Publisher: Springer-Verlag (Total: 2626 journals)

 A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  

        1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Last   [Sort alphabetically]   [Restore default list]

Showing 1 - 200 of 2626 Journals sorted by number of followers
Intl. J. on Digital Libraries     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 782, SJR: 0.441, CiteScore: 2)
Information Retrieval     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 761, SJR: 0.352, CiteScore: 2)
Trends in Organized Crime     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 537, SJR: 0.26, CiteScore: 1)
Crime, Law and Social Change     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 503, SJR: 0.357, CiteScore: 1)
J. of Police and Criminal Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 430, SJR: 0.35, CiteScore: 1)
Diabetologia     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 344, SJR: 3.228, CiteScore: 5)
Innovative Higher Education     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 319, SJR: 0.586, CiteScore: 1)
Natural Hazards     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 304, SJR: 0.767, CiteScore: 2)
Gyroscopy and Navigation     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 250, SJR: 0.292, CiteScore: 1)
Biodiversity and Conservation     Open Access   (Followers: 242, SJR: 1.243, CiteScore: 3)
Dysphagia     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 204, SJR: 0.99, CiteScore: 2)
Higher Education     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 202, SJR: 1.782, CiteScore: 2)
Pharmaceutical Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 189, SJR: 1.077, CiteScore: 3)
Archives and Museum Informatics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 181, SJR: 0.101, CiteScore: 0)
European J. of Information Systems     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 173, SJR: 1.628, CiteScore: 4)
Crime Prevention and Community Safety     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 165, SJR: 0.268, CiteScore: 1)
Space Science Reviews     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 95, SJR: 3.262, CiteScore: 7)
J. of Autism and Developmental Disorders     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 91, SJR: 1.81, CiteScore: 4)
Intensive Care Medicine     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 78, SJR: 3.293, CiteScore: 4)
Ethics and Information Technology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 71, SJR: 0.512, CiteScore: 2)
Education and Information Technologies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 71, SJR: 0.403, CiteScore: 1)
Archival Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 70, SJR: 0.745, CiteScore: 2)
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 70, SJR: 1.182, CiteScore: 4)
Landscape Ecology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 65, SJR: 1.858, CiteScore: 4)
European J. of Law and Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 65, SJR: 0.375, CiteScore: 1)
Marine Biology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 63, SJR: 1.085, CiteScore: 2)
J. of Archaeological Method and Theory     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 63, SJR: 2.014, CiteScore: 3)
J. of Information Technology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 62, SJR: 1.752, CiteScore: 4)
Climatic Change     Open Access   (Followers: 62, SJR: 2.035, CiteScore: 4)
Research in Higher Education     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 60, SJR: 1.702, CiteScore: 2)
Educational Technology Research and Development     Partially Free   (Followers: 60)
Machine Learning     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 59, SJR: 0.695, CiteScore: 3)
J. of Experimental Criminology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 58, SJR: 2.639, CiteScore: 4)
Oecologia     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 58, SJR: 1.695, CiteScore: 3)
Cambridge journal of evidence-based policing     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 57)
J. of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 57, SJR: 0.337, CiteScore: 1)
Advances in Data Analysis and Classification     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 57, SJR: 1.09, CiteScore: 1)
J. of Business Ethics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 57, SJR: 1.276, CiteScore: 3)
Intl. J. for Philosophy of Religion     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 56, SJR: 0.354, CiteScore: 0)
Experimental Techniques     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 54, SJR: 0.296, CiteScore: 1)
Earth, Moon, and Planets     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 54, SJR: 0.63, CiteScore: 1)
Applied Composite Materials     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 53, SJR: 0.58, CiteScore: 2)
Advances in Polymer Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 49, SJR: 1.04, CiteScore: 3)
J. of Archaeological Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 49, SJR: 2.159, CiteScore: 4)
J. of Earth System Science     Open Access   (Followers: 49, SJR: 0.366, CiteScore: 1)
Canadian J. of Anesthesia/J. canadien d'anesthésie     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 48, SJR: 0.908, CiteScore: 2)
Memory & Cognition     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 48, SJR: 1.379, CiteScore: 2)
J. of Astrophysics and Astronomy     Open Access   (Followers: 48, SJR: 0.266, CiteScore: 0)
Contemporary Political Theory     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 48, SJR: 0.331, CiteScore: 0)
European J. of Applied Physiology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 47, SJR: 1.186, CiteScore: 2)
Intl. J. of Historical Archaeology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 47, SJR: 0.427, CiteScore: 1)
Environmental Management     Open Access   (Followers: 47, SJR: 0.921, CiteScore: 2)
J. of Intl. Business Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 45, SJR: 5.198, CiteScore: 7)
Astrophysics and Space Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 44, SJR: 0.616, CiteScore: 1)
Comparative European Politics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 43, SJR: 1.24, CiteScore: 2)
Bulletin of Materials Science     Open Access   (Followers: 43, SJR: 0.31, CiteScore: 1)
Demography     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 42, SJR: 2.345, CiteScore: 3)
Water Resources Management     Open Access   (Followers: 42, SJR: 1.185, CiteScore: 3)
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 42, SJR: 0.571, CiteScore: 2)
Climate Dynamics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 42, SJR: 2.445, CiteScore: 4)
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 42, SJR: 0.956, CiteScore: 2)
Mindfulness     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 41, SJR: 1.132, CiteScore: 3)
IMF Economic Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 41, SJR: 3.287, CiteScore: 2)
