for Journals by Title or ISSN
for Articles by Keywords
help
  Subjects -> AGRICULTURE (Total: 660 journals)
    - AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (71 journals)
    - AGRICULTURE (443 journals)
    - CROP PRODUCTION AND SOIL (84 journals)
    - DAIRYING AND DAIRY PRODUCTS (25 journals)
    - POULTRY AND LIVESTOCK (37 journals)

AGRICULTURE (443 journals)                  1 2 3 4 5 | Last

Acta agriculturae Slovenica     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Acta Agrobotanica     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Acta Agronomica Hungarica     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Acta Agronomica Sinica     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 6)
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Acta Scientiarum. Technology     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Acta Technologica Agriculturae     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Advances in Agriculture & Botanics     Open Access   (Followers: 10)
Advances in Agriculture, Sciences and Engineering Research     Open Access   (Followers: 10)
Advances in Agronomy     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 11)
Advances in Life Science and Technology     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
AFBM Journal     Open Access  
Africa Development     Open Access   (Followers: 6)
Africa Research Bulletin: Political, Social and Cultural Series     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
African Journal of Agricultural Research     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
African Journal of Food Science     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
African Journal of Horticultural Science     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
African Journal of Range and Forage Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
African Journal of Sustainable Development     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
Agribusiness : an International Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Agricultura Tecnica     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Agricultural Advances     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Agricultural and Food Science     Open Access   (Followers: 14)
Agricultural Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 44)
Agricultural History     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 147)
Agricultural Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Agricultural Science     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 5)
Agricultural Sciences     Open Access   (Followers: 7)
Agricultural Sciences in China     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
Agricultural Systems     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 19)
Agricultural Water Management     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 13)
Agriculture     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Agriculture & Food Security     Open Access   (Followers: 9)
Agriculture (Poľnohospodárstvo)     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia     Full-text available via subscription  
Agriculture and Human Values     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 29)
Agriprobe     Full-text available via subscription  
Agrivita : Journal of Agricultural Science     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Agro-Science     Full-text available via subscription  
Agroalimentaria     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Agrociencia     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Agrokémia és Talajtan     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Agronomía Colombiana     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Agronomía Costarricense     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Agronomía Mesoamericana     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Agronomie Africaine     Full-text available via subscription  
Agronomy     Open Access   (Followers: 8)
Agrosearch     Open Access  
AI & Society     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Alinteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi : Alinteri Journal of Agricultural Sciences     Open Access  
Ambiência     Open Access  
Ambiente & Agua : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Science     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences     Open Access   (Followers: 9)
American Journal of Botany     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 13)
American Journal of Economics and Sociology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 19)
American Journal of Potato Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Annales UMCS, Agricultura     Open Access  
Annales UMCS, Horticultura     Full-text available via subscription  
Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Annals of Agricultural Sciences     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Annual Review of Resource Economics     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 10)
APCBEE Procedia     Partially Free   (Followers: 2)
Applied Economics Letters     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 18)
Applied Financial Economics Letters     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Arboricultural Journal : The International Journal of Urban Forestry     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Archivos de Zootecnia     Open Access  
Arquivos do Instituto Biológico     Open Access  
Arthropod-Plant Interactions     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Asian Economic Papers     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Asian Journal of Agricultural Research     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Asian Journal of Plant Sciences     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Australian Cottongrower, The     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Australian Economic Papers     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Australian Forest Grower     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Australian Forestry     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 4)
Australian Grain     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 4)
Australian Holstein Journal     Full-text available via subscription  
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering     Open Access  
Australian Sugarcane     Full-text available via subscription  
Avances en Investigacion Agropecuaria     Open Access  
Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Bangladesh Journal of Scientific Research     Open Access  
Berkala Ilmiah Pertanian     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Bioagro     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Biocontrol Science and Technology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Biodiversity     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 16)
Biodiversity : Research and Conservation     Open Access   (Followers: 17)
Biological Agriculture & Horticulture : An International Journal for Sustainable Production Systems     Partially Free   (Followers: 13)
Biosystems Engineering     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Biotemas     Open Access  
Bragantia     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
British Poultry Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
California Agriculture     Open Access   (Followers: 1)

