for Journals by Title or ISSN
for Articles by Keywords
help

Publisher: Universitas Negeri Semarang   (Total: 76 journals)   [Sort by number of followers]

Showing 1 - 76 of 76 Journals sorted alphabetically
Accounting Analysis J.     Open Access   (Followers: 10)
ACTIVE : J. of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation     Open Access   (Followers: 21)
BELIA : Early Childhood Education Papers     Open Access   (Followers: 9)
Biosaintifika : J. of Biology & Biology Education     Open Access   (Followers: 7)
Catharsis : J. of Arts Education     Open Access  
Chemistry in Education     Open Access   (Followers: 9)
Chi'e : J. of Japanese Learning and Teaching     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Dinamika Pendidikan     Open Access  
Economic Education Analysis J.     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Economics Development Analysis J.     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Edu Elektrika J.     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Edukasi     Open Access  
ELT Forum : J. of English Language Teaching     Open Access   (Followers: 10)
English Education J.     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Forum Ilmu Sosial     Open Access  
Geo-Image     Open Access  
Harmonia     Open Access  
Imajinasi : Jurnal Seni     Open Access  
Indonesian J. of Chemical Science     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Indonesian J. of Conservation     Open Access  
Indonesian J. of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies     Open Access  
Indonesian J. of Early Childhood Education Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Indonesian J. of Guidance and Counseling     Open Access  
Indonesian J. of History Education     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Innovative J. of Curriculum and Educational Technology     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Intl. J. of Active Learning     Open Access  
Intuisi : Jurnal Psikologi Ilmiah     Open Access  
J. of Economic Education     Open Access  
J. of Educational Development     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
J. of Educational Social Studies     Open Access   (Followers: 9)
J. of Edugeography     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
J. of Indonesian History     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
J. of Innovative Science Education     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
J. of Nonformal Education     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
J. of Physical Education and Sports     Open Access   (Followers: 6)
J. of Physical Education Health and Sport     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
J. of Primary Education     Open Access   (Followers: 14)
J. of Sport Sciences and Fitness     Open Access   (Followers: 15)
JEJAK : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Joyful Learning J.     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Jurnal Abdimas     Open Access  
Jurnal Bahan Alam Terbarukan     Open Access  
Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen     Open Access  
Jurnal Fisika     Open Access  
Jurnal Geografi     Open Access  
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Jurnal Komunitas     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Jurnal MIPA     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia (Indonesian J. of Physics Education)     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia     Open Access   (Followers: 2, SJR: 0.206, CiteScore: 1)
Jurnal Sastra Indonesia     Open Access  
Jurnal Teknik Elektro     Open Access  
Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Language Circle : J. of Language and Literature     Open Access   (Followers: 2)
Lisanul' Arab : J. of Arabic Learning and Teaching     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Management Analysis J.     Open Access  
Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Public Health Perspective J.     Open Access  
Sainteknol : Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi     Open Access  
Scientific J. of Informatics     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Seloka : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Solidarity : J. of Education, Society and Culture     Open Access  
Unnes J. of Biology Education     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Unnes J. of Mathematics     Open Access   (Followers: 3)
Unnes J. of Mathematics Education     Open Access   (Followers: 5)
Unnes J. of Mathematics Education Research     Open Access   (Followers: 10)
Unnes J. of Public Health     Open Access  
Unnes Law J.     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Unnes Physics Education J.     Open Access   (Followers: 4)
Unnes Physics J.     Open Access   (Followers: 1)
Unnes Science Education J.     Open Access  
Wacana : Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora     Open Access  
Similar Journals
Journal Cover
Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education
Number of Followers: 5  

  This is an Open Access Journal Open Access journal
ISSN (Print) 2252-6927
Published by Universitas Negeri Semarang Homepage  [76 journals]
  • The mathematical problem solving ability of student on learning with
           Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) model in term of student
           learning style

