for Journals by Title or ISSN
for Articles by Keywords
help

 A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  

  First | 1 2     

  Subjects -> SOCIAL SERVICES AND WELFARE (Total: 193 journals)
Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Journal of Social Inclusion     Open Access   (Followers: 6)
Journal of Social Issues     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 19)
Journal of Social Philosophy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 17)
Journal of Social Policy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23)
Journal of Social Service Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
Journal of Social Work     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 90)
Journal of Social Work Education     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4)
Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11)
Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Just Policy: A Journal of Australian Social Policy     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 7)
L'Orientation scolaire et professionnelle     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Learning in Health and Social Care     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Maltrattamento e abuso all’infanzia     Full-text available via subscription  
Mental Health and Social Inclusion     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 21)
Mental Health and Substance Use: dual diagnosis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 19)
Merrill-Palmer Quarterly     Full-text available via subscription  
Migration Action     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
Mortality: Promoting the interdisciplinary study of death and dying     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
Mundos do Trabalho     Open Access  
National Emergency Response     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 11)
Nonprofit Policy Forum     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Nordic Social Work Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy     Open Access   (Followers: 7)
Nouvelles pratiques sociales     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Parity     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
Partner Abuse     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 4)
Pedagogia i Treball Social : Revista de Cičncies Socials Aplicades     Open Access  
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 96)
Personality and Social Psychology Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 28)
Philosophy & Social Criticism     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14)
Practice: Social Work in Action     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Psychoanalytic Social Work     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
Public Policy and Aging Report     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Qualit@s Revista Eletrônica     Open Access  
Qualitative Social Work     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 19)
Quality in Ageing and Older Adults     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 33)
Race and Social Problems     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Research in Social Stratification and Mobility     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Research on Economic Inequality     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4)
Research on Language and Social Interaction     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 16)
Research on Social Work Practice     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 51)
Review of Social Economy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Revista Internacional De Seguridad Social     Hybrid Journal  
Revista Katálysis     Open Access  
Revista Trabajo Social     Open Access  
Safer Communities     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 38)
Science and Public Policy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25)
Self and Identity     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11)
Service social     Full-text available via subscription  
Serviço Social & Sociedade     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 5)
Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedad (Rio de Janeiro)     Open Access  
Social & Legal Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
Social Action : The Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology     Free   (Followers: 1)
Social and Personality Psychology Compass     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
Social Behavior and Personality : An International Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 8)
Social Care and Neurodisability     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4)
Social Choice and Welfare     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
Social Cognition     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 13)
Social Compass     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Social Influence     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Social Justice Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14)
Social Philosophy and Policy     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 13)
Social Policy & Administration     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14)
Social Policy and Society     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 78)
Social Science Japan Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Social Semiotics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6)
Social Studies of Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 21)
Social Work     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 21)
Social Work & Social Sciences Review     Open Access   (Followers: 13)
Social Work Education: The International Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11)
Social Work Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 20)
Social Work Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 13)
Social Work With Groups     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
Sociedade e Estado     Open Access  
Sociedade em Debate     Open Access  
Society and Mental Health     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9)
SourceOCDE Questions sociales/Migrations/Sante     Full-text available via subscription  
Soziale Passagen     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Sozialer Fortschritt     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Technical Aid to the Disabled Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Tempo Social     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
The Milbank Quarterly     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11)
Third Sector Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Third World Planning Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
Transnational Social Review     Hybrid Journal  
unsere jugend     Full-text available via subscription  
Violence and Victims     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 44)
Youth Studies Australia     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 5)
Zeitschrift für Hochschulrecht, Hochschulmanagement und Hochschulpolitik: zfhr     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)

  First | 1 2     

Journal Cover   Science and Public Policy
  [SJR: 0.597]   [H-I: 33]   [25 followers]  Follow
    
