for Journals by Title or ISSN
for Articles by Keywords
help
  Subjects -> LAW (Total: 1250 journals)
    - CIVIL LAW (37 journals)
    - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (44 journals)
    - CORPORATE LAW (82 journals)
    - CRIMINAL LAW (20 journals)
    - CRIMINOLOGY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT (139 journals)
    - FAMILY AND MATRIMONIAL LAW (21 journals)
    - INTERNATIONAL LAW (165 journals)
    - JUDICIAL SYSTEMS (22 journals)
    - LAW (713 journals)
    - LAW: GENERAL (7 journals)

LAW (713 journals)                  1 2 3 4 | Last

Showing 1 - 200 of 354 Journals sorted alphabetically
ABA Journal Magazine     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 20)
Acta Juridica     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 9)
Acta Politica     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 13)
Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica     Open Access  
Actualidad Jurídica Ambiental     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Adelaide Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 20)
Administrative Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 40)
Aegean Review of the Law of the Sea and Maritime Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7)
African Journal of Legal Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
African Journal on Conflict Resolution     Open Access   (Followers: 17)
Afrilex     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Air and Space Law     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 20)
Akron Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Alaska Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 10)
Albany Law Review     Free   (Followers: 6)
Alberta Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 15)
Alternative Law Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Alternatives : Global, Local, Political     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 16)
Amazon's Research and Environmental Law     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
American Journal of Comparative Law     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 56)
American Journal of Jurisprudence     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 17)
American Journal of Law & Medicine     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 13)
American Journal of Legal History     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 6)
American Journal of Trial Advocacy     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 8)
American University Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 16)
American University National Security Law Brief     Open Access   (Followers: 8)
Amicus Curiae     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Amsterdam Law Forum     Open Access   (Followers: 9)
Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez     Open Access  
Annales Canonici     Open Access  
Annual Survey of South African Law     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 5)
Anuario da Facultade de Dereito da Universidade da Coruña     Open Access  
Anuario de Psicología Jurídica     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
ANZSLA Commentator, The     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 4)
Appeal : Review of Current Law and Law Reform     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Arbitration Law Monthly     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Arbitration Law Reports and Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 13)
Arctic Review on Law and Politics     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Arena Hukum     Open Access  
Argumenta Journal Law     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Arizona Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Arizona State Law Journal     Free   (Followers: 2)
Arkansas Law Review     Free   (Followers: 6)
Ars Aequi Maandblad     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Art + Law     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 11)
Article 40     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Artificial Intelligence and Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Asian American Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Asian Journal of Legal Education     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 5)
Asian Pacific American Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Asy-Syir'ah : Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum     Open Access  
Australasian Law Management Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 7)
Australian and New Zealand Sports Law Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 8)
Australian Feminist Law Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Australian Indigenous Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 17)
Australian Journal of Legal History     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 18)
Ave Maria Law Review     Free   (Followers: 3)
Badamai Law Journal     Open Access  
Ballot     Open Access  
Baltic Journal of Law & Politics     Open Access   (Followers: 7)
Bar News: The Journal of the NSW Bar Association     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 5)
Behavioral Sciences & the Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24)
Beijing Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 7)
Berkeley Journal of Entertainment and Sports Law     Open Access   (Followers: 6)
Berkeley Technology Law Journal     Free   (Followers: 11)
Bioethics Research Notes     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 14)
Bond Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 18)
Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 8)
Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice     Open Access   (Followers: 10)
Boston College Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 18)
Boston University Law Review     Free   (Followers: 11)
BRICS Law Journal     Open Access  
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law     Open Access   (Followers: 8)
Brigham Young University Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 8)
British Journal of American Legal Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Brooklyn Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Bulletin of Legal Medicine     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
C@hiers du CRHIDI     Open Access  
Cadernos de Dereito Actual     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGDir./UFRGS     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário     Open Access  
Cahiers, Droit, Sciences et Technologies     Open Access  
California Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 20)
California Lawyer     Free  
California Western Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Cambridge Law Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 152)
Campbell Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Campus Legal Advisor     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Case Western Reserve Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi     Open Access  
Časopis zdravotnického práva a bioetiky     Open Access  
Catalyst : A Social Justice Forum     Open Access   (Followers: 10)
Catholic University Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Chicago-Kent Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 4)
Chicana/o-Latina/o Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
China : An International Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 16)
China-EU Law Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4)
Chinese Journal of Comparative Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Chinese Law & Government     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 6)
Cleveland State Law Review     Free   (Followers: 2)
College Athletics and The Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Colombia Forense     Open Access  
Columbia Journal of Environmental Law     Free   (Followers: 9)
Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 16)
Columbia Law Review (Sidebar)     Open Access   (Followers: 16)
Commercial Law Quarterly: The Journal of the Commercial Law Association of Australia     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 5)
Comparative Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 42)
Comparative Legal History     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 7)
Con-texto     Open Access  
Conflict Resolution Quarterly     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24)
Conflict Trends     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 9)
Cornell Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 8)
Criterio Jurídico     Open Access  
Critical Analysis of Law : An International & Interdisciplinary Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Cuadernos de Historia del Derecho     Open Access   (Followers: 7)
Cuestiones Juridicas     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Current Legal Problems     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 26)
Danube : The Journal of European Association Comenius - EACO     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
De Jure     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
De Rebus     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Deakin Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 14)
Defense Counsel Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Democrazia e diritto     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Denning Law Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 8)
DePaul Journal of Women, Gender and the Law     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
DePaul Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Der Staat     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 13)
Derecho PUCP     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Derecho y Ciencias Sociales     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Die Verwaltung     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 10)
Dikaion     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Dike     Open Access  
Direito e Desenvolvimento     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Direito e Liberdade     Open Access  
Diritto penale contemporaneo     Free   (Followers: 2)
Diritto, immigrazione e cittadinanza     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Dixi     Open Access  
Droit et Cultures     Open Access   (Followers: 7)
Droit et Médecine Bucco-Dentaire     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Droit, Déontologie & Soin     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Drug Science, Policy and Law     Full-text available via subscription  
Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum     Open Access   (Followers: 6)
Duke Forum for Law & Social Change     Open Access   (Followers: 8)
Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy     Open Access   (Followers: 16)
Duke Law & Technology Review     Open Access   (Followers: 10)
Duke Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 26)
DULR Online     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
East Asia Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
ECI Interdisciplinary Journal for Legal and Social Policy     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Ecology Law Quarterly     Free   (Followers: 3)
Edinburgh Law Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 21)
Education and the Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11)
El Cotidiano     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Election Law Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23)
Energy Law Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 4)
Environmental Justice     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10)
Environmental Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 22)
Environmental Policy and Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 15)
ERA-Forum     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Espaço Jurídico : Journal of Law     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
ESR Review : Economic and Social Rights in South Africa     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Ethnopolitics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4)
Ethos: Official Publication of the Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 4)
EU agrarian Law     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Europaisches Journal fur Minderheitenfragen     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
European Energy and Environmental Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 16)
European Journal for Education Law and Policy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8)
European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
European Journal of Law and Technology     Open Access   (Followers: 15)
European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
European Law Journal     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 144)
European Public Law     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 35)
European Review of Contract Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22)
European Review of Private Law     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 30)
European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5)
Evaluation Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12)
Evidence & Policy : A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 9)
Faulkner Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Federal Communication Law Journal     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
Federal Law Review     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 22)
Federal Probation     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Feminist Legal Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 16)
feminists@law     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Fiat Justisia     Open Access  
First Amendment Studies     Hybrid Journal  
Florida Bar News     Free  
Florida Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Florida State University Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Fordham Environmental Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal     Open Access   (Followers: 18)
Fordham Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 14)
FORO. Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, Nueva Época     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Fundamina : A Journal of Legal History     Open Access   (Followers: 7)
Geoforum     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23)
George Washington Law Review     Free   (Followers: 8)
Georgia Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Georgia State University Law Review     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Global Journal of Comparative Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)