Qualitative Sociology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 41, SJR: 0.984, CiteScore: 1)
Foundations of Physics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 41, SJR: 0.454, CiteScore: 1)
European Political Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 41, SJR: 0.25, CiteScore: 0)
J. of Family Violence     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 41, SJR: 0.679, CiteScore: 1)
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 41, SJR: 1.093, CiteScore: 2)
Economia Politica     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 40, SJR: 0.277, CiteScore: 1)
Intl. J. of Earth Sciences     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 40, SJR: 1.125, CiteScore: 2)
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 40, SJR: 0.864, CiteScore: 4)
Scientometrics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 39, SJR: 1.125, CiteScore: 3)
J. of World Prehistory     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 38, SJR: 2.022, CiteScore: 3)
Experimental Astronomy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 38, SJR: 0.908, CiteScore: 2)
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 38, SJR: 0.589, CiteScore: 2)
Aquatic Ecology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 38, SJR: 0.656, CiteScore: 2)
Educational Psychology Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 38, SJR: 2.204, CiteScore: 4)
Environment, Development and Sustainability     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 38, SJR: 0.392, CiteScore: 1)
Metal Science and Heat Treatment     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 37, SJR: 0.279, CiteScore: 0)
European J. of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 37, SJR: 1.312, CiteScore: 3)
Annals of Finance     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 37, SJR: 0.579, CiteScore: 1)
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 37, SJR: 1.323, CiteScore: 2)
European J. of Health Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 36, SJR: 1.153, CiteScore: 2)
Advances in Health Sciences Education     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 36, SJR: 1.64, CiteScore: 2)
European J. of Nutrition     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 36, SJR: 1.408, CiteScore: 3)
Solar Physics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 35, SJR: 1.517, CiteScore: 3)
JOM J. of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 35, SJR: 1.054, CiteScore: 2)
European J. of Epidemiology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 35, SJR: 3.228, CiteScore: 6)
Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 35, SJR: 0.695, CiteScore: 1)
Intl. Politics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 34, SJR: 0.728, CiteScore: 1)
J. of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 34, SJR: 0.991, CiteScore: 2)
Biotechnology Letters     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 34, SJR: 0.621, CiteScore: 2)
Accreditation and Quality Assurance: J. for Quality, Comparability and Reliability in Chemical Measurement     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 34, SJR: 0.316, CiteScore: 1)
Italian Economic J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 33, SJR: 0.181, CiteScore: 0)
Political Behavior     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 33, SJR: 2.708, CiteScore: 2)
Child and Adolescent Social Work J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 33, SJR: 0.444, CiteScore: 1)
Ecosystems     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 33, SJR: 2.081, CiteScore: 4)
J. of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 32, SJR: 1.058, CiteScore: 3)
J. of Risk and Uncertainty     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 32, SJR: 1.471, CiteScore: 2)
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 32)
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries     Open Access   (Followers: 32, SJR: 1.8, CiteScore: 4)
Der Onkologe     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 32, SJR: 0.119, CiteScore: 0)
J. of Quantitative Criminology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 32, SJR: 3.562, CiteScore: 4)
American J. of Community Psychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 32, SJR: 1.329, CiteScore: 2)
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 32, SJR: 0.978, CiteScore: 3)
J. of Economic Growth     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 32, SJR: 5.529, CiteScore: 5)
Australian Educational Researcher     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 31, SJR: 0.675, CiteScore: 1)
Higher Education Policy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 31, SJR: 0.652, CiteScore: 1)
Plant Ecology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 31, SJR: 0.914, CiteScore: 2)
AAPS J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 31, SJR: 1.118, CiteScore: 4)
Academic Psychiatry     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 31, SJR: 0.53, CiteScore: 1)
Motivation and Emotion     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 30, SJR: 1.136, CiteScore: 2)
Transportation     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 30, SJR: 1.911, CiteScore: 3)
J. of Population Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 30, SJR: 1.574, CiteScore: 2)
Clinical Social Work J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 30, SJR: 0.498, CiteScore: 1)
Current Diabetes Reports     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 30, SJR: 1.618, CiteScore: 4)
Boundary-Layer Meteorology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 30, SJR: 1.262, CiteScore: 2)
CEAS Aeronautical J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 29, SJR: 0.248, CiteScore: 1)
Resonance     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 29, SJR: 0.15, CiteScore: 0)
Information Systems Frontiers     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 29, SJR: 0.821, CiteScore: 4)
GPS Solutions     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 29, SJR: 1.674, CiteScore: 5)
Environmental Earth Sciences     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 28, SJR: 0.552, CiteScore: 2)
ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 28, SJR: 0.72, CiteScore: 2)
IIC - Intl. Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 28, SJR: 0.28, CiteScore: 0)
J. of Nutrition, Health and Aging     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 28, SJR: 1.249, CiteScore: 3)
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 28, SJR: 0.934, CiteScore: 2)
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 28, SJR: 1.845, CiteScore: 3)
European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR)     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 28, SJR: 0.409, CiteScore: 1)
J. of Happiness Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 0.827, CiteScore: 2)