        1 2 3 4 5 | Last

Journal Cover Cambridge Journal of Economics
   [17 followers]  Follow    
   Hybrid Journal Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
     ISSN (Print) 0309-166X - ISSN (Online) 1464-3545
     Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) Homepage  [310 journals]   [SJR: 1.008]   [H-I: 38]
  • Samuelson's ghosts: Whig history and the reinterpretation of economic
           theory
    • Authors: Freeman, A; Chick, V, Kayatekin, S.
      Pages: 519 - 529
      PubDate: 2014-05-06T06:39:54-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/cje/beu017|hwp:master-id:cameco;beu017
      Issue No: Vol. 38, No. 3 (2014)
       
  • Earw(h)ig: I can't hear you because your ideas are old
    • Authors: Boettke, P. J; Coyne, C. J, Leeson, P. T.
      Pages: 531 - 544
      Abstract: This paper provides a critical challenge to the Whig view of economic ideas, which holds that good ideas from the past are embodied in the common scientific wisdom. In contrast to this position, we contend that the market for ideas, while no doubt competitive in terms of scientific rivalry, is not free of distortions in the incentives and signals that guide economic scientists. As a result, ideas that are flawed can come to dominate the profession, while useful ideas are left on the proverbial sidewalk of intellectual affairs. The smooth evolution of economic thought from falsehood to truth that underlies the Whig perspective is complicated by both historical circumstances and the intimate relationship between economics and politics that follows from the attraction of public policy for those who enter the discipline.
      PubDate: 2014-05-06T06:39:54-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/cje/bes075|hwp:master-id:cameco;bes075
      Issue No: Vol. 38, No. 3 (2014)
       
  • Contextual political economy, not Whig economics
    • Authors: Bagchi; A. K.
      Pages: 545 - 562
      Abstract: The paper has three objectives. First, it seeks to resuscitate a methodology of the history of economic thought that takes account of the problem-solving efforts of political economists rather than concentrating entirely on the putative advances in techniques of analysis, detaching them from their political and social context. Second, it seeks to establish the priority of two Italian savants in theorising some basic features of capitalist growth long before its prime movers had been conceptualised in the eighteenth century. Third, it puts colonialism and imperialism as the ever-present components of capitalist development on centre stage. Contextual political economy would be a study of the capitalist system as it has really operated, i.e. as a system characterised by enormous turbulence superimposed on growth, in which formal and informal colonialism and speculation have played major roles.
      PubDate: 2014-05-06T06:39:54-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/cje/bet041|hwp:master-id:cameco;bet041
      Issue No: Vol. 38, No. 3 (2014)
       
  • The William Petty problem and the Whig history of economics
    • Authors: Goodacre; H.
      Pages: 563 - 583
      Abstract: The term ‘Whig interpretation of history’ was applied by Herbert Butterfield to a particular current within English historiography, an outstanding characteristic of which was its tendency to praise revolutions provided they had been successful, the particular successes to which he referred being those of Protestants and Whigs over Catholics and Tories. He also acknowledged that his critique ‘possibly’ gave the phrase an ‘extended sense’ applicable to any current in historiography characterised by equivalently crude teleology and decontextualisation. It is with reference to this possible ‘extended’ sense that the phrase has gained currency in critical currents within the history of the natural and social sciences. The present case study of the secondary literature on the English writer William Petty (1623–87) argues that, while the two senses are of course conceptually distinct, they are nevertheless very much part of the same story if we are to explain how it has come about that the distortions indicated in the extended sense have become so deeply rooted in the economics mainstream’s portrayal of its own history.
      PubDate: 2014-05-06T06:39:54-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/cje/bes073|hwp:master-id:cameco;bes073
      Issue No: Vol. 38, No. 3 (2014)
       