        1 2 3 4 | Last

Journal Cover Arbitration Law Reports and Review
  [13 followers]  Follow
    
   Hybrid Journal Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
   ISSN (Print) 2044-8651 - ISSN (Online) 2044-9887
   Published by Oxford University Press Homepage  [370 journals]
  • List of Abbreviations
    • Abstract: ACLaw Reports, Appeal Cases (HL and PC)ACSRAustralian Corporations and Securities ReportsAdm CtAdmiralty CourtADRAlternative Dispute ResolutionADRLJArbitration and Dispute Resolution Law JournalAIRAll India ReportsAll ERAll England Law ReportsAll ER (Comm)All England Law Reports (Commercial)BCCBritish Company CasesBCLCButterworths Company Law CasesBeavBeavan's Reports [ER 48-55]BLRBuilding Law ReportsCACourt of AppealsCCCompanies CourtCEDRCentre for Dispute ResolutionChLaw Reports, Chancery DivisionCh DivChancery DivisionCLCCommercial Law CasesCLRCommonwealth Law ReportsComm CtCommercial CourtCPLaw Reports, Common PleasCPRCivil Procedure RulesCTFCoffee Trade FederationDLRDominion Law ReportsDLTDelhi Law TimesECCEuropean Commercial CasesECHREuropean Court of Human RightsECJEuropean Court of JusticeECREuropean Court ReportsEGLREstates Gazette Law ReportsETEmployment TribunalsEWCALaw Reports, England and Wales Court of AppealsEWHCLaw Reports, England and Wales High CourtFFederal Reporter (USA)F 2dFederal Reporter, Second Series (USA)F 3rdFederal Reporter, Third Series (USA)FamFamily Reports (UK)FOSFAFederation of Oils, Seeds and Fats AssociationsFSAFinancial Services AuthorityFSRFleet Street ReportsHCCIHungarian Chamber of Commerce and IndustryHCNIHigh Court of Justice of Northern IrelandHLHouse of LordsGAFTAGrain and Free Trade AssociationIBAInternational Bar AssociationICCInternational Chamber of CommerceICRIndustrial Cases ReportsIL PrInternational Litigation ProcedureIRLRIndustrial Relations Court of AustraliaJSCJoint Stock CompaniesKBKing’s BenchLCIALondon Court of International ArbitrationLloyd’s RepLloyd’s List Law ReportsLloyd’s Rep IRLloyd’s Law Reports Insurance and ReinsuranceLMAALondon’s Maritime Arbitrators AssociationLTLaw Times ReportsNIQBNorth Ireland Queen’s BenchNSWCANew South Wales Court of AppealsNSWSCNew South Wales Supreme CourtNYPENew York Produce ExchangePLaw Reports, ProbateP&CRProperty & Compensation ReportsQBLaw Reports, Queen’s Bench DivisionQBDQueen’s Bench DivisionQd RQueensland ReportsRPCReports of Patent CasesRSCRules of the Supreme CourtSCCSupreme Court Cases (India)SDNYSouthern District of New YorkSGCASingapore Court of AppealSLRSingapore Law ReportsSwanSwanston's Chancery Reports [ER 36]TCCTechnology and Construction CourtTLRThe Times Law ReportsUKHLHouse of Lords, United KingdomUKPCUnited Kingdom Privy CouncilUNCITRALUnited Nations Commission on International Trade LawUSSCUnited States Supreme CourtVSCSupreme Court of VictoriaWLRWeekly Law Reports
      PubDate: 2012-08-09
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als023
       
