for Journals by Title or ISSN
for Articles by Keywords
help

Publisher: Informa plc   (Total: 10 journals)   [Sort by number of followers]

Showing 1 - 10 of 10 Journals sorted alphabetically
Agra Europe     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
Arbitration Law Monthly     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
Consumer Drugs     Full-text available via subscription  
IN VIVO     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 4, SJR: 0.409, CiteScore: 1)
Medtech Insight     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Money Laundering Bulletin     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 4)
START-UP     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
The Pink Sheet     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 7)
The Pink Sheet Daily     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 3)
The Rose Sheet     Full-text available via subscription   (Followers: 2)
Journal Cover
Arbitration Law Monthly
Number of Followers: 3  
 
  Full-text available via subscription Subscription journal
ISSN (Print) 1472-9822
Published by Informa plc Homepage  [10 journals]
  • Duties of the tribunal: delegation of decisions to the Tribunal Secretary
    • Abstract: In P vQ and Others [2017] EWHC 194 (Comm),Popplewell J considered the extent to which an arbitral tribunal can delegateits functions to the Secretary appointed by the tribunal. The judgment is avaluable one, as it is the first detailed analysis of the role of the Chairmanand the Secretary in the conduct of contemporary international commercialarbitration.
      PubDate: 2018-04-25 17:56:35.0
       
  • Remission of award by the court: consequences of remission
    • Abstract: The horrendouslycomplicated facts of Stockman Interhold SA v Arricano Real Estate plc [2017] EWHC 2909 (Comm), facing Christopher Hancock QC, sitting as aDeputy Judge of the High Court, gave rise to an important and little-discussedquestion. Where an award is remitted to the arbitrator on the ground that therehas been an irregularity in the proceedings, does the arbitrator obtainjurisdiction over matters arising after the issuing of the original award'
      PubDate: 2018-04-25 17:54:46.0
       
  • Arbitration: service of arbitration proceedings
    • Abstract: The question in Glencore Agriculture BV (Formerly Glencore GrainBV) v Conqueror Holdings Ltd (The Amity) [2017] EWHC 2893 (Comm) was whetherservice of arbitration proceedings by email upon the employee of the chartererswho had been in email correspondence with the owners as to delay in loadingconstituted valid service.
      PubDate: 2018-04-25 17:53:20.0
       
  • Jurisdiction: meaning of “substantive jurisdiction”
    • Abstract: An appeal may be made against an arbitration award onjurisdictional grounds under section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996. Section 67applies only where the tribunal has erred in its approach to “substantivejurisdiction”, a term defined in section 30. The courts have construed section30 narrowly, to prevent decisions on construction being converted intojurisdictional issues.
      PubDate: 2018-04-25 17:51:59.0
       
  • Security for challenges to the award: security and litigation funders
    • Abstract: Where a challenge is brought in the English courts toan arbitration award, the court may order the applicant to provide security forthe costs of the arbitration (section 70(6) of the Arbitration Act 1996) andmay also order the applicant to provide security for the sum awarded (section70(7) of the 1996 Act).
      PubDate: 2018-04-25 17:50:39.0
       
  • Jurisdiction: bilateral investment treaties
    • Abstract: The decision of Bryan J in GPF GP Sarl v The Republic of Poland [2018] EWHC 409 (Comm) was a challenge undersection 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996 to a ruling of an arbitral tribunal tothe effect that there was no jurisdiction under a bilateral investment treaty todetermine claims based upon various acts of the defendant which had the effectof reducing the value of land controlled by the claimant in Warsaw.
      PubDate: 2018-04-25 17:47:29.0
       
  • Appeals against awards: time limits and extension of time
    • Abstract: In Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co Ltd v Songa Offshore Equinox Ltd and Another [2018] EWHC 538 (Comm) Bryan J readdressed the vexed question of exactly when the 28 days permitted by section 70(3) of the Arbitration Act 1996 to appeal against an award began to run where there had been an application to the arbitrators to correct their award under section 57 of the 1996 Act.
      PubDate: 2018-04-25 17:43:12.0
       
  • Investment arbitration: compatibility with EU law
    • Abstract: In Slovak Republic v Achmea BV Case C-284/16, the CJEU has confirmed thatan arbitral tribunal is not a national court or tribunal for the purposes ofthe Treaty for European Union and accordingly cannot make a reference to theCourt of Justice of the European Union for the determination of points of lawrelating to the Treaty.
      PubDate: 2018-04-25 17:40:45.0
       
  • Commencement of arbitration proceedings: service of notice of arbitration
    • Abstract: In Sino Channel Asia Ltd v Dana Shipping & Trading Pte Singapore [2017] EWCA Civ 1703; [2018] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 17, an appeal heard by Gross and Flaux LJJ, the question was whether service of arbitration proceedings upon a third party seemingly acting for the respondent amounted to a valid service on the respondent.
      PubDate: 2018-04-18 20:53:06.0
       
