for Journals by Title or ISSN
for Articles by Keywords
help

Publisher: Oxford University Press   (Total: 396 journals)

 A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  

        1 2 | Last   [Sort by number of followers]   [Restore default list]

Showing 1 - 200 of 396 Journals sorted alphabetically
ACS Symposium Series     Full-text available via subscription   (SJR: 0.189, CiteScore: 0)
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5, SJR: 0.79, CiteScore: 2)
Adaptation     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9, SJR: 0.143, CiteScore: 0)
Advances in Nutrition     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 50, SJR: 2.196, CiteScore: 5)
Aesthetic Surgery J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6, SJR: 1.434, CiteScore: 1)
African Affairs     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 65, SJR: 1.869, CiteScore: 2)
Age and Ageing     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 90, SJR: 1.989, CiteScore: 4)
Alcohol and Alcoholism     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 18, SJR: 1.376, CiteScore: 3)
American Entomologist     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 7)
American Historical Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 156, SJR: 0.467, CiteScore: 1)
American J. of Agricultural Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 42, SJR: 2.113, CiteScore: 3)
American J. of Clinical Nutrition     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 165, SJR: 3.438, CiteScore: 6)
American J. of Epidemiology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 188, SJR: 2.713, CiteScore: 3)
American J. of Hypertension     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25, SJR: 1.322, CiteScore: 3)
American J. of Jurisprudence     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 19, SJR: 0.281, CiteScore: 1)
American J. of Legal History     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 8, SJR: 0.116, CiteScore: 0)
American Law and Economics Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 1.053, CiteScore: 1)
American Literary History     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 16, SJR: 0.391, CiteScore: 0)
Analysis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 1.038, CiteScore: 1)
Animal Frontiers     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Annals of Behavioral Medicine     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 15, SJR: 1.423, CiteScore: 3)
Annals of Botany     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 36, SJR: 1.721, CiteScore: 4)
Annals of Oncology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 46, SJR: 5.599, CiteScore: 9)
Annals of the Entomological Society of America     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 10, SJR: 0.722, CiteScore: 1)
Annals of Work Exposures and Health     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 32, SJR: 0.728, CiteScore: 2)
AoB Plants     Open Access   (Followers: 4, SJR: 1.28, CiteScore: 3)
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 19, SJR: 0.858, CiteScore: 2)
Applied Linguistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 56, SJR: 2.987, CiteScore: 3)
Applied Mathematics Research eXpress     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1, SJR: 1.241, CiteScore: 1)
Arbitration Intl.     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 20)
Arbitration Law Reports and Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14)
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 30, SJR: 0.731, CiteScore: 2)
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3)
Arthropod Management Tests     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2)
Astronomy & Geophysics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 43, SJR: 0.146, CiteScore: 0)
Behavioral Ecology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 52, SJR: 1.871, CiteScore: 3)
Bioinformatics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 315, SJR: 6.14, CiteScore: 8)
Biology Methods and Protocols     Hybrid Journal  
Biology of Reproduction     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 9, SJR: 1.446, CiteScore: 3)
Biometrika     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 20, SJR: 3.485, CiteScore: 2)
BioScience     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 29, SJR: 2.754, CiteScore: 4)
Bioscience Horizons : The National Undergraduate Research J.     Open Access   (Followers: 1, SJR: 0.146, CiteScore: 0)
Biostatistics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 17, SJR: 1.553, CiteScore: 2)
BJA : British J. of Anaesthesia     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 175, SJR: 2.115, CiteScore: 3)
BJA Education     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 65)
Brain     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 68, SJR: 5.858, CiteScore: 7)
Briefings in Bioinformatics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 49, SJR: 2.505, CiteScore: 5)
Briefings in Functional Genomics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3, SJR: 2.15, CiteScore: 3)
British J. for the Philosophy of Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 35, SJR: 2.161, CiteScore: 2)
British J. of Aesthetics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25, SJR: 0.508, CiteScore: 1)
British J. of Criminology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 590, SJR: 1.828, CiteScore: 3)
British J. of Social Work     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 87, SJR: 1.019, CiteScore: 2)
British Medical Bulletin     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6, SJR: 1.355, CiteScore: 3)
British Yearbook of Intl. Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 32)
Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4, SJR: 1.376, CiteScore: 1)
Cambridge J. of Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 65, SJR: 0.764, CiteScore: 2)
Cambridge J. of Regions, Economy and Society     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11, SJR: 2.438, CiteScore: 4)
Cambridge Quarterly     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9, SJR: 0.104, CiteScore: 0)
Capital Markets Law J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2, SJR: 0.222, CiteScore: 0)
Carcinogenesis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2, SJR: 2.135, CiteScore: 5)
Cardiovascular Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14, SJR: 3.002, CiteScore: 5)
Cerebral Cortex     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 46, SJR: 3.892, CiteScore: 6)
CESifo Economic Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 18, SJR: 0.483, CiteScore: 1)
Chemical Senses     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1, SJR: 1.42, CiteScore: 3)
Children and Schools     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5, SJR: 0.246, CiteScore: 0)
