Subjects -> ASTRONOMY (Total: 94 journals)
 Showing 1 - 46 of 46 Journals sorted alphabetically Advances in Astronomy       (Followers: 51) Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics       (Followers: 39) Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences       (Followers: 63) Artificial Satellites       (Followers: 23) Astrobiology       (Followers: 14) Astronomical & Astrophysical Transactions: The Journal of the Eurasian Astronomical Society       (Followers: 6) Astronomical Journal       (Followers: 8) Astronomical Review       (Followers: 4) Astronomische Nachrichten       (Followers: 4) Astronomy & Geophysics       (Followers: 48) Astronomy and Astrophysics       (Followers: 60) Astronomy and Astrophysics       (Followers: 32) Astronomy and Computing       (Followers: 2) Astronomy Letters       (Followers: 22) Astronomy Reports       (Followers: 15) Astronomy Studies Development       (Followers: 12) Astroparticle Physics       (Followers: 8) Astrophysical Bulletin       (Followers: 3) Astrophysical Journal       (Followers: 19) Astrophysical Journal Letters       (Followers: 14) Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series       (Followers: 14) Astrophysics       (Followers: 29) Astrophysics and Space Science       (Followers: 46) Astrophysics and Space Sciences Transactions (ASTRA)       (Followers: 56) Astropolitics: The International Journal of Space Politics & Policy       (Followers: 12) Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy       (Followers: 11) Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics       (Followers: 24) Colloid Journal       (Followers: 3) Comptes Rendus Physique       (Followers: 2) Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology       (Followers: 3) COSPAR Colloquia Series       (Followers: 11) Earth, Moon, and Planets       (Followers: 55) Earth, Planets and Space       (Followers: 74) EAS Publications Series       (Followers: 8) EPL Europhysics Letters       (Followers: 8) Experimental Astronomy       (Followers: 39) Expert Opinion on Astronomy and Astrophysics       (Followers: 7) Extreme Life, Biospeology & Astrobiology - International Journal of the Bioflux Society       (Followers: 6) Few-Body Systems       (Followers: 1) Foundations of Physics       (Followers: 41) Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences       (Followers: 12) Galaxies       (Followers: 6) Globe, The       (Followers: 4) Gravitation and Cosmology       (Followers: 4) Icarus       (Followers: 75) International Journal of Advanced Astronomy       (Followers: 28) International Journal of Astrobiology       (Followers: 4) International Journal of Astronomy       (Followers: 19) International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics       (Followers: 29) International Journal of Satellite Communications Policy and Management       (Followers: 13) International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy       (Followers: 12) ISRN Astronomy and Astrophysics       (Followers: 7) Journal for the History of Astronomy       (Followers: 19) Journal of Astrobiology & Outreach       (Followers: 3) Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation       (Followers: 3) Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems       (Followers: 5) Journal of Astrophysics       (Followers: 26) Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy       (Followers: 52) Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics       (Followers: 199) Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics       (Followers: 38) Journal of Geophysical Research : Planets       (Followers: 178) Journal of Geophysical Research : Space Physics       (Followers: 178) Journal of High Energy Astrophysics       (Followers: 22) Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies       (Followers: 10) KronoScope       (Followers: 1) Macalester Journal of Physics and Astronomy       (Followers: 4) MNASSA : Monthly Notes of the Astronomical Society of South Africa       (Followers: 1) Molecular Astrophysics       (Followers: 1) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society       (Followers: 14) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society : Letters Nature Astronomy       (Followers: 8) New Astronomy       (Followers: 27) New Astronomy Reviews       (Followers: 17) Nonlinear Dynamics       (Followers: 19) NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics       (Followers: 5) Open Astronomy       (Followers: 2) Physics of the Dark Universe       (Followers: 4) Planetary and Space Science       (Followers: 101) Planetary Science       (Followers: 52) Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union       (Followers: 2) Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia       (Followers: 2) Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan       (Followers: 3) Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific       (Followers: 4) Research & Reviews : Journal of Space Science & Technology       (Followers: 17) Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics       (Followers: 29) Revista Mexicana de Astronomía y Astrofísica       (Followers: 2) Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy       (Followers: 4) Solar Physics       (Followers: 34) Solar System Research       (Followers: 14) Space Science International       (Followers: 192) Space Science Reviews       (Followers: 97) Space Weather       (Followers: 24) Transport and Aerospace Engineering       (Followers: 13) Universe       (Followers: 5)
Similar Journals
 Foundations of PhysicsJournal Prestige (SJR): 0.454 Citation Impact (citeScore): 1Number of Followers: 41      Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles) ISSN (Print) 1572-9516 - ISSN (Online) 0015-9018 Published by Springer-Verlag  [2626 journals]
• Respecting One’s Fellow: QBism’s Analysis of Wigner’s
Friend
• Abstract: Abstract According to QBism, quantum states, unitary evolutions, and measurement operators are all understood as personal judgments of the agent using the formalism. Meanwhile, quantum measurement outcomes are understood as the personal experiences of the same agent. Wigner’s conundrum of the friend, in which two agents ostensibly have different accounts of whether or not there is a measurement outcome, thus poses no paradox for QBism. Indeed the resolution of Wigner’s original thought experiment was central to the development of QBist thinking. The focus of this paper concerns two very instructive modifications to Wigner’s puzzle: One, a recent no-go theorem by Frauchiger and Renner (Nat Commun 9:3711, 2018), and the other a thought experiment by Baumann and Brukner (Quantum, Probability, Logic: The Work and Influence of Itamar Pitowsky, Springer, Cham, 2020). We show that the paradoxical features emphasized in these works disappear once both friend and Wigner are understood as agents on an equal footing with regard to their individual uses of quantum theory. Wigner’s action on his friend then becomes, from the friend’s perspective, an action the friend takes on Wigner. Our analysis rests on a kind of quantum Copernican principle: When two agents take actions on each other, each agent has a dual role as a physical system for the other agent. No user of quantum theory is more privileged than any other. In contrast to the sentiment of Wigner’s original paper, neither agent should be considered as in “suspended animation.” In this light, QBism brings an entirely new perspective to understanding Wigner’s friend thought experiments.
PubDate: 2020-12-01