  • List of Reported Cases 2011
    • Abstract: These Arbitration Law Reports and Review 2011 should be cited as [2011] ArbLR, followed by the case number and where relevant the paragraph number. For example, [2011] ArbLR 32 at para 10.
      PubDate: 2012-08-09
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als020
       
  • Table of Arbitration Rules
    • Abstract: References are to case number (bold) and paragraph numbers within the cases.
      PubDate: 2012-08-09
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als027
       
  • Table of Cases Judicially Considered
    • Abstract: These Arbitration Law Reports and Review 2011 should be cited as [2011] ArbLR, followed by the case number and where relevant the paragraph number. For example, [2011] ArbLR 32 at para 10.
      PubDate: 2012-08-09
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als024
       
  • Table of Cases in Annual Review
    • Abstract: References are to page number.
      PubDate: 2012-08-09
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als025
       
  • Table of Legislation and Treaties
    • Abstract: References are to case number (bold) and paragraph numbers within the cases.
      PubDate: 2012-08-09
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als026
       
  • Annual Review of English Judicial Decisions on Arbitration 2011
    • Authors: Shackleton SR.
      Abstract: English courts rendered more than 80 arbitration-related judgments in 2011: over 70 judgments at first instance are available as well as 9 by the Court of Appeal. There was one decision by the Supreme Court.11
      PubDate: 2012-08-09
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als021
       
  • AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower
           Plant JSC
    • First page: 219
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Anti-suit injunction—No arbitral proceedings commenced—Whether court had jurisdiction to grant relief (yes)—Whether anti-suit injunction available (yes)—Senior Courts Act 1981, s 37Arbitration agreement—Enforcement—Declaration—Compétence-compétence—Whether courts may declare validity of arbitration agreement (yes)
      PubDate: 2012-02-03
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr015
       
  • Claxton Engineering Services Ltd v TXM Olaj-ÉS Gázkutató Korlátolt
           Felelısségő Társaság
    • First page: 295
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration proceedings—Anti-arbitration injunction—English courts deciding that Budapest arbitration agreement did not exist—Arbitration commenced in Hungary—Court at first instance granting anti-arbitration injunction—Court of Appeal granting permission to appeal in relation to injunction—Application to set aside or vary anti-arbitration injunction—Whether ‘exceptional circumstances’ continued to operate following grant of permission to appeal (yes)—Whether to set aside anti-suit injunction (no)—Whether to vary injunction (yes)—Senior Courts Act, s 37
      PubDate: 2012-01-17
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr017
       
  • Deutsche Bank AG v Tongkah Harbour and Ors
    • First page: 321
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Stay—Two of three agreements containing arbitration provisions—Bank commencing litigation in respect of two agreements and arbitration under third—Whether matters in litigation within scope of arbitration agreement—Whether to stay litigation proceedings (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 9
      PubDate: 2012-01-13
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr020
       
  • Dowans Holdings SA and Anr v Tanzania Electric Supply Co Ltd
    • First page: 335
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Enforcement—ICC award rendered in Tanzania—Challenges to award at place of arbitration—Whether party seeking to enforce award obligated to prove award was ‘binding’ (no)—Whether award ‘binding’ (yes)—Whether chances of success of challenge proceedings fanciful (no)—Whether to adjourn enforcement (yes)—Whether to order security (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, ss 101(2), 103(2)(f) and (5)
      PubDate: 2012-01-13
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr021
       
  • Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Sir David Richards and Ors
    • First page: 363
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Stay—Court proceedings commenced for unfair prejudice claim—Whether claim arbitrable (yes)—Whether to grant a stay (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 9
      PubDate: 2012-01-12
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr022
       
  • Milan Nigeria Ltd v Angeliki B Maritime Company (‘The Angeliki
           B’)
    • First page: 433
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Arbitrators ruling no new arguments permitted—Arbitrators ruling that closing submissions would be disregarded if no earlier reliance on Carriage of Goods Act to establish title—Arbitrators relying on Carriage of Goods Act—Whether arbitrators in breach of their own procedural order (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(a)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Fairness—Arbitrators awarding damages in US dollars—Damages allegedly suffered in Nigerian naira—Whether opportunity to address point during the arbitration (yes)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(a)Arbitration award—Appeal—Error of law—Burden of proof—Arbitrators awarding damages on the basis that cargo owner had not proved causation of damages by ship owners—Whether arbitrators erred in law (yes)—Whether to remit award to arbitrators (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 69Arbitration award—Appeal—Error of law—Permission—Arbitrators awarding damages in US dollars—Damages allegedly incurred in Nigerian Naira—Whether error of law (no)—Whether finding of fact (yes)—Whether to grant permission to appeal (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 69
      PubDate: 2012-08-09
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr024
       