Chinese J. of Comparative Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4, SJR: 0.412, CiteScore: 0)
Chinese J. of Intl. Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 0.329, CiteScore: 0)
Chinese J. of Intl. Politics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10, SJR: 1.392, CiteScore: 2)
Christian Bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10, SJR: 0.183, CiteScore: 0)
Classical Receptions J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 0.123, CiteScore: 0)
Clean Energy     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Clinical Infectious Diseases     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 67, SJR: 5.051, CiteScore: 5)
Communication Theory     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 2.424, CiteScore: 3)
Communication, Culture & Critique     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 0.222, CiteScore: 1)
Community Development J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 0.268, CiteScore: 1)
Computer J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9, SJR: 0.319, CiteScore: 1)
Conservation Physiology     Open Access   (Followers: 2, SJR: 1.818, CiteScore: 3)
Contemporary Women's Writing     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9, SJR: 0.121, CiteScore: 0)
Contributions to Political Economy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5, SJR: 0.906, CiteScore: 1)
Critical Values     Full-text available via subscription  
Current Developments in Nutrition     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Current Legal Problems     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 29)
Current Zoology     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3, SJR: 1.164, CiteScore: 2)
Database : The J. of Biological Databases and Curation     Open Access   (Followers: 8, SJR: 1.791, CiteScore: 3)
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14, SJR: 0.259, CiteScore: 1)
Diplomatic History     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 20, SJR: 0.45, CiteScore: 1)
DNA Research     Open Access   (Followers: 5, SJR: 2.866, CiteScore: 6)
Dynamics and Statistics of the Climate System     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Early Music     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 16, SJR: 0.139, CiteScore: 0)
Economic Policy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 41, SJR: 3.584, CiteScore: 3)
ELT J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24, SJR: 0.942, CiteScore: 1)
English Historical Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 54, SJR: 0.612, CiteScore: 1)
English: J. of the English Association     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14, SJR: 0.1, CiteScore: 0)
Environmental Entomology     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 11, SJR: 0.818, CiteScore: 2)
Environmental Epigenetics     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Environmental History     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 0.408, CiteScore: 1)
EP-Europace     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2, SJR: 2.748, CiteScore: 4)
Epidemiologic Reviews     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9, SJR: 4.505, CiteScore: 8)
ESHRE Monographs     Hybrid Journal  
Essays in Criticism     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 17, SJR: 0.113, CiteScore: 0)
European Heart J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 59, SJR: 9.315, CiteScore: 9)
European Heart J. - Cardiovascular Imaging     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9, SJR: 3.625, CiteScore: 3)
European Heart J. - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 1)
European Heart J. - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes     Hybrid Journal  
European Heart J. : Case Reports     Open Access  
European Heart J. Supplements     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8, SJR: 0.223, CiteScore: 0)
European J. of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9, SJR: 1.681, CiteScore: 2)
European J. of Intl. Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 191, SJR: 0.694, CiteScore: 1)
European J. of Orthodontics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 4, SJR: 1.279, CiteScore: 2)
European J. of Public Health     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 20, SJR: 1.36, CiteScore: 2)
European Review of Agricultural Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10, SJR: 1.172, CiteScore: 2)
European Review of Economic History     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 30, SJR: 0.702, CiteScore: 1)
European Sociological Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 42, SJR: 2.728, CiteScore: 3)
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health     Open Access   (Followers: 12)
Family Practice     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 16, SJR: 1.018, CiteScore: 2)
Fems Microbiology Ecology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14, SJR: 1.492, CiteScore: 4)
Fems Microbiology Letters     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 27, SJR: 0.79, CiteScore: 2)
Fems Microbiology Reviews     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 31, SJR: 7.063, CiteScore: 13)
Fems Yeast Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14, SJR: 1.308, CiteScore: 3)
Food Quality and Safety     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Foreign Policy Analysis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24, SJR: 1.425, CiteScore: 1)
Forest Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7, SJR: 0.89, CiteScore: 2)
Forestry: An Intl. J. of Forest Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 16, SJR: 1.133, CiteScore: 3)
Forum for Modern Language Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6, SJR: 0.104, CiteScore: 0)
French History     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 33, SJR: 0.118, CiteScore: 0)
French Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 20, SJR: 0.148, CiteScore: 0)
French Studies Bulletin     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10, SJR: 0.152, CiteScore: 0)
Gastroenterology Report     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Genome Biology and Evolution     Open Access   (Followers: 13, SJR: 2.578, CiteScore: 4)
Geophysical J. Intl.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 35, SJR: 1.506, CiteScore: 3)
German History     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 0.161, CiteScore: 0)
GigaScience     Open Access   (Followers: 4, SJR: 5.022, CiteScore: 7)
Global Summitry     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
Glycobiology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 13, SJR: 1.493, CiteScore: 3)