    • Authors: Mashuri Mashuri, Nindy Dwi Nitoviani, Putriaji Hendikawati
      Pages: 1 - 7
      Abstract: The purposes of this research were to find out the mathematical problem solving ability on learning with TAPPS model and to find out how the description of mathematical problem solving ability on TAPPS model in terms of learning style. This mixed methods research used concurrent embedded design. The population in this research was eighth-grade students of SMP N 4 Kudus in the academic year of 2016/2017. The sample was chosen by using random sampling technique, it obtained that VIIIA as experimental class and VIIIB as control class. The results of the research showed that (1) the mathematical problem solving ability on learning with TAPPS model achieved classical mastery, (2) the mathematical problem solving ability on learning with TAPPS model was better than expository model, (3) the students' ability in mathematical problem solving with a visual learning style had good category at the stage of devising a plan and the other stage had enough category, otherwise students with an auditorial learning style had enough category at the stage of looking back and another stage had good category, and students with a kinesthetic learning style had good category at the stage of understanding the problem and the other stage had enough category and less category.
      PubDate: 2018-03-29
      DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v7i1.18870
      Issue No: Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
       
  • Problem solving ability of seventh grade students viewed from geometric
           thinking levels in search solve create share learning model

    • Authors: Kristina Wijayanti, Aizzatun Nikmah, Emi Pujiastuti
      Pages: 8 - 16
      Abstract: The purposes of this study was to know wether the student’s problem solving ability on SSCS and PBL learning models achive the mastery learning ; to compare the the student’s problem solving ability on SSCS  and PBL learning models; to describe the problem solving ability student on SSCS learning model viewed from geometry thinking levels, and to know the quality of SSCS learning models. The method used was a mixed method. The population of this study was all students of SMP N 10 Semarang. The sample was chooseb by simple random sampling technique  and class VII D as control class and VII G as experiment class.The quantitative data was analyzed by z-test to and the equivalence of two means.  The qualitative data was analyzed  through the validity test, data display, data reduction, and conclusion .  Results indicated that either SSCS and PBL learning models have achieve the mastery learning of poblem solving ability test but there was no difference between students' problem solving abilitiy in the  SSCS and PBL  learning models. Students with PreRecognition and Visual  can’t fully identify the properties of figure so it makes difficulty in solving problem. Students with Analysis level solve  problem  using the properties of certain figures.
      PubDate: 2018-03-29
      DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v7i1.21251
      Issue No: Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
       
  • The effectiveness of auditory intellectually repetition learning aided by
           questions box towards students’ mathematical reasoning ability grade XI
           SMA 2 Pati

    • Authors: Arief Agoestanto, Oei Yuda Setiyo Priyanto, Bambang Eko Susilo
      Pages: 17 - 23
      Abstract: The objective of this study is to determine does the AIR learning is effective towards students’ mathematical reasoning ability grade XI SMA 2 Pati on the sequence and the series material. The population in this study is all students grade XI SMA 2 Pati Academic Year 2016/2017. The method used in this study is quantitative method. While the data collection includes test methods, questionnaires, and observations. The results showed that: (1) the mathematical reasoning ability of students grade XI SMA 2 Pati who learn with AIR learning model is reaching the mastery learning; (2) the mathematical reasoning ability of students grade XI SMA 2 Pati who learn with AIR learning model aided by Questions Box is reaching the mastery learning; (3) the  mathematical reasoning ability of students grade XI SMA 2 Pati who learn with AIR model aided by Questions Box is better than the mathematical reasoning ability of students who learn with AIR learning model and expository learning model; (4) the  mathematical reasoning ability of students grade XI SMA 2 Pati who learn with AIR model aided by Questions Box is better than the mathematical reasoning ability of students who learn with AIR learning model and expository learning model for each group, either low, medium or high. Based on the four results of the above research, it can be concluded that the AIR learning aided by Questions Box is effective towards students’ mathematical reasoning ability grade XI SMA 2 Pati on the sequence and series material.  
      PubDate: 2018-03-29
      DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v7i1.15828
      Issue No: Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
       
  • Mobile technology in a mathematics trail program: how does it works'

    • Authors: Adi Nur Cahyono, Miftahudin Miftahudin
      Pages: 24 - 30
      Abstract: The aim of the study reported upon in this paper is to explore the potential of the use of mobile technology for supporting math trail program.  An explorative study was conducted in the city of Semarang in Indonesia involving 30 students of SMPN 10 Semarang. The study consisted of an introduction session, a math trail activity supported by the use of mobile phone app, and a debriefing session. Data were gathered by means of participatory observation, students' work, and interviews.  Findings indicate that math trail programs supported by the use of mobile phones have promoted the engagement of students in mathematical activities. The use of mobile technology has the potential to support the program. Mobile app has been able to play a role in guiding students in math trail activities with features offered, such as: navigation features, help buttons, and direct feedback.
      PubDate: 2018-03-29
      DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v7i1.21955
      Issue No: Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
       