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 0.599, CiteScore: 1)
Microsystem Technologies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 0.346, CiteScore: 1)
J. of Financial Services Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 1.31, CiteScore: 1)
Landslides     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 1.802, CiteScore: 4)
Breast Cancer     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 0.653, CiteScore: 2)
J. of Banking Regulation     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 0.22, CiteScore: 0)
Astrophysics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 0.225, CiteScore: 0)
Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 0.74, CiteScore: 2)
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 2.066, CiteScore: 4)
Intl. J. of Information Security     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 0.555, CiteScore: 3)
Law and Philosophy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 26, SJR: 0.471, CiteScore: 1)
The European Physical J. D - Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Plasma Physics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 26, SJR: 0.387, CiteScore: 1)
J. of Ornithology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 26)
Public Choice     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 26, SJR: 0.991, CiteScore: 1)
Intl. J. of Sexuality and Gender Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 26)
J. of Computational Neuroscience     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 26, SJR: 0.888, CiteScore: 2)
J. of Analytical Chemistry     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 26, SJR: 0.265, CiteScore: 1)
Aquaculture Intl.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 26, SJR: 0.591, CiteScore: 2)
Human Rights Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 26, SJR: 0.175, CiteScore: 1)
J. of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25, SJR: 0.784, CiteScore: 2)
Intl. J. of Science and Mathematics Education     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25, SJR: 0.737, CiteScore: 1)
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25, SJR: 0.543, CiteScore: 1)
Review of Accounting Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25, SJR: 2.757, CiteScore: 2)
Continental Philosophy Review     Partially Free   (Followers: 25, SJR: 0.145, CiteScore: 0)
Acta Mechanica     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25, SJR: 1.04, CiteScore: 2)
Artificial Intelligence Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25, SJR: 0.833, CiteScore: 4)
Human Ecology     Open Access   (Followers: 25, SJR: 0.752, CiteScore: 2)
Evolutionary Biology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25, SJR: 0.81, CiteScore: 2)
World J. of Surgery     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24, SJR: 1.359, CiteScore: 2)
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution     Open Access   (Followers: 24, SJR: 0.589, CiteScore: 2)
J. of Public Health Policy     Partially Free   (Followers: 24, SJR: 0.715, CiteScore: 1)
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24, SJR: 1.052, CiteScore: 2)
Mechanics of Composite Materials     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24, SJR: 0.313, CiteScore: 1)
Wetlands     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24, SJR: 0.755, CiteScore: 2)
Russian Aeronautics (Iz VUZ)     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24, SJR: 0.136, CiteScore: 0)
Experimental Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24, SJR: 2.276, CiteScore: 2)
J. of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24, SJR: 0.587, CiteScore: 2)
Biological Invasions     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24, SJR: 1.514, CiteScore: 3)
Fluid Dynamics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24, SJR: 0.345, CiteScore: 1)
Environmental and Resource Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24, SJR: 1.186, CiteScore: 2)
Intl. J. of Mental Health and Addiction     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24, SJR: 0.49, CiteScore: 1)
J. of Chemical Sciences     Partially Free   (Followers: 24, SJR: 0.352, CiteScore: 1)
Human Nature     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 1.092, CiteScore: 2)
J. of Materials Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 0.807, CiteScore: 3)
Science & Education     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23)
Critical Criminology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 0.34, CiteScore: 1)
Diabetes Therapy     Open Access   (Followers: 23, SJR: 1.094, CiteScore: 3)
Electrical Engineering     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 0.323, CiteScore: 1)
Astronomy and Astrophysics Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 3.385, CiteScore: 5)
European Spine J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 1.535, CiteScore: 2)
Animal Cognition     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 1.389, CiteScore: 3)
Heat and Mass Transfer     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 0.448, CiteScore: 1)
Current Microbiology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 0.562, CiteScore: 1)
Advances in Computational Mathematics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 0.812, CiteScore: 1)
Experimental Mechanics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 0.947, CiteScore: 2)
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 0.402, CiteScore: 1)
Erkenntnis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 1.502, CiteScore: 1)
J. of Public Health     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 0.265, CiteScore: 1)
Research in Science Education     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 1.019, CiteScore: 2)
American J. of Psychoanalysis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 0.314, CiteScore: 0)
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 1.899, CiteScore: 5)
J. of the Academy of Marketing Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 4.614, CiteScore: 7)
Canadian J. of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 0.346, CiteScore: 0)
Behavior Research Methods     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 2.099, CiteScore: 4)
Early Childhood Education J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 0.548, CiteScore: 1)
Astronomy Letters     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 0.452, CiteScore: 1)
Applied Solar Energy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 0.225, CiteScore: 0)
Chromatographia     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 0.514, CiteScore: 1)
J. of Child and Family Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 0.784, CiteScore: 2)
J. of General Internal Medicine     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 1.612, CiteScore: 2)
J. of Materials Engineering and Performance     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 0.611, CiteScore: 2)