• Quantum Causality Relations and the Emergence of Reality from Coherent
Superpositions
• Abstract: Abstract The Hilbert space formalism describes causality as a statistical relation between initial experimental conditions and final measurement outcomes, expressed by the inner products of state vectors representing these conditions. This representation of causality is in fundamental conflict with the classical notion that causality should be expressed in terms of the continuity of intermediate realities. Quantum mechanics essentially replaces this continuity of reality with phase sensitive superpositions, all of which need to interfere in order to produce the correct conditional probabilities for the observable input-output relations. In this paper, I investigate the relation between the classical notion of reality and quantum superpositions by identifying the conditions under which the intermediate states can have real external effects, as expressed by measurement operators inserted into the inner product. It is shown that classical reality emerges at the macroscopic level, where the relevant limit of the measurement resolution is given by the variance of the action around the classical solution. It is thus possible to demonstrate that the classical notion of objective reality emerges only at the macroscopic level, where observations are limited to low resolutions by a lack of sufficiently strong intermediate interactions. This result indicates that causality is more fundamental to physics than the notion of an objective reality, which means that the apparent contradictions between quantum physics and classical physics may be resolved by carefully distinguishing between observable causality and unobservable sequences of hypothetical realities “out there”.
PubDate: 2020-12-01

• ”The Unavoidable Interaction Between the Object and the Measuring
Instruments”: Reality, Probability, and Nonlocality in Quantum Physics
• Abstract: Abstract This article aims to contribute to the ongoing task of clarifying the relationships between reality, probability, and nonlocality in quantum physics. It is in part stimulated by Khrennikov’s argument, in several communications, for “eliminating the issue of quantum nonlocality” from the analysis of quantum entanglement. I argue, however, that the question may not be that of eliminating but instead that of further illuminating this issue, a task that can be pursued by relating quantum nonlocality to other key features of quantum phenomena. I suggest that the following features of quantum phenomena and quantum mechanics, distinguishing them from classical phenomena and classical physics—(1) the irreducible role of measuring instruments in defining quantum phenomena, (2) discreteness, (3) complementarity, (4) entanglement, (5) quantum nonlocality, and (6) the irreducibly probabilistic nature of quantum predictions—are all interconnected, so that it is difficult to give an unconditional priority to any one of them. To argue this case, I shall consider quantum phenomena and quantum mechanics from a nonrealist or, in terms adopted here, “reality-without-realism” (RWR) perspective. This perspective extends Bohr’s view, grounded in his analysis of the irreducible role of measuring instruments in the constitution of quantum phenomena.
PubDate: 2020-12-01

