Subjects -> PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND COPYRIGHTS (Total: 26 journals)
Showing 1 - 9 of 9 Journals sorted alphabetically
Berkeley Technology Law Journal     Free   (Followers: 14)
Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 20)
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 28)
International Data Privacy Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22)
International Journal of Intellectual Property Management     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 30)
IP Theory     Open Access   (Followers: 12)
JIPITEC Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law     Open Access   (Followers: 24)
John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 7)
John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law     Free   (Followers: 10)
Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship     Open Access   (Followers: 33)
Journal of Data Protection & Privacy     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 6)
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 30)
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR)     Open Access   (Followers: 23)
Law, State and Telecommunications Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 14)
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property     Open Access   (Followers: 8)
Propiedad Intelectual     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial     Open Access  
The Journal of World Intellectual Property     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 26)
Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi     Open Access  
Web Journal of Current Legal Issues     Open Access   (Followers: 6)
World Patent Information     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 17)
Similar Journals
Journal Cover
International Data Privacy Law
Number of Followers: 22  
  Hybrid Journal Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
ISSN (Print) 2044-3994 - ISSN (Online) 2044-4001
Published by Oxford University Press Homepage  [413 journals]
  • In memory of Giovanni Buttarelli
    • Authors: D’Cunha C.
      Pages: 129 - 131
      Abstract: European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) Giovanni Buttarelli sadly passed away on 20 August 2019. His vision, boldness, and integrity as a data protection leader have been widely remarked upon in recent weeks. His greatest passion was for the law; he had a forensic devotion to its intricacies and its potential. He had a keen sense of fairness and reasonableness, and expressed frustration with legalism that was blind to social, economic, and political reality. This was the basis for his visionary approach to data protection and fundamental rights. Integral to this vision was the complementarity between competition law and data protection law. In his mandate as EDPS, cruelly cut short before reaching its term, this once marginal theme would move to the mainstream of public policy debate.
      PubDate: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipz020
      Issue No: Vol. 9, No. 3 (2019)
  • The reconstruction of privacy through law: a strategy of diminishing
    • Authors: Keller P.
      Pages: 132 - 152
      Abstract: Key PointsIn a time of rapid development in privacy and data protection laws, the state of urban life has much to tell us about their long run effectiveness. Compared to even the recent past, major cities have largely lost the definitive public anonymity and obscurity that has characterized urban life for centuries. Saturated with sensors networked to powerful data analytics, they are at the epicentre of an ongoing revolution in governmental and commercial surveillance. In short, the future radical transparency of all human life is already emerging in our major cities.This article addresses a crucial question. Given a hundred years of privacy and then data protection law, how did this happen' In this article, I argue that the explanation for this long running failure lies substantially in the wider political economy of information law, which continues to shape and limit the capacities of privacy and data protection law. The prevailing liberal democratic model of information law is structured around two key concerns: protecting the state’s powers of ultimate access to information and ensuring that all information remains potentially marketable. The particular vulnerability of personal information to demands for state and market access is, however, much more than a matter of political and economic power imbalances. Information law has developed through a dynamic relationship between governmental and commercial information uses and the continuous application of new technologies that render information more accessible and usable.Over the long history of privacy and data protection laws, technologies have thus played a uniquely important role in catalysing the erosion of existing personal information protections and creating opportunities for strengthening access rights. The formidable privacy of physical circumstances, which was an ordinary and often unremarkable feature of life, has been gradually eroded away. The contested re-construction of that privacy through law has been, in comparison, porous and compromised.I explain this claim through three illustrations: First, in the transformation of the concepts of public space and public domain, which are frequently used to justify access to personal information with minimal safeguards; Secondly, in the conflict within the principles of individual consent and choice, which provide the cornerstone for both personal autonomy and marketability of information; and, Thirdly, in the comparative structural weaknesses of privacy and data protection laws as a field within the wider sphere of information law.Whether societies find more effective boundaries against further transparency or even change the governance of how personal information is accessed and used in conditions of transparency are primarily political and economic questions. Constructive changes in law and regulation can, however, feed into those wider processes of decision making. In its final part, the article discusses ways in which important elements of privacy and data protection laws could be used more effectively. This includes current efforts to use diverse forms of collaborative public scrutiny and accountability to challenge information law’s embedded preferences towards access and use. Cities, not surprisingly, remain the test bed for success or failure.