  • Interim relief: preservation of assets and evidence
    • Abstract: Section 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996 permits the English courts to grant orders preserving assets or evidence for an arbitration in case of urgency and where the tribunal is unable to act. In Company 1 v Company 2 and Another [2017] EWHC 2319 (QB) the issue before HH Judge Saffman was not only whether the matter was urgent, but also whether it was appropriate for the English court to intervene to support an arbitration which had its seat in Switzerland. The application failed on both counts.
      PubDate: 2018-04-18 20:51:30.0
       
  • Enforcement of arbitration awards: third party debt orders and
           receivership orders
    • Abstract: In Taurus Petroleum Ltd v State Oil Marketing Company of the Ministry of Oil, Republic of Iraq [2017] UKSC 64; [2018] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 29 the Supreme Court by a 3:2 majority ruled that the claimant was unable to enforce in England an arbitration award obtained in Baghdad, by using third party debt orders and receivership orders.
      PubDate: 2018-04-18 20:50:03.0
       
  • Jurisdiction: the parties to an arbitration agreement
    • Abstract: It is common for disputes to arise as to whether a person is properly to be regarded as a party to an arbitration agreement. It is far less common for the same issue to arise in relation to both alleged parties. That was nevertheless the situation in SEA2011 Inc v ICT Ltd [2018] EWHC 520 (Comm).
      PubDate: 2018-04-18 20:48:42.0
       
  • Removal of arbitrator: qualifications
    • Abstract: In Allianz Insurance plc v Tonicstar Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 434 the Court of Appeal has reversed the first instance decision of Teare J, [2018] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 229 on the question whether the qualification required for the appointment of an arbitrator in respect of a reinsurance dispute – “experience of insurance or reinsurance” – precluded the appointment of a highly experienced QC.
      PubDate: 2018-04-18 20:47:26.0
       
  • Jurisdiction: removal of jurisdiction after commencement of arbitration
    • Abstract: Exportadora de Sal SA de CV v Corretaje MaritimoSud-Americano Inc [2018] EWHC 224 (Comm)raised the unusual situation in which there was an alleged removal of thejurisdiction of the arbitrator during the course of the arbitration.
      PubDate: 2018-04-18 20:46:13.0
       
  • Arbitration and third parties: estoppel and abuse of process
    • Abstract: The Court of Appeal in Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Emmott [2018] EWCA Civ 51 has upheld in part thefirst instance judgment of O’Farrell J, [2016] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 21 granting ananti-suit injunction to MWP from maintaining proceedings in New South Waleswhen many of the issues at stake had earlier been determined in an arbitrationbetween the parties.
      PubDate: 2018-04-18 20:43:50.0
       
  • Extension of time for appeal: application in agricultural holding cases
    • Abstract: In Smyth-Tyrrell and Another v Sowden [2017] EWHC 2331 (Ch) HHJ Paul Matthews considered and refused an application for an extension of the 28-day period permitted for an appeal under the Arbitration Act 1996. The arbitration was held under the mandatory requirement in the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986, but the court proceeded on the basis that the 1996 Act’s principles applied.
      PubDate: 2017-11-07 21:48:56.0
       
  • Appeals against arbitration awards: serious irregularity
    • Abstract: The lengthy judgment of Teare J in UMS Holdings Ltd and Others v Great Station Properties SA and Another [2017] EWHC 2398 (Comm) sets out in a great deal of detail the limits of serious irregularity challenges under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996. It might be thought somewhat concerning to see that a challenge that the court regarded as misconceived was resolved only after a four-day hearing and a judgment stretching to 144 paragraphs.
      PubDate: 2017-11-07 21:47:34.0
       
  • Serious irregularity: ad hoc agreement to arbitrate
    • Abstract: In Union Marine Classification Services LLC v The Government of the Union of Comoros and Another (No 2) [2017] EWHC 2364 (Comm) a challenge was made to an arbitration award on the ground that the issue resolved by the arbitrator had not been a part of the original submission to arbitration. HHJ Waksman QC ruled that the parties had agreed to ad hoc arbitration on the point.
      PubDate: 2017-11-07 21:45:32.0
       
  • Enforcement of arbitration awards: effect of setting aside by curial court
    • Abstract: In the usual course of events, where a foreign arbitration award has been set aside by the curial court, the English courts will treat themselves as bound by the ruling of the court and will not recognise or enforce the award under the New York Convention as implemented by the Arbitration Act 1996. In Maximov v Open Joint Stock Company “Novolipetsky Metallurgichesky Kombinat” [2017] EWHC 1911 (Comm) the award holder tried to persuade the English court that the ruling of the Russian curial courts setting aside the award should not be recognised, by reason of the bias of those courts. Sir Michael Burton rejected the argument on the facts.
      PubDate: 2017-11-07 21:44:22.0
       
  • Enforcement of foreign awards: notice of proceedings and inability to
           present case
    • Abstract: One of the grounds upon which enforcement of a foreign arbitration award made in a New York Convention country may be refused by the English courts is where the respondent was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case.
      PubDate: 2017-11-07 21:43:10.0
       
 
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
Fax: +00 44 (0)131 4513327
 
About JournalTOCs
API
Help
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-