• SICs: Some Explanations
• Abstract: Abstract The problem of constructing maximal equiangular tight frames or SICs was raised by Zauner in 1998. Four years ago it was realized that the problem is closely connected to a major open problem in number theory. We discuss why such a connection was perhaps to be expected, and give a simplified sketch of some developments that have taken place in the past 4 years. The aim, so far unfulfilled, is to prove existence of SICs in an infinite sequence of dimensions.
PubDate: 2020-12-01

• Are Quantum Spins but Small Perturbations of Ontological Ising Spins'
• Abstract: Abstract The dynamics-from-permutations of classical Ising spins is generalized here for an arbitrarily long chain. This serves as an ontological model with discrete dynamics generated by pairwise exchange interactions defining the unitary update operator. The model incorporates a finite signal velocity and resembles in many aspects a discrete free field theory. We deduce the corresponding Hamiltonian operator and show that it generates an exact terminating Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula. Motivation for this study is provided by the Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. We find that our ontological model, which is classical and deterministic, appears as if of quantum mechanical kind in an appropriate formal description. However, it is striking that (in principle arbitrarily) small deformations of the model turn it into a genuine quantum theory. This supports the view that quantum mechanics stems from an epistemic approach handling physical phenomena.
PubDate: 2020-12-01

• Extending the Agent in QBism
• Abstract: Abstract According to the subjective Bayesian interpretation of quantum mechanics (QBism), the instruments used to measure quantum systems are to be regarded as an extension of the senses of the agent who is using them, and quantum states describe the agent’s expectations for what they will experience through these extended senses. How can QBism then account for the fact that (i) instruments must be calibrated before they can be used to ‘sense’ anything; (ii) some instruments are more precise than others; (iii) more precise instruments can lead to discovery of new systems' Furthermore, is the agent ‘incoherent’ if they prefer to use a less precise instrument' Here we provide answers to these questions.
PubDate: 2020-12-01

• Quantum Versus Classical Entanglement: Eliminating the Issue of Quantum
Nonlocality
• Abstract: Abstract We analyze the interrelation of quantum and classical entanglement. The latter notion is widely used in classical optic simulation of some quantum-like features of light. We criticize the common interpretation that “quantum nonlocality” is the basic factor differing quantum and classical realizations of entanglement. Instead, we point to the breakthrough Grangier et al. experiment on coincidence detection which was done in 1986 and played the crucial role in rejection of (semi-)classical field models in favor of quantum mechanics. Classical entanglement sources produce light beams with the coefficient of second order coherence $$g^{(2)}(0) \ge 1.$$ This feature of classical entanglement is obscured by using intensities of signals in different channels, instead of counting clicks of photo-detectors. The interplay between intensity and clicks counting is not just a technicality. We elevate this issue to the high foundational level.
PubDate: 2020-12-01

• Deriving Born’s Rule from an Inference to the Best Explanation
• Abstract: Abstract In previous articles we presented a simple set of axioms named “Contexts, Systems and Modalities” (CSM), where the structure of quantum mechanics appears as a result of the interplay between the quantized number of modalities accessible to a quantum system, and the continuum of contexts that are required to define these modalities. In the present article we discuss further how to obtain (or rather infer) Born’s rule within this framework. Our approach is compared with other former and recent derivations, and its strong links with Gleason’s theorem are particularly emphasized.
PubDate: 2020-12-01

• Preface to Special Issue: Quantum Information Revolution: Impact to
Foundations
• PubDate: 2020-11-20