      PubDate: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipz012
      Issue No: Vol. 9, No. 3 (2019)
  • A right to reset your user profile and more: GDPR-rights for personalized
           news consumers
    • Authors: Eskens S.
      Pages: 153 - 172
      Abstract: Key PointsNews media more and more process personal data of news consumers to provide a personalized news selection on the news media home pages or in their apps.This article shows that the journalism provision in Article 85 of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (‘GDPR’) does not apply to the processing of personal data for news personalization. Therefore, the GDPR generally applies to such processing.This article finds that through exercising their data protection rights, news consumers may stop personalization or change their profile on which the personalization is based, to change the content that they are being recommended.We argue that in the context of news personalization, the most important function of the GDPR is to enable news consumers to determine how they are profiled or ‘read’.
      PubDate: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipz007
      Issue No: Vol. 9, No. 3 (2019)
  • The right to data portability in practice: exploring the implications of
           the technologically neutral GDPR
    • Authors: Wong J; Henderson T.
      Pages: 173 - 191
      Abstract: Key PointsThe European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) introduces one new data subject right, Article 20’s right to data portability (RtDP). The RtDP aims to allow data subjects to obtain and reuse their personal data for their own purposes across different services.We investigate the RtDP by making 230 real-world data portability requests across a wide range of data controllers. The RtDP is interesting to study as it operates under a framework that aims to be technologically neutral while requiring specific technologies for implementation. Our objective is to assess the ease of the RtDP process from the perspective of the data subject and to examine the file formats returned by data controllers.From our results, including responses indicating that no personal data were stored, only 172 (74.8 per cent) of RtDP requests were successfully completed. However, compliance with the GDPR varied where not all file formats meet the GDPR requirements. There was also confusion amongst data controllers about data subject rights more generally.Based on our observations, we revisit the current guidance for data portability. We suggest new technical definitions to clarify how data should be made portable and determine the appropriateness of certain file formats for different data types.We suggest recommendations and future work for various stakeholders to address the legal implications derived from our study. This includes discussing possibilities for new data portability standards and codes, conducting further empirical research, and building technological solutions to ensure that the RtDP can be better understood in theory and exercised in practice.
      PubDate: Sat, 06 Jul 2019 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipz008
      Issue No: Vol. 9, No. 3 (2019)
  • Governance of academic research data under the GDPR—lessons from the
    • Authors: Mourby M; Gowans H, Aidinlis S, et al.
      Pages: 192 - 206
      Abstract: Key PointsThe General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) includes a new power for Member States to pass exemptions for the purpose of ‘academic expression’.This may appear to provide greater freedom to researchers working under the new EU data protection regime.Using the UK as a case study, however, it is evident that even a full exercise of the academic derogation is likely to be limited by the GDPR’s requirement of necessity, and by privacy rights wherever they are engaged.Ultimately, the GDPR provisions applicable to universities as public authorities are likely to have greater impact on academic data processing in public institutions; a shift which is not conducive to greater freedom in research data processing.
      PubDate: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipz010
      Issue No: Vol. 9, No. 3 (2019)
  • How compatible is the US ‘CLOUD Act’ with cloud computing'
           A brief analysis
    • Authors: Abraha H.
      Pages: 207 - 215
      Abstract: Key PointsThe recently adopted Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act is a response to the challenges the USA and foreign law enforcement authorities have been facing in their efforts to access electronic evidence stored beyond their territorial jurisdictions.This article briefly analyses the Act against its stated policy objectives that it seeks to achieve.The analysis focuses on the adequacy of privacy protections provided under the Act, potential conflicts of law, the problems with bypassing mutual legal assistance systems, and the global implications of the Act.
      PubDate: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipz009
      Issue No: Vol. 9, No. 3 (2019)
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762

Your IP address:
Home (Search)
About JournalTOCs
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-