   Hybrid Journal Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
   ISSN (Print) 0302-3427 - ISSN (Online) 1471-5430
   Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) Homepage  [339 journals]
  • Why do international research collaborations last? Virtuous circle of
           feedback loops, continuity and renewal
    • Authors: Ulnicane; I.
      Pages: 433 - 447
      Abstract: It is often argued that the unintended consequences of science policy transformation over the last 50 years—increased role of fixed-term project funding, evaluation and temporary contracts—are short-termism, fragmentation and limited freedom to choose research topics and collaborators. This paper focuses on a phenomenon that should be highly unlikely in this context: long-term international research collaborations lasting over 10 and 20 years which remain creative and productive. To shed light on the little studied topic of why and how long-term international research collaborations evolve, the paper develops a mid-range theory from multiple longitudinal case studies. It suggests that long-term collaborations combining formal and informal interactions operate as virtuous circles whereas earlier results ensure feedback loops and thematic and organisational continuity, but renewal is crucial. The emergent theory is built from multiple data sources and methods analysing international collaborations in the emerging field of nanosciences in Europe.
      PubDate: 2015-08-07T01:54:10-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scu060
      Issue No: Vol. 42, No. 4 (2015)
       
  • Policy ideas and policy learning about 'basic research' in South Korea
    • Authors: Ko; Y.
      Pages: 448 - 459
      Abstract: ‘Basic research’ is based on epistemological and intentional criteria. In terms of science policy, however, these criteria imply contradictory views on investment in ‘basic research’. The former espouses the linear model of innovation and encourages policy-makers concerned with economic problems to expand investment on basic research. However, the latter can collide with the policy norm of policy-makers and discourage investment in ‘basic research’ in an institutional setting where the nation-state prevails over scientists, as in South Korea. Emphasizing policy ideas and policy learning, this paper empirically shows that changes in investment priority and the emergence of new concepts about ‘basic research’ are co-products of a policy paradigm of the linear model and a policy norm of industrial competitiveness in Korea. Specifically, emphasis was placed on the balance between pure and oriented basic research, but moved on to ‘oriented basic research’, ‘basic engineering’, and to ‘basic research’ coupled with ‘woncheon-technology’.
      PubDate: 2015-08-07T01:54:10-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scu065
      Issue No: Vol. 42, No. 4 (2015)
       
  • Collaborative research for academic knowledge creation: How team
           characteristics, motivation, and processes influence research impact
    • Authors: Jeong, S; Choi, J. Y.
      Pages: 460 - 473
      Abstract: Contending that collaboration management practices and interpersonal relationships are the main factors in successful collaboration in R&D, scholars have turned their attention to the relationships between collaborators. Internal factors in research collaboration activities are not yet understood at the team level. They are the so-called black box of collaboration study. The purpose of this paper is to empirically demonstrate how factors relating to team characteristics, motivation, and processes influence research impact. The study works from a multi-theoretical perspective, extending from behavioral science to general management study, and seeks to answer the question: How should we organize and manage a collaborative team to improve its research impact? The empirical results show that, along with previously identified qualitative and quantitative factors, input factors such as: project motivation, transformational leadership, frequent face-to-face communication, more outsourcing, more attentional resource, and more evenly distributed workload improve research impact.
      PubDate: 2015-08-07T01:54:10-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scu067
      Issue No: Vol. 42, No. 4 (2015)
       
  • Openness determinants of national research funding programmes in EU27
    • Authors: Cuntz, A; Peuckert, J.
      Pages: 474 - 486
      Abstract: We empirically study how the characteristics of research and innovation systems influence the openness of national research funding programmes as regards the availability of funding to non-resident researchers. Based on a unique data set of national R&D programmes in the EU27 we identify a number of country-specific factors. These factors determine the degrees of programme openness observed when controlling for programme features in a hierarchical estimation model. Interestingly, we find that the quality and performance of national research add to the explanation of programme openness, whereas national integration into EU funding and research collaboration does not.
      PubDate: 2015-08-07T01:54:10-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scu063
      Issue No: Vol. 42, No. 4 (2015)
       