  • John Milsom and Ors (Receivers of the property of Mukhtar Ablyazov) v
           Mukhtar Ablyazov
    • First page: 455
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration proceedings—Confidentiality—Receivership order requiring the production of documents and information and allowing disclosure—Application to court for interim relief in support of arbitration proceedings—Production of evidence and documents filed in court proceedings to receivers—Whether receivers might disclose the information received (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 44
      PubDate: 2012-01-13
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr025
       
  • PT Thiess Contractors Indonesia v PT Kaltim Prima Coal
    • First page: 467
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Stay—Agreement containing arbitration clause—Second related agreement governed by English law—Disputes concerning new pricing arrangements referred to arbitration—Court proceedings commenced for breach of second related agreement—Whether issues arising in court proceedings within scope of arbitration agreement (no)—Whether to grant a stay (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 9
      PubDate: 2012-01-12
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr026
       
  • Excalibur Ventures LLC v Texas Keystone Inc and Ors
    • First page: 483
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Stay—ICC arbitration agreement—Claimant commencing parallel court and arbitration proceedings—Whether court had jurisdiction to determine existence of arbitration agreement (yes)—Whether Claimant's commencement of proceedings merely protective (no)—Whether to stay court proceedings (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 9Arbitration proceedings—Anti-arbitration injunction—Non-signatories—ICC Court determining prima facie existence of arbitration agreement—Whether court had jurisdiction to grant injunction restraining New York arbitration (yes)—Whether to grant anti-arbitration injunction (yes)—Senior Court Act 1981, s 37
      PubDate: 2012-05-15
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr027
       
  • Jivraj v Hashwani
    • First page: 515
      Abstract: AbstractAbritrators—Appointment—Arbitration agreement stipulating appointment of three members of the Ismaili community—Appointment of arbitrator not a member of the Ismaili community—Whether arbitrator an ‘employee’ (no)—Whether Employment Equality Regulations applied (no)—Whether arbitration agreement void (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 18
      PubDate: 2012-01-27
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr028
       
  • Mobile Telesystems Finance SA v Nomihold Securities Inc
    • First page: 545
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Enforcement—Order registering award as judgment of court—Freezing order granted—Whether to vary freezing order to permit payment of interest to lenders (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 66
      PubDate: 2012-01-17
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr029
       
  • Russian Commercial Bank (Cyprus) Ltd v Talon Enterprises Ltd and Ors
    • First page: 563
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Extension of time—Arbitrators issuing consent judgments and consent award—Challenge to award on ground of fraud—Application for extension of time some five months after award—Whether to grant extension of time (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 70(3) and 80(5)Arbitration award—Enforcement—Injunction against enforcement—Consent award—Parties' agreeing stay of enforcement—Allegations that consent award affected by fraud—Injunction obtained against enforcement—Whether failure to make full disclosure in application for injunction (yes)—Whether to continue injunction (no)
      PubDate: 2012-02-22
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr030
       
  • Sovarex SA v Romero Alvarez SA
    • First page: 589
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Enforcement—Jurisdiction—Party resisting enforcement contesting existence of contract—Whether party participated in the arbitration (no)—Whether loss of rights to contest jurisdiction (no)—Whether action on the award required (no)—Whether court could direct trial of issue of jurisdiction (yes)—Whether to stay enforcement proceedings (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, ss 66 and 73Arbitration award—Enforcement—Spanish court dismissing stay application—Spanish court also dismissing application for a declaration that no contract had been concluded—Whether English court bound by Spanish court's decision to refuse stay (no)—Whether decisions by Spanish courts gave rise to issue estoppel (no)—Whether English court had jurisdiction (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 66
      PubDate: 2012-02-07
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr031
       
  • States of Guernsey v Jacobs UK Ltd
    • First page: 607
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Existence—Offer containing arbitration agreement not accepted—Conditional counter offer not accepted—Whether parties concluded main agreement (no)—Whether arbitration agreement came into existence (no)
      PubDate: 2012-02-07
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr032
       
  • Stellar Shipping Co LLP v Cosco (Dalian) Shipyard Co Ltd
    • First page: 623
      Abstract: AbstractInterim measures—Commencement of arbitration—Threat to sell vessel contrary to contractual obligations of notice and first offer—Injunction preventing sale granted ex parte—Whether ex parte application appropriate (no)—Whether circumstances of urgency (no)—Whether to discharge injunction (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 44
      PubDate: 2012-02-01
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr033
       
  • Sunwing Vacation Inc and Ors v E-Clear (UK) Plc and Ors
    • First page: 635
      Abstract: AbstractInterim measures—Creditor of company in voluntary liquidation applying for order that liquidators disclose documents required for arbitration proceedings in Germany—Arbitration against third party—Whether to order disclosure (yes)—Insolvency Act 1986, ss 112 and 155
      PubDate: 2012-02-03
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr034
       