Health and Social Work     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 56, SJR: 0.388, CiteScore: 1)
Health Education Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 15, SJR: 0.854, CiteScore: 2)
Health Policy and Planning     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25, SJR: 1.512, CiteScore: 2)
Health Promotion Intl.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 22, SJR: 0.812, CiteScore: 2)
History Workshop J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 31, SJR: 1.278, CiteScore: 1)
Holocaust and Genocide Studies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 28, SJR: 0.105, CiteScore: 0)
Human Communication Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 15, SJR: 2.146, CiteScore: 3)
Human Molecular Genetics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8, SJR: 3.555, CiteScore: 5)
Human Reproduction     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 72, SJR: 2.643, CiteScore: 5)
Human Reproduction Open     Open Access  
Human Reproduction Update     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 18, SJR: 5.317, CiteScore: 10)
Human Rights Law Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 59, SJR: 0.756, CiteScore: 1)
ICES J. of Marine Science: J. du Conseil     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 54, SJR: 1.591, CiteScore: 3)
ICSID Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11)
ILAR J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2, SJR: 1.732, CiteScore: 4)
IMA J. of Applied Mathematics     Hybrid Journal   (SJR: 0.679, CiteScore: 1)
IMA J. of Management Mathematics     Hybrid Journal   (SJR: 0.538, CiteScore: 1)
IMA J. of Mathematical Control and Information     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2, SJR: 0.496, CiteScore: 1)
IMA J. of Numerical Analysis - advance access     Hybrid Journal   (SJR: 1.987, CiteScore: 2)
Industrial and Corporate Change     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10, SJR: 1.792, CiteScore: 2)
Industrial Law J.     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 37, SJR: 0.249, CiteScore: 1)
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 47, SJR: 2.511, CiteScore: 4)
Information and Inference     Free  
Integrative and Comparative Biology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8, SJR: 1.319, CiteScore: 2)
Interacting with Computers     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11, SJR: 0.292, CiteScore: 1)
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 7, SJR: 0.762, CiteScore: 1)
Intl. Affairs     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 62, SJR: 1.505, CiteScore: 3)
Intl. Data Privacy Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25)
Intl. Health     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 6, SJR: 0.851, CiteScore: 2)
Intl. Immunology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 3, SJR: 2.167, CiteScore: 4)
Intl. J. for Quality in Health Care     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 36, SJR: 1.348, CiteScore: 2)
Intl. J. of Constitutional Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 64, SJR: 0.601, CiteScore: 1)
Intl. J. of Epidemiology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 242, SJR: 3.969, CiteScore: 5)
Intl. J. of Law and Information Technology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5, SJR: 0.202, CiteScore: 1)
Intl. J. of Law, Policy and the Family     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 24, SJR: 0.223, CiteScore: 1)
Intl. J. of Lexicography     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10, SJR: 0.285, CiteScore: 1)
Intl. J. of Low-Carbon Technologies     Open Access   (Followers: 1, SJR: 0.403, CiteScore: 1)
Intl. J. of Neuropsychopharmacology     Open Access   (Followers: 3, SJR: 1.808, CiteScore: 4)
Intl. J. of Public Opinion Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11, SJR: 1.545, CiteScore: 1)
Intl. J. of Refugee Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 38, SJR: 0.389, CiteScore: 1)
Intl. J. of Transitional Justice     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11, SJR: 0.724, CiteScore: 2)
Intl. Mathematics Research Notices     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1, SJR: 2.168, CiteScore: 1)
Intl. Political Sociology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 39, SJR: 1.465, CiteScore: 3)
Intl. Relations of the Asia-Pacific     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 23, SJR: 0.401, CiteScore: 1)
Intl. Studies Perspectives     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 9, SJR: 0.983, CiteScore: 1)
Intl. Studies Quarterly     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 47, SJR: 2.581, CiteScore: 2)
Intl. Studies Review     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 25, SJR: 1.201, CiteScore: 1)
ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2, SJR: 0.15, CiteScore: 0)
ITNOW     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1, SJR: 0.103, CiteScore: 0)
J. of African Economies     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 17, SJR: 0.533, CiteScore: 1)
J. of American History     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 46, SJR: 0.297, CiteScore: 1)
J. of Analytical Toxicology     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 14, SJR: 1.065, CiteScore: 2)
J. of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 15, SJR: 2.419, CiteScore: 4)
J. of Antitrust Enforcement     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 1)
J. of Applied Poultry Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 5, SJR: 0.585, CiteScore: 1)
J. of Biochemistry     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 41, SJR: 1.226, CiteScore: 2)
J. of Burn Care & Research     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 10, SJR: 0.768, CiteScore: 2)
J. of Chromatographic Science     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 18, SJR: 0.36, CiteScore: 1)
J. of Church and State     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 11, SJR: 0.139, CiteScore: 0)
J. of Communication     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 55, SJR: 4.411, CiteScore: 5)
J. of Competition Law and Economics     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 37, SJR: 0.33, CiteScore: 0)
J. of Complex Networks     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 2, SJR: 1.05, CiteScore: 4)
J. of Computer-Mediated Communication     Open Access   (Followers: 29, SJR: 2.961, CiteScore: 6)
J. of Conflict and Security Law     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 12, SJR: 0.402, CiteScore: 0)
J. of Consumer Research     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 46, SJR: 5.856, CiteScore: 5)
J. of Crohn's and Colitis     Hybrid Journal   (Followers: 8, SJR: 2.728, CiteScore: 5)

