for Journals by Title or ISSN
for Articles by Keywords
help

Publisher: (Total: journals)

The Journal TOCs for this publisher/subject is currently unavailable. Please visit later.
Similar Journals
Journal Cover
European Business Review
Number of Followers: 11  
 
  Hybrid Journal Hybrid journal (It can contain Open Access articles)
ISSN (Print) 0955-534X
This journal is no longer being updated because:
    RSS feed has been removed by the publisher
  • Evidence of transactional capability in two different countries
    • Pages: 470 - 487
      Abstract: European Business Review, Volume 31, Issue 4, Page 470-487, June 2019.
      Purpose The aim of this study is to identify and analyze empirical evidence, which verifies the existence of the transactional capability construct in firms of financial systems in two different countries. Design/methodology/approach This study investigates how the dimensions, and sub dimensions, of the transactional capability construct are reflected in the design of contracts. When analyzing the information from personal consumption loan contracts of nine Spanish firms and ten Peruvian firms in the financial system of each country, generalizable evidence of the transactional capability can be identified. Findings The main result of this study is the identification of empirical evidence that proves the existence of transactional capability in financial markets with different characteristics. Research limitations/implications This study was limited by a lack of similar research, which hampered the task of identifying and defining the dimensions that form the transactional capability construct. Originality/value The identification of transactional capability was based on the analysis of contracts of personal credit consumption in the Peruvian and Spanish financial systems.
      Citation: European Business Review
      PubDate: 2019-06-06T10:44:44Z
      DOI: 10.1108/EBR-12-2017-0242
       
  • Could sustainability improve the promotion of luxury products'
    • Pages: 488 - 511
      Abstract: European Business Review, Volume 31, Issue 4, Page 488-511, June 2019.
      Purpose This paper aims to examine the extent to which sustainability information unfavorably impacts consumers’ behavior in the case of luxury. In particular, it explores the effect of social and environmental attributes on the perceived quality. Design/methodology/approach A between-subject experimental design involving 973 French and Saudi consumers has been conducted. Findings The results indicate that sustainability information negatively impacts the perceived quality of luxury products. However, this result varies regarding the consumers’ country of origin. While no significant effect was observed in the case of French respondents, Saudi consumers lower the evaluation of quality when social information is provided. In addition, the negative effect of sustainability information is moderated by the consumers’ degree of liking of luxury and by the brand corporate social responsibility image. Research limitations/implications This research fills a gap occurred in the previous literature. In effect, limited studies examined perceptions of the association between luxury and sustainability. In addition, it enriches the limited literature on sustainable consumption in the context of developing countries. However, further studies should focus on specific dimensions of quality and examine different sustainable practices and luxury goods. Practical implications From a practical point of view, this study suggests new applications with respect to the link between luxury and sustainability. Originality/value No study to date, as per the authors’ knowledge, has investigated empirically the impact of sustainability information on the perceived quality of luxury products. Contrary to the literature indicating a positive effect of sustainable attributes on consumers’ behavior, this study confirms the incompatibility between luxury and sustainability.
      Citation: European Business Review
      PubDate: 2019-06-06T10:44:47Z
      DOI: 10.1108/EBR-04-2018-0083
       
  • Leading change for success: embracing resistance
    • Pages: 512 - 523
      Abstract: European Business Review, Volume 31, Issue 4, Page 512-523, June 2019.
      Purpose Organizational change is one of the most researched issues in management and leadership. Change is generally viewed as necessary, with positive outcomes for all stakeholders. Resistance is consequently seen as a surprising outcome. However, much of the management literature focuses on change as organizational dynamics-driven, especially by those at the top, in the interests of those at the top, often with scant attention to the role of employees. The purpose of this paper is to take a different perspective, grounded in the systems theory. Design/methodology/approach This is a conceptual paper. The authors critically examine theoretical explanations of resistance to change in organizations and offer an alternative perspective. Findings Systems theorists have addressed change, and its necessity in organizational survival, using an open systems model. The open systems theory posits that organizations are social systems that have purposes of their own and is made of parts (employees) that are purposeful and operate within a purposeful larger system – the environment (stakeholders). Change that ignores a key part – employees – will be resisted. Originality/value Using the systems theory, the authors propose several suggestions for organizational leaders and managers to implement sustainable change. These include, among others, recommendations on circular organizational designs, the need for more democratic organizations, purposeful leadership styles and how to include employees in proactive organizational change processes.
      Citation: European Business Review
      PubDate: 2019-06-06T10:44:52Z
      DOI: 10.1108/EBR-06-2018-0119
       