  • TTMI Sarl v Statoil ASA (‘The Sibohelle’)
    • First page: 641
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Challenge—Jurisdiction—Parties—Mistake as to name of party to contract—Arbitrator deciding that no contract and no arbitration agreement concluded between parties to arbitration—Whether contract by performance (yes)—Whether to set aside award (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 67
      PubDate: 2012-02-29
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr035
       
  • Tryggingarfelagio Foroyar P/F v CPT Empresas Marítimas SA(‘The
           Athena’)
    • First page: 659
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Anti–suit injunction granted to restrain proceedings in Chile—Salvage services engaged in urgent circumstances—Whether parties agreed a London arbitration agreement (yes)—Whether to discharge anti–suit injunction (no)—Senior Court Act, s 37
      PubDate: 2012-02-08
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr036
       
  • West Tankers Inc v Allianz SpA and Anr (‘The Front Comor’)
    • First page: 683
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Enforcement—Permission to enforce declaratory award—Whether award capable of ‘enforcement’—Whether to set aside order for permission to enforce (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 66
      PubDate: 2012-02-22
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr037
       
  • Wilky Property Holdings Plc v London & Surrey Investments Ltd
    • First page: 691
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Stay—Dispute resolution clause providing for the appointment of an ‘expert’ to determine any difference or dispute as to the meaning of contract—Whether arbitration agreement (no)—Whether provision for expert determination (yes)—Whether to grant a stay (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 9
      PubDate: 2012-02-22
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr038
       
  • Yukos Capital SARL v OJSC Rosneft Oil Co
    • First page: 713
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Enforcement—Awards set aside by Russian courts—Amsterdam Court of Appeal refusing to recognize Russian decisions on ground of lack of independence of Russian judiciary—Whether to enforce award in England—Whether decision of Amsterdam Court of Appeal giving rise to issue estoppel (yes)—Whether English courts precluded by Act of State or Non-justiciability from considering allegations of lack of independence of the Russian judiciary (no)
      PubDate: 2012-03-06
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr039
       
  • African Fertilizers and Chemicals NIG Ltd (Nigeria) v BD Shipsnavo GmbH
           & Co Reederei KG
    • First page: 761
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Enforcement—Arbitrators issuing declaratory award upholding jurisdiction—Whether purely declaratory award enforceable (yes)—Whether judgment entered in terms of award a judgment under the Brussels Convention (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 66
      PubDate: 2012-02-25
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als001
       
  • William McIlroy Swindon Ltd and Anr v Quinn Insurance Limited
    • First page: 771
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Nine-month time limit for reference of claims to arbitration—Insurer denying liability—Arbitration not commenced in respect of insurer's denial of liability—Damages suffered by third parties determined by courts—Subsequent commencement of litigation by third parties to recover damages from insurer—Whether claims precluded by arbitration clause time bar (no)
      PubDate: 2012-03-13
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als016
       
  • Dollingstown Football Club v The Irish Football Association
    • First page: 785
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Appeal—Question of law—Permission—Exclusion agreement—Arbitration agreement stating arbitrators ‘will settle the dispute to the exclusion of any ordinary court’—Whether exclusion of appeals on question of law (yes)—Whether to grant permission (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 69(1)
      PubDate: 2012-02-25
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als003
       
  • A v B and Anr
    • First page: 803
      Abstract: AbstractArbitrator—Removal—Bias—Sole arbitrator instructed as barrister by one party's solicitors in unrelated litigation—Whether real possibility of apparent bias (no)—Whether to remove arbitrator (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 12Arbitration Award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Fairness—Arbitrator instructed as barrister by one party's solicitors in unrelated litigation—Arbitrator giving late disclosure of instructions—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(a)
      PubDate: 2012-03-13
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als004
       
  • House of Fraser Ltd v Scottish Widows Plc
    • First page: 827
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Appeal—Question of law—Permission—Whether arbitrator's assessment of evidence an appealable question of law (no)—Whether admission of inadmissible evidence an appealable question of law (no)—Whether to grant permission (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 69
      PubDate: 2012-03-02
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als005
       
  • The Londonderry Port and Harbour Commissioners v WS Atkins Consultants Ltd
           and Anr
    • First page: 841
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Stay—Incorporation by reference—Proposal for services to be provided on the basis of standard form contract—Standard form containing arbitration agreement—Whether agreement by conduct (yes)—Whether arbitration agreement incorporated by reference (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 9Arbitration agreement—Enforcement—Stay—Request for disclosure of documents in litigation—Correspondence concerning time table for service of defence in litigation—Whether step in the proceedings (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 9(3)
      PubDate: 2012-02-16
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als006
       
  • Soeximex SAS v Agrocorp International Pte Ltd
    • First page: 849
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Challenge—Serious Irregularity—Issues—Illegality of contract raised as defence—Arbitrators holding that nationality of buyer not relevant to illegality defence—Whether arbitrators failing to deal with other points concerning illegality defence (yes)—Whether serious irregularity (yes)—Whether award should be remitted (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(d)
      PubDate: 2012-02-25
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als007
       