        1 2 | Last   [Sort by number of followers]   [Restore default list]

Journal Cover
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
Number of Followers: 0  
 
  Hybrid Journal Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
ISSN (Print) 2058-5225 - ISSN (Online) 2058-1742
Published by Oxford University Press Homepage  [396 journals]
  • Depression: are patient’s receiving adequate treatment'
    • Authors: May H.
      Pages: 235 - 236
      Abstract: This editorial refers to ‘Cardiovascular hazards of insufficient treatment of depression among patients with known cardiovascular disease: a propensity score adjusted analysis’, by S. Bangalore et al., on page 258.
      PubDate: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy037
      Issue No: Vol. 4, No. 4 (2018)
       
  • Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: lost in
           translation'
    • Authors: Lee E; Yan A.
      Pages: 237 - 238
      Abstract: This editorial refers to ‘A real-world cohort study on the quality of potassium and creatinine monitoring during initiation of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with heart failure’ by E. Nilsson et al., on page 267.
      PubDate: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy025
      Issue No: Vol. 4, No. 4 (2018)
       
  • Privacy of patient data in quality-of-care registries in cardiology and
           cardiothoracic surgery: the impact of the new general data protection
           regulation EU-law
    • Authors: Wierda E; Eindhoven D, Schalij M, et al.
      Pages: 239 - 245
      Abstract: Quality-of-care registries have been shown to improve quality of healthcare and should be facilitated and encouraged. The data of these registries are also very valuable for medical data research. While fully acknowledging the importance of re-using already available data for research purposes, there are concerns about how the applicable privacy legislation is dealt with. These concerns are also articulated in the new European law on privacy, the ‘General Data Protection Regulation’ (GDPR) which has come into force on 25 May 2018. The aim of this review is to examine what the implications of the new European data protection rules are for quality-of-care registries in Europe while providing examples of three quality-of-care registries in the field of cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery in Europe. A general overview of the European and national legal framework (relevant data protection and privacy legislation) applying to quality-of-care registries is provided. One of the main rules is that non-anonymous patient data may, in principle, not be used for research without the patient’s informed consent. When patient data are solely and strictly used for quality control and improvement, this rule does not apply. None of the described registries (NHR, SWEDEHEART, and NICOR) currently ask specific informed consent of patients before using their data in the registry, but they do carry out medical data research. Application of the GDPR implies that personal data may only be used for medical data research after informing patients and obtaining their explicit consent.
      PubDate: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy034
      Issue No: Vol. 4, No. 4 (2018)
       