  • The moderating effect of corporate reputation on inter-firm alliance
           impact on company performance
    • Pages: 524 - 543
      Abstract: European Business Review, Volume 31, Issue 4, Page 524-543, June 2019.
      Purpose The purpose of this paper is to untangle the impacts of a firm’s corporate reputation and its alliance partners’ social capital on its financial performance, drawing on the relational and the network points of view. Design/methodology/approach This paper explored the moderating effect of corporate reputation on the relationship between partners’ social capital (e.g. resource heterogeneity, structural relations and partners’ social ties) and a focal firm’s performance. An OLS three-step regression model (controls, main effects and interaction effects) was used to test the proposed hypotheses based on 265 US joint ventures. Findings The influence of partners’ social capital on a focal firm’s performance is negatively moderated by the focal firm’s reputation at the firm and network levels; larger and more prestigious firms listed in Fortune database tend to choose partners with a higher level of resource heterogeneity, whereas smaller firms tend to choose partners in similar industries to increase economies of scale. The social capital factors of the partners will have different effects on the focal firm performance. Originality/value The value of this paper is in providing insight into the importance and nuances of corporate reputation in offsetting the advantages of inter-firm alliances and their impact on firm performance. In particular, the performance benefits of inter-firm alliance partners’ social ties and heterogeneous resources are negatively affected by the corporate reputation of a firm.
      Citation: European Business Review
      PubDate: 2019-06-06T10:44:55Z
      DOI: 10.1108/EBR-12-2017-0232
       
  • How cross-culture affects the outcomes of co-creation
    • Pages: 544 - 566
      Abstract: European Business Review, Volume 31, Issue 4, Page 544-566, June 2019.
      Purpose The aim of this study is two-fold. Firstly, to examine the outcomes of co-creation from a customer perspective using well-recognised customer management variables (customer satisfaction, loyalty and word-of-mouth (WOM). Secondly, to assess potential cross-cultural differences that may exist within the context of co-creation. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire was completed in the banking services industry, and the final valid sample comprised individuals from the UK and Spain. Multi-sample analysis was carried out using PLS software. Findings Co-creation has a direct influence on customer satisfaction, customer loyalty and WOM; co-creation activities lead to cumulative customer satisfaction, which also affects customer loyalty and positive WOM. Furthermore, the results show that the direct relationships between co-creation and loyalty and WOM are more powerful for British consumers than Spanish consumers, who need to feel satisfied prior to demonstrating loyalty and engaging in positive WOM. Practical implications Firms can use co-creation as a strategic tool if they provide trustworthy collaboration spaces. Furthermore, firms need to adapt the way they interact, listen and respond to customers in different cultural contexts. Trustworthy collaboration spaces and adapting to cultural differences can result in customers who are more satisfied, loyal to the company and more likely to carry out positive WOM, which can ultimately lead to future business. Originality/value This study provides insights into co-creation from a customer perspective. Although much service research has examined the drivers of customer co-creation, literature that analyses the consequences of customer co-creation is still scarce. Moreover, this is the first study to provide empirical evidence of cross-cultural differences within the context of co-creation.
      Citation: European Business Review
      PubDate: 2019-06-06T10:44:58Z
      DOI: 10.1108/EBR-01-2018-0022
       
 
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
Fax: +00 44 (0)131 4513327
 
Home (Search)
Subjects A-Z
Publishers A-Z
Customise
APIs
Your IP address: 3.226.251.205
 
About JournalTOCs
API
Help
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-