• No Purification Ontology, No Quantum Paradoxes
• Abstract: Abstract It is almost universally believed that in quantum theory the two following statements hold: (1) all transformations are achieved by a unitary interaction followed by a von-Neumann measurement; (2) all mixed states are marginals of pure entangled states. I name this doctrine the dogma of purification ontology. The source of the dogma is the original von Neumann axiomatisation of the theory, which largely relies on the Schrődinger equation as a postulate, which holds in a nonrelativistic context, and whose operator version holds only in free quantum field theory, but no longer in the interacting theory. In the present paper I prove that both ontologies of unitarity and state-purity are unfalsifiable, even in principle, and therefore axiomatically spurious. I propose instead a minimal four-postulate axiomatisation: (1) associate a Hilbert space $${\mathcal {H}}_\text{A}$$ to each system $$\text{A}$$ ; (2) compose two systems by the tensor product rule $${\mathcal {H}}_{\text{A}\text{B}}={\mathcal {H}}_\text{A}\otimes {\mathcal {H}}_\text{B}$$ ; (3) associate a transformation from system $$\text{A}$$ to $$\text{B}$$ to a quantum operation, i.e. to a completely positive trace-non-increasing map between the trace-class operators of $$\text{A}$$ and $$\text{B}$$ ; (4) (Born rule) evaluate all joint probabilities through that of a special type of quantum operation: the state preparation. I then conclude that quantum paradoxes—such as the Schroedinger-cat’s, and, most relevantly, the information paradox—are originated only by the dogma of purification ontology, and they are no longer paradoxes of the theory in the minimal formulation. For the same reason, most interpretations of the theory (e.g. many-world, relational, Darwinism, transactional, von Neumann–Wigner, time-symmetric,...) interpret the same dogma, not the strict theory stripped of the spurious postulates.
PubDate: 2020-11-18

• Local Model of Entangled Photon Experiments Compatible with Quantum
Predictions Based on the Reality of the Vacuum Fields
• Abstract: Abstract Arguments are provided for the reality of the quantum vacuum fields. A polarization correlation experiment with two maximally entangled photons created by spontaneous parametric down-conversion is studied in the Weyl–Wigner formalism, that reproduces the quantum predictions. An interpretation is proposed in terms of stochastic processes assuming that the quantum vacuum fields are real. This proves that local realism is compatible with a violation of Bell inequalities, thus rebutting the claim that it has been refuted by experiments. Entanglement appears as a correlation between fluctuations of a signal field and vacuum fields.
PubDate: 2020-11-07

• Preface of the Special Issue Probing the Limits of Quantum Mechanics:
Theory and Experiment, Volume 2
• PubDate: 2020-11-01

• No Paradox in Wave–Particle Duality
• Abstract: Abstract The assertion that an experiment by Afshar et al. demonstrates violation of Bohr’s Principle of Complementarity is based on the faulty assumption that which-way information in a double-slit interference experiment can be retroactively determined from a future measurement.
PubDate: 2020-11-01

• Making the Case for Causal Dynamical Triangulations
• Abstract: Abstract The aim of the causal dynamical triangulations approach is to define nonperturbatively a quantum theory of gravity as the continuum limit of a lattice-regularized model of dynamical geometry. My aim in this paper is to give a concise yet comprehensive, impartial yet personal presentation of the causal dynamical triangulations approach.
PubDate: 2020-11-01

• Elementary Charge and Neutrino’s Mass from Planck Length
• Abstract: Abstract It is shown that the postulation of a minimum length for the horizons of a black hole leads to lower bounds for the electric charges and magnetic moments of elementary particles. If the minimum length has the order of the Planck scale, these bounds are given, respectively, by the electronic charge and by $$\mu \sim 10^{-21} \mu _B$$ . The latter implies that the masses of fundamental particles are bounded above by the Planck mass, and that the smallest non-zero neutrino mass is $$m_{\nu } \sim 10^{-2}$$ eV. A precise estimation in agreement to the area quantisation of Loop Quantum Gravity predicts a mass for the lightest massive state in concordance with flavor oscillation measurements, and a Barbero–Immirzi parameter in accordance to horizon entropy estimations.
PubDate: 2020-11-01