  • Variation in preoperative antithrombotic strategy, severe bleeding, and
           use of blood products in coronary artery bypass grafting: results from the
           multicentre E-CABG registry
    • Authors: Biancari F; Mariscalco G, Gherli R, et al.
      Pages: 246 - 257
      Abstract: AimsNo data exists on inter-institutional differences in terms of adherence to international guidelines regarding the discontinuation of antithrombotics and rates of severe bleeding in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).Methods and resultsThis is an analysis of 7118 patients from the prospective multicentre European CABG (E-CABG) registry who underwent isolated CABG in 15 European centres. Preoperative pause of P2Y12 receptor antagonists shorter than that suggested by the 2017 ESC guidelines (overall 11.6%) ranged from 0.7% to 24.8% between centres (adjusted P < 0.0001) and increased the rate of severe-massive bleeding [E-CABG bleeding grades 2–3, OR 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27–2.17; Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding (UDPB) bleeding grades 3–4, OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.16–1.93]. The incidence of resternotomy for bleeding (overall 2.6%) ranged from 0% to 6.9% (adjusted P < 0.0001), and surgical site bleeding (overall 59.6%) ranged from 0% to 84.6% (adjusted P = 0.003). The rate of the UDPB bleeding grades 3–4 (overall 8.4%) ranged from 3.7% to 22.3% (P < 0.0001), and of the E-CABG bleeding grades 2–3 (overall 6.5%) ranged from 0.4% to 16.4% between centres (P < 0.0001). Resternotomy for bleeding (adjusted OR 5.04, 95% CI 2.85–8.92), UDPB bleeding grades 3–4 (adjusted OR 6.61, 95% CI 4.42–9.88), and E-CABG bleeding grades 2–3 (adjusted OR 8.71, 95% CI 5.76–13.15) were associated with an increased risk of hospital/30-day mortality.ConclusionsAdherence to the current guidelines on the early discontinuation of P2Y12 receptor antagonists is of utmost importance to reduce excessive bleeding and early mortality after CABG. Inter-institutional variation should be considered for a correct interpretation of the results in multicentre studies evaluating perioperative bleeding and use of blood products.
      PubDate: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy027
      Issue No: Vol. 4, No. 4 (2018)
       
  • Cardiovascular hazards of insufficient treatment of depression among
           patients with known cardiovascular disease: a propensity score adjusted
           analysis
    • Authors: Bangalore S; Shah R, Pappadopulos E, et al.
      Pages: 258 - 266
      Abstract: AimsThe association between depression care adequacy and the risk of subsequent adverse cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes among patients with a previous diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke is not well defined.Methods and resultsThis retrospective cohort study used commercial claims data (2010–2015) and included adults with newly diagnosed and treated major depressive disorder (MDD) following an initial MI or stroke diagnosis. Depression care adequacy was assessed during the 3-month period following the MDD diagnosis index date using two measures: antidepressant dosage adequacy and duration adequacy. Cox models adjusted for the propensity of receiving adequate depression care were used to compare the risk of a composite CVD outcome (MI, stroke, congestive heart failure, and angina) as well as each individual CVD event between patients receiving adequate vs. inadequate depression care. A total of 1568 patients were included in the final cohort. Of these, 937 (59.8%) were categorized as receiving inadequate depression care based on at least one of the two treatment adequacy criteria. Propensity score adjusted Cox models showed that depression care inadequacy was associated with a significantly higher risk of the composite CVD endpoint [hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–1.39], stroke (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02–1.42), and angina (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.21–3.16) with no significant interaction based on cohort included (MI vs. stroke) or the definition of inadequate depression (dose vs. duration inadequacy) (Pinteraction > 0.05).ConclusionInadequate MDD care was associated with a higher risk of adverse CVD events. These findings reveal a significant unmet clinical need in patients with post-MI or post-stroke MDD that may impact CVD outcomes.
      PubDate: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy023
      Issue No: Vol. 4, No. 4 (2018)
       