  • The enhancement of students’ ability in problem solving and mathematical
           disposition aspect through brain-based learning model

    • Authors: Ika Deavy Martyaningrum, Nuriana Rachmani Dewi, Wuryanto Wuryanto
      Pages: 31 - 38
      Abstract: The main purpose of this research is to analyze the achievement and the increasing of students’ problem solving ability and students’ mathematical disposition as the result of learning application through Brain-Based Learning model and conventional learning comprehensively. This research uses the mix method with concurrent triangulation. The research results show that: (1) The students’ ability of problem solving using Brain-Based Learning model reaches classical learning mastery, (2) the students’ achievement of problem solving using Brain-Based Learning model is higher than that of using conventional learning, (3) the students’ enhancement of mathematical disposition using Brain-Based Learning model is the same with the achievement of using conventional leaning, (4) there is a few correlations between the achievement of problem solving ability and mathematical disposition, as well as their enhancement. To get comprehensive and accurate representation about the enhancement of mathematical disposition through Brain-Based Learning, it is necessary to conduct the future similar study with the same objects yet longer duration.
      PubDate: 2018-03-29
      DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v7i1.21854
      Issue No: Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
       
  • Self-assessment on the achievement of the ability of mathematical
           proportional application in Meaningful Instructional Design (MID) learning
           viewed from student’s learning style

    • Authors: Mulyono Mulyono, Kartono Kartono, Meis Dania Nila Rosyida
      Pages: 39 - 47
      Abstract: This study aims to (1) test the students' mathematical proportional reasoning ability to achieve classical mastery, (2) to analyze the average achievement of mathematical proportional reasoning ability in Meaningful Instructional Design learning by applying self-assessment with the common learning model (3) to test the proportion of students’ mastery in Meaningful Instructional Design learning by applying self-assessment which is better than the proportion of the common learning model and (4) to obtain a description of students' proportional reasoning abilities of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic style of learning style. The method used in this research is Mixed Methods Concurrent Embedded Design. The quantitative subject of this study is the students of class VIII B MTs NU Banat Kudus as the experimental class which use Meaningful Instructional Design, while the subject of qualitative research is 6 students of class VIII B consisting of 2 students with the high and low value on mathematical proportional reasoning test in each learning style group. Eventually, the results of this study are (1) the achievement of students’ mathematical proportional reasoning ability is significant in MID learning, (2) there is difference of proportional reasoning ability in MID learning model with a common used learning model, (3) the proportion of students' learning mastery by using Meaningful Instructional Design model with Self-assessment is higher than those who use the common learning model and (4) the students with visual learning style are able to propose and perform mathematical manipulation by understanding and remembering the material ever seen and written, the students with auditory learning style are able to make guesses, present mathematical manipulations, and draw conclusions by understanding and remembering material discussed, while students with kinesthetic learning style are able to make guesses, perform mathematical manipulations, and draw conclusions by understanding and remembering material which is ever practiced.
      PubDate: 2018-03-29
      DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v7i1.20751
      Issue No: Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
       
  • Mathematical literacy ability of 9th grade students according to learning
           styles in Problem Based Learning-Realistic approach with Edmodo

    • Authors: Wardono Wardono, Scolastika Mariani, Rista Tri Rahayuningsih, Endang Retno Winarti
      Pages: 48 - 56
      Abstract: This study aims to determine the difference and increase of the mathematical literacy ability using PBL-PRS-E, PBL-PS and scientific approach, and to find out difference of the mathematical literacy ability between learning styles. This study belongs to quantitative research. The population in this study are 9th grade students SMP Negeri 1 Majenang, Cilacap academic year 2016/2017. This study uses a quasi-experimental design with pretest-posttest control group design. Then, methods of the study are test, questionnaire, and documentation. Data analysis was performed by one way anova, two way anova, and increase in the gain normalized. The results of the study are (1) the mathematical literacy ability of students in the experimental group 1 is better than the mathematical literacy ability of students in the experimental group 2 and control group, (2) there is no difference in the mathematical literacy ability between learning styles, (3) there is no interaction between the mathematical literacy ability based learning models and student's learning styles, and (4) ithe increase of students’ mathematical literacy ability in the experimental group 1 is better than in the control group but less than the increase of stuednts’ mathematical literacy ability in the experimental group 2. Eventually, this study suggests that 9 grade mathematics teacher in SMPN 1 Majenang can use PBL-PRS-E model to improve the learning result and mathematical literacy ability of students.
      PubDate: 2018-03-29
      DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v7i1.22572
      Issue No: Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
       