• An Interaction-Free Quantum Measurement-Driven Engine
• Abstract: Abstract Recently highly-efficient quantum engines were devised by exploiting the stochastic energy changes induced by quantum measurement. Here we show that such an engine can be based on an interaction-free measurement, in which the meter seemingly does not interact with the measured object. We use a modified version of the Elitzur–Vaidman bomb tester, an interferometric setup able to detect the presence of a bomb triggered by a single photon without exploding it. In our case, a quantum bomb subject to a gravitational force is initially in a superposition of being inside and outside one of the interferometer arms. We show that the bomb can be lifted without blowing up. This occurs when a photon traversing the interferometer is detected at a port that is always dark when the bomb is located outside the arm. The required potential energy is provided by the photon (which plays the role of the meter) even though it was not absorbed by the bomb. A natural interpretation is that the photon traveled through the arm which does not contain the bomb—otherwise the bomb would have exploded—but it implies the surprising conclusion that the energy exchange occurred at a distance despite a local interaction Hamiltonian. We use the weak value formalism to support this interpretation and find evidence of contextuality. Regardless of interpretation, this interaction-free quantum measurement engine is able to lift the most sensitive bomb without setting it off.
PubDate: 2020-11-01

• A Puzzle for the Field Ontologists
• Abstract: Abstract It has been widely thought that the wave function describes a real, physical field in a realist interpretation of quantum mechanics. In this paper, I present a new analysis of the field ontology for the wave function. First, I argue that the non-existence of self-interactions for a quantum system such as an electron poses a puzzle for the field ontologists. If the wave function represents a physical field, then it seems odd that there are (electromagnetic and gravitational) interactions between the fields of two electrons but no interactions between two parts of the field of an electron. Next, I argue that the three solutions a field ontologist may provide are not fully satisfactory. Finally, I propose a solution of this puzzle that leads to a particle ontological interpretation of the wave function.
PubDate: 2020-10-31

• On the Equivalence Principle and Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
• Abstract: Abstract Einstein’s Equivalence Principle implies that the Lorentz force equation can be derived from a geodesic equation by imposing a certain (necessary) condition on the electromagnetic potential (Trzetrzelewski, EPL 120:4, 2018). We analyze the quantization of that constraint and find the corresponding differential equations for the phase of the wave function. We investigate these equations in the case of Coulomb potential and show that physically acceptable solutions do not exist. This result signals an inconsistency between Einstein’s Equivalence Principle and Relativistic Quantum Mechanics at an atomic level.
PubDate: 2020-10-06

• Conformal Invariance of the Newtonian Weyl Tensor
• Abstract: Abstract It is well-known that the conformal structure of a relativistic spacetime is of profound physical and conceptual interest. In this note, we consider the analogous structure for Newtonian theories. We show that the Newtonian Weyl tensor is an invariant of this structure.
PubDate: 2020-10-06

• Derivation of Classical Mechanics in an Energetic Framework via
Conservation and Relativity
• Abstract: Abstract The notions of conservation and relativity lie at the heart of classical mechanics, and were critical to its early development. However, in Newton’s theory of mechanics, these symmetry principles were eclipsed by domain-specific laws. In view of the importance of symmetry principles in elucidating the structure of physical theories, it is natural to ask to what extent conservation and relativity determine the structure of mechanics. In this paper, we address this question by deriving classical mechanics—both nonrelativistic and relativistic—using relativity and conservation as the primary guiding principles. The derivation proceeds in three distinct steps. First, conservation and relativity are used to derive the asymptotically conserved quantities of motion. Second, in order that energy and momentum be continuously conserved, the mechanical system is embedded in a larger energetic framework containing a massless component that is capable of bearing energy (as well as momentum in the relativistic case). Imposition of conservation and relativity then results, in the nonrelativistic case, in the conservation of mass and in the frame-invariance of massless energy; and, in the relativistic case, in the rules for transforming massless energy and momentum between frames. Third, a force framework for handling continuously interacting particles is established, wherein Newton’s second law is derived on the basis of relativity and a staccato model of motion-change. Finally, in light of the derivation, we elucidate the structure of mechanics by classifying the principles and assumptions that have been employed according to their explanatory role, distinguishing between symmetry principles and other types of principles (such as compositional principles) that are needed to build up the theoretical edifice.
PubDate: 2020-10-03

JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762