  • A real-world cohort study on the quality of potassium and creatinine
           monitoring during initiation of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in
           patients with heart failure
    • Authors: Nilsson E; De Deco P, Trevisan M, et al.
      Pages: 267 - 273
      Abstract: AimsClinical heart failure (HF) guidelines recommend monitoring of creatinine and potassium throughout the initial weeks of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) therapy. We here assessed the extent to which this occurs in our health care.Methods and resultsObservational study in 2007–2010 HF patients starting MRA therapy in Stockholm, Sweden. Outcomes included potassium and creatinine laboratory testing before MRA initiation and in the early (Days 1–10) and extended (Days 11–90) post-initiation periods. Exclusion criteria considered death/hospitalization within 90 days, and lack of a second MRA dispense. Of 4036 HF patients starting on MRA, 45% were initiated from a hospital, 24% from a primary care centre, and 30% from other private centres. Overall, 89% underwent pre-initiation testing, being more common among hospital (97%) than for primary care (74%) initiations. Only 24% were adequately monitored in all three recommended intervals, being again more frequent following hospital (33%) than private (21%) or primary care (17%) initiations. In multivariable analyses, adequate monitoring was more likely for hospital [odds ratio (OR) 2.85, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.34–3.56] initiations, and for patients with chronic kidney disease (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.30–2.43) and concomitant use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05–1.52), angiotensin receptor blockers (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01–1.40) or beta-blockers (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.22–2.26). Age, sex, and prescribing centre explained a small portion of adequate monitoring (c-statistic 0.63). Addition of comorbidities and medications improved prediction marginally (c-statistic 0.65).ConclusionAlthough serum potassium and creatinine monitoring before MRA initiation for HF is frequent, rates of post-initiation monitoring remain suboptimal, especially among primary care centres.
      PubDate: Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy019
      Issue No: Vol. 4, No. 4 (2018)
       
  • Use of clinical risk stratification in non-ST elevation acute coronary
           syndromes: an analysis from the CONCORDANCE registry
    • Authors: Bing R; Goodman S, Yan A, et al.
      Pages: 309 - 317
      Abstract: AimsThere is little information on clinical risk stratification (CRS) compared to objective risk tools in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS). We quantified CRS use, its agreement with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk scores (GRS), and association with outcomes.Methods and resultsData were extracted from the Australian Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary Care, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events (CONCORDANCE), a multi-centre NSTEACS registry. From February 2009 to December 2015, 4512 patients from 41 sites were included. Predictors of CRS use and association with treatment were identified, CRS–GRS agreement determined and prediction of in-hospital and 6-month mortality compared. Clinical risk stratification was documented in 21% of patients. Family history of coronary disease was the only independent predictor of CRS use [odds ratio (OR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.04–1.45]; electrocardiogram changes (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.68–0.96), elevated biomarkers (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.48–0.73), dementia (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36–0.84), and an urban hospital setting (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19–0.89) were independent negative predictors. A treatment-risk paradox was observed: high CRS risk patients received less anticoagulation (79% vs. 88%, P = 0.001) and angiography (83% vs. 71%, P < 0.001). CRS–GRS agreement was poor (kappa coefficient = 0.034) and CRS less predictive for in-hospital (c-statistic 0.54 vs. 0.87, P < 0.001) and 6-month (c-statistic 0.55 vs. 0.74, P < 0.01) mortality.ConclusionIn Australia, CRS does not guide treatment, correlate with GRS or predict outcomes. This study suggests the need for greater awareness and integration of validated tools such as the GRACE score to optimally direct treatment and potentially improve outcomes.
      PubDate: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy002
      Issue No: Vol. 4, No. 4 (2018)
       
  • Does the subtype of acute coronary syndrome treated by percutaneous
           coronary intervention predict long-term clinical outcomes'
    • Authors: Biswas S; Andrianopoulos N, Papapostolou S, et al.
      Pages: 318 - 327
      Abstract: Aims The prognosis of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for different subtypes of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains unclear. We compared short- and long-term mortality in patients undergoing PCI for unstable angina (UA), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).Methods and resultsThis was a retrospective cohort study of 13 184 patients (5966 STEMI, 5307 NSTEMI, and 1911 UA) undergoing PCI between 1 January 2005 and 30 November 2013 in a multi-centre registry. Clinical and procedural characteristics, as well as outcomes, were compared by ACS subtype. Long-term all-cause mortality data were obtained via linkage to the National Death Index (NDI). Patients with STEMI compared with NSTEMI and UA were younger (62.9 ± 12.8 vs. 64.7 ± 12.5 vs. 65.5 ± 11.8 years; P < 0.01), had fewer comorbidities including diabetes, heart failure, and previous myocardial infarction (all P < 0.01). Procedural success was similar across all groups (P = 0.54). In-hospital, 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality increased significantly from UA to NSTEMI to STEMI patients (1-year mortality 2.5% vs. 4.5% vs. 8.7%; P < 0.01). Kaplan–Meier survival estimates showed increased early mortality in the STEMI group (log-rank P < 0.01). However, after approximately 8.2 years, survival was similar across all groups. In a proportional-odds model using flexible parametric survival modelling, ACS subtype was not an independent predictor of NDI-linked mortality [UA: odds ratio (OR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.71–1.02; STEMI: OR 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88–1.16; NSTEMI as reference category].ConclusionDespite disparate baseline characteristics and differences in short-term mortality, long-term mortality was similar across the spectrum of ACS treated by PCI and contemporary medical therapy.
      PubDate: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy009
      Issue No: Vol. 4, No. 4 (2018)
       