  • Misconception as a critical and creative thinking inhibitor for
           mathematics education students

    • Authors: Rochmad Rochmad, Muhammad Kharis, Arief Agoestanto, Muhammad Zuhair Zahid, Mashuri Mashuri
      Pages: 57 - 62
      Abstract: The accurate understanding of critical thinking and mathematical creativity in solving the current problem is still difficult to standardize. These two thinking skills are indispensable to anyone who is studying mathematics, especially for Undergraduate Mathematics students who are studying Linear Algebra. However, the difficulties in critical thinking discourage students to think creatively and mathematically. In linear algebraic subject matter, many problems require critical reasoning. It goes without saying that the difficulties in various reasoning aspects critically cause other difficulties in developing creative thinking aspects. Further, mathematical critical thinking skills in solving problems require a background in understanding the concepts related to the problem faced. In addition, the failure to understand and connect between concepts in solving linear algebra problems makes it worst and difficult to critically and creatively think.
      PubDate: 2018-03-29
      DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v7i1.18078
      Issue No: Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
       
  • The effect of scaffolding techniques on the ability of student’s
           reasoning ability and mathematics anxiety reviewed from gender

    • Authors: Siti Sofiatun, Pinta Deniyanti Sampoerna, Lukman El Hakim
      Pages: 63 - 71
      Abstract: The research conducted in Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) Insan Cendekia Serpong with quasi-experimental design aims to find out the effect of scaffolding technique on students’ ability of mathematical reasoning (KPM) and mathematical anxiety (KM) viewed from gender. The research sample is class X of science students (MIPA) which consist of 87 students; 41 male and 46 female obtained by cluster random sampling technique. The research data was obtained from the KPM test result and KM questionnaire filling and processed with two-track anava and t-test to answer the research hypothesis. The findings of this research are: (1) students’ KPM who were taught with scaffolding technique is higher than the conventional; (2) there is no interaction between learning techniques and gender to KPM; (3) KPM of male students who were taught with scaffolding technique is higher than the conventional; (4) there is no difference of KPM between group of female students who were taught with scaffolding and conventional technique; (5) there is no difference of KM between group of students who were taught with scaffolding and conventional technique; (6) there is no interaction between learning techniques and gender to student’s KM; (7) there is no difference of KM between male students who were taught with scaffolding and conventional technique; (8) there was no difference of KM between female students who were taught with scaffolding and conventional technique.
      PubDate: 2018-03-29
      DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v7i1.22574
      Issue No: Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
       
  • The students’ activity profiles and mathematic problem solving ability
           on the LAPS-Heuristic model learning

    • Authors: Amidi Amidi, Farah Anisah Zahra
      Pages: 72 - 77
      Abstract: Problem-solving skills that cover the ability to understand problems, design mathematical model, complete the model and interpret the solution obtained are the abilities which students must possess. With regard to above symptom, this study described  student’s  activity and mathematics problem solving ability based on SOLO Taxonomy on Laps-Heuristic learning model. The procedure of the study was done through providing learning with Laps-Heuristic model with mind mapping, observing student activity during learning, giving mathematics problem solving test, analyzing the result of mathematics problem solving test, classifying the result of mathematics problem solving test based on taxonomy of SOLO, choosing the subjects of study, interviewing selected subjects, and compiling the study results. While the procedures of data analysis of this study included data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. Based on the result of the study, it showed that the students’ activity was excellent due the fact that their scores were above 75% and their problem solving abilities were classified based on the SOLO Taxonomy consisting of 8 relational level students, 25 multi-structural level students, and 1extended abstract student.
      PubDate: 2018-03-29
      DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v7i1.17087
      Issue No: Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
       
 
 
JournalTOCs
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
Email: journaltocs@hw.ac.uk
Tel: +00 44 (0)131 4513762
Fax: +00 44 (0)131 4513327
 
Home (Search)
Subjects A-Z
Publishers A-Z
Customise
APIs
Your IP address: 100.26.182.28
 
About JournalTOCs
API
Help
News (blog, publications)
JournalTOCs on Twitter   JournalTOCs on Facebook

JournalTOCs © 2009-