  • AK Kablo Imalat San Ve Tic AS v Intamex SA
    • First page: 863
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Fairness—Allegation that arbitrators made finding not pleaded by either party—Whether arbitrators made alleged finding (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no) Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(a)Arbitration award—Appeal—Permission—Question of law—Whether arbitrators’ alleged conclusion an error of law—Whether arbitrators made the alleged conclusion (no)—Whether arbitrators made an obviously wrong statement of law (no)—Whether to grant permission (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 69Arbitration award—Remission—Whether reasoning in award unclear or incomplete (no)—Whether to remit award to arbitrators (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 70
      PubDate: 2012-03-26
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als008
       
  • A Lloyds Syndicate v X
    • First page: 875
      Abstract: AbstractArbitral proceedings—Interim measures—Injunction—Evidence—Expert instructed by one party providing evidence for opposing party—Arbitral tribunal refusing to prevent expert from giving evidence—Whether to grant injunction restraining expert from acting (no)
      PubDate: 2012-02-15
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als009
       
  • BNP Paribas SA v Open Joint Stock Company Russian Machines and Anr
    • First page: 885
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Anti-suit injunction—London arbitration—Legal proceedings commenced in Moscow by member of same corporate group as party to arbitration—Alternative service of claim form for anti-suit injunction—Whether court has jurisdiction in relation to non-party (yes)—Whether retrospectively to validate service effected in England (yes)—Whether alternative service in Russia valid (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 44
      PubDate: 2012-03-05
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als010
       
  • ED&F Man Sugar Ltd v Belmont Shipping Ltd (‘The MV
           Amplify’)
    • First page: 925
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration Award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Fairness—Arbitrators not drawing parties’ attention to court decision—Arbitrators not applying court decision—Whether arbitrators obligated to raise point with the parties (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(a)
      PubDate: 2012-03-05
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als011
       
  • Micoperi SrL v The Shipowners Mutual Protection & Indemnity
           Association (Luxembourg)
    • First page: 933
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Appeal—Question of law—Permission to appeal granted on the basis of errors of fact involving errors of law—Whether errors of law (no)—Whether to grant appeal (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 69Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Arbitrators expressing view on reasonableness of settlement under cover in dispute—Issue of reasonableness not referred to arbitrators—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act s 68(2)(a)
      PubDate: 2012-03-13
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als012
       
  • Five Oceans Salvage Ltd v Wenzhou Timber Group Co (‘The Medea
           K’)
    • First page: 943
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Fairness—Party alleging it had no notice of arbitral proceedings—Whether arbitrator failed to ensure party's representatives properly appointed (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(a)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Failure to comply with agreed procedure—Party alleging it had no notice of arbitral proceedings—Agreed procedure requiring appointment of representatives—Whether arbitrator failed to ensure party's representatives properly appointed (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(c)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Party alleging it had no notice of arbitral proceedings—Whether arbitrator accepted that an irregularity had occurred (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(i)Arbitration award—Challenge—Time limits—Party unaware that award not enforceable in China—Party unaware of opportunity to set aside award until defence in English proceedings—Whether to extend time (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 79Arbitration award—Arbitrator issuing final award—Enforcement in China—Party alleging it had no notice of arbitral proceedings—Whether arbitrator had jurisdiction to render further awards (no)—Whether arbitrator functus officio (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 32
      PubDate: 2012-03-21
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als013
       
  • Lesley McCaughan v Belwood Homes Ltd
    • First page: 953
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Stay—Claims of rescission and damages for misrepresentation—Whether claims within arbitration agreement (yes)—Whether arbitrator had jurisdiction to grant relief sought (no)—Whether to grant stay (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 9Arbitrator—Powers—Specific performance—Separate building and sales contracts—Claim for specific performance under building contract—Whether claim under building contract relating to land (yes)—Whether arbitrator had power to grant specific performance (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 48(5)(b)
      PubDate: 2012-03-06
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als014
       
  • Niagara Maritime SA v Tianjin Iron & Steel Group Co Ltd (‘The
           Good Luck’)
    • First page: 959
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Anti-suit injunction—Terms on back of bill of lading purporting to incorporate arbitration agreement contained in time charter—Commencement of litigation in China and arbitration in London—Chinese court finding arbitration agreement not incorporated—Whether urgency (yes)—Whether arbitral tribunal able to grant relief (no)—Whether high possibility that arbitration agreement existed (yes)—Whether to extend anti-suit injunction (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 44, Senior Courts Act 1981, s 37(1)
      PubDate: 2012-03-13
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als015
       
  • Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v John Forster Emmott
    • First page: 967
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Fairness—Arbitrators limiting oral hearing to questions of liability and deferring issues of quantum—Arbitrators proceeding to deal with types of remedies to be ordered –Whether arbitrators had deferred question of appropriate remedies (no)—Whether fair opportunity to address remedies (yes)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(a)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Fairness—Arbitrators finding confidential information destroyed—Arbitrators finding no financial loss caused by destruction—Whether loss pleaded in the arbitration (no)—Whether arbitrators obligated to afford opportunity to address loss point (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(a)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Fairness—Arbitrators finding underbilling of clients in breach of contract—Arbitrators finding amounts to be small—Arbitrators finding amounts to be incapable of quantification—Arbitrators ordering compensation by denying profit share over relevant period—Whether arbitrators relied on points not raised in the arbitration (no)—Whether arbitrators making findings in the absence of evidence (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(a)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Fairness—Allegation of secret profits in the form of shares—Arbitrators finding shares held in trust in favour of third party when transferred—Whether ownership or control of shares a point advanced during the arbitration (yes)—Whether arbitrators entitled to carry out novel analysis (yes)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(a)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Excess of powers—Arbitrators deciding shares beneficially held by third party—Whether finding determined any dispute with third party (no)—Whether finding in excess of arbitrators’ powers (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(b)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Agreed procedure—Arbitrators bifurcating proceedings—Deferment of questions on quantum—Award following oral hearing on liability—Arbitrators deciding types of remedies to be ordered—Whether arbitrators had deferred question of remedies (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(c)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Issues—Arbitrators choosing approach which absolved them from need to inquire into quantum of damages—Arbitrators concluding amount of damages incapable of quantification—Arbitrators ordering compensation by denying profit share to party in breach—Whether failure to deal with damages (no)—Whether under compensation (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(d)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Issues—Arbitrators finding party in breach of contract—Arbitrators deciding party nonetheless entitled to one third interest in company under the contract—Whether party in breach allowed to profit from its own wrong (no)—Whether failure to deal with issue (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(d)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Issues—Arbitrators finding breach of disclosure obligations—Arbitrators ordering monetary damages in favour of party in breach—Whether failure to deal with breach of disclosure obligations (no)—Whether failure to deal with allegations concerning diversion of business (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(d)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Issues—Arbitrators directing an account of payments by rival law firm—Arbitrators not making an order against party as a “partner” in rival law firm—Arbitrators not finding that party was a partner in rival law firm (no)—Whether issue raised during arbitration (no)—Whether failure to deal with an issue (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(d)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Public policy—Arbitrators deciding no transfer of shares as secret profit—Arbitrators deciding shares held in trust for third party—Whether dishonest scheme (no)—Whether award advanced the scheme (no)—Whether arbitrators obligated to defer decision until completion of investigations by regulatory authorities (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(g)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Public policy—New evidence—Arbitrators deciding no transfer of shares as secret profit—Arbitrators not having benefit of documentary evidence overlooked and not produced in arbitration—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(g)Arbitration award—Appeal—Permission—Question of law—Whether application for permission identified questions of law—Whether arbitrators’ decisions obviously wrong (no)—Whether to grant permission to appeal (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 69
      PubDate: 2012-08-09
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als002
       
  • Bibliography 2011
    • First page: 1005
      PubDate: 2012-08-09
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/als022
       
  • Claxton Engineering Services Ltd v TXM Olaj-ÉS Gázkutató Korlátolt
           Felelısségő Társaság
    • First page: 1
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration proceedings—Anti-Arbitration injunction—English courts deciding that Budapest arbitration agreement did not exist—Arbitration commenced in Hungary under arbitration agreement in writing—Whether court had jurisdiction to restrain pursuit of arbitration in Hungary (yes)—Whether ‘exceptional circumstances’ (yes)—Whether to grant injunction …(yes)—Senior Courts Act (1981), s 37
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr001
       
  • Novasen SA v Alimenta SA
    • First page: 13
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration Award—Challenge—Jurisdiction—Undisclosed principal concluding contract through agent—Arbitrators deciding in favour of jurisdiction—Whether undisclosed principal could invoke arbitration agreement (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, ss 7 and 67
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr002
       
  • Ispat Industries Ltd v Western Bulk Pte Ltd
    • First page: 27
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Fairness—Arbitrators failing to order disclosure of documents—Arbitrators allowing admission of witness statement on eve of oral hearing—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(a)Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious irregularity—Issues—Majority arbitrators not stating why witness evidence relied on credible—Majority arbitrators not addressing points raised by dissenting arbitrator—Whether failure to deal with issues (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(d)Arbitration award—Appeal—Question of law—Interim measures—Application for security in New York—Arbitrators deciding that application not a breach of the arbitration agreement—Whether arbitrators erred in law (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 69Arbitration award—Appeal—Question of law—Permission to appeal granted on three issues—Whether arbitrators erred in law (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 69
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr003
       
  • Nanjing Tianshun Shipbuilding Co Ltd and Anr v Orchard Tankers Pte Ltd
    • First page: 43
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration Award—Challenge—Jurisdiction—Subject matter—Arbitration agreement requiring commencement within 30 days—Arbitration commenced late—Whether arbitrators had jurisdiction over claims (yes)—Whether claims time-barred (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 67Arbitration Award—Appeal—Permission—Question of law—Whether to grant permission (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 69
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr004
       
  • Cosco Bulk Carrier Co Ltd v Armada Shipping SA and Anr (‘The Spar
           Sirius’)
    • First page: 53
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration Agreement—Enforcement—Bankruptcy—Party to London arbitration agreement in Swiss bankruptcy proceedings—Whether disputes should be resolved in London arbitration (yes)—Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 and the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, Art 17
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr005
       
  • JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov and Ors
    • First page: 71
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration Agreement—Enforcement—Stay—Whether arbitration agreements null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed (no)— Whether to grant a stay (yes) Arbitration Act 1996, s 9
      PubDate: 2011-12-15
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr006
       