        1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Last   [Sort alphabetically]   [Restore default list]

Similar Journals
Journal Cover
Journal of Family Violence
Journal Prestige (SJR): 0.679
Citation Impact (citeScore): 1
Number of Followers: 41  
 
  Hybrid Journal Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
ISSN (Print) 1573-2851 - ISSN (Online) 0885-7482
Published by Springer-Verlag Homepage  [2626 journals]
  • Trait Anger Moderates the Relation Between Facial Affect Recognition
           Ability and Perpetration of Male-to-Female Physical and Psychological
           Intimate Partner Aggression
    • Abstract: Researchers have sought to identify deficits in affect recognition as a precipitating factor in intimate partner aggression (IPA) perpetration, but results from these studies have produced mixed findings. This may be due to the unlikelihood that deficits in affect recognition abilities would prompt perpetration of IPA without affective predispositions toward aggression, such as trait anger. The current study sought to examine the relation between negative affect recognition ability and men’s past perpetration of physical and psychological IPA across levels of trait anger. Heterosexual couples (N = 83) completed self-report measures regarding the frequency of male-to-female IPA perpetration within their relationship. Additionally, males completed measures of trait anger and were administered a facial affect recognition test. Decreased ability in decoding negative facial affect was associated with increased perpetration of physical and psychological IPA, but only for men high in trait anger. There was no relation between negative facial affect recognition ability and IPA perpetration at low levels of trait anger. Results from this study indicated that the highest rates of physical and psychological IPA perpetration within the sample were among those with co-occurring high trait anger and decreased ability to decode negative facial affect. Our findings suggest that perpetration of IPA is associated with an interaction of affective traits and deficits in social cognitive processing. Treatments aimed at reducing aggression and violence among intimate partners would benefit from improving affect recognition when high trait anger is present.
      PubDate: 2020-05-29
       
  • Assessing The Evidence: How Systems That Address Intimate Partner Violence
           Evaluate The Credibility And Utility Of Research Findings
    • Abstract: Despite advances in practitioner-researcher partnerships, barriers to the uptake of research evidence in practice sectors that address intimate partner violence (IPV) persist. The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine how practitioners across victim services, criminal justice, and law enforcement systems assess the usefulness and credibility of research evidence to their practice and policy-related decision making. Data were derived through qualitative interviews with 37 representatives of victim services, criminal justice, and law enforcement organizations in the state of Washington. Practitioners were asked to describe the criteria and processes used to determine the credibility and usefulness of research evidence they encounter. Practitioners across systems reported that the identity and credibility of the messenger conveying the research evidence, the relevance and applicability of the research to their own practice context, and the rigor of the methods used to derive the evidence are important criteria in assessing its utility and trustworthiness. A subset of respondents reported a suspicion of the research enterprise altogether, and/or a lack of resources available to engage with research evidence. Given the centrality of the messengers of research evidence in practitioners’ assessment of its credibility, IPV systems may be well-served to more deeply invest in research to practice intermediaries who are adequately resourced to translate evidence across sectors. Additional practice and research implications are discussed.
      PubDate: 2020-05-28
       
  • Intimate Partner Violence Prevention and Intervention Group-Format
           Programs for Immigrant Latinas: a Systematic Review
    • Abstract: Immigrant Latinas (IL) experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) often experience barriers to accessing formal support systems due to immigration-related issues (e.g., fear of deportation, language proficiency, lack of family support in the U.S.). This paper contains a systematic review of peer-reviewed published articles within the past 25 years addressing IPV prevention and intervention programming designed for this vulnerable population. We examined specific group-format programs and curricula conducted at community-based agencies with social services across the country. Qualitative analysis of the 10 articles that met search criteria (i.e., programs must be culturally specific, designed to serve IL, conducted in group-format, focused on IPV intervention or prevention) generated information regarding the nature of group interventions addressing this issue and population. Several themes emerged upon completion of the qualitative review describing key characteristics of each intervention. All reviewed articles reported generally positive outcomes using a variety of methods. Studies using quantitative methods found statistically significant outcomes for constructs including depression, self-esteem, and knowledge of wellness. Professionals from diverse practice settings working with IL would likely benefit by developing intervention and prevention group-format programming to address this problem.
      PubDate: 2020-05-23
       