  • Negotiated expertise in policy-making: How governments use hybrid advisory
           committees
    • Authors: Krick; E.
      Pages: 487 - 500
      Abstract: By linking the realms of public policy-making, science and the public, advisory committees that include academics, state representatives and societal stakeholders answer to a double challenge that governments face today: a need for technical knowledge and an increasing demand for public acceptance and accountability. In contrast to purely scientific policy advice, little theoretical attention has so far been paid to these hybrid advisory committees. Drawing on and adapting research on knowledge utilisation, theories of delegation, decision-making and governance, an analytical framework of the use of multi-source, negotiated expertise will be developed and applied to four cases set up by the German Federal Government with mandates in social policy and in science and technology policy. The study shows the committees’ pronounced governance potential, which builds on their political and epistemic authority. It describes two distinct dynamics that lend the committees to instrumental, problem solving, and symbolic, substantiating purposes.
      PubDate: 2015-08-07T01:54:10-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scu069
      Issue No: Vol. 42, No. 4 (2015)
       
  • Stakeholder-led knowledge production: Development of a long-term
           management plan for North Sea Nephrops fisheries
    • Authors: Stange, K; van Tatenhove, J, van Leeuwen, J.
      Pages: 501 - 513
      Abstract: This paper investigates how different kinds of knowledge are mobilised in interactions between the stakeholders, scientists and bureaucrats who are involved in EU fisheries management. It reports on an initiative led by the North Sea Regional Advisory Council aimed at making a long-term management plan for Nephrops fisheries in the North Sea. The sharing of knowledge between the actors is explored using insights from organisation management, focusing on the kinds of resources and efforts that are needed at different boundaries to allow knowledge sharing and knowledge production to occur. The findings point to the challenge of reaching a common understanding between actors when both novelty and high stakes are involved. Experiences gained during this pioneering initiative raise questions about how far it is possible to take a ‘bottom up’ collaborative process aimed at developing management instruments within a setting where there are conflicts of interests between the stakeholders involved.
      PubDate: 2015-08-07T01:54:10-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scu068
      Issue No: Vol. 42, No. 4 (2015)
       
  • Integrating the supply and demand sides of public support to new
           technology-based firms
    • Authors: Bergek, A; Norrman, C.
      Pages: 514 - 529
      Abstract: This paper analyses public support and argues that supply does not match demand in terms of the support needs of different types of new technology-based firms (NTBFs). The demand side of public support to NTBFs is analysed by developing a typology of NTBFs, based on venture origin and degree of innovativeness. Each type’s characteristics, challenges and support needs are identified. The supply side is analysed in terms of the goals, instruments and level of aggregation of the two main policy areas that provide support for NTBFs: small and medium-sized enterprise policy and science, technology and innovation policy. Finally, the demand and supply sides are compared and three main shortcomings of existing public support to NTBFs are identified. This paper makes a twofold contribution: first, the typology gives guidelines for policy-makers with respect to the support needs of the NTBFs. Second, it identifies shortcomings in existing public support and recommends improvements.
      PubDate: 2015-08-07T01:54:10-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scu072
      Issue No: Vol. 42, No. 4 (2015)
       
  • Characterizing and comparing innovation systems by different 'modes' of
           knowledge production: A proximity approach
    • Authors: Hardeman, S; Frenken, K, Nomaler, O, Ter Wal, A. L. J.
      Pages: 530 - 548
      Abstract: Though the concept of innovation systems has become influential in both academia and policy-making, an analytical approach to understanding innovation systems is still lacking. In particular, there is no analytical framework to measure ‘Mode 1’ and ‘Mode 2’ knowledge production. We propose a framework based on the proximity concept. Mode 1 and Mode 2 knowledge production are characterized by collaborations with cognitive, organizational, social, institutional and geographical proximity, and distance, respectively. Using a gravity model approach we apply our framework to the case of type 2 diabetes research and provide a characterization of the global innovation system and a comparative analysis of the North American and European innovation systems. Our main results hold that although collaborative research on type 2 diabetes generally follows a logic of proximity and hence is not characterized as Mode 2, important differences and similarities exist between the North American and European innovation systems.
      PubDate: 2015-08-07T01:54:10-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scu070
      Issue No: Vol. 42, No. 4 (2015)
       