  • In search of a 'crude fancy of childhood': deconstructing mercantilism
    • Authors: Blanc, J; Desmedt, L.
      Pages: 585 - 604
      Abstract: This paper argues against the unity of ‘mercantilism’, refuting a rational reconstruction that underestimates both the diversity of early modern European economists and their writings, and the depth of their analyses. Beginning with a brief examination of the origins of ‘mercantilism’ and the evolution of perceptions of it, we examine the various readings proposed of ‘mercantilist’ writings (classical ‘reconstruction’, the German historical school and then contemporary work). The ‘deconstruction’ undertaken here does not aim to demonstrate that pre-classical writings were devoid of any conceptualisation or internal coherence. However, contemporary readers must make some effort to grasp the concepts used and engage with the proposals made. To this end it might be useful to propose an initial classification of authors based on their social position. The paper identifies different categories of writers and proposes new combinations of authors, reflecting the range of economic, and especially monetary, thinking of the period, with reference to the position of those authors relative to the spheres of government in Europe. This categorisation takes account of the social position of the authors, so as to identify any implications it might have for their concerns and their proposals. We first identify three categories of writers who are generally outside those spheres (late scholastics, economic philosophers and pamphleteers); then two categories of ‘insiders’ (officers of the mint and treasury administrators). The closeness of authors to the regime significantly influenced their writings.
      PubDate: 2014-05-06T06:39:55-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/cje/bes081|hwp:master-id:cameco;bes081
      Issue No: Vol. 38, No. 3 (2014)
       
  • The relation of morality to political economy in Hume
    • Authors: Kayatekin; S. A.
      Pages: 605 - 622
      Abstract: In his Treatise of Human Nature, Hume argues that reason does not motivate action but rather directs our judgement by informing us about their causes and effects. He distances, in his argument, passions from reason by claiming that passions are not ideas, do not represent anything, are self-contained and thus cannot be contradictory to truth or reason. Moral judgements, according to Hume, are passions and as such they cannot be contrary to reason. For Hume, morality does not consist of immutable principles to be discovered by reason; it is based on human passions, which, through repetition, human beings come to associate with certain moral characteristics. Following on this statement, I here explore the following point: to the extent economic behaviour is determined by passions such as greed, benevolence and pleasure, we cannot separate economic activity and morality. As an extension, morality and political economy are inextricably linked in Hume. This suggests that ethics, through the study of morality and political economy, and the study of economic behaviour and institutions are inseparable subjects. It is interesting to observe this in the work of Hume, a fundamental influence on Adam Smith, one of the most important precursors of modern economics. The paper underlines the importance of understanding the evolution of the history of economic thinking that led to modern-day economics and which, though claiming Hume via Smith as one of its progenitors, argues for a complete separation of ethics and economics. In particular, the separation of positive from normative economics becomes infeasible in light of Hume’s analysis, rendering problematic the claim of modern economics that Hume is the founding father.
      PubDate: 2014-05-06T06:39:55-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/cje/bes072|hwp:master-id:cameco;bes072
      Issue No: Vol. 38, No. 3 (2014)
       
  • Political economy and the social disciplines: the modern life of Das Adam
           Smith Problem
    • Authors: Dixon, W; Wilson, D.
      Pages: 623 - 641
      Abstract: The standard vision of the self in economics has been backdated onto a misrepresented Adam Smith but has more in common with the egoistic vision of Thomas Hobbes. This self, given its narrowness, has provoked criticism concerning its adequacy for explaining social, historical and psychological phenomena. The latter are then addressed within a framework that reproduces their Hobbesian origin by ceding a territory of self-interest, rational choice, to economics and so looks to disciplinary proliferation to cover the areas left aside. In this manner we shall show an anti-Whig history as much constrained by its origins as what it contests. Both sides have reproduced uncritically the framework of Das Adam Smith Problem. Here we investigate how developments of sociology, social history, socio-economics and economic psychology have not been able to exit from the terms of that problem.
      PubDate: 2014-05-06T06:39:55-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/cje/bes074|hwp:master-id:cameco;bes074
      Issue No: Vol. 38, No. 3 (2014)
       