  • Kidney function modifies the selection of treatment strategies and
           long-term survival in stable ischaemic heart disease: insights from the
           Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart
           Disease (APPROACH) registry
    • Authors: Shavadia J; Southern D, James M, et al.
      Pages: 274 - 282
      Abstract: AimsPatients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been under-represented in stable ischaemic heart disease (SIHD) trials despite their heightened risk of cardiovascular mortality. We examine associations between kidney disease, treatment selection, and long-term survival in patients with SIHD.Methods and resultsSIHD patients with angiographically significant stenosis (≥70%) were categorized by renal function [dialysis-dependent, severe CKD [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30], mild-moderate CKD (eGFR 30–59), and no CKD (eGFR ≥ 60)] and by treatment groups [revascularization ≤3 months of angiogram (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery) vs. medical therapy]. The association between renal function category and treatment on long-term survival was examined and adjusted for differences in age, sex, co-morbidities, and coronary anatomy. Of the 17 910 SIHD patients, 0.7% (n = 118) were dialysis-dependent, 1.2% (n = 215) severe CKD, 12.0% (n = 2157) mild-moderate CKD, and 86.1% (n = 15420) no CKD. The presence of CKD was associated with significantly lower adjusted odds of receiving revascularization [reference no CKD: dialysis-dependent: odds ratio (OR) 0.52 (0.35, 0.79), severe (non-dialysis) CKD: OR 0.54 (0.40, 0.73), and mild-moderate CKD: OR 0.80 (0.71, 0.89)]. Over a median follow-up of 8.0 (interquartile range 3.2) years, patients with progressive CKD had higher long-term mortality (dialysis-dependent, 53.4%; severe CKD, 30.2%; mild-moderate CKD, 22.2%; no CKD, 11.9%, Ptrend < 0.0001). Revascularization was associated with improved long-term survival [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): dialysis-dependent: HR 0.29 (0.15, 0.55), severe CKD: HR 0.63 (0.36, 1.08), mild-moderate CKD: HR 0.49 (0.40, 0.60), and no CKD: HR 0.47 (0.42, 0.52)] (Pinteraction < 0.001).ConclusionIn SIHD, the presence of CKD was accompanied by lower revascularization rates and a higher risk of mortality. However, revascularization in CKD was associated with improved long-term survival.
      PubDate: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx042
      Issue No: Vol. 4, No. 4 (2017)
       
  • Risk scoring to guide antiplatelet therapy post-percutaneous coronary
           intervention for acute coronary syndrome results in improved clinical
           outcomes
    • Authors: Antoniou S; Colicchia M, Guttmann O, et al.
      Pages: 283 - 289
      Abstract: AimsTo use the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) and Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines (CRUSADE) scores to risk stratify antiplatelet treatment post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Methods and resultsThis was a prospective registry of 3374 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS between 2013 and 2015 at a UK cardiac centre. Patients with either low GRACE or high CRUSADE risk scores were stratified either to clopidogrel therapy or ticagrelor was used. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or target vessel revascularization with bleeding rates as a secondary outcome, assessed at a median follow-up of 1.8 years (interquartile range 0.8–3.4 years). A total of 1723 (51.1%) patients were risk stratified to either clopidogrel (n = 520) or ticagrelor treatment (n = 1203), with the remaining 1651 not risk scored and treated with clopidogrel therapy. Patients in the risk score stratified group were older than the control group otherwise the groups were similar. Over the follow-up period, a significant reduction in MACE rates between the patients’ risk score stratified and control (clopidogrel therapy) (13.7% vs. 19.7%, P < 0.0001) was seen [hazard ratio (HR) 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31–0.86]. This persisted after adjusting for baseline variables (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.37–0.89) and propensity matching (HR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.27–0.93; P = 0.0015) No significant differences in the rate of major bleeding were seen between the groups (5.3% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.86). In the risk-stratified group, no difference in outcome (ischaemic/bleeding) was seen between clopidogrel and ticagrelor.ConclusionOur registry data suggest that using appropriate risk scoring to guide antiplatelet therapy after ACS is safe and can result in improved clinical outcomes.
      PubDate: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx041
      Issue No: Vol. 4, No. 4 (2017)
       
