JournalTOCs

About Help News

Journal of European Competition Law & Practice
Number of Followers: 22

Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
ISSN (Print) 2041-7764 - ISSN (Online) 2041-7772
Published by Oxford University Press

[411 journals]

Achieving Competition within Industrial Policy
- Authors: Rosa M.
  Pages: 451 - 452
  PubDate: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 GMT
  DOI: 10.1093/jeclap/lpz035
  Issue No: Vol. 10, No. 8 (2019)
‘Repayable Advances’ for Support of Research Projects
- Authors: Hargita E; Nicolaides P, Staviczky P.
  Pages: 453 - 464
  PubDate: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 GMT
  DOI: 10.1093/jeclap/lpz063
  Issue No: Vol. 10, No. 8 (2019)
Exploitative Conducts in Digital Markets: Time for a Discussion after the
Facebook Decision
- Authors: Botta M; Wiedemann K.
  Pages: 465 - 478
  Abstract: Key PointsThe enforcement of Art. 102 TFEU vis-à-vis excessive and discriminatory pricing in digital markets remains unlikely in the coming years.The recent interim ruling of the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court in the Facebook case shows the difficulties that a competition authority might face when it comes to sanctioning exploitative abuses in digital markets.Rather than adopting infringement decisions, competition agencies should conclude behavioural commitments with the dominant online platform.Competition authorities may borrow from the European data protection regime a number of behavioural remedies to tackle forms of privacy degradation unilaterally imposed by online platforms.
  PubDate: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 GMT
  DOI: 10.1093/jeclap/lpz064
  Issue No: Vol. 10, No. 8 (2019)
Case C-724/17 Vantaan kaupunki v Skanska Industrial Solutions:
Transposition of the Concept of an ‘Undertaking’ into Civil Damages
Actions
- Authors: Siakka T.
  Pages: 479 - 481
  Abstract: 1. On 14 March 2019, the Court of Justice (CoJ) of the European Union delivered a landmark judgment in the Skanska case, holding for the first time that the concept of an undertaking and the related principle of economic continuity apply in the context of damages actions in the same way as for the imposition of fines. The judgment is also notable for the principles that the Court articulated regarding the purpose of cartel damages claims, namely, to both compensate victims and have a deterrent effect.
  PubDate: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:00:00 GMT
  DOI: 10.1093/jeclap/lpz059
  Issue No: Vol. 10, No. 8 (2019)
Fútbol Club Barcelona v Commission: Foul Play—if in Doubt, the
Commission to Question the Evidence Submitted by the Parties
- Authors: Przerwa J; Polanec J.
  Pages: 482 - 484
  Abstract: AbstractThe General Court rules that the Commission should investigate beyond the evidence submitted by the parties if it is in possession of documents calling that evidence into question.
  PubDate: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 00:00:00 GMT
  DOI: 10.1093/jeclap/lpz066
  Issue No: Vol. 10, No. 8 (2019)
Recent Developments in the Case-Law of the ECtHR on the Right to a Fair
Trial in Competition Proceedings
- Authors: Berghe P.
  Pages: 485 - 490
  Abstract: AbstractJudgment of 23 October 2018, Produkcija Plus Storitveno Podjetje v Slovenia, Application No 47072/15Judgment of 14 February 2019, SA-Capital v Finland, Application No 5556/10
  PubDate: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 GMT
  DOI: 10.1093/jeclap/lpz027
  Issue No: Vol. 10, No. 8 (2019)
Prima Facie Evidence in Cartel Damages Litigation – Landmark Decision by
the German Federal Court of Justice in the Rail Cartel Case
- Authors: Ritz C; Marx C, Bogenreuther M.
  Pages: 491 - 498
  Abstract: Key PointsThe German Federal Court of Justice takes a stricter approach towards the standard of proof on the causation of damages in cartel damages cases.According to the Court, anticompetitive agreements are often very complex and multifaceted and thus do not necessarily always follow the same patterns in terms of cause and effect.Although the rule of prima facie evidence is no longer applicable in those cases, however, the Court acknowledged that there may still be a factual presumption that claimants can rely on regarding causation of damages.
  PubDate: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 GMT
  DOI: 10.1093/jeclap/lpz014
  Issue No: Vol. 10, No. 8 (2019)
Overcharge Estimation: Making Statistical Evidence More Meaningful
- Authors: Bönisch P; Inderst R.
  Pages: 499 - 504
  Abstract: Key PointsOvercharges in cartel cases are typically presented as a point-estimate of the effect along with its statistical significance.We suggest a simple addition that compared to statistical significance alone, it yields a more nuanced yet still intuitive picture of the underlying data within the current statistical testing framework.In particular, this may allow a judge to infer whether a significant finding is lacking due to poor data or due to the actual absence of an effect.
  PubDate: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 GMT
  DOI: 10.1093/jeclap/lpz048
  Issue No: Vol. 10, No. 8 (2019)
The Law on Fines Imposed in EU Competition Proceedings: The
Ever-Increasing Reach of Settlements
- Authors: Serre E; Lagathu E.
  Pages: 505 - 516
  Abstract: Key PointsThe year 2018 has still been a year with high fines, including three fines for abuse of a dominant position, nine sanctions for a breach of Article 101 TFEU and a EUR 124,500,000 fine for gun jumping.The European Commission has once again broadened the scope of the settlement procedure, which was (informally) applied in five vertical cases.In the Servier cases, the General Court has preserved the European Commission’s broad margin of appreciation to depart from the 2006 Guidelines in unusual cases.
  PubDate: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 GMT
  DOI: 10.1093/jeclap/lpz053
  Issue No: Vol. 10, No. 8 (2019)

JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762

Your IP address: 3.94.202.172

Home (Search)
API
About JournalTOCs
News (blog, publications)