  • Epistemic integration of the European Research Area: The shifting
           geography of the knowledge base of Finnish research, 1995-2010
    • Authors: Toivanen, H; Suominen, A.
      Pages: 549 - 566
      Abstract: The integration of national research systems is one of the central objectives of European research policies. Yet the epistemic objectives of this project have been poorly defined, and scant attention has been paid to whether political, social and financial integration of the European Research Area (ERA) is accompanied by epistemic integration. We discuss the conceptual framework and methodological practices to monitor research integration, and conclude that most of them, such as research collaboration, are only partial indicators of it. To augment existing approaches with an analysis of epistemic integration, we analyse the geographical sources of knowledge of Finnish research in the period 1995–2010. We show a broad shift towards a European knowledge base, demonstrating epistemic integration into the ERA, and that Finnish researchers are, paradoxically, sourcing knowledge from an increasingly distributed system of European knowledge hubs. As policy implications, we recommend clarifying the ERA’s epistemic objectives and redefining its strategy of ‘reducing fragmentation’.
      PubDate: 2015-08-07T01:54:10-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scu066
      Issue No: Vol. 42, No. 4 (2015)
       
  • Research collaboration in the social sciences: What factors are associated
           with disciplinary and interdisciplinary collaboration?
    • Authors: Woolley, R; Sanchez-Barrioluengo, M, Turpin, T, Marceau, J.
      Pages: 567 - 582
      Abstract: Attention is increasingly directed toward better understanding the factors driving collaborations among researchers, particularly between researchers from different disciplinary backgrounds. This study investigates factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration in the social sciences. We utilize data from a survey of Australian-based social scientists. Interdisciplinary collaboration constitutes a considerable proportion of social scientists’ collaboration activity. Factors linked to the duration and diversity of research careers are positively associated with participation in collaborations. Job experience in Australian and foreign universities also boosts total collaboration, while holding an international citizenship increases interdisciplinary collaboration. Interdisciplinary collaborations are also associated with researcher orientation toward applied research activity. Investment in social science research is important for maintaining existing interdisciplinary and applied collaborations, although better information on these collaborations is desirable. Measures to expand such collaborations should take career stage into account. Broad-based population policies may also be an important underlying factor supporting international collaboration.
      PubDate: 2015-08-07T01:54:10-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scu074
      Issue No: Vol. 42, No. 4 (2015)
       
  • A cross-national environmental cluster collaboration: Shifting between an
           analytical and management level of the triple helix
    • Authors: Rosenlund, J; Hogland, W, Johansson, A. W, Seddon, J.
      Pages: 583 - 593
      Abstract: The STInno project, which was part of the EU Framework Programme 7 aimed to minimise the distance between south–north regions in Europe with a specific focus on wastewater treatment clusters. Three triple helix collaborations from three different countries participated, using their knowledge to work on a case study of olive mill wastewaters. The objective of this paper was to study how the triple helix functioned in practice. Results showed that a management model of the triple helix is somewhat different from the analytical model. A shift between these two views occurred during the project and the participants had to relate to this, as it had an effect on the outcomes. Concepts of social capital and trust are used to further elaborate on this by emphasising the importance of the people side of the triple helix and how the original, analytical model can be limiting when used in management practice.
      PubDate: 2015-08-07T01:54:10-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scu075
      Issue No: Vol. 42, No. 4 (2015)
       
  • Vulnerability in Technological Cultures: New Directions in Research and
           Governance edited by Anique Hommels, Jessica Mesman and Wiebe E. Bijker
    • Authors: Evans; S. W.
      Pages: 594 - 595
      PubDate: 2015-08-07T01:54:10-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scv001
      Issue No: Vol. 42, No. 4 (2015)
       
  • Cheap and Clean: How Americans Think About Energy in the Age of Global
           Warming by Stephen Ansolabehere and David M. Konisky
    • Authors: Levenda; A. M.
      Pages: 595 - 597
      PubDate: 2015-08-07T01:54:10-07:00
      DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scv002
      Issue No: Vol. 42, No. 4 (2015)
       
 
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
Fax: +00 44 (0)131 4513327
 
About JournalTOCs
API
Help
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-2015