  • Guest Editor Introduction: Special Issue on Intimate Partner Stalking
    • Abstract: This article introduces a special issue on intimate partner stalking (IPS) focused on the current state of research, practice, and policy on IPS. Articles were solicited for inclusion in this special issue throughout 2018 and underwent multiple rounds of peer review. Nine articles were selected for inclusion in this special issue focusing on innovative research methods and analyses related to IPS and identification of current gaps in research and practice. Practitioner perspectives are also offered across multiple articles. There continues to be a dearth of rigorous research on IPS and this special issue highlights emerging research and recommendations for continued research. Policy and practice implications are discussed throughout with a focus on supporting survivors and holding offenders accountable.
      PubDate: 2020-05-23
       
  • Challenges with and Recommendations for Intimate Partner Stalking Policy
           and Practice: a Practitioner Perspective
    • Abstract: Informed by the perspectives of two practitioners with over ten years of experience addressing stalking issues and a researcher from the field of violence against women, this paper will highlight the trajectory of the United States’ response to intimate partner stalking by first discussing advancements that have been made in stalking laws. This will be followed by the practical challenges that law enforcement and service providers continue to face when encountering this crime, despite this progress. There are four major challenges to addressing intimate partner stalking: a) stalking remains a very misunderstood crime; b) building stalking cases proves challenging; c) service providers may lack the knowledge and/or resources needed to respond to stalking victims effectively; and d) research on stalking is limited. The manuscript concludes with practical recommendations for addressing some of these challenges.
      PubDate: 2020-05-23
       
  • Coercive Control During Pregnancy, Birthing and Postpartum: Women’s
           Experiences and Perspectives on Health Practitioners’ Responses
    • Abstract: This article explores the complexity of women’s experiences of coercive control during childbearing, birthing and postpartum and investigates the importance of health practitioners’ responses to women’s experiences. Research questions were: “What cues, from women’s lived experiences, indicate that coercive control is being exerted by their partners'” and “how can health practitioners recognise coercive control during pregnancy, birthing and post-partum'”. The qualitative study drew on relational empowerment to access rich data. Sixteen women in Australia participated in the research. Following the temporal sequence of pregnancy, birthing and postpartum, health workers responses are examined. Themes identified included: reproductive coercion followed by coercive control of ante-natal care, control during birthing, intersections with cultural expectations, partner’s self-obsession, grandstanding after a birth, and women’s feelings of isolation. Women’s experience of coercive control, their sense of isolation or, alternatively, support ultimately affected their ability to remove themselves and their children from the abusive situation. Health practitioners’ responses either helped women to identify their partner’s behaviors as abusive or exacerbated women’s feelings of isolation. The research suggests that health practitioners’ acknowledgement of coercive control, and the involvement of social workers conversant with feminist informed dynamics of domestic violence, can impact positively on women’s agency.
      PubDate: 2020-05-21
       
  • Innovations in Interpersonal Violence Prevention: Research, Collaboration
           and Opportunities
    • Abstract: Intimate partner and sexual violence (IPV and SV) remain significant public health problems for young women and men, and both IPV and SV have short and long-term psychological and physical health impacts for all. Through consistent direction and support from Centers for Disease Control’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), IPV/SV violence prevention research has shown its potential to prevent these forms of violence. This change is highly significant; many did not believe it was possible to prevent rape and intimate partner violence. In recognition of this emerging field of study, the 2013 Campus Sexual Violence Elimination Act required US public colleges to provide bystander-based training to reduce sexual violence, yet no requirement for evaluation of this recommendation was included in this law. Further, while bystander approaches are recognized as “promising prevention strategies” by the 2014 White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault, few rigorous and sufficiently powered studies evaluate the efficacy of bystander programs to reduce violence victimization and perpetration at college and community levels. The papers in this special issue catalogue methods, measures, and outcomes to guide successful implementation and investigations of bystander prevention programs, considering demographic and situational contexts that have traditionally been understudied. Lessons learned from these investigations provide a roadmap of strategies to guide the next generation of researchers, program developers, and policymakers toward effective interpersonal violence prevention.
      PubDate: 2020-05-16
       
  • Assessing the Effects of Witnessed Parental Conflict and Guilt on Dating
           Violence Perpetration among South Korean College Students
    • Abstract: Aggression in dating relationships is a serious problem that can have long-term negative consequences. While research had been increasing in western societies concomitant with an increasing awareness of intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration, studies in Asian societies are still few and far between. This paper examines dating violence perpetration among college students in South Korea. Overall violence, emotional, and physical violence are examined respectively. Witnessed parental conflict is used as the main explanatory variable consistent with much of the literature on intimate partner violence perpetration, and also examines the effect of the self-conscious emotion of guilt on dating violence perpetration. Guilt had been shown in the psychological literature to be prosocial and adaptive, but its role has been largely ignored in the IPV and aggression literature. Both its direct and moderating effects on dating violence are examined. Anonymous surveys were administered to college students in four universities across four cities and four regions in South Korea. Three hundred and thirty students who have had a dating experience are included in the analyses. Results show that both witnessed parental conflict and guilt are independently related to dating violence overall, and also to emotional and physical violence. Guilt moderates the effect of witnessed parental conflict on emotional but not physical violence. A closer examination of the role of self-conscious emotions on dating aggression is important. The results extend the generally western theories of dating violence to South Korea and provide evidence of the relevance of these theories cross-culturally.
      PubDate: 2020-05-14
       
  • Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Employment in Women Reporting Abuse:
           5-Year Data from a Longitudinal Study
    • Abstract: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a common public health problem that has serious consequences for women in terms of health and functioning. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is one of the major health issues that women face after experiencing intimate partner violence. There is evidence that sufficient and sustainable employment might decrease risk for PTSD in women who have experienced violence. The purpose of this study is to investigate if variables related to employment (i.e., income, hours worked per week, job benefits) affect risk for PTSD over 5 years after women left abusive relationships. Data collection took place between 2010 and 2016. To test the hypothesis that present employment variables predict the woman’s PTSD in the future, a series of conditional latent growth curve (LGC) models were conducted. The overall models indicated that there appears to be a consistent impact of economic factors on PTSD symptoms; however, the variable with the greatest impact was the number of hours worked. Women who had full-time or near full-time employment were at less risk to have PTSD in the future. These findings support efforts to increase access to full time work for women who have experienced intimate violence.
      PubDate: 2020-05-12
       
  • ‘Web of Violence’, Depression, and Impairment in a Clinical
           Sample of Adolescents
    • Abstract: Youth exposure to ‘web of violence’ is associated with impairments in mental and physical health. The current study aimed to identify subgroups of violent events, such as maltreatment, bullying perpetration and peer victimization and explore how these relate to depressive symptoms, hopelessness, and impairment among a sample of clinically-referred youth. A sample of 151 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 years was evaluated at a mood disorders program in an outpatient hospital-based clinic. Cluster analysis was used to identify subgroups based on ‘web of violence’ experiences. Group differences were then analyzed by demographics and clinical variables. Overall, rates of exposure to maltreatment, peer victimization and bullying perpetration were high. Cluster analysis identified two subgroups of adolescents which can be characterized as low versus high exposure groups. The high exposure group reported more severe depressive symptoms, greater hopelessness, and more impairment than the low exposure group. Among this clinical sample, distinct subgroups of youth were identified that differed based exposure to maltreatment and peer fighting and victimization. Adolescents in the high exposure group showed significantly worse clinical outcomes compared to the low exposure group. These findings further highlight the importance of a comprehensive assessment for involvement in violence when evaluating adolescents with depression.
      PubDate: 2020-05-06
       
  • The Opportunity – VAWA 2013 Reauthorization Provides a Natural
           Experiment for Bystander Efficacy Evaluation
    • Abstract: This methods paper describes the fractional factorial design within the context of an evaluation of campus bystander programming. Prior evaluations include relative program comparisons, but do not reflect campus implementation of specific aspects of prevention programming. Campuses use combinations of programs, delivered across modalities, audiences, intensity, and degrees of requirement. Bystander program evaluation, in a natural experiment, must consider combinations of these components. This evaluation offers a novel application of the fractional factorial framework, considering combinations of program components, as implemented, within a multi-campus quasi-experimental design. Leveraging qualitative data, cluster analysis provides an initial identification of bystander program component combinations, mapped to experimental conditions. SAS v9.4 PROC FACTEX constructs possible fractional factorial designs to estimate main effects. From key informant interviews, primary program components are determined: delivery method, level of skill-building, degree of requirement, and intended audience. A total of seven combinations are identified. Using presence or absence of program components, a partial factorial structure is identified, where component clusters comprised seven of the 24 = 16 possible combinations. The smallest number of experimental conditions necessary for estimating these effects is determined with PROC FACTEX. Resulting designs indicate the necessary experimental conditions for determining bystander program component effectiveness available within this study. Our fractional factorial approach offers a novel strategy for planning an evaluation of several bystander program component combinations. This paper provides foundational elements needed to implement a bystander evaluation design, with the requisite emphasis on program components and relevant combinations, while optimizing number of participating campuses.
      PubDate: 2020-05-06
       
  • Domestic Abusers: Expert Triangulators, New Victim Advocacy Models to
           Buffer Against It
    • Abstract: Domestic abusers use triangulation to manipulate, coerce, intimidate, isolate and exploit their victims. This triangulation continues when abusers are behind bars, through voice or video calling or writing victims from jail. New, emerging models of system response demonstrate that timely, competent, readily available professional advocacy services and options—delivered through electronic pathways—can buffer against this triangulation. We use case examples to illustrate how detained abusers use triangulation to manipulate and tamper with their victim, along with successful intervention by victim advocates via text message to buffer against such triangulation.
      PubDate: 2020-05-02
       