  • Clyde & Co LLP and Anr v Van Winkelhof
    • First page: 89
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Stay—Injunctive relief – Partner in law firm commencing proceedings before employment tribunal—Whether arbitration agreement enforceable (no)— Whether to grant application requiring partner to consent to a stay—(no)—Employment Rights Act, s 203 and Equality Act 2010, s 144(1)
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr007
       
  • Tedcom Finance Ltd and Anr v Vetabet Holdings Ltd and Ors
    • First page: 103
      Abstract: AbstractInterim measures—Preservation of assets—Cyprus arbitrators ordering party not to dissipate assets—Application for orders in England—Non-parties to arbitration—Whether court had jurisdiction (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 44
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr008
       
  • Telenor East Holding II AS v Altimo Holdings & Investments Ltd and Ors
    • First page: 107
      Abstract: AbstractInterim measures—Injunction—Arbitral tribunal not constituted—Share holders disputing issue of new shares—Whether one party entitled to offer of new shares—Whether to grant injunction to prevent Company from proceeding with share issue (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 44
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr009
       
  • B v S
    • First page: 121
      Abstract: AbstractInterim measures—Freezing injunction—Arbitration agreement contained in FOSFA Form 54—Scott v Avery clause precluding court action prior to final arbitration award—Whether precluded legal proceedings includes interim measures (yes)—Whether to set aside freezing injunction (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 44
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr010
       
  • CMA-CGM Marseille v Petro Broker International
    • First page: 145
      Abstract: AbstractAward—Enforcement—Payment into court—Injunction against enforcement withdrawn—Whether payment into court should be returned (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, ss 44 and 66
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr011
       
  • Consolidated Contractors (Oil and Gas) Company SAL (acting by MR Lee
           Manning as receiver) v Canadian Nexen Petroleum Yemen and Ors
    • First page: 163
      Abstract: AbstractInterim measures—Party in receivership—Court ordering the commencement of arbitration by the Receiver—Whether the court had jurisdiction—Whether the arbitrators had jurisdiction to decide issues referred—Whether to discontinue the arbitration (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 44
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr012
       
  • Pacific Inter-Link SDN BHD v EFKO Food Ingredients Ltd
    • First page: 175
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Challenge–Jurisdiction—Subject matter—Whether parties concluded contracts containing arbitration agreements (no)—Whether arbitrators had substantive jurisdiction (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 67
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr013
       
  • Nikola Rotenberg v Sucafina SA
    • First page: 191
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration proceedings—Time limits of administering institution exceeded—Extension by the court—Whether to extend time (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 79Arbitration award—Final award not taken up and not published—Status of partial or interim awards—Whether final and binding (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, ss 39 and 47
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr014
       
  • Claxton Engineering Services Ltd v TXM Olaj-ÉS Gázkutató Korlátolt
           Felelısségő Társaság
    • First page: 289
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Stay—Court at first instance deciding that Budapest arbitration agreement did not exist—Court at first instance refusing permission to appeal—Whether courts or arbitrators should decide arbitral jurisdiction—Whether agreement to English jurisdiction clause can be based on one party's silence (no)—Whether to grant permission to appeal (yes)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 9Anti-Arbitration injunction—English courts deciding that Budapest arbitration agreement did not exist—Arbitration commenced in Hungary—Court at first instance granting anti-arbitration injunction on the basis of ‘exceptional circumstances’—Whether to grant permission to appeal (yes)—Senior Court Act, s 37
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr016
       
  • Clyde & Co LLP and Anr v Krista Bates van Winkelhof
    • First page: 301
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration agreement—Enforcement—Stay—Injunctive relief—Partner in law firm commencing proceedings before employment tribunal—Whether arbitration agreement enforceable (no)—Whether to require partner to consent to a stay –(no)—Employment Rights Act, s 203 and Equality Act 2010, s 144(1)
      PubDate: 2011-12-23
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr018
       
  • Cordoba Holdings Ltd v Ballymore Properties Ltd
    • First page: 305
      Abstract: AbstractArbitration award—Appeal—Error of law—Permission—Arbitrator taking into account improvements to premises by tenant—Whether issue raised before arbitrator (no)—Whether question of law arising out of award (no)—Whether to grant permission (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 69Arbitration award—Challenge—Serious Irregularity—Issues—Whether arbitrator failed to deal with an issue of law—Whether issue put to the arbitrator (no)—Whether serious irregularity (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 68(2)(d)
      PubDate: 2011-12-19
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr019
       
  • Ghalib Hussain and Anr v Wycombe Islamic Mission and Ors
    • First page: 393
      Abstract: AbstractArbitrators—Appointment—Authority—Parties appointing spiritual leader to resolve disputes—Whether spiritual leader appointed as arbitrator (no)—Whether decisions legally binding (no)—Arbitration Act 1996, s 18
      PubDate: 2011-12-29
      DOI: 10.1093/alrr/alr023
       
 
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
Fax: +00 44 (0)131 4513327
 
Home (Search)
Subjects A-Z
Publishers A-Z
Customise
APIs
Your IP address: 54.198.143.210
 
About JournalTOCs
API
Help
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-2016