  • The Whiggish foundations of Marxian and Sraffian economics
    • Authors: Kliman; A.
      Pages: 643 - 661
      Abstract: The first half of the paper discusses what is wrong with Whig history and why it is wrong to distort the past. The author’s views are compared with those of noted historians of economics. This discussion provides motivation for the second half of the paper, which focuses on Whiggish accounts of the scientifically progressive character of mainstream Marxian and Sraffian economics that rest heavily upon ‘proofs’ of internal inconsistency in Marx’s own theories. The paper argues that the inconsistencies are actually products of Whiggish misinterpretation. Thus, it is not the case that progress has taken place through correction of error; mainstream Marxian and Sraffian theories are not corrections of the original theories, but alternatives to them.
      PubDate: 2014-05-06T06:39:55-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/cje/bet045|hwp:master-id:cameco;bet045
      Issue No: Vol. 38, No. 3 (2014)
       
  • Schumpeter's theory of self-restoration: a casualty of Samuelson's Whig
           historiography of science
    • Authors: Freeman; A.
      Pages: 663 - 679
      Abstract: This article argues that Samuelson’s influential 1987 call for a ‘Whig history of economic science’ rests on a Whig historiography of the natural sciences. This contrasts with how science actually works: Samuelson neglects the critical role of controversy in the development of knowledge, leading to the misleading idea that scientists pursue discovery at the expense of reflection on the foundation and history of their subject. The consequence is institutional delegitimation: the exclusion of legitimate contrary hypotheses when economists test their theories, invalidating the test. Samuelson further confuses the history of ideas with the history of texts. This expands the scope of institutional delegitimation to a systematic misrepresentation of the actual ideas at stake in the economic controversies, erecting a permanent obstacle to the discovery of truth. I illustrate this with Samuelson’s exclusion from consideration of two ‘non-ignorable’ contributions to macroeconomic theory: Schumpeter’s Business Cycles, which he failed to recognise as a theory of endogenous capitalist self-restoration, and the concept of endogenous decline, excluded by his Whig reinterpretation of Marx’s theory of value. Schumpeter and Marx offered opposed, but legitimate, alternatives to the post-war macroeconomic consensus of which Samuelson was a major architect. In particular, both recognised that deep and prolonged crises were a natural product of capitalism, not an inexplicable exception. To respond to the 2008 downturn, economics needs to reopen a wide discussion without excluding, a priori, any of these opposed theoretical explanations, instead seeking to understand clearly what each of them actually says and testing them against the empirical evidence of history.
      PubDate: 2014-05-06T06:39:55-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/cje/beu012|hwp:master-id:cameco;beu012
      Issue No: Vol. 38, No. 3 (2014)
       
  • Whatever happened to Keynes's monetary theory'
    • Authors: Chick, V; Tily, G.
      Pages: 681 - 699
      Abstract: Some see a return to Keynes’s ideas in response to the crisis that began in 2007, but we argue that the resurrected ideas belong to that betrayal of Keynes’s thought known as ‘Keynesian’ economics. What happened is almost a reversal of the Whig history view of economics, in which past knowledge is embodied in later theory: Keynes has been made a pre-Keynesian. We trace this transformation mainly through his monetary theory, though we range more widely where necessary. We state what we consider to be his monetary theory, then identify and summarise the key contributions to its destruction. Then, in a speculative section, we suggest a variety of motivations for this subversion of his ideas. We end by assessing what has been lost, in particular his monetary policy, and suggest social and political pressures that may have been partly responsible.
      PubDate: 2014-05-06T06:39:55-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/cje/beu011|hwp:master-id:cameco;beu011
      Issue No: Vol. 38, No. 3 (2014)
       
 
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
Fax: +00 44 (0)131 4513327
 
About JournalTOCs
API
Help
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-2014