  • Intimate Partner Violence in the Military: an Investigation of Reporting
           Crimes to Law Enforcement Officials
    • Abstract: Although awareness of intimate partner violence (IPV) has increased, acknowledging that American military members and their families are particularly vulnerable to these forms of violence has been relatively recent. While scholars have shown that victims of IPV are unlikely to report their victimizations to the police (Venema Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(5), 872–899, 2016), virtually no attempts have been made to explore reporting crimes to the police by those in the military and/or victimized by someone in the military. In this paper, the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) data from 1992 to 2016 were used to examine whether incidents of intimate partner violence were less likely to be reported to the police if either the victim and/or offender were active duty military personnel. To ascertain whether military status affected decisions to report for other violent crimes, models predicting the probability of reporting to the police for robbery victimizations were also examined. This research revealed that a military connection significantly decreased the likelihood of IPV being reported compared to the civilian population, however, military status had no effect on the likelihood of robbery victimizations being reported. Results support the contention that the military culture may reduce the likelihood that IPV victimizations will be reported to police compared to their civilian counterparts. Because this was not true for robbery victimizations, policies directed at reducing the reluctance of IPV victims to seek justice through law enforcement channels are needed along with continued efforts to prevent IPV in the military specifically, and within the nation generally.
      PubDate: 2020-05-01
       
  • Association between Interview Quality and Child Sexual Abuse Trial Outcome
    • Abstract: Child witness interviews frequently comprise the central evidence in child sexual assault prosecutions. The aim of the present study was to explore the association between interview quality, interview inconsistencies raised during cross-examination, and trial outcome, while taking into account the strength of the prosecution case. Sixty-nine interviews of child complainants (56 female; aged 6–18 years) were coded for quality (proportion of open-ended questions, interviewer compliance with best-practice, and evidential categories sought). Corresponding trial transcripts were coded for indicators of case strength including number of victims and corroborating evidence (e.g., DNA, eyewitnesses). Cross-examination transcripts were coded for inconsistencies within the child witness interview or between this interview and another statement by the same complainant. After controlling for number of victims and corroborative evidence, interview quality was not associated with trial outcomes. The strongest predictor of verdict was the number of victims: the greater the number of victims, the more likely the defendant was to be convicted of at least one count. The number of inconsistencies was marginally associated with outcome: the greater the number of inconsistencies, the more likely the defendant was to be acquitted. The findings highlight the importance of examining the trial as a whole when investigating the relationship between the child witness interviews and the legal process. Future studies are necessary to replicate these findings, ideally with interviews ranging in quality on key indicators of best-practice interviewing.
      PubDate: 2020-05-01
       
  • A Longitudinal Analysis of Women Veterans’ Partner Violence
           Perpetration: the Roles of Interpersonal Trauma and Posttraumatic Stress
           Symptoms
    • Abstract: Significant research has focused on intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization among women Veterans, yet much less is known about women Veterans’ IPV perpetration. Although military sexual trauma (MST) is a predictor of IPV victimization, military sexual assault (MSA), a component of MST, may predict especially adverse consequences for women Veterans. This study examined the unique effects of MSA on IPV victimization of, and perpetration by, women Veterans, and investigated posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and prior IPV victimization as potential mediators of IPV perpetration. Participants included 187 women Veterans drawn from a larger web-based survey. We assessed the two components of MST (MSA and harassment) at Time 1 (T1), PTSD symptoms at Time 2 (T2), IPV victimization at T2 and Time 3 (T3), and IPV perpetration at T3. MSA predicted multiple subtypes of IPV victimization and perpetration, whereas harassment predicted neither. Those who reported MSA were more likely to experience T3 psychological and sexual IPV victimization, with PTSD symptoms significantly mediating this path. MSA was also directly related to T3 psychological IPV perpetration and indirectly related to physical and sexual IPV perpetration through PTSD symptoms. MSA was directly related to T2 PTSD symptoms while T2 IPV victimization was directly related to T3 IPV perpetration. These findings underscore that women Veterans’ IPV perpetration may be in response to their own IPV victimization through self-defense and/or due to their PTSD symptoms. Results support prevention, screening, and treatment for IPV victimization and PTSD symptoms to lower risk of future IPV revictimization and perpetration.
      PubDate: 2020-05-01
       
  • Examining the Association between Severity of Child Neglect and Quality of
           Parenting
    • Abstract: Child neglect is the most prevalent form of child maltreatment (CM) in the U.S. and is consistently associated with negative outcomes for children. Although some research suggests that differences in parenting exist across the spectrum of maltreatment severity, little is known about whether and how severity of neglect relates to observed parenting quality. The present study tested whether mothers who engage in documented, higher severity neglect of their children would display less warm, affiliative parenting, and more harsh, controlling parenting while interacting with their preschool child, than less severely neglectful mothers, and non-CM mothers. A sample of 121 mother-preschooler dyads [low severity neglect (n = 29), high severity neglect (n = 40), and non-CM (n = 52)] participated, and parenting behaviors were coded during a joint laboratory challenge task. This study explored associations between severity of child neglect perpetration through coding of child protective services case records; and quality of observed parenting, using observational, micro-social coding of parenting behaviors. Regression analyses showed that high severity neglecting mothers displayed significantly less warm, affiliative parenting than lower severity neglecting and non-CM mothers, and more harsh, controlling parenting relative to their non-CM peers. Further, there were no differences between low severity neglect and non-CM mothers in the amount of warm, affiliative parenting observed. These findings advance our understanding of child neglect by revealing important differences in quality of observed parenting across the spectrum of neglect severity. Implications for conceptualizing child neglect and targeted intervention strategies are discussed.
      PubDate: 2020-05-01
       