  • Outcome of current and history of cancer on the risk of cardiovascular
           events following percutaneous coronary intervention: a Kumamoto University
           Malignancy and Atherosclerosis (KUMA) study
    • Authors: Tabata N; Sueta D, Yamamoto E, et al.
      Pages: 290 - 300
      Abstract: AimsWith the advancement in successfully treating different types of cancers, there is an immediate and increased need to focus on the risk and complexity of treating cardiovascular events in cancer survivors. This has led to the emergence of onco-cardiology/cardio-oncology field. We examined the varying incidence of cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with or without cancer.Methods and resultsParticipants were divided into a non-malignant group and a malignant group, consisting of patients who were receiving or had ever received cancer treatment. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 1 year of PCI. In the patient groups studied, we showed that the malignant group had a significantly higher probability of TLR than the non-malignant group (P = 0.002). Moreover, proportional hazards analyses identified malignancy as an independent predictor of TLR [hazard ratio (HR) 2.28, 95% confidential interval (CI) 1.3–4.0; P = 0.004]. Combining malignancy status with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels further increased the HR for TLR (HR 3.01, 95% CI 1.57–5.76; P = 0.001), and the net reclassification improvement was significant (15.2%, 95% CI 4.3–26%; P = 0.02). Time since completion of cancer treatment had an impact on the rate of TLR, with those patients with a current or recent cancer history having more TLR events within 1 year.ConclusionWe demonstrated a significant association between the recent history of cancer and the risk of recurrent coronary atherosclerosis in patients undergoing PCI and showed that malignancy status can predict the likelihood of cardiovascular events following this procedure.
      PubDate: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx047
      Issue No: Vol. 4, No. 4 (2017)
       
  • Low diagnostic yield of non-invasive testing in patients with suspected
           coronary artery disease: results from a large unselected hospital-based
           sample
    • Authors: Therming C; Galatius S, Heitmann M, et al.
      Pages: 301 - 308
      Abstract: AimsStable angina is the most common presentation of heart disease and has a good prognosis. With declining coronary artery disease (CAD), rates a diagnostic approach balancing costs and benefits is a challenge, particularly in women. This study describes the real-life diagnostic workup in a large hospital to explore whether the diagnostic approach may be improved.Methods and resultsWe identified 4028 patients free of CAD, referred for and assessed with non-invasive (NIT) or invasive test for stable suspected CAD in 2012–15. In both the sexes, the majority (>85%) presented with chest pain as primary symptom. Women had more non-angina (60.2 vs. 54.5%) and less typical angina (8.2 vs. 11.8%, P < 0.001). Despite a mean pretest probability of 20.9% in women and 45.1% in men (P < 0.001), only 69 (3.1%) women and 190 men (10.4%) were diagnosed with obstructive CAD. In all, 93% underwent a NIT and 80% of these were normal. Among the 1238 men and 1595 women with non-angina or dyspnoea, only 6.1% and 2.9%, respectively, had positive NIT. After multiple adjustments, women remained less likely to have positive NIT [odds ratio (OR) 0.42 95% confidence interval (95% CI 0.32–0.56)] and given a positive test also less likely to have obstructive CAD [OR 0.30 (0.17–0.52)]. The C-statistics for predicting positive NIT was 0.77 (0.72–0.82) in women and 0.77 (0.74–0.80) in men.ConclusionThese data confirm the very low diagnostic yield of non-invasive and invasive assessment of CAD in current clinical practice, particularly in women and in patients with atypical symptoms. Data call for a more rational approach to avoid unnecessary testing.
      PubDate: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx048
      Issue No: Vol. 4, No. 4 (2017)
       
  • Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in patients 80+ years
           of age with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
    • Authors: Coleman C; Weeda E, Nguyen E, et al.
      Pages: 328 - 329
      Abstract: Non-valuvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is common among the elderly; with >50% NVAF patients being ≥80 years of age.1 Despite this fact, patients ≥80 years of age are often under-represented in trials, with only ∼one-third of patients enrolled in the four landmark NVAF trials of the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (OAC) being ≥75 years of age.2
      PubDate: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 GMT
      DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx044
      Issue No: Vol. 4, No. 4 (2017)
       
 
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
Fax: +00 44 (0)131 4513327
 
Home (Search)
Subjects A-Z
Publishers A-Z
Customise
APIs
Your IP address: 34.228.41.66
 
About JournalTOCs
API
Help
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-