpretation of the protections the Act affords transgender people put transgender people at risk of being denied services and coverage for gender-affirming care. This Article provides advocates with alternative legal arguments to help employees bring claims when their employer provides a health benefit plan that discriminates on the basis of gender identity. These arguments can avoid the Employee Retirement Income Security Act’s broad preemption scheme and lack of nondiscrimination provisions. This Article proposes that, based on a narrow exception to preemption regarding the Employee Retirement Income Security Act’s construction with other federal laws and the case law interpreting that exception, federal nondiscrimination laws — including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act — may and must play a role in regulating discrimination on the basis of gender identity in employee health benefit plans.
      PubDate: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 06:29:39 PST
  • Voluntary Sterilization of Inmates for Reduced Prison Sentences

    • Authors: Elise B. Adams
      Abstract: In May 2017, a Tennessee judge issued a standing order allowing inmates to receive thirty days’ jail credit in exchange for undergoing a voluntary sterilization procedure. Although the order was ultimately rescinded, this Article will address the constitutional and ethical concerns that a district court would have considered had the order not been rescinded. While inmates can always choose to waive their constitutional rights, the coercive nature of prisons—explained in the unconstitutional conditions doctrine—may compromise a prisoner’s ability to provide voluntary consent. The constitutionality of the order largely depends on the level of scrutiny a court applies. Regardless of the order’s constitutionality, the adverse ethical and social ramifications outweigh any potential benefits that could come from such an order. This order would also give too much power to state governments over an individual’s reproductive freedoms. Instead of automatically reducing an inmate’s sentence after undergoing a sterilization procedure, drug offenders should have the opportunity to choose from several different birth control options that could possibly lead to a reduced sentence.
      PubDate: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 06:29:32 PST
  • From Sex Objects to Sisters-In-Arms: Reducing Military Sexual Assault
           Through Integrated Basic Training and Housing

    • Authors: Gabrielle Lucero
      PubDate: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 06:29:25 PST
  • Journal Staff

    • PubDate: Sat, 12 May 2018 15:33:00 PDT
  • Pregnancy in Confinement, Anti-Shackling Laws and the “Extraordinary
           Circumstances” Loophole

    • Authors: Chris DiNardo
      PubDate: Sat, 12 May 2018 15:32:54 PDT
  • Examining the Trump Administration’s Transgender Service Ban Through an
           International Human Rights Law Framework

    • Authors: Matthew J. Lang
      PubDate: Sat, 12 May 2018 15:32:47 PDT
  • Shooting for Equality: An Analysis of the Market Force Defense as Applied
           to the U.S. Women’s Soccer Team’s Equal Pay Claim

    • Authors: Ali Jessani
      PubDate: Sat, 12 May 2018 15:32:42 PDT
  • Ain’t I…': The Dehumanizing Effect of the Regulation of Slave
           Womanhood and Family Life

    • Authors: Dacia Green
      PubDate: Sat, 12 May 2018 15:32:36 PDT
  • Protecting Does and Outing Mobsters: Recalibrating Anonymity Standards in
           Revenge Porn Proceedings

    • Authors: Elizabeth Brown
      PubDate: Sat, 12 May 2018 15:32:30 PDT
  • Journal Staff

    • PubDate: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 06:21:33 PST
  • A Call to Arms: The Department of Defense’s Egg Freezing Benefit Summons
           Increased Reporting Regulations

    • Authors: Gloria Y. Liu
      PubDate: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 06:21:30 PST
  • Undue Sacrifice: How Female Sexual Assault Victims Fight the Military
           While Fighting in the Military

    • Authors: Russell Spivak
      Abstract: Over the last century, women have fought for the right to serve their nation in the exact same way men have: in uniform. Women have indeed made enormous strides toward serving in equal measure to their male counterparts. But women are still too often perceived and treated as second-class citizens, inhibiting a genuine realization of their equality in the armed forces. This is exhibited, if not reinforced, by the prevalence of women’s sexual assault while serving their country and the insufficient prosecution thereof. By diagnosing and remedying the insufficiencies in the military justice system’s legal regime governing the prosecution of military sexual assault as well as victim’s insufficient means of redress in civilian courts, we may be able to secure more prosecutions of attackers. This article looks to address this problem. It begins with a background on women’s growing participation in the military, both in how far women have come and what is left to achieve. Section II examines the specific problem of military sexual assault, including its prevalence, impact on the military at large, and the inadequate prosecution process. Section III looks at strategies, both enacted and untaken, to eradicate these underlying causes. Section IV discusses how to change the system to allow victims a realistic shot at pursuing and attaining justice. Section V details a recent case that may open the floodgates for female victims to assert their rights in federal courts, Doe v. Hagenbeck. The article concludes with a recap of the substantive points made as well as a few final thoughts.
      PubDate: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 06:21:27 PST
  • Advancing Faculty DiversityThrough Self-Directed Mentoring

    • Authors: Yvonne M. Dutton et al.
      Abstract: Mentoring is widely acknowledged to be important in career success, yet may be lacking for female and minority law professors, contributing to disparities in retention and promotion of diverse faculty. This Article presents the results of a unique diversity mentoring program conducted at one law school. Mentoring is often thought of as something directed by the mentor on behalf of the protégé. Our framework inverts that model, empowering diverse faculty members to proactively cultivate their own networks of research mentors. The studied intervention consisted of modest programming on mentorship, along with supplemental travel funds to focus specifically on travel for the purpose of cultivating mentors beyond one’s own institution. Participants were responsible for setting their own mentorship goals, approaching mentors and arranging meetings, and reporting annually on their activities and progress. Both quantitative and qualitative evidence demonstrate that the program has been effective along its measurable goals in its first year. Participants report growing their networks of mentors, receiving significant advice on research and the tenure process, and being sponsored for new opportunities. The authors conclude that this type of mentoring initiative, if more broadly applied, could have a significant impact on reducing disparities in retention and promotion in the legal academy. To facilitate such replication, the Article describes both the process of designing the program and the actual operation of the program as carried out at one school. In sum, the Article offers a concrete starting point for discussions at any law school interested in advancing faculty diversity through improved mentoring.
      PubDate: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 06:21:24 PST
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762

Your IP address:
Home (Search)
About JournalTOCs
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-