  • Sexual Assault Experiences Vary for Active Duty Military Women Depending
           on their Relationship to the Perpetrator
    • Abstract: We examined how sexual assault experiences vary depending on active duty women’s relationship to their perpetrator (intimate partner versus acquaintances/friends, strangers, and unspecified perpetrators). This study analyzed weighted data from a 2016 survey representative of active duty Service members regarding their sexual assault experiences in the past year. Independent sample t-tests compared experiences based on the nature of the relationship between the victim and perpetrator. Military women sexually assaulted by intimate partners were more likely than those assaulted by non-intimate partners to indicate multiple incidents of sexual assault, penetrative sexual assault, stalking and sexual harassment before and after an incident, and a history of sexual assault in their lifetime. Military women sexually assaulted by intimate partners also indicated lower satisfaction with responses from leadership and victim advocates compared to other relationship types. Survey results distinguish intimate partner sexual assault from non-intimate partner sexual assault. While Department of Defense programs are organized around such differences, these results suggest further tailoring of prevention and response programs to reflect unique victim experiences.
      PubDate: 2020-05-01
       
  • Sexual Intimate Partner Violence: a Neglected Issue within the Department
           of Defense
    • Abstract: The purpose of this special section is to highlight the intersection of sexual assault and intimate partner violence – sexual intimate partner violence (SIPV) – within the Department of Defense (DoD). As an introduction to this special section, the editors first define SIPV, and argue that it has been a neglected issue within the DoD. They explore the complexities of addressing this issue within the DoD, including the fact that sexual assault is addressed through different offices depending on whether it was perpetrated by an intimate partner. The authors of this introductory article next preview the contributions of the five research articles within this special section, identifying areas where future research is needed. This article concludes with suggestions for additional actions that the DoD might take to increase awareness of SIPV within the military and to improve prevention of and response to SIPV within the ranks.
      PubDate: 2020-05-01
       
  • A Quasi-Experimental Effectiveness Study of Triple P on Child Maltreatment
    • Abstract: We examined the impact of the implementation of The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program in North Carolina (NC) on reducing child maltreatment, a serious public health problem in the US with lasting harmful effects on children. In 2012 and 2013, 34 of 100 counties in NC implemented Triple P. A panel data set with county-level child welfare data and emergency department (ED) discharge data from 2008 to 2015 for 100 counties in NC was constructed. A quasi-experimental design using difference-in-differences analysis estimated the association between the implementation of Triple P and the rate of (1) investigated child maltreatment reports; (2) entry into foster care; and (3) ED visits concerning for child maltreatment. Implementation of Triple P was associated with in a 4% decrease in the county rate of investigated reports of child maltreatment (RR = 0.96, 95% CI [0.93, 0.99]) and a 7% decrease in the county rate of children in foster care (RR = 0.93, 95% CI [0.88, 0.98]). Each of these findings was robust to one but not both sensitivity tests performed. There was no reduction in county-level rates of ED visits with ICD-9-CM codes concerning for child maltreatment. Implementation of Triple P in NC outside of the parameters of scientific study is associated with small reductions in the rates of child maltreatment reports and foster care placements. Additional research is needed to understand whether such small reductions justify the substantial investment communities are making in Triple P.
      PubDate: 2020-05-01
       
  • Perceived and Collective Norms Associated with Sexual Violence among Male
           Soldiers
    • Abstract: The present study explores perceived and collective social norms pertaining to consent for sexual activity, comfort with sexism, stereotypes about rape, attitudes regarding relationships, and the use of dating apps. Data were collected via an anonymous online questionnaire administered to 338 active duty male soldiers between the ages of 18 and 24 at an Army post in the mid-South region of the United States. Analyses examined the extent soldiers accurately perceived the collective norms of their peers. Men were inaccurate in their estimation of the extent to which other male soldiers followed principles of consent in their sexual behaviors, such as stopping the first time a woman says “no” to sexual activity, stopping sexual activity even if aroused, and garnering a verbal affirmation for sex. Soldiers were inaccurate in their perception of peer norms regarding indicators of sexual interest and consent, including the belief that when a woman lets a man kiss her she wants to have sex, and if a woman wears a sexy dress she’s asking for sex. Soldiers were also inaccurate in their estimations of other male soldier’s comfort with sexism including feeling uncomfortable with sexist comments or sexual jokes that put down women. In addition, soldiers underestimated men’s preference for a good relationship with one woman rather than many sexual partners and overestimated their peers’ use of dating sites to locate sexual partners. These findings highlight the need to correct misperceived norms regarding dating and sexual activity among soldiers.
      PubDate: 2020-03-13
       
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
 


Your IP address: 18.207.254.88
 
Home (Search)
API
About